CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01547416Updated Jul 11, 2013

The Effect of Combined General/Epidural Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia on Diaphragmatic Function

A Phase 4 interventional study of epidural 250mL of 0.2% ropivacaine and 2 μg/mL of fentanyl, 5 mL/hr continuous infusion and 0.5 mL bolus dose and no epidural drug administered in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Yonsei University. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-07-11.

Sponsored by Yonsei University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study was to investigate whether robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy give rise to the impairment of diaphragmatic function postoperatively, and whether combined general/epidural anesthesia could provide better postoperative diaphragmatic function.

Read the detailed description

Diaphragmatic dysfunction after abdominal surgery can result in extended hospital stay and increased medical costs, because it is related with atelectasis, lung collapse or pneumonia. The mechanism of diaphragm dysfunction is thought to be from not only direct injury to abdominal wall and viscera but inhibitory reflexes of phrenic activity. Thoracic or upper abdominal surgery is suggested as a risk factor of postoperative diaphragm dysfunction, and perioperative analgesic modality is also known to affect diaphragm movements. But there has been no trial to investigate the effect of laparoscopic pelvic surgery such as prostatectomy on diaphragm movement. Moreover, it is not clear if minimally invasive Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) has any influence on respiratory and diaphragm functions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Diaphragmatic dysfunction
  • General anesthesia
  • Epidural Anesthesia
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,370 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,400 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 58 across 4,822 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Yonsei University is the lead sponsor of 1,387 studies on the registry; 232 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients of over 18 years of age undergoing elective Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with previous history of smoking, cardiopulmonary or neuromuscular disease or obesity (body mass index > 30 kg.m-2)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    combined general/epidural anesthesia

    epidural catheter was inserted in group GE at T8/9, T9/10, or T10/11 interspinous space with a 17-gauge Tuohy needle in lateral decubitus position and advanced 5 cm cephalad. Epidural analgesia was maintained using the patient-controlled analgesia technique.

    Drug: epidural 250mL of 0.2% ropivacaine and 2 μg/mL of fentanyl, 5 mL/hr continuous infusion and 0.5 mL bolus dose

  • Active comparator
    General anesthesia

    Patients allocated to general anesthesia group did not receive epidural anesthesia.

    Drug: no epidural drug administered

Interventions

  • Drugepidural 250mL of 0.2% ropivacaine and 2 μg/mL of fentanyl, 5 mL/hr continuous infusion and 0.5 mL bolus dose

    Before the induction of anesthesia, epidural catheter was inserted in group GE at T8/9, T9/10, or T10/11 interspinous space with a 17-gauge Tuohy needle in lateral decubitus position and advanced 5 cm cephalad. . Epidural analgesia was maintained using the patient-controlled analgesia technique containing 250 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine and 2 μg/mL fentanyl with setting of 5 mL/hr for continuous infusion and 0.5 mL of bolus dose. Lockout time was set to 15 min. General anesthesia was induced with 2 mg/kg of propofol and 50 mg of rocuronium. After tracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. All the patients were ventilated with controlled mode of 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight and respiratory rate was adjusted to maintain end-tidal carbon dioxide between 35-40 mmHg.

  • Drugno epidural drug administered

    Patients allocated to general anesthesia group and DID NOT receive epidural anesthesia. General anesthesia was induced with 2 mg/kg of propofol and 50 mg of rocuronium. After tracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. All the patients were ventilated with controlled mode of 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight and respiratory rate was adjusted to maintain end-tidal carbon dioxide between 35-40 mmHg.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of diaphragm movement using sonography (diaphragm inspiratory amplitude, diaphragm inspiratory and expiratory velocity)on postoperative day 1 and 2 from baseline (day before surgery)

    The measurements of diaphragmatic motion were attained at the posterior surface of the diaphragm. From the tracings on M-mode, the distance between echogenic lines (DIA) in cm and diaphragm inspiratory/expiratory velocity in cm.s-1 during quiet, deep, and sniff breathing were measured on the frozen images. Three consecutive sonographic examinations were performed, and the highest value of three measurements was recorded

    Time frame: on the day before surgery until postoperative day 2

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in pulmonary function test on postoperative day 1 and 2 from baseline (day before surgery)

    Spirometric measurements included vital capacity (VCIN), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC, peak expiratory flow rate (PEF), maximal midexpiratory flow rate (MMEF), tidal volume (VT), and expiratory residual volume (ERV)

    Time frame: on the day before surgery until postoperative day 2

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Severence Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
    Seoul, 120-752, Korea, Republic of
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 11, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01547416
Lead sponsor
Yonsei University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 7, 2012
Start date
Nov 2011
Primary completion
Mar 2012
Completion
May 2012
Last update
Jul 11, 2013

Study contacts

Young Jun Oh, M.D. Ph.D.
principal investigator · Severance Hospital, Yonsi University Health System

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion