ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01568905Updated Nov 1, 2019Results posted

Palatability of Experimental Cigarettes - Study 2

An interventional study of Low level nicotine cigarette and Intermediate nicotine level cigarette in Smoking, sponsored by University of Minnesota. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-01.

Sponsored by University of Minnesota · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Smoking remains a leading cause of preventable disease and premature death worldwide. Approximately 1 out of every 5 deaths is associated with cigarette smoking, and roughly half of all daily smokers will die prematurely from tobacco-related illness. Reducing the nicotine in cigarettes to the point that they are rendered non-addictive can potentially be an effective public policy measure that can significantly reduce tobacco-related mortality and morbidity by decreasing the initiation of smoking and promoting cessation. The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA) enables the FDA to establish tobacco product standards including placing limits on the allowable nicotine content of cigarettes. Currently, no reduced nicotine cigarettes are available that will allow studying the feasibility of this policy measure. The National Institute on Drug Abuse has contracted with Research Triangle Institute to assist in the development of cigarettes with varying nicotine content that can be made available to researchers. They have established a contract that will result in the manufacture of 9 million cigarettes to be distributed to the research community. Prior to full production, the palatability and nicotine intake of these cigarettes in smokers must be determined.

Read the detailed description

Phase 3: This descriptive study will use a between subjects, double blind design. This study will test 3 nicotine levels of nicotine, tar and ventilation. Subjects and research assistants will be blind to the cigarette type.

02

Conditions studied

  • Smoking

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • smoker
  • smoking
  • nicotine levels
  • tobacco
  • nicotine
03

In context

Smoking

325 studies on the registry are indexed under Smoking; 141 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 117 across 250 interventional studies indexed under Smoking.

Browse Smoking studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 1,210 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 133 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-64 years old
  • Regular smokers (10+ cigarettes per day and has done so for the last year)
  • Inhaling when smoking
  • Carbon monoxide (CO) > 8 ppm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • In the past year, suffered from any cardiovascular disease such as: heart disease, heart attack, stroke or angina, any respiratory diseases such as chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), any type of cancer
  • Currently suffering from Bipolar Disorder, General Anxiety Disorder, Schizophrenia, or a major depressive episode
  • Taken any of the following drugs more than twice per week during the past month: antidepressants, anti-anxiety medications.
  • Consumed more than 15 alcoholic drinks per week for the past month
  • Pregnant, trying to become pregnant, or lactating (assessed by self-report)
  • In the past 3 months, used nicotine replacement products (like the patch, gum, or inhaler), or the medications bupropion varenicline
  • Currently trying or planning to reduce or quit tobacco use in the next 30 days
  • Used other forms of tobacco 10 or more days in the past 30 days
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1 Low Level Nicotine Cigarette

    (0.4 mg/g)

    Other: Low level nicotine cigarette

  • Experimental
    Arm 2 Intermediate Nicotine Level Cigarette

    (5.7-5.8 mg/g)

    Other: Intermediate nicotine level cigarette

  • Experimental
    Arm 3 High Level Nicotine Cigarette

    (11.4-12.8 mg/g)

    Other: High level nicotine cigarette

Interventions

  • OtherLow level nicotine cigarette

    smoke the study cigarette exclusively for one week

  • OtherIntermediate nicotine level cigarette

    smoke the study cigarette exclusively for one week

  • OtherHigh level nicotine cigarette

    smoke the study cigarette exclusively for one week

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in UrineTotal Nicotine Equivalent (TNE) Between Baseline and Week 1

    Two urine TNE levels are taken, one at baseline and one at week 1, to assess TNE levels for nicotine exposure. TNE is the sum of nicotine, cotinine, trans 3'-hydroxycotinine and their respective glucuronide conjugates. Values reported in nmols/ml.

    Time frame: Second Visit (Week 1) minus Baseline (Day 1)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Responses on Modified Cigarette Evaluation Scale

    Modified Cigarette Evaluation Scale \[CES\] is a 100 mm visual analog scale (0=not at all or very little nicotine; 100=extremely or high in nicotine) of 20 questions assessing different dimensions of responses to usual brand cigarettes (e.g., psychological reward, satisfaction and aversiveness) and includes additional 5 point likert-type questions (definitely agree to definitely disagree) on perceptions of satisfaction and willingness to use the product. Results satisfaction subscale.

    Time frame: Baseline usual brand cigarettes (Day 1) compared to when using study cigarettes (Week 1)

  2. Change From Baseline of Perceived Health Risk Scale Response to Test Cigarettes

    Questionnaire: Perceived Health Risk Scale asks subjects to rate their perception of health risks for lung cancer for the study product to which they have been randomly assigned. This is a 100 mm visual analog scale; 0=very low risk of disease, 100=very high risk of disease.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) Compared to Second Visit (Week 1)

  3. Comparison of Number of Cigarettes Smoked

    Subjects were given a daily diary to collect the number of study and/or conventional cigarettes they have smoked each day. Cigarettes smoked (both usual brand and experimental) in a given week were summed over the first 7 reported days. If the number of cigarettes smoked was missing for 1 day, the average of the other days in that week was used in its place and reported as total number of cigarettes per week.

    Time frame: 1 week

07

Results

Posted Jan 12, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArm 1 Low Level Nicotine CigaretteArm 2 Intermediate Nicotine Level CigaretteArm 3 High Level Nicotine Cigarette
Started131112
Completed121112
Not completed100

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in UrineTotal Nicotine Equivalent (TNE) Between Baseline and Week 1

Two urine TNE levels are taken, one at baseline and one at week 1, to assess TNE levels for nicotine exposure. TNE is the sum of nicotine, cotinine, trans 3'-hydroxycotinine and their respective glucuronide conjugates. Values reported in nmols/ml.

Time frame:
Second Visit (Week 1) minus Baseline (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · nmols/ml
Change in UrineTotal Nicotine Equivalent (TNE) Between Baseline and Week 1
nmols/mlArm 1 Low Level Nicotine CigaretteArm 2 Intermediate Nicotine Level CigaretteArm 3 High Level Nicotine Cigarette
Change in UrineTotal Nicotine Equivalent (TNE) Between Baseline and Week 1-16.2 ± 5.0-7.6 ± 4.71.3 ± 4.4
SecondaryResponses on Modified Cigarette Evaluation Scale

Modified Cigarette Evaluation Scale \[CES\] is a 100 mm visual analog scale (0=not at all or very little nicotine; 100=extremely or high in nicotine) of 20 questions assessing different dimensions of responses to usual brand cigarettes (e.g., psychological reward, satisfaction and aversiveness) and includes additional 5 point likert-type questions (definitely agree to definitely disagree) on perceptions of satisfaction and willingness to use the product. Results satisfaction subscale.

Time frame:
Baseline usual brand cigarettes (Day 1) compared to when using study cigarettes (Week 1)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Responses on Modified Cigarette Evaluation Scale
units on a scaleArm 1 Low Level Nicotine CigaretteArm 2 Intermediate Nicotine Level CigaretteArm 3 High Level Nicotine Cigarette
Responses on Modified Cigarette Evaluation Scale36.8 ± 4.154.1 ± 4.161.4 ± 4.1
SecondaryChange From Baseline of Perceived Health Risk Scale Response to Test Cigarettes

Questionnaire: Perceived Health Risk Scale asks subjects to rate their perception of health risks for lung cancer for the study product to which they have been randomly assigned. This is a 100 mm visual analog scale; 0=very low risk of disease, 100=very high risk of disease.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) Compared to Second Visit (Week 1)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline of Perceived Health Risk Scale Response to Test Cigarettes
units on a scaleArm 1 Low Level Nicotine CigaretteArm 2 Intermediate Nicotine Level CigaretteArm 3 High Level Nicotine Cigarette
Change From Baseline of Perceived Health Risk Scale Response to Test Cigarettes56.6 ± 4.666.7 ± 4.668.3 ± 4.6
SecondaryComparison of Number of Cigarettes Smoked

Subjects were given a daily diary to collect the number of study and/or conventional cigarettes they have smoked each day. Cigarettes smoked (both usual brand and experimental) in a given week were summed over the first 7 reported days. If the number of cigarettes smoked was missing for 1 day, the average of the other days in that week was used in its place and reported as total number of cigarettes per week.

Time frame:
1 week
Reported as:
Mean · cigarettes per week
Comparison of Number of Cigarettes Smoked
cigarettes per weekArm 1 Low Level Nicotine CigaretteArm 2 Intermediate Nicotine Level CigaretteArm 3 High Level Nicotine Cigarette
Comparison of Number of Cigarettes Smoked92.1 ± 15.9112.8 ± 49.4157.6 ± 15.2

Adverse events

Collected over 1 week. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arm 1 Low Level Nicotine Cigarette—0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)
Arm 2 Intermediate Nicotine Level Cigarette—0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)
Arm 3 High Level Nicotine Cigarette—0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Daily cigarette smokers

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Arm 1 Low Level Nicotine CigaretteArm 2 Intermediate Nicotine Level CigaretteArm 3 High Level Nicotine CigaretteTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years12111235
>=65 years0000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Arm 1 Low Level Nicotine CigaretteArm 2 Intermediate Nicotine Level CigaretteArm 3 High Level Nicotine CigaretteTotal
Mean37.0 ± 12.432.7 ± 10.843.6 ± 9.637.9 ± 11.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Arm 1 Low Level Nicotine CigaretteArm 2 Intermediate Nicotine Level CigaretteArm 3 High Level Nicotine CigaretteTotal
Female87520
Male44715
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Arm 1 Low Level Nicotine CigaretteArm 2 Intermediate Nicotine Level CigaretteArm 3 High Level Nicotine CigaretteTotal
United States12111235
Menthol
Menthol(participants)Arm 1 Low Level Nicotine CigaretteArm 2 Intermediate Nicotine Level CigaretteArm 3 High Level Nicotine CigaretteTotal
Menthol43411
Non Menthol88824
Cigarettes per day
Cigarettes per day(Cigarettes per day)Arm 1 Low Level Nicotine CigaretteArm 2 Intermediate Nicotine Level CigaretteArm 3 High Level Nicotine CigaretteTotal
Mean16.8 ± 5.116.1 ± 3.518.7 ± 4.317.2 ± 4.4
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hatsukami DK, Heishman SJ, Vogel RI, Denlinger RL, Roper-Batker AN, Mackowick KM, Jensen J, Murphy SE, Thomas BF, Donny E. Dose-response effects of spectrum research cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Jun;15(6):1113-21. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts247. Epub 2012 Nov 22. PubMed 23178320 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2011, a primary completion of Mar 2012 and a completion of Mar 2012. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jan 2017, 4 years 10 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 3, 2012
First posted
Apr 2, 2012
Start
Feb 2011
Primary completionActual
Mar 2012
CompletionActual
Mar 2012
Results first posted
Jan 12, 2017
Last update
Nov 1, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 1, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01568905
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 2, 2012
Start date
Feb 2011
Primary completion
Mar 2012
Completion
Mar 2012
Results posted
Jan 12, 2017
Last update
Nov 1, 2019

Study contacts

Dorothy Hatsukami, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Tobacco Use Research Program, University of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion