CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01580592CUTEXUpdated Apr 7, 2017Results posted

Cold Urticaria Treatment With Xolair

A Phase 2 interventional study of Omalizumab and Omalizumab in Cold Contact Urticaria, sponsored by Charite University, Berlin, Germany. Completed at 3 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-07.

Sponsored by Charite University, Berlin, Germany · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
31
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Urticaria is a very frequent skin condition characterised by transient wheal and flare type skin reactions associated with severe pruritus. Cold contact urticaria (CCU) is a frequent form of physical urticaria that is characterized by the development of wheal and flare type skin reactions due to the release of histamine and other proinflammatory mast cell mediators following exposure of the skin to cold. Among all physical urticaria subtypes the frequency of CCU varies between 5.7% and 33.8% in different studies. Physical urticarias including CCU are known to severely impair the quality of life of affected patients.

The treatment of choice in CCU, as well as in other inducible forms and spontaneous urticaria, are non-sedating H1 antihistamines. Recent data have shown that updosing of H1 blockers is significantly more effective in reducing symptoms in cold urticaria than standard-dose treatment. Thus, patients who cannot be sufficiently controlled with standard-dose antihistamines should receive high-dose H1 blockers up to 4 times the standard dose as recommended by the new international guidelines for the management of urticaria.

Previous phase II studies in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria have shown favorable results for the treatment with omalizumab (Xolair®). Proof-of-concept data from completed studies suggest that omalizumab improves urticaria in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria who have failed treatment with H1 antihistamines as well as those who have failed treatment with a combination of H1 and H2 antihistamines and a leukotriene receptor antagonist. In addition, two case reports of patients with severe therapy refractory CCU treated with omalizumab reported a complete response with no urticarial symptoms after cold challenge. In summary, these data suggest that omalizumab may have a beneficial effect in the treatment of CCU.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cold Contact Urticaria

Browse trials for

03

In context

Urticaria

237 studies on the registry are indexed under Urticaria; 26 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 31 is below the median of 61 across 174 interventional studies indexed under Urticaria.

Browse Urticaria studies →

Lead sponsor

Charite University, Berlin, Germany is the lead sponsor of 836 studies on the registry; 129 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adults (18 years or older) Informed consent signed and dated Able to read, understand and willing to sign the informed consent form and abide with study procedures Diagnosis of CCU lasting for at least 6 months Willing, committed and able to return for all clinic visits and complete all study-related procedures, including willingness to have SC injections administered by a qualified person In females of childbearing potential: Negative pregnancy test; females willing to use highly effective contraception (Pearl-Index \< 1). A woman will be considered not of childbearing potential if she is post-menopausal for greater than two years or surgically sterile (bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy) No participation in other clinical trials 4 weeks before and after participation in this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with acute urticaria Concurrent/ongoing treatment with immunosuppressives (e.g. systemic steroids, cyclosporine, methotrexate, dapsone or others) within 4 weeks or 5 half lives prior to day 0, whichever is longer Significant medical condition rendering the patient immunocompromised or not suitable for a clinical trial Significant concomitant illness that would adversely affect the subject's participation or evaluation in this study History of malignancies within five years prior to screening other than a successfully treated non-metastatic cutaneous, basal, or squamous cell carcinoma and/or in situ cancer Presence of clinically significant laboratory abnormalities Lactating females or pregnant females Subjects for whom there is concern about compliance with the protocol procedures Any medical condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with participation in the study or place the subject at risk History of substance abuse (drug or alcohol) or any other factor (e.g., serious psychiatric condition) within the last 5 years that could limit the subject's ability to comply with study procedures Subjects who are detained officially or legally to an official institute Previous use of omalizumab within the last 6 months Intake of antihistamines or leukotriene antagonists within 7 days prior to visit 1 Intake of oral corticosteroids within 14 days prior to visit 1 Use of depot corticosteroids or chronic systemic corticosteroids within 21 days before beginning of the study Known hypersensitivity to any ingredients, including excipients (sucrose, histidine, polysorbate 20) of the study medication or drugs related to omalizumab (e.g.: monoclonal antibodies, polyclonal gammaglobulin)

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
31 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Omalizumab 150mg

    Drug: Omalizumab

  • Experimental
    Omalizumab 300mg

    Drug: Omalizumab

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugOmalizumab

    150mg, s.c., every 4 weeks

    Also known as: Xolair

  • DrugOmalizumab

    300mg, s.c., every 4 weeks

    Also known as: Xolair

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo, s.c., every 4 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Critical Temperature Thresholds (CTT) From Baseline to Day 70 After Treatment With Omalizumab Compared to Placebo

    The primary efficacy outcome was the change in trigger thresholds from baseline to week ten using TempTest® to assess critical temperature thresholds in °C.

    Time frame: day 70

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations, Laboratory Assessments, Vital Signs, and Adverse Events

    This includes physical examination, routine safety laboratory assessments, vital signs and adverse event reporting

    Time frame: day 70

07

Results

Posted Feb 15, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOmalizumab 150mgOmalizumab 300mgPlacebo
Started10912
Completed10912
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Critical Temperature Thresholds (CTT) From Baseline to Day 70 After Treatment With Omalizumab Compared to Placebo

The primary efficacy outcome was the change in trigger thresholds from baseline to week ten using TempTest® to assess critical temperature thresholds in °C.

Time frame:
day 70
Reported as:
Mean · degree celcius
Change in Critical Temperature Thresholds (CTT) From Baseline to Day 70 After Treatment With Omalizumab Compared to Placebo
degree celciusOmalizumab 150mgOmalizumab 300mgPlacebo
Change in Critical Temperature Thresholds (CTT) From Baseline to Day 70 After Treatment With Omalizumab Compared to Placebo-10.6 ± 7.6-10.4 ± 9.4-0.3 ± 3.9
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab 150mg · ANOVA · p = 0.001 · Mean difference (final values): -10.6for omalizumab 150mg
  • Omalizumab 300mg · ANOVA · p = 0.01 · Mean difference (final values): 10.4
  • Placebo · Mean difference (final values): 0.3
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations, Laboratory Assessments, Vital Signs, and Adverse Events

This includes physical examination, routine safety laboratory assessments, vital signs and adverse event reporting

Time frame:
day 70
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations, Laboratory Assessments, Vital Signs, and Adverse Events
participantsOmalizumab 150mgOmalizumab 300mgPlacebo
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations, Laboratory Assessments, Vital Signs, and Adverse Events779
Statistical analysis
  • Omalizumab 150mg vs Omalizumab 300mg vs Placebo · Chi-squared · p = 0.988

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Omalizumab 150mg—0/10 (0%)4/10 (40%)
Omalizumab 300mg—0/9 (0%)4/9 (44.4%)
Placebo—0/12 (0%)5/12 (41.7%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventOmalizumab 150mgOmalizumab 300mgPlacebo
HeadacheGeneral disorders2/102/94/12
upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations2/102/94/12

Baseline characteristics

Intention-to-treat

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Omalizumab 150mgOmalizumab 300mgPlaceboTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years1091231
>=65 years0000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Omalizumab 150mgOmalizumab 300mgPlaceboTotal
Female77923
Male3238
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Omalizumab 150mgOmalizumab 300mgPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino0000
Not Hispanic or Latino1091231
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Omalizumab 150mgOmalizumab 300mgPlaceboTotal
Germany1091231
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • University Aachen
    Aachen, Germany
  • Allergie-Centrum-Charité, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
  • Hautklinik Mainz
    Mainz, Germany
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Metz M, Schutz A, Weller K, Gorczyza M, Zimmer S, Staubach P, Merk HF, Maurer M. Omalizumab is effective in cold urticaria-results of a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Sep;140(3):864-867.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.01.043. Epub 2017 Apr 4. No abstract available. PubMed 28389393 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 7, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01580592
Lead sponsor
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Collaborators
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Martin Metz (Professor, Charite University, Berlin, Germany) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 19, 2012
Start date
Apr 2012
Primary completion
Dec 2014
Completion
Feb 2015
Results posted
Feb 15, 2016
Last update
Apr 7, 2017

Study contacts

Martin Metz, MD
principal investigator · Charité

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion