CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01558089EARLY RAUpdated Nov 11, 2016Results posted

Good EULAR Response In Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

An observational study in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 9 sites in Greece. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-11-11.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
76
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This open-label, prospective, observational study will evaluate the clinical response to etanercept + methotrexate therapy in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis, as prescribed by the rheumatologist in a normal clinical setting in Greece

Read the detailed description

All subjects enrolled should meet the usual prescribing criteria for Etanercept as per the local product information and should be entered into the study at the investigator's discretion

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 76 is below the median of 155 across 1,057 observational studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

patients with rheumatoid arthritis who fulfill the inclusion/exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria

  1. signed and dated informed consent document
  2. 18 years of age and older at the time of consent
  3. Patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis, who satisfy the 2010 Rheumatoid Arthritis Classification Criteria
  4. Patients who have been prescribed for first time to receive treatment with MTX + Etanercept prior to enrollment to this study, following routine clinical practice and according to the approved SmPC,
  5. Patients with DAS28 ≥ 3.2
  6. Duration of disease symptoms ≥ 6 weeks and ≤2 years
  7. Failure to respond to prior DMARDs including MTX monotherapy according to routine clinical practice.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindications according to the SmPC
  2. History of or present anti-TNFa or other biologic therapy for the treatment of RA
  3. Known significant concurrent medical disease according to investigator's opinion and the current SmPC
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
76 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • etanercept + methotrexate

    Drug: etanercept · Drug: methotrexate

Interventions

  • Drugetanercept

    according to SmPC and clinical practice

  • Drugmethotrexate

    according to SmPC and clinical practice

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary: Participants With EULAR (Good)

    Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response at 6 months based on DAS28 EULAR response criteria defined as Good response = DAS28 change \>1.2 with DAS28 ≤3.2; Moderate response = DAS28 change \>0.6 with DAS28 \>3.2-5.1; Non-response = DAS28 change ≤0.6 and absolute DAS28 \>5.1

    Time frame: Visit 4 (Month 6)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Visit 4 (Month 6)

    In order to calculate the DAS28 the number of swollen joints and tender joints were assessed using the 28 Joint Count (TJC28 and SJC28). A joint was counted as tender/swollen if the tender/swelling code was 'Present'. Swollen and tender 28 joint counts will be performed at visit 1 (baseline), visit 2, visit 3 and visit 4 or early withdrawal.

    Time frame: Baseline and Visit 4 (Month 6)

  2. Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Visit 4 (Month 6)

    In order to calculate the DAS28 the number of swollen joints and tender joints were assessed using the 28 Joint Count (TJC28 and SJC28). A joint was counted as tender/swollen if the tender/swelling code was 'Present'. Swollen and tender 28 joint counts will be performed at visit 1 (baseline), visit 2, visit 3 and visit 4 or early withdrawal.

    Time frame: Baseline and Visit 4 (Month 6)

  3. Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of General Health (VAS) at Visit 4 (Month 6)

    The patients used a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to score their general health during the last week. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (severe pain)

    Time frame: Baseline and Visit 4 (Month 6)

  4. Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Visit 4 (Month 6)

    Time frame: Baseline and Visit 4 (Month 6)

  5. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Health Index at Visit 4 (Month 6)

    The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) was measured on a 5 item scale. The scores for the 5 items (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) ranged from 1 (no problem) to 3 (extreme problems). For EQ-5D, participants rate questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each of the 5 dimensions is divided into 3 levels of perceived problems: Level 1=no problem; level 2=some problem; level 3=extreme problem. A unique health state is defined by combining 1 level from each dimension. A total of 243 possible health states are defined in this way. Each state is referred to in terms of a 5 digit code. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Time frame: Baseline and Visit 4 (Month 6)

  6. Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Visit 4 (Month 6)

    The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is composed of 20 items. It is a participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score ranges from 0-3: 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty.

    Time frame: Baseline and Visit 4 (Month 6)

  7. Predictor of Good EULAR Response Versus Moderate/No Response at Visit 4 (Month 6) - DAS28 (LOCF)

    In a first step a univariate logistic regression model was fit for the following baseline variables: DAS28 (n=48), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS) (n=47), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS) (n=47), CRP (n=46), Patient Pain (VAS) (n=47), HAQ-DI (n=47), EQ-5D (n=47). Only those variables that were significant at a 10% level were then included in the second step: a multivariate analysis with stepwise regression (entry level=10%, stay level=5%). The final model presented in the Basic Results table displays those covariates which were significant at the 2-sided 5% level (baseline value for DAS28; n=48). Note that DAS28 is not a categorical variable; therefore no stratified results for this variable are presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and Visit 4 (Month 6)

07

Results

Posted Nov 11, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneETANERCEPT/ METHOTREXATE
Started76
Completed63
Not completed13
Withdrew: Adverse event1
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy1
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up5
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject6

Outcome measures

PrimaryPrimary: Participants With EULAR (Good)

Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response at 6 months based on DAS28 EULAR response criteria defined as Good response = DAS28 change \>1.2 with DAS28 ≤3.2; Moderate response = DAS28 change \>0.6 with DAS28 \>3.2-5.1; Non-response = DAS28 change ≤0.6 and absolute DAS28 \>5.1

Time frame:
Visit 4 (Month 6)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Primary: Participants With EULAR (Good)
participantsEtanercept/Methotrexate
Primary: Participants With EULAR (Good)19
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Visit 4 (Month 6)

In order to calculate the DAS28 the number of swollen joints and tender joints were assessed using the 28 Joint Count (TJC28 and SJC28). A joint was counted as tender/swollen if the tender/swelling code was 'Present'. Swollen and tender 28 joint counts will be performed at visit 1 (baseline), visit 2, visit 3 and visit 4 or early withdrawal.

Time frame:
Baseline and Visit 4 (Month 6)
Reported as:
Mean · Joints
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Visit 4 (Month 6)
JointsEtanercept/Methotrexate
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Visit 4 (Month 6)-7.68 ± 7.08
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Visit 4 (Month 6)

In order to calculate the DAS28 the number of swollen joints and tender joints were assessed using the 28 Joint Count (TJC28 and SJC28). A joint was counted as tender/swollen if the tender/swelling code was 'Present'. Swollen and tender 28 joint counts will be performed at visit 1 (baseline), visit 2, visit 3 and visit 4 or early withdrawal.

Time frame:
Baseline and Visit 4 (Month 6)
Reported as:
Mean · Joints
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Visit 4 (Month 6)
JointsEtanercept/Methotrexate
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Visit 4 (Month 6)-4.52 ± 5.22
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of General Health (VAS) at Visit 4 (Month 6)

The patients used a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to score their general health during the last week. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (severe pain)

Time frame:
Baseline and Visit 4 (Month 6)
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of General Health (VAS) at Visit 4 (Month 6)
mmEtanercept/Methotrexate
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of General Health (VAS) at Visit 4 (Month 6)-38.14 ± 28.79
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Visit 4 (Month 6)
Time frame:
Baseline and Visit 4 (Month 6)
Reported as:
Mean · mm/hour
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Visit 4 (Month 6)
mm/hourEtanercept/Methotrexate
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Visit 4 (Month 6)-21.21 ± 22.28
SecondaryChange From Baseline in EQ-5D Health Index at Visit 4 (Month 6)

The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) was measured on a 5 item scale. The scores for the 5 items (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) ranged from 1 (no problem) to 3 (extreme problems). For EQ-5D, participants rate questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each of the 5 dimensions is divided into 3 levels of perceived problems: Level 1=no problem; level 2=some problem; level 3=extreme problem. A unique health state is defined by combining 1 level from each dimension. A total of 243 possible health states are defined in this way. Each state is referred to in terms of a 5 digit code. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

Time frame:
Baseline and Visit 4 (Month 6)
Reported as:
Mean · units on scale
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Health Index at Visit 4 (Month 6)
units on scaleEtanercept/Methotrexate
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Health Index at Visit 4 (Month 6)0.40 ± 0.36
SecondaryChange From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Visit 4 (Month 6)

The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is composed of 20 items. It is a participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score ranges from 0-3: 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty.

Time frame:
Baseline and Visit 4 (Month 6)
Reported as:
Mean · units on scale
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Visit 4 (Month 6)
units on scaleEtanercept/Methotrexate
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Visit 4 (Month 6)-0.78 ± 0.63
SecondaryPredictor of Good EULAR Response Versus Moderate/No Response at Visit 4 (Month 6) - DAS28 (LOCF)

In a first step a univariate logistic regression model was fit for the following baseline variables: DAS28 (n=48), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS) (n=47), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS) (n=47), CRP (n=46), Patient Pain (VAS) (n=47), HAQ-DI (n=47), EQ-5D (n=47). Only those variables that were significant at a 10% level were then included in the second step: a multivariate analysis with stepwise regression (entry level=10%, stay level=5%). The final model presented in the Basic Results table displays those covariates which were significant at the 2-sided 5% level (baseline value for DAS28; n=48). Note that DAS28 is not a categorical variable; therefore no stratified results for this variable are presented.

Time frame:
Baseline and Visit 4 (Month 6)
Reported as:
Number · Odds Ratio (per unit increase)
Predictor of Good EULAR Response Versus Moderate/No Response at Visit 4 (Month 6) - DAS28 (LOCF)
Odds Ratio (per unit increase)Etanercept/Methotrexate
Predictor of Good EULAR Response Versus Moderate/No Response at Visit 4 (Month 6) - DAS28 (LOCF)2.831 (1.358 to 5.898)

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
ETANERCEPT/ METHOTREXATE—6/76 (7.9%)14/76 (18.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventETANERCEPT/ METHOTREXATE
Ulcerative keratitisEye disorders1/76
Injection site pruritusGeneral disorders1/76
Gallbladder disorderHepatobiliary disorders1/76
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations1/76
Lower respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations1/76
Respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations1/76
MyopathyMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/76
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/76
ThrombosisVascular disorders1/76
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventETANERCEPT/ METHOTREXATE
ErythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/76
VertigoEar and labyrinth disorders2/76
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders2/76
Drug ineffectiveGeneral disorders2/76
Injection site erythemaGeneral disorders2/76
Injection site pruritusGeneral disorders2/76
ArthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/76
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/76

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ETANERCEPT/ METHOTREXATE
Mean55.5 ± 14.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ETANERCEPT/ METHOTREXATE
Female66
Male10
08

Study locations

9 sites
  • G. Gennimatas General Hospital /Rheumatology Clinic
    Athens, Attica 11527, Greece
  • Ippokrateio General Hospital of Athens / 2nd internal Medicine Clinic of the University of Athens
    Athens, Attica 11527, Greece
  • University General Hospital of Heraklion
    Heraklion, Creete 71110, Greece
  • G. Papanikolaoy
    Thessaloniki, Exochi 570 10, Greece
  • 424 Military Hospital
    Thessaloniki, Thessalonikis, Greece
  • Laiko General Peripheral Hospital
    Athens, 115 27, Greece
  • Peripheral University General Hospital of Larissa
    Larissa, 41 222, Greece
  • "Olympion therapeutic center" General Clinic of Patras
    Patras, 26443, Greece
  • Euromedica Kyanous Stavros
    Thessaloniki, 54636, Greece
09

References and documents

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 11, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01558089
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 20, 2012
Start date
Mar 2013
Primary completion
May 2015
Completion
May 2015
Results posted
Nov 11, 2016
Last update
Nov 11, 2016

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion