CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01561469Updated Jul 10, 2014Results posted

Evaluation of Patients With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Treated With Linezolid or Vancomycin

An observational study in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) and Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-07-10.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
188
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to review the local management of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus hospital-acquired pneumonia treated with vancomycin or linezolid with the goal to define if any difference exists among these antimicrobials in regard to clinical and economic outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Non-randomized, retrospective, observational study

02

Conditions studied

  • Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
  • Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia

Keywords

  • Linezolid
  • Vancomycin
  • Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
  • Respiratory Tract Infections
03

In context

Pneumonia

2,045 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia; 284 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 188 is close to the median of 201 across 689 observational studies indexed under Pneumonia.

Browse Pneumonia studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This non-interventional study will retrospectively evaluate patients with documented MRSA hospital-acquired including ventilator-associated pneumonia treated with linezolid or vancomycin with incorporation of 100 patients in the vancomycin arm and 100 patients in the linezolid arm.

Inclusion criteria

Patients will be enrolled in the study if they fulfill the following three inclusion criteria:

  1. Protocol criteria for HAP/VAP: Criteria for making a correct diagnosis of HAP will be met if the patient develops a new or progressive pulmonary infiltrate associated with at least two of the following: new or increased respiratory symptomatology (cough, sputum or tracheal secretions, shortness of breath), fever or hypothermia, leukocytosis, left shift, or leukopenia, or deterioration of pulmonary function.
  2. Isolation of MRSA from a respiratory sample or blood culture within 48 hours of the diagnosis of HAP/VAP
  3. Treatment of MRSA HAP/VAP with either vancomycin or linezolid with incorporation of 100 patients in the vancomycin arm and 100 patients in the linezolid arm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients not meeting enrollment criteria.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
188 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Linezolid observational cohort

    Drug: Linezolid

  • Vancomycin observational cohort

    Drug: Vancomycin

Interventions

  • DrugLinezolid

    Patients with documented MRSA hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia treated with linezolid according to routine medical care.

    Also known as: Zyvox

  • DrugVancomycin

    Patients with documented MRSA hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia treated with vancomycin according to routine medical care.

    Also known as: Vancocin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success

    Clinical success was assessed as number of participants cured or improved. Cure = complete resolution of signs and symptoms of pneumonia; Improvement = partial resolution of signs and symptoms of pneumonia.

    Time frame: 14 days after diagnosis with VAP or hospital discharge, whichever occurred first

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Microbiological Outcome

    Microbiological outcome was defined as superinfections (infections diagnosed within 72 hours of the diagnosis of HAP and until day 28) and colonization (positive cultures with a multi-drug resistant organism).

    Time frame: 28 days after diagnosis of VAP

  2. Duration of Hospital Stay

    Duration of hospital stay was assessed as number of days from VAP diagnosis to discharge from the hospital.

    Time frame: Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP

  3. Duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay

    Duration of ICU stay was assessed as number of days from VAP diagnosis to discharge from the ICU.

    Time frame: Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP

  4. Duration of Mechanical Ventilation

    Duration of mechanical ventilation was assessed as number of days from VAP diagnosis to extubation or to discharge if not extubated.

    Time frame: Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP

  5. Duration of Antimicrobial Treatment

    Time frame: Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP

  6. Number of Antibiotic Free Days

    Time frame: Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP

07

Results

Posted Jul 10, 2014
Limitations and caveats
Prioritization of endpoints as primary or secondary was not specified in protocol and was based on study team's inputs.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLinezolidVancomycin
Started10187
Completed10187
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Success

Clinical success was assessed as number of participants cured or improved. Cure = complete resolution of signs and symptoms of pneumonia; Improvement = partial resolution of signs and symptoms of pneumonia.

Time frame:
14 days after diagnosis with VAP or hospital discharge, whichever occurred first
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success
percentage of participantsLinezolidVancomycin
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success8569
Statistical analysis
  • Linezolid vs Vancomycin · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.009
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Microbiological Outcome

Microbiological outcome was defined as superinfections (infections diagnosed within 72 hours of the diagnosis of HAP and until day 28) and colonization (positive cultures with a multi-drug resistant organism).

Time frame:
28 days after diagnosis of VAP
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Outcome
participantsLinezolidVancomycin
Superinfections4237
Colonization3432
Statistical analysis
  • Linezolid vs Vancomycin · Chi-squared · p = 1.00
  • Linezolid vs Vancomycin · Chi-squared · p = 0.759
SecondaryDuration of Hospital Stay

Duration of hospital stay was assessed as number of days from VAP diagnosis to discharge from the hospital.

Time frame:
Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP
Reported as:
Median · days
Duration of Hospital Stay
daysLinezolidVancomycin
Duration of Hospital Stay18 (10 to 28)16 (11 to 25.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Linezolid vs Vancomycin · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.773
SecondaryDuration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay

Duration of ICU stay was assessed as number of days from VAP diagnosis to discharge from the ICU.

Time frame:
Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP
Reported as:
Median · days
Duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay
daysLinezolidVancomycin
Duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay11 (8 to 22)13 (8 to 19.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Linezolid vs Vancomycin · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.823
SecondaryDuration of Mechanical Ventilation

Duration of mechanical ventilation was assessed as number of days from VAP diagnosis to extubation or to discharge if not extubated.

Time frame:
Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP
Reported as:
Median · days
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation
daysLinezolidVancomycin
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation11 (11 to 24)13 (9.5 to 24)
Statistical analysis
  • Linezolid vs Vancomycin · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.276
SecondaryDuration of Antimicrobial Treatment
Time frame:
Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP
Reported as:
Mean · days
Duration of Antimicrobial Treatment
daysLinezolidVancomycin
Duration of Antimicrobial Treatment11 ± 411 ± 5
Statistical analysis
  • Linezolid vs Vancomycin · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.512
SecondaryNumber of Antibiotic Free Days
Time frame:
Up to 28 days after diagnosis of VAP

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Linezolid———
Vancomycin———

Baseline characteristics

Analysis population included all participants who met the eligibility criteria for this study.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)LinezolidVancomycinTotal
Median59 (48 to 68)56 (40 to 66)57 (45.75 to 68)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)LinezolidVancomycinTotal
Female383876
Male6349112
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01561469
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Collaborators
University of Louisville, Henry Ford Hospital, Summa Health System, Sparrow Health System, Jackson Health System
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 23, 2012
Start date
Nov 2008
Primary completion
Jun 2013
Completion
Jun 2013
Results posted
Jul 10, 2014
Last update
Jul 10, 2014

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion