CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01562119ADMUpdated Apr 19, 2013

Long Term Evaluation of Human Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft For Coverage of the Wound After Extensive Deep Burn

An observational study in Burn and Traumatic Implants, sponsored by Tang-Du Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 52 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-04-19.

Sponsored by Tang-Du Hospital · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2013), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
30
Ages
3 Years to 52 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The present study was to retrospectively evaluate the long-term outcomes of the cograft acellular dermal matrix (ADM) with autologous thin split-thickness skin for coverage of functional regional wounds in burned patients.

Read the detailed description

The potential of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) had been proved to improve cosmetic and functional outcomes, nevertheless, there had been few reports about the long term results of the morphological, histological and functional changes after placement. The present study was to retrospectively evaluate the long-term outcomes of the cograft acellular dermal matrix (ADM) with autologous thin split-thickness skin for coverage of functional regional wounds in burned patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Burn
  • Traumatic Implants

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Burns
  • Wound repair
  • Skin substitutes
03

In context

Burns

719 studies on the registry are indexed under Burns; 145 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 55 across 135 observational studies indexed under Burns.

Browse Burns studies →

Lead sponsor

Tang-Du Hospital is the lead sponsor of 164 studies on the registry; 77 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 52 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Thirty burn patients, treated by composite graft of ADM with autologous split-thickness skin from January 2007 to December 2009, were enrolled in this study.

Inclusion criteria

  • the patient's skin with ADM implant

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Function of the region covered by human acellular dermal matrix allograft

    Time frame: March, 2012 to May, 2013

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physical characteristics of the transplanted human acellular dermal matrix allograft

    Time frame: March, 2012 to May, 2013

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Burn and Plastic Sugery, Tangdu Hospital
    Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, China
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 19, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01562119
Lead sponsor
Tang-Du Hospital
Responsible party
Xiaolin Wang,Principal Investigator (Ms., Tang-Du Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 23, 2012
Start date
Jan 2011
Primary completion
May 2013 (estimated)
Completion
May 2013 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 19, 2013

Study contacts

Xueyong Li, Doctor
study director · Department of Burn and Plastic Sugery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion