ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01551979Updated Apr 12, 2018Results posted

Therapeutic Efficacy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Schizophrenia

An interventional study of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Schizophrenia, sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-12.

Sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to look at the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a therapeutic intervention for patients with schizophrenia. The primary outcome is improvement in negative symptoms related to schizophrenia. The investigators are focusing on negative symptoms given their greater resistance to pharmacological and other established therapies. If the investigators trial were to show beneficial effects, its clinical significance would be great.

Read the detailed description

This study builds on the results of a previous phase 1, single-site study in which we demonstrated the safety of image-guided theta burst stimulation (TBS) form of rTMS over the cerebellar vermis (Demirtas-Tatlidede et al., 2010) in eigh patients with schizophrenia.

The primary goal of the present study is to assess efficacy of iTBS to the cerebellar vermis on positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. A second, added goal is to investigate the mechanisms of the expected clinical improvement.

Schizophrenia is a leading cause of mental disability and current treatments still remain only partially successful for many patients. Our underlying hypothesis is that modulation of the cerebellar vermis may enhance activity of the neural systems that sub-serve cognition and emotion, reestablish the disturbed cerebellar regulation in schizophrenic patients, and produce clinical improvement.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Schizophrenia
  • repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,539 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 473 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 22 is below the median of 70 across 2,924 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 565 studies on the registry; 81 are open to participants now.

Of its 75 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 62 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18-65 years
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia according to DSM-IV criteria (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) by a board-certified psychiatrist

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preexisting or progressive neurological disorders
  • Prior neurological procedures
  • Previous head injury
  • Change in antipsychotic medication during the last 4 weeks
  • Been an inpatient in a psychiatry clinic within the last month
  • Any other axis 1 diagnosis
  • Patients may not be actively enrolled in a separate intervention study
  • Patients unable to undergo a brain MRI
  • Any unstable medical condition
  • History of seizures, diagnosis of epilepsy, history of abnormal (epileptiform_ EEG, or family history of treatment resistant epilepsy
  • Possible pregnancy. All female participants of child bearing age are required to have a pregnancy test.
  • Any metal in the brain, skull, or elsewhere unless approved by the responsible MD
  • Any medical devices (ie. cardiac pacemaker, deep brain stimulator, medication infusion pump, cochlear implant, vagal nerve stimulator) unless otherwise approved by the responsible MD
  • Substance abuse (alcohol, amphetamines, cocaine, MDMA [methylenedioxymethamphetamine], ecstasy, PCP [phencyclidine], Angle dust) or dependence within the past six months
  • No medication is an absolute exclusion from TMS. Medications will be reviewed by the responsible MD and a decision about inclusion will be made based on the following: the patient's past medical history, drug dose, history of recent medication changes or duration of treatment, and combination with other CNS (central nervous system) active drugs (the published TMS guidelines review of medications to be considered with TMS)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active rTMS

    High frequency rTMS stimulation of the vermis(lobule VII) of the cerebellum.

    Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham rTMS

    Sham rTMS to the vermis (lobule VII) of the cerebellum.

    Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    intermittent Theta Burst (iTBS) pattern (20 trains of 10 bursts given with 8s intervals) will be applied at 80% of active motor threshold. Each participant will receive 600 pulses per session. Sham participants will undergo the same procedures as those in the active rTMS group.

    Also known as: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Noninvasive Brain Stimulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Positive Subscale

    Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Positive Subscale, a 7 item subscale measuring the presence/absence and severity of positive symptoms of schizophrenia. The minimum score is 7 and the maximum score is 49, with higher values representing greater symptom severity. Change from baseline on the PANSS Positive Subscale can range from -42 to +42; negative values represent an improvement in symptom severity, and positive values represent worsening symptom severity. Therapeutic efficacy was assessed at baseline, after 5 days of treatment, 1 week post treatment, and 3 weeks post treatment.

    Time frame: Before treatment (baseline), last day of treatment (after 5 days of treatment), 1 and 3 weeks post treatment

  2. Change From Baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Negative Subscale

    Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Negative Subscale, a 7 item subscale measuring the presence/absence and severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. The minimum score is 7 and the maximum score is 49, with higher values representing greater symptom severity. Change from baseline on the PANSS Negative Subscale can range from -42 to +42; negative values represent an improvement in symptom severity, and positive values represent worsening symptom severity. Therapeutic efficacy was assessed at baseline, after 5 days of treatment, 1 week post treatment, and 3 weeks post treatment.

    Time frame: Before treatment (baseline), last day of treatment (after 5 days of treatment), 1 and 3 weeks post treatment

  3. Change From Baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) General Subscale

    Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) General Subscale, a 16 item subscale measuring the presence/absence and severity of general psychopathology of schizophrenia. The minimum score is 16 and the maximum score is 112, with higher values representing greater psychopathology severity. Change from baseline on the PANSS General Subscale can range from -96 to +96; negative values represent an improvement in symptom severity, and positive values represent worsening symptom severity. Therapeutic efficacy was assessed at baseline, after 5 days of treatment, 1 week post treatment, and 3 weeks post treatment.

    Time frame: Before treatment (baseline), last day of treatment (after 5 days of treatment), 1 and 3 weeks post treatment

  4. Change From Baseline on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity of Illness

    Treatment response was evaluated with the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scale, which is comprised of two companion one-item measures that use 7-point scales to evaluate severity of psychopathology and improvement from the initiation of treatment; each component is rated separately and the CGI does not yield a global score. The CGI Severity of Illness is a 7-point subscale in which a clinician rates the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment. Ratings range from 1 to 7 and higher values represent more severe psychopathology: 1 indicates a normal and not at all ill patient and 7 indicates among the most extremely ill patients. Change from baseline on the CGI Severity of Illness subscale can range from -6 to +6, with negative values representing an improvement in psychopathology and positive values representing worsening psychopathology. Severity of Illness was assessed at baseline, after 5 days of treatment, 1 week post treatment, and 3 weeks post treatment.

    Time frame: Before treatment (baseline), last day of treatment (after 5 days of treatment), 1 and 3 weeks post treatment

  5. Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Global Improvement

    Treatment response was evaluated with the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scale, which is comprised of two companion one-item measures that use 7-point scales to evaluate severity of psychopathology and improvement from the initiation of treatment; each component is rated separately and the CGI does not yield a global score. The CGI Global Improvement is a 7-point subscale in which a clinician assesses how much a patient's illness has changed compared to baseline. Ratings range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating very much improved and 7 indicating very much worse. Change from baseline on the CGI Global Improvement subscale can range from -6 to +6, with negative values representing an improvement in psychopathology and positive values representing worsening psychopathology. Global Improvement was assessed after 5 days of treatment, 1 week post treatment, and 3 weeks post treatment.

    Time frame: Last day of treatment (after 5 days of treatment), 1 and 3 weeks post treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia

    The Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia is a 9-item scale that assesses depressive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Each item is rated separately and ratings range from 0 to 3. Higher values represent more severe depressive symptoms: 0 indicates an absent symptom and 3 indicates a severe symptom. The overall Calgary Depression Scale score is computed by summing each item. The total Calgary Depression Scale score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher values representing more severe depression in patients with schizophrenia. Change from baseline on the Calgary Depression Scale can range from -27 to +27, with negative values representing an improvement in depressive symptoms and positive values representing worsening depressive symptom severity. Depression was assessed at baseline, after 5 days of treatment, 1 week post treatment, and 3 weeks post treatment.

    Time frame: Before treatment (baseline), last day of treatment (after 5 days of treatment), 1 and 3 weeks post treatment

07

Results

Posted Jun 2, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneActive rTMSSham rTMS
Started107
Last day of treatment (after 5 days)107
1 week post treatment106
Completed85
Not completed22

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Positive Subscale

Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Positive Subscale, a 7 item subscale measuring the presence/absence and severity of positive symptoms of schizophrenia. The minimum score is 7 and the maximum score is 49, with higher values representing greater symptom severity. Change from baseline on the PANSS Positive Subscale can range from -42 to +42; negative values represent an improvement in symptom severity, and positive values represent worsening symptom severity. Therapeutic efficacy was assessed at baseline, after 5 days of treatment, 1 week post treatment, and 3 weeks post treatment.

Time frame:
Before treatment (baseline), last day of treatment (after 5 days of treatment), 1 and 3 weeks post treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Positive Subscale
units on a scaleActive rTMSSham rTMS
5 days of treatment - baseline-2.4 ± 3.565-1.857 ± 1.574
1 week post treatment - baseline-5.889 ± 3.333-3.667 ± 3.724
3 week post treatment - baseline-5 ± 4.504-3 ± 3.317
PrimaryChange From Baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Negative Subscale

Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Negative Subscale, a 7 item subscale measuring the presence/absence and severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. The minimum score is 7 and the maximum score is 49, with higher values representing greater symptom severity. Change from baseline on the PANSS Negative Subscale can range from -42 to +42; negative values represent an improvement in symptom severity, and positive values represent worsening symptom severity. Therapeutic efficacy was assessed at baseline, after 5 days of treatment, 1 week post treatment, and 3 weeks post treatment.

Time frame:
Before treatment (baseline), last day of treatment (after 5 days of treatment), 1 and 3 weeks post treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Negative Subscale
units on a scaleActive rTMSSham rTMS
5 days of treatment - baseline-1 ± 4.876-1.571 ± 2.070
1 week post treatment - baseline-3.889 ± 3.296-1.667 ± 3.141
3 week post treatment - baseline-3.5 ± 6.024-0.2 ± 4.604
PrimaryChange From Baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) General Subscale

Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) General Subscale, a 16 item subscale measuring the presence/absence and severity of general psychopathology of schizophrenia. The minimum score is 16 and the maximum score is 112, with higher values representing greater psychopathology severity. Change from baseline on the PANSS General Subscale can range from -96 to +96; negative values represent an improvement in symptom severity, and positive values represent worsening symptom severity. Therapeutic efficacy was assessed at baseline, after 5 days of treatment, 1 week post treatment, and 3 weeks post treatment.

Time frame:
Before treatment (baseline), last day of treatment (after 5 days of treatment), 1 and 3 weeks post treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) General Subscale
units on a scaleActive rTMSSham rTMS
5 days of treatment - baseline-3.1 ± 4.149-2.714 ± 5.090
1 week post treatment - baseline-8.222 ± 5.696-2 ± 4.690
3 week post treatment - baseline-7.375 ± 10.1270 ± 1
PrimaryChange From Baseline on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity of Illness

Treatment response was evaluated with the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scale, which is comprised of two companion one-item measures that use 7-point scales to evaluate severity of psychopathology and improvement from the initiation of treatment; each component is rated separately and the CGI does not yield a global score. The CGI Severity of Illness is a 7-point subscale in which a clinician rates the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment. Ratings range from 1 to 7 and higher values represent more severe psychopathology: 1 indicates a normal and not at all ill patient and 7 indicates among the most extremely ill patients. Change from baseline on the CGI Severity of Illness subscale can range from -6 to +6, with negative values representing an improvement in psychopathology and positive values representing worsening psychopathology. Severity of Illness was assessed at baseline, after 5 days of treatment, 1 week post treatment, and 3 weeks post treatment.

Time frame:
Before treatment (baseline), last day of treatment (after 5 days of treatment), 1 and 3 weeks post treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity of Illness
units on a scaleActive rTMSSham rTMS
5 days of treatment - baseline-0.3 ± 0.483-0.286 ± 0.488
1 week post treatment - baseline-0.4 ± 0.699-0.5 ± 0.548
3 week post treatment - baseline-0.5 ± 0.535-0.2 ± 0.837
PrimaryClinical Global Impression (CGI) Global Improvement

Treatment response was evaluated with the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scale, which is comprised of two companion one-item measures that use 7-point scales to evaluate severity of psychopathology and improvement from the initiation of treatment; each component is rated separately and the CGI does not yield a global score. The CGI Global Improvement is a 7-point subscale in which a clinician assesses how much a patient's illness has changed compared to baseline. Ratings range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating very much improved and 7 indicating very much worse. Change from baseline on the CGI Global Improvement subscale can range from -6 to +6, with negative values representing an improvement in psychopathology and positive values representing worsening psychopathology. Global Improvement was assessed after 5 days of treatment, 1 week post treatment, and 3 weeks post treatment.

Time frame:
Last day of treatment (after 5 days of treatment), 1 and 3 weeks post treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Global Improvement
units on a scaleActive rTMSSham rTMS
5 days of treatment3.6 ± 0.5163.429 ± 1.134
1 week post treatment3.3 ± 0.6754 ± 0.632
3 week post treatment3.375 ± 0.5183.8 ± 0.447
SecondaryChange From Baseline on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia

The Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia is a 9-item scale that assesses depressive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Each item is rated separately and ratings range from 0 to 3. Higher values represent more severe depressive symptoms: 0 indicates an absent symptom and 3 indicates a severe symptom. The overall Calgary Depression Scale score is computed by summing each item. The total Calgary Depression Scale score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher values representing more severe depression in patients with schizophrenia. Change from baseline on the Calgary Depression Scale can range from -27 to +27, with negative values representing an improvement in depressive symptoms and positive values representing worsening depressive symptom severity. Depression was assessed at baseline, after 5 days of treatment, 1 week post treatment, and 3 weeks post treatment.

Time frame:
Before treatment (baseline), last day of treatment (after 5 days of treatment), 1 and 3 weeks post treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia
units on a scaleActive rTMSSham rTMS
5 days of treatment - baseline-2.6 ± 3.204-1.167 ± 2.563
1 week post treatment - baseline-2.7 ± 2.908-1.833 ± 2.229
3 week post treatment - baseline-2.25 ± 2.1210.8 ± 2.387

Adverse events

Collected over 4 weeks (5 days of treatment and 1 week and 3 weeks post treatment). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active rTMS—1/10 (10%)5/10 (50%)
Sham rTMS—0/7 (0%)1/7 (14.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventActive rTMSSham rTMS
Acute exacerbation of psychosisPsychiatric disorders1/100/7
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventActive rTMSSham rTMS
Neck painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/101/7
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/101/7
Scalp painSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/101/7
Discomfort with TMSNervous system disorders1/100/7
Blood pressure increaseCardiac disorders1/100/7
Head heavinessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/100/7
Change in energy levelNervous system disorders1/100/7
Change in moodPsychiatric disorders1/100/7

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Active rTMSSham rTMSTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years10717
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Active rTMSSham rTMSTotal
Female224
Male8513
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Active rTMSSham rTMSTotal
United States10717
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02134, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Batini C, Buisseret-Delmas C, Corvisier J, Hardy O, Jassik-Gerschenfeld D. Brain stem nuclei giving fibers to lobules VI and VII of the cerebellar vermis. Brain Res. 1978 Sep 22;153(2):241-61. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90405-5. PubMed 80249 ↗
  • Demirtas-Tatlidede A, Freitas C, Cromer JR, Safar L, Ongur D, Stone WS, Seidman LJ, Schmahmann JD, Pascual-Leone A. Safety and proof of principle study of cerebellar vermal theta burst stimulation in refractory schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2010 Dec;124(1-3):91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.08.015. PubMed 20817483 ↗
  • Demirtas-Tatlidede A, Freitas C, Pascual-Leone A, Schmahmann JD. Modulatory effects of theta burst stimulation on cerebellar nonsomatic functions. Cerebellum. 2011 Sep;10(3):495-503. doi: 10.1007/s12311-010-0230-5. PubMed 21132574 ↗
  • Fregni F, Boggio PS, Valle AC, Rocha RR, Duarte J, Ferreira MJ, Wagner T, Fecteau S, Rigonatti SP, Riberto M, Freedman SD, Pascual-Leone A. A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke. 2006 Aug;37(8):2115-22. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000231390.58967.6b. Epub 2006 Jun 29. PubMed 16809569 ↗
  • Fregni F, Thome-Souza S, Bermpohl F, Marcolin MA, Herzog A, Pascual-Leone A, Valente KD. Antiepileptic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with cortical malformations: an EEG and clinical study. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2005;83(2-3):57-62. doi: 10.1159/000086674. Epub 2005 Jun 30. PubMed 15990468 ↗
  • Fregni F, Freedman S, Pascual-Leone A. Recent advances in the treatment of chronic pain with non-invasive brain stimulation techniques. Lancet Neurol. 2007 Feb;6(2):188-91. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70032-7. PubMed 17239806 ↗
  • George MS, Wassermann EM, Williams WA, Callahan A, Ketter TA, Basser P, Hallett M, Post RM. Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves mood in depression. Neuroreport. 1995 Oct 2;6(14):1853-6. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199510020-00008. PubMed 8547583 ↗
  • George MS, Nahas Z, Kozel FA, Goldman J, Molloy M, Oliver N. Improvement of depression following transcranial magnetic stimulation. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 1999 Dec;1(2):114-24. doi: 10.1007/s11920-999-0020-2. PubMed 11122913 ↗
  • Gershon AA, Dannon PN, Grunhaus L. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2003 May;160(5):835-45. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.5.835. PubMed 12727683 ↗
  • Hajak G, Marienhagen J, Langguth B, Werner S, Binder H, Eichhammer P. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in schizophrenia: a combined treatment and neuroimaging study. Psychol Med. 2004 Oct;34(7):1157-63. doi: 10.1017/s0033291704002338. PubMed 15697042 ↗
  • Hashimoto M, Ohtsuka K. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the posterior cerebellum during visually guided saccades in man. Brain. 1995 Oct;118 ( Pt 5):1185-93. doi: 10.1093/brain/118.5.1185. PubMed 7496779 ↗
  • Heath RG. Modulation of emotion with a brain pacemamer. Treatment for intractable psychiatric illness. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1977 Nov;165(5):300-17. PubMed 303280 ↗
  • Heath RG, Dempesy CW, Fontana CJ, Myers WA. Cerebellar stimulation: effects on septal region, hippocampus, and amygdala of cats and rats. Biol Psychiatry. 1978 Oct;13(5):501-29. PubMed 728506 ↗
  • Huber TJ, Schneider U, Rollnik J. Gender differences in the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2003 Aug 30;120(1):103-5. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(03)00170-7. PubMed 14500119 ↗
  • Jardri R, Lucas B, Delevoye-Turrell Y, Delmaire C, Delion P, Thomas P, Goeb JL. An 11-year-old boy with drug-resistant schizophrenia treated with temporo-parietal rTMS. Mol Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;12(4):320. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001968. No abstract available. PubMed 17389898 ↗
  • Jin Y, Potkin SG, Kemp AS, Huerta ST, Alva G, Thai TM, Carreon D, Bunney WE Jr. Therapeutic effects of individualized alpha frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation (alphaTMS) on the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2006 Jul;32(3):556-61. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbj020. Epub 2005 Oct 27. PubMed 16254067 ↗
  • Martin PI, Naeser MA, Theoret H, Tormos JM, Nicholas M, Kurland J, Fregni F, Seekins H, Doron K, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a complementary treatment for aphasia. Semin Speech Lang. 2004 May;25(2):181-91. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-825654. PubMed 15118944 ↗
  • Ohtsuka K, Enoki T. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the posterior cerebellum during smooth pursuit eye movements in man. Brain. 1998 Mar;121 ( Pt 3):429-35. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.3.429. PubMed 9549519 ↗
  • Papez JW. A proposed mechanism of emotion. 1937. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1995 Winter;7(1):103-12. doi: 10.1176/jnp.7.1.103. No abstract available. PubMed 7711480 ↗
  • Pascual-Leone A, Rubio B, Pallardo F, Catala MD. Rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in drug-resistant depression. Lancet. 1996 Jul 27;348(9022):233-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)01219-6. PubMed 8684201 ↗
  • Rollnik JD, Huber TJ, Mogk H, Siggelkow S, Kropp S, Dengler R, Emrich HM, Schneider U. High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in schizophrenic patients. Neuroreport. 2000 Dec 18;11(18):4013-5. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200012180-00022. PubMed 11192620 ↗
  • Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14. PubMed 19833552 ↗
  • Schmahmann JD. The role of the cerebellum in cognition and emotion: personal reflections since 1982 on the dysmetria of thought hypothesis, and its historical evolution from theory to therapy. Neuropsychol Rev. 2010 Sep;20(3):236-60. doi: 10.1007/s11065-010-9142-x. Epub 2010 Sep 7. PubMed 20821056 ↗
  • Schutter DJ, van Honk J, d'Alfonso AA, Peper JS, Panksepp J. High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic over the medial cerebellum induces a shift in the prefrontal electroencephalography gamma spectrum: a pilot study in humans. Neurosci Lett. 2003 Jan 16;336(2):73-6. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)01077-7. PubMed 12499043 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 12, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01551979
Collaborators
Sidney R. Baer, Jr. Foundation
Responsible party
Mark Halko (Instructor in Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 13, 2012
Start date
Feb 2012
Primary completion
Nov 2015
Completion
Nov 2015
Results posted
Jun 2, 2017
Last update
Apr 12, 2018

Study contacts

Mark Halko, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion