CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01576042CALYPSOUpdated Oct 16, 2014Results posted

Pilot Study of Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

An interventional study of amiodarone and sotalol in Ventricular Tachycardia, sponsored by Duke University. Terminated at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-10-16.

Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Main objectives of the study were met; consensus among investigators that continuing the study would not add new information beyond that already learned.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
27
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this pilot trial is to determine the feasibility of a large, multi-center randomized clinical trial aimed to test whether a treatment strategy of percutaneous catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is superior to state-of-the-art pharmacologic therapy at reducing all-cause mortality in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) who receive therapy for VT in the absence of any reversible cause.

Read the detailed description

This study will be conducted at up to 8 sites and will randomize 50 patients over 1 year to a strategy of catheter ablation (n=25) vs. state-of-the-art pharmacologic therapy (n=25). To be considered for enrollment in this pilot trial, patients must be at least 18 years of age and must have an ICD for a primary or secondary prevention indication, have ≥ 1 documented ICD shock or ≥ 3 ATP therapies for VT in the absence of a reversible cause that in the opinion of the treating physician requires further therapy and be eligible for both catheter ablation and at least 1 antiarrhythmic medication. Patients will be followed at 3 and 6 months and their vital status will be determined via a phone call at 12 months. Data on the safety and efficacy of therapies used in the pilot study will be collected. Of particular interest are adverse events resulting from the catheter ablation procedure and major side effects from antiarrhythmic medications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ventricular Tachycardia

Keywords

  • Ischemic heart disease
  • Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
  • Ventricular Tachycardia
  • Patient with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)
03

In context

Tachycardia

623 studies on the registry are indexed under Tachycardia; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 27 is below the median of 64 across 379 interventional studies indexed under Tachycardia.

Browse Tachycardia studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,025 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.

Of its 194 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Have an ICD with or without cardiac resynchronization therapy (i.e. CRT-D) for a primary or secondary prevention indication
  • Have ischemic heart disease defined as the presence of wall motion abnormalities and documented coronary artery disease (one ≥ 70% stenosis in ≥ 1 major coronary artery)
  • Have ≥ 1 documented ICD shock or ≥ 3 ATP therapies within 6 months before randomization for VT in the absence of a reversible cause that in the opinion of the treating physician requires further therapy. The VT has to be monomorphic and at a rate of ≤ 260 bpm.
  • Be at least 18 years of age
  • Be eligible for catheter ablation
  • Have no history of intolerance or contraindication to at least 1 of the following antiarrhythmic medications: amiodarone, sotalol, and mexiletine.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion:

  • Patients who in the opinion of the treating physician should not receive additional therapy
  • More than 30 days of amiodarone treatment in the past 3 months unless the patient has been on ≤ 200 mgs of amiodarone daily for atrial arrhythmias or premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) and the patient is eligible for a higher dose of amiodarone
  • Incessant VT that necessitates immediate treatment
  • Reversible causes of VT including but not limited to ischemia, decompensated HF, and electrolyte disturbances
  • The presence of a contraindication to catheter ablation of VT (including the presence of a mobile ventricular thrombus; an acute MI, coronary revascularization, or a stroke in the preceding 30 days; unstable angina or NYHA class IV HF; a mechanical valve; or inability to receive anticoagulation or antithrombotic therapy)
  • Patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
  • Patients with hypertrophic obstructive, restrictive, or infiltrative cardiomyopathy
  • Patients with acute myocarditis, congenital heart disease, valvular disease likely to require surgery in the next 1 year, and/or inoperable obstructive valvular disease
  • Patients with a heart transplant or who are expected to undergo cardiac transplantation within 12 months
  • Patients with a left ventricular assist device
  • Patients who are already on antiarrhythmic drug therapy (other than beta-blockers) for VT (patients will not be excluded if they are receiving antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial arrhythmias or PVCs if they are eligible for additional drug therapy for VT).
  • Heritable arrhythmias or increased risk for torsade de pointes with class III drugs
  • End stage renal disease requiring dialysis
  • Estimated life expectancy of \<1 year from a non-cardiac cause
  • Women who are pregnant or who have childbearing potential and are not using a reliable method of contraception
  • Inability to give informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
27 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Catheter ablation

    The only ablation catheter that will be allowed in this study will be the Biosense Webster's NAVI-STAR Thermo-Cool catheter as it is the only catheter that has been approved by the FDA for sustained monomorphic VT due to prior myocardial infarction in adults

    Device: Biosense Webster's NAVI-STAR Thermo-Cool

  • Other
    Antiarrhythmic medication

    The choice of antiarrhythmic medications will comply with the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death

    Drug: amiodarone · Drug: sotalol

Interventions

  • Drugamiodarone

    The dosage of antiarrhythmic medications will comply with the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.

    Also known as: Cordarone

  • Drugsotalol

    The choice and dosage of antiarrhythmic medications will comply with the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.

    Also known as: Betapace, Betapace AF, Sotalex, Sotacor

  • DeviceBiosense Webster's NAVI-STAR Thermo-Cool

    The only ablation catheter that will be allowed in this study will be the Biosense Webster's NAVI-STAR Thermo-Cool catheter as it is the only catheter that has been approved by the FDA for sustained monomorphic VT due to prior myocardial infarction in adults.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Completed Month 3 Follow-Up

    Records participants who completed Month 3 Follow-Up Visit

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Completed Month 6 Follow-Up

    Records participants who completed Month 6 Follow-Up Visit

    Time frame: 6 Months

  2. Number of Participants Had at Least One of the Efficacy Outcome Measurement

    Records participants who had at least one of the efficacy outcome measurement (including death, hospitalization due to VT)

    Time frame: 6 Months

  3. Cardiovascular Hospitalizations

    Records participants hospitalized for VT during the study

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  4. Number of Participants Remained on Randomized Treatment Assignment

    Records participants who only received study treatment as randomized during the entire study

    Time frame: 6 month

  5. Number of Participants Switched to Other Arm

    Records participants who received study treatment as randomized and later switched to other treatment arm during the study

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Time to First Recurrent ICD Therapy for VT

    Days from the date of the first study treatment to the date of first ICD recurrent therapy for VT.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  7. Number of Participants Received Treatment Assigned

    Records participants who received study randomized treatment during the study

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Sep 25, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCatheter AblationAntiarrhythmic Medication
Started1314
Switched to the other arm51
Completed1114
Not completed20
Withdrew: Physician decision20

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Completed Month 3 Follow-Up

Records participants who completed Month 3 Follow-Up Visit

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Completed Month 3 Follow-Up
participantsCatheter AblationAntiarrhythmic Medication
Number of Participants Completed Month 3 Follow-Up1112
SecondaryNumber of Participants Completed Month 6 Follow-Up

Records participants who completed Month 6 Follow-Up Visit

Time frame:
6 Months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Completed Month 6 Follow-Up
participantsCatheter AblationAntiarrhythmic Medication
Number of Participants Completed Month 6 Follow-Up710
SecondaryNumber of Participants Had at Least One of the Efficacy Outcome Measurement

Records participants who had at least one of the efficacy outcome measurement (including death, hospitalization due to VT)

Time frame:
6 Months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Had at Least One of the Efficacy Outcome Measurement
participantsCatheter AblationAntiarrhythmic Medication
Number of Participants Had at Least One of the Efficacy Outcome Measurement1114
SecondaryCardiovascular Hospitalizations

Records participants hospitalized for VT during the study

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Cardiovascular Hospitalizations
participantsCatheter AblationAntiarrhythmic Medication
Cardiovascular Hospitalizations57
SecondaryNumber of Participants Remained on Randomized Treatment Assignment

Records participants who only received study treatment as randomized during the entire study

Time frame:
6 month
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Remained on Randomized Treatment Assignment
participantsCatheter AblationAntiarrhythmic Medication
Number of Participants Remained on Randomized Treatment Assignment613
SecondaryNumber of Participants Switched to Other Arm

Records participants who received study treatment as randomized and later switched to other treatment arm during the study

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Switched to Other Arm
participantsCatheter AblationAntiarrhythmic Medication
Number of Participants Switched to Other Arm51
SecondaryTime to First Recurrent ICD Therapy for VT

Days from the date of the first study treatment to the date of first ICD recurrent therapy for VT.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Time to First Recurrent ICD Therapy for VT
DaysCatheter AblationAntiarrhythmic Medication
Time to First Recurrent ICD Therapy for VT70.1 ± 38.0978.7 ± 62.08
SecondaryNumber of Participants Received Treatment Assigned

Records participants who received study randomized treatment during the study

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Received Treatment Assigned
participantsCatheter AblationAntiarrhythmic Medication
Number of Participants Received Treatment Assigned1114

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events related to the procedure or the use of antiarrhythmic medications was collected thru 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Catheter Ablation—6/13 (46.2%)7/13 (53.8%)
Antiarrhythmic Medication—7/14 (50%)7/14 (50%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent serious events
EventCatheter AblationAntiarrhythmic Medication
Cardiac FailureCardiac disorders5/131/14
Ventricular TachycardiaCardiac disorders4/132/14
Device MalfunctionGeneral disorders2/130/14
HematomaVascular disorders1/130/14
Renal FailureRenal and urinary disorders1/130/14
IleusGastrointestinal disorders1/130/14
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/130/14
Aortic ThrombosisVascular disorders0/131/14
Lung Neoplasm MalignantNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/131/14
Chest PainGeneral disorders0/131/14
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent other events
EventCatheter AblationAntiarrhythmic Medication
Ventricular TachycardiaCardiac disorders3/132/14
Cardiac FailureCardiac disorders2/131/14
HematomaVascular disorders2/130/14
SyncopeNervous system disorders0/132/14
HypotensionVascular disorders1/130/14
IleusGastrointestinal disorders1/130/14
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/130/14
Device MalfunctionGeneral disorders1/130/14
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/130/14
Renal FailureRenal and urinary disorders1/130/14

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Catheter AblationAntiarrhythmic MedicationTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years7714
>=65 years6713
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Catheter AblationAntiarrhythmic MedicationTotal
Female022
Male131225
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Catheter AblationAntiarrhythmic MedicationTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American246
White111021
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Catheter AblationAntiarrhythmic MedicationTotal
United States131427
08

Study locations

5 sites
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Ohio State University Medical Center
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15237, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Myerburg RJ, Kessler KM, Castellanos A. Sudden cardiac death: epidemiology, transient risk, and intervention assessment. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Dec 15;119(12):1187-97. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-12-199312150-00006. PubMed 8239250 ↗
  • Gilman JK, Jalal S, Naccarelli GV. Predicting and preventing sudden death from cardiac causes. Circulation. 1994 Aug;90(2):1083-92. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.2.1083. PubMed 7913885 ↗
  • Zipes DP, Wellens HJ. Sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 1998 Nov 24;98(21):2334-51. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.21.2334. No abstract available. PubMed 9826323 ↗
  • Zheng ZJ, Croft JB, Giles WH, Mensah GA. Sudden cardiac death in the United States, 1989 to 1998. Circulation. 2001 Oct 30;104(18):2158-63. doi: 10.1161/hc4301.098254. PubMed 11684624 ↗
  • Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 1997 Nov 27;337(22):1576-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199711273372202. PubMed 9411221 ↗
  • Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, Wilber DJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Brown MW, Andrews ML; Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II Investigators. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 21;346(12):877-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013474. Epub 2002 Mar 19. PubMed 11907286 ↗
  • Kadish A, Dyer A, Daubert JP, Quigg R, Estes NA, Anderson KP, Calkins H, Hoch D, Goldberger J, Shalaby A, Sanders WE, Schaechter A, Levine JH; Defibrillators in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE) Investigators. Prophylactic defibrillator implantation in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2151-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa033088. PubMed 15152060 ↗
  • Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, Poole JE, Packer DL, Boineau R, Domanski M, Troutman C, Anderson J, Johnson G, McNulty SE, Clapp-Channing N, Davidson-Ray LD, Fraulo ES, Fishbein DP, Luceri RM, Ip JH; Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) Investigators. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 20;352(3):225-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043399. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2005 May 19;352(20):2146. PubMed 15659722 ↗
  • Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NA 3rd, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, Gillinov AM, Gregoratos G, Hammill SC, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, Newby LK, Page RL, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, Stevenson LW, Sweeney MO, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Faxon DP, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices); American Association for Thoracic Surgery; Society of Thoracic Surgeons. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2008 May 27;117(21):e350-408. doi: 10.1161/CIRCUALTIONAHA.108.189742. Epub 2008 May 15. No abstract available. Erratum In: Circulation.2009 Aug 4; 120(5):e34-5. PubMed 18483207 ↗
  • Hammill SC, Stevenson LW, Kadish AH, Kremers MS, Heidenreich P, Lindsay BD, Mirro MJ, Radford MJ, Wang Y, Lang CM, Harder JC, Brindis RG. Review of the registry's first year, data collected, and future plans. Heart Rhythm. 2007 Sep;4(9):1260-3. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.07.021. Epub 2007 Jul 25. No abstract available. PubMed 17765637 ↗
  • Hammill SC, Kremers MS, Stevenson LW, Kadish AH, Heidenreich PA, Lindsay BD, Mirro MJ, Radford MJ, Wang Y, Curtis JP, Lang CM, Harder JC, Brindis RG. Review of the Registry's second year, data collected, and plans to add lead and pediatric ICD procedures. Heart Rhythm. 2008 Sep;5(9):1359-63. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.07.015. Epub 2008 Jul 22. No abstract available. PubMed 18774117 ↗
  • Hammill SC, Kremers MS, Kadish AH, Stevenson LW, Heidenreich PA, Lindsay BD, Mirro MJ, Radford MJ, McKay C, Wang Y, Lang CM, Pontzer K, Rumsfeld J, Phurrough SE, Curtis JP, Brindis RG. Review of the ICD Registry's third year, expansion to include lead data and pediatric ICD procedures, and role for measuring performance. Heart Rhythm. 2009 Sep;6(9):1397-401. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.07.015. Epub 2009 Jul 16. No abstract available. PubMed 19716099 ↗
  • Hammill SC, Kremers MS, Stevenson LW, Heidenreich PA, Lang CM, Curtis JP, Wang Y, Berul CI, Kadish AH, Al-Khatib SM, Pina IL, Walsh MN, Mirro MJ, Lindsay BD, Reynolds MR, Pontzer K, Blum L, Masoudi F, Rumsfeld J, Brindis RG. Review of the registry's fourth year, incorporating lead data and pediatric ICD procedures, and use as a national performance measure. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Sep;7(9):1340-5. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.07.015. Epub 2010 Jul 18. No abstract available. PubMed 20647056 ↗
  • Poole JE, Johnson GW, Hellkamp AS, Anderson J, Callans DJ, Raitt MH, Reddy RK, Marchlinski FE, Yee R, Guarnieri T, Talajic M, Wilber DJ, Fishbein DP, Packer DL, Mark DB, Lee KL, Bardy GH. Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 4;359(10):1009-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071098. PubMed 18768944 ↗
  • Sweeney MO, Sherfesee L, DeGroot PJ, Wathen MS, Wilkoff BL. Differences in effects of electrical therapy type for ventricular arrhythmias on mortality in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Mar;7(3):353-60. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.11.027. Epub 2009 Dec 2. PubMed 20185109 ↗
  • Noyes K, Corona E, Veazie P, Dick AW, Zhao H, Moss AJ. Examination of the effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on health-related quality of life: based on results from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Trial-II. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2009;9(6):393-400. doi: 10.2165/11317980-000000000-00000. PubMed 19929037 ↗
  • Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) Investigators. Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1989 Aug 10;321(6):406-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198908103210629. PubMed 2473403 ↗
  • Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, Peters RW, Obias-Manno D, Barker AH, Arensberg D, Baker A, Friedman L, Greene HL, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar 21;324(12):781-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199103213241201. PubMed 1900101 ↗
  • Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial II Investigators. Effect of the antiarrhythmic agent moricizine on survival after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jul 23;327(4):227-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199207233270403. PubMed 1377359 ↗
  • Waldo AL, Camm AJ, deRuyter H, Friedman PL, MacNeil DJ, Pauls JF, Pitt B, Pratt CM, Schwartz PJ, Veltri EP. Effect of d-sotalol on mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after recent and remote myocardial infarction. The SWORD Investigators. Survival With Oral d-Sotalol. Lancet. 1996 Jul 6;348(9019):7-12. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)02149-6. Erratum In: Lancet 1996 Aug 10;348(9024):416. PubMed 8691967 ↗
  • Aliot EM, Stevenson WG, Almendral-Garrote JM, Bogun F, Calkins CH, Delacretaz E, Della Bella P, Hindricks G, Jais P, Josephson ME, Kautzner J, Kay GN, Kuck KH, Lerman BB, Marchlinski F, Reddy V, Schalij MJ, Schilling R, Soejima K, Wilber D; European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); American College of Cardiology (ACC); American Heart Association (AHA). EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias: developed in a partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA). Heart Rhythm. 2009 Jun;6(6):886-933. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.04.030. No abstract available. PubMed 19467519 ↗
  • Grimm W, Flores BT, Marchlinski FE. Shock occurrence and survival in 241 patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Circulation. 1993 Jun;87(6):1880-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.6.1880. PubMed 8504500 ↗
  • Exner DV, Pinski SL, Wyse DG, Renfroe EG, Follmann D, Gold M, Beckman KJ, Coromilas J, Lancaster S, Hallstrom AP; AVID Investigators. Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators. Electrical storm presages nonsudden death: the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) trial. Circulation. 2001 Apr 24;103(16):2066-71. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.16.2066. PubMed 11319196 ↗
  • Pacifico A, Hohnloser SH, Williams JH, Tao B, Saksena S, Henry PD, Prystowsky EN. Prevention of implantable-defibrillator shocks by treatment with sotalol. d,l-Sotalol Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jun 17;340(24):1855-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199906173402402. PubMed 10369848 ↗
  • Kuhlkamp V, Mewis C, Mermi J, Bosch RF, Seipel L. Suppression of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: a comparison of d,l-sotalol with no antiarrhythmic drug treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Jan;33(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00521-x. PubMed 9935007 ↗
  • Seidl K, Hauer B, Schwick NG, Zahn R, Senges J. Comparison of metoprolol and sotalol in preventing ventricular tachyarrhythmias after the implantation of a cardioverter/defibrillator. Am J Cardiol. 1998 Sep 15;82(6):744-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00478-0. PubMed 9761084 ↗
  • Connolly SJ, Dorian P, Roberts RS, Gent M, Bailin S, Fain ES, Thorpe K, Champagne J, Talajic M, Coutu B, Gronefeld GC, Hohnloser SH; Optimal Pharmacological Therapy in Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients (OPTIC) Investigators. Comparison of beta-blockers, amiodarone plus beta-blockers, or sotalol for prevention of shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the OPTIC Study: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Jan 11;295(2):165-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.2.165. PubMed 16403928 ↗
  • Zipes DP, Camm AJ, Borggrefe M, Buxton AE, Chaitman B, Fromer M, Gregoratos G, Klein G, Moss AJ, Myerburg RJ, Priori SG, Quinones MA, Roden DM, Silka MJ, Tracy C, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Antman EM, Anderson JL, Hunt SA, Halperin JL, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B, Blanc JJ, Budaj A, Dean V, Deckers JW, Despres C, Dickstein K, Lekakis J, McGregor K, Metra M, Morais J, Osterspey A, Tamargo JL, Zamorano JL; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force; European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines; European Heart Rhythm Association; Heart Rhythm Society. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2006 Sep 5;114(10):e385-484. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.178233. Epub 2006 Aug 25. No abstract available. PubMed 16935995 ↗
  • Julian DG, Camm AJ, Frangin G, Janse MJ, Munoz A, Schwartz PJ, Simon P. Randomised trial of effect of amiodarone on mortality in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction after recent myocardial infarction: EMIAT. European Myocardial Infarct Amiodarone Trial Investigators. Lancet. 1997 Mar 8;349(9053):667-74. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)09145-3. Erratum In: Lancet 1997 Apr 19;349(9059):1180. Lancet 1997 Jun 14;349(9067):1776. PubMed 9078197 ↗
  • Cairns JA, Connolly SJ, Roberts R, Gent M. Randomised trial of outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with frequent or repetitive ventricular premature depolarisations: CAMIAT. Canadian Amiodarone Myocardial Infarction Arrhythmia Trial Investigators. Lancet. 1997 Mar 8;349(9053):675-82. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)08171-8. Erratum In: Lancet 1997 Jun 14;349(9067):1776. PubMed 9078198 ↗
  • Singh SN, Fletcher RD, Fisher SG, Singh BN, Lewis HD, Deedwania PC, Massie BM, Colling C, Lazzeri D. Amiodarone in patients with congestive heart failure and asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmia. Survival Trial of Antiarrhythmic Therapy in Congestive Heart Failure. N Engl J Med. 1995 Jul 13;333(2):77-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199507133330201. PubMed 7539890 ↗
  • International mexiletine and placebo antiarrhythmic coronary trial: I. Report on arrhythmia and other findings. Impact Research Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 Dec;4(6):1148-63. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80133-3. PubMed 6209318 ↗
  • Calkins H, Epstein A, Packer D, Arria AM, Hummel J, Gilligan DM, Trusso J, Carlson M, Luceri R, Kopelman H, Wilber D, Wharton JM, Stevenson W. Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease using cooled radiofrequency energy: results of a prospective multicenter study. Cooled RF Multi Center Investigators Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Jun;35(7):1905-14. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00615-x. PubMed 10841242 ↗
  • Reddy VY, Reynolds MR, Neuzil P, Richardson AW, Taborsky M, Jongnarangsin K, Kralovec S, Sediva L, Ruskin JN, Josephson ME. Prophylactic catheter ablation for the prevention of defibrillator therapy. N Engl J Med. 2007 Dec 27;357(26):2657-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa065457. PubMed 18160685 ↗
  • Stevenson WG, Wilber DJ, Natale A, Jackman WM, Marchlinski FE, Talbert T, Gonzalez MD, Worley SJ, Daoud EG, Hwang C, Schuger C, Bump TE, Jazayeri M, Tomassoni GF, Kopelman HA, Soejima K, Nakagawa H; Multicenter Thermocool VT Ablation Trial Investigators. Irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation guided by electroanatomic mapping for recurrent ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction: the multicenter thermocool ventricular tachycardia ablation trial. Circulation. 2008 Dec 16;118(25):2773-82. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.788604. Epub 2008 Dec 8. PubMed 19064682 ↗
  • Kuck KH, Schaumann A, Eckardt L, Willems S, Ventura R, Delacretaz E, Pitschner HF, Kautzner J, Schumacher B, Hansen PS; VTACH study group. Catheter ablation of stable ventricular tachycardia before defibrillator implantation in patients with coronary heart disease (VTACH): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Jan 2;375(9708):31-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61755-4. PubMed 20109864 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 16, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01576042
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
Duke Clinical Research Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 12, 2012
Start date
May 2012
Primary completion
May 2014
Completion
May 2014
Results posted
Sep 25, 2014
Last update
Oct 16, 2014

Study contacts

Sana M Al-Khatib, MD, MHS
principal investigator · Duke University
William Stevenson, MD
principal investigator · Brigham and Women's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion