A Phase 1 interventional study of videoendoscopic resection of pilonidal sinus in Recurrence and Postoperative Complication, sponsored by SB Istanbul Education and Research Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-04-24.
Sponsored by SB Istanbul Education and Research Hospital · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment
This study examines performing pilonidal sinus surgery minimal invasively with videoendoscopic approach.
Lots of surgical techniques are performing on pilonidal sinus disease treatment. Lately large flap techniques are popular but causing anatomical distortions and bad cosmesis. In this new approach the investigators concluded that two 1cm diameter holes are enough to surgical treatment. One hole is for videoendoscopic camera and the other one for grasper to extract piluses and granulation tissues.
4,349 studies on the registry are indexed under Recurrence; 1,004 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 50 across 3,429 interventional studies indexed under Recurrence.
Browse Recurrence studies →SB Istanbul Education and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
excision and primer repair surgical technique will be perform
Procedure: videoendoscopic resection of pilonidal sinus
Resection of pilonidal sinus tissue with videoendoscopic approach.
Also known as: Active Comparator: Control: Group 1, Procedure/Surgery: Videoendoscopic: Group-2
recurrence rates
primary outcome measure of effectivity of pilonidal sinus surgery is recurrence rates.
Time frame: six months
postoperative complications, wound healing
Postoperative complications such as bleeding and infection are important outcome measurements. Wound healing time is the other important one.
Time frame: 1 month
The record gives a start of Mar 2011, a primary completion of Mar 2013 and a completion of Mar 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
SB Istanbul Education and Research Hospital