CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01543503Updated Feb 10, 2016Results posted

An Global Comparative Observational Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

An observational study in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche. Completed at 154 sites in 16 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-10.

Sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,225
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective, multi-center, observational study will assess the efficacy and safety of treatment in patients who are treated with a TNF Inhibitor or RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) as the first biologic therapy. Data will be collected for 52 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 318 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,225 is above the median of 155 across 1,057 observational studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche is the lead sponsor of 2,061 studies on the registry; 85 are open to participants now.

Of its 319 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 239 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients, >/=18 years of age
  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
  • Non-respondent or intolerant to non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy
  • Patient has been prescribed a first biologic therapy up to 6 weeks prior to the inclusion visit, irrespective of the treatment prescribed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients whose first biologic therapy is given as part of a clinical trial studying rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment
  • Patients who are receiving or have received experimental DMARDs as part of a clinical trial studying RA treatment in the last 12 months
  • Patients whose first biologic is rituximab, abatacept or anakinra.
  • Patients who have received any biologic therapy for more than 6 weeks prior to the inclusion visit
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,225 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Cohort
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Week 24

    Disease activity score based on 28 joint counts (DAS28) is a composite measure of disease severity and it incorporates four specific measures of disease: swollen joint count (SJC) of 28 joints, tender joint count (TJC) of 28 joints, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity by visual analogue scale (VAS), and acute-phase inflammatory marker \[erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in millimeter/hour (mm/h), or C-reactive protein (CRP) in milligram/liter (mg/L)\]. For the purposes of this study, ESR was used whenever possible to calculate the DAS28 (DAS28-ESR). Higher the scores, greater is the disease activity. A DAS28 score of less than or equal to (\</=) 3.2 = low disease activity, a DAS28 score of \>3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Week 52

    Disease activity score based on 28 joint counts (DAS28) is a composite measure of disease severity and it incorporates four specific measures of disease: swollen joint count (SJC) of 28 joints, tender joint count (TJC) of 28 joints, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity by visual analogue scale (VAS), and acute-phase inflammatory marker (ESR in mm/h, or CRP in mg/L). For the purposes of this study, ESR was used whenever possible to calculate the DAS28 (DAS28-ESR). Higher the scores, greater is the disease activity. A DAS28 score of \</= 3.2 = low disease activity, a DAS28 score of \>3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate

    Blood samples were collected for ESR, which is an acute phase reactant and a measure of inflammation. BL = baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein

    Blood samples were collected for C-reactive protein (CRP). CRP is an inflammation marker. High levels of this protein indicate inflammation in diseases such as RA.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count

    A swollen joint count (SJC) is the most specific clinical method to quantify abnormalities in participants with RA. It reflects the amount of inflamed synovial tissue. Twenty-eight joints were assessed for swelling. Joints were classified as swollen (1)/ not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 28.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  5. Mean Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count

    A tender joint count (TJC) is the most specific clinical method to quantify abnormalities in participants with RA. It is associated with the level of pain. Twenty-eight joints were assessed for tenderness. Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 28.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index and Simplified Disease Activity Index Score

    Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was calculated as the sum of the following parameters: SJC + TJC + VAS Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity + VAS Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity. VAS assessments involved a 10-cm horizontal scale from 'no disease activity' to 'maximum disease activity'. CDAI scores ranged from 0 to 76, with higher scores indicating increased disease activity. Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) was calculated as the sum of the following parameters: SJC +TJC + Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity + Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity + CRP. SDAI scores ranged from 0 to 86, with higher scores also indicating increased disease activity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  7. Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Score

    The Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity was assessed using a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). Change from baseline = scores at observation minus score at baseline. An increase in score from baseline represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  8. Loss of Efficacy or Development of Intolerance to Biologic Therapy

    Events that are clearly consistent with the expected pattern of progression of the underlying disease may contribute to lack of efficacy. Lack of efficacy was one of the reasons for termination of biology therapy. The number of participants showing lack of efficacy to biologic therapy is presented.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  9. Proportion of Participants Who Terminated Biologic Treatment

    The proportion of participants who discontinued biologic treatment was compared between tocilizumab-treated and TNF inhibitor-treated participants.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  10. Reasons for Treatment Discontinuation

    The reasons for discontinuation of tocilizumab or TNF inhibitor is presented.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  11. Cumulative Number of Participants Who Discontinued Biologic Therapy at the End of Each Study Period

    The total number of participants who discontinued biologic therapy at the end of each study period (Week 0 - 24, Week 24 - 52, Week 52 - 57 and Week 57 - end of treatment) is presented. Participants who did not have a biologic therapy discontinuation or discontinued before having one, were considered as 'censored' at the date study termination.

    Time frame: Up to end of treatment

  12. Number of Participants of Infusion Reactions or Injection Site Reactions During the Study Following the Start of the First Biologic Therapy

    An infusion reaction was defined as an adverse event (AE) occurring during and within 24 hours after the infusion, which may include hypersensitivity reactions or anaphylactic reactions. Injection site reactions were included in the summaries for infusion reactions.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  13. Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Non-serious Adverse Events

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  14. Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events of Special Interest, Including Infections, During the Study

    Adverse events of special interest (AESI) for this study included: infections (including opportunistic infections), myocardial infarction/acute coronary syndrome, gastrointestinal perforation and related events, malignancies, anaphylaxis / hypersensitivity reactions, demyelinating disorders, stroke, bleeding events and hepatic events. Based on seriousness criteria, they were categorized as serious and non-serious adverse events of special interest.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  15. Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index Score

    The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0 to 3 (0=no difficulty and 3=inability to perform a task in that area). HAQ-DI total scores expressed as overall mean score with range 0-3: 0-0.25=normal functioning; 0.25-0.5=mild functional limitation; 0.5-1=moderate functional limitation; more than 1=significant functional limitation.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  16. Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Score

    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the participant's fatigue. The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  17. Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale Pain Score

    VAS is a 100 mm scale. Intensity of pain range: 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. Change from baseline =scores at observation minus score at baseline. An increase in score from baseline represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  18. Shift From Baseline in Morning Stiffness

    Shift tables presenting the number of participants in each bivariate category Week (W) 0 versus Week 24 and Week 52, with regards to morning stiffness at the different time points, was presented for each treatment arm. For participants who experienced joint stiffness while waking up in the morning, duration of morning stiffness was categorized as follows: Less than 30 minutes (min), Between 30 and 60 minutes, Between 60 and 120 minutes, Between 120 to 240 minutes, More than 240 minutes and the whole day. Baseline = BL

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

  19. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity

    The patient's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the participant. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52

07

Results

Posted Feb 10, 2016

Participant flow

This observational study was conducted at 158 sites in 16 countries from 9 February 2012 to 20 February 2015.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Started426798
Completed350711
Not completed7687
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up3236
Withdrew: Adverse event913
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy416
Withdrew: Participant withdrew informed consent810
Withdrew: Change of jobs01
Withdrew: Intolerance to the biologic treatment01
Withdrew: Probable overlap of ra with fibromyalgia10
Withdrew: Participant did not complete last visit02
Withdrew: Refused to continue treatment70
Withdrew: Incorrect medication received10
Withdrew: Participant moved to another city20
Withdrew: Participant will not return for visits02
Withdrew: Participant transferred to another city10
Withdrew: Participant moved to scotland10
Withdrew: Participant decision to stop treatment10
Withdrew: Investigator did not wish to participate11
Withdrew: Participant recruited after closing date01
Withdrew: Site stopped participation51
Withdrew: Participant did not attend a visit10
Withdrew: Moved to other rheumatologic site01
Withdrew: Participant consented to another study02
Withdrew: Participant went to united states10
Withdrew: Screen failure10

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Change From Baseline in Calculated Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Week 24

Disease activity score based on 28 joint counts (DAS28) is a composite measure of disease severity and it incorporates four specific measures of disease: swollen joint count (SJC) of 28 joints, tender joint count (TJC) of 28 joints, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity by visual analogue scale (VAS), and acute-phase inflammatory marker \[erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in millimeter/hour (mm/h), or C-reactive protein (CRP) in milligram/liter (mg/L)\]. For the purposes of this study, ESR was used whenever possible to calculate the DAS28 (DAS28-ESR). Higher the scores, greater is the disease activity. A DAS28 score of less than or equal to (\</=) 3.2 = low disease activity, a DAS28 score of \>3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Week 24
Units on a scaleTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Week 24-2.795 (-3.107 to -2.483)-1.945 (-2.249 to -1.640)
Statistical analysis
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -0.851 · 95% CI -1.112 to -0.589
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Week 52

Disease activity score based on 28 joint counts (DAS28) is a composite measure of disease severity and it incorporates four specific measures of disease: swollen joint count (SJC) of 28 joints, tender joint count (TJC) of 28 joints, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity by visual analogue scale (VAS), and acute-phase inflammatory marker (ESR in mm/h, or CRP in mg/L). For the purposes of this study, ESR was used whenever possible to calculate the DAS28 (DAS28-ESR). Higher the scores, greater is the disease activity. A DAS28 score of \</= 3.2 = low disease activity, a DAS28 score of \>3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Week 52
units on a scaleTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Week 52-3.015 (-3.279 to -2.751)-2.105 (-2.325 to -1.885)
Statistical analysis
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -0.910 · 95% CI -1.204 to -0.617
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate

Blood samples were collected for ESR, which is an acute phase reactant and a measure of inflammation. BL = baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mm/hr
Mean Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
mm/hrTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Change from BL to Week 24, n = 225, 456-22.732 (-24.717 to -20.747)-9.502 (-11.112 to -7.892)
Change from BL to Week 52, n = 215, 411-21.515 (-23.875 to -19.155)-8.868 (-10.865 to -6.870)
Statistical analysis
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -13.230 · 95% CI -15.513 to -10.947
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -12.648 · 95% CI -15.419 to -9.876
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein

Blood samples were collected for C-reactive protein (CRP). CRP is an inflammation marker. High levels of this protein indicate inflammation in diseases such as RA.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg/L
Mean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein
mg/LTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Change from BL to Week 24, n = 177, 396-11.005 (-14.131 to -7.880)-4.333 (-6.859 to -1.807)
Change from BL to Week 52, n = 173, 348-6.332 (-10.524 to -2.140)-5.216 (-8.711 to -1.722)
Statistical analysis
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -6.673 · 95% CI -10.271 to -3.074
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = 0.659 · Mean difference (net): -1.116 · 95% CI -6.074 to 3.842
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count

A swollen joint count (SJC) is the most specific clinical method to quantify abnormalities in participants with RA. It reflects the amount of inflamed synovial tissue. Twenty-eight joints were assessed for swelling. Joints were classified as swollen (1)/ not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 28.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Number of swollen joints
Mean Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count
Number of swollen jointsTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Change from BL to Week 24, n = 288, 554-5.698 (-6.124 to -5.273)-5.122 (-5.480 to -4.764)
Change from BL to Week 52, n = 258, 503-6.313 (-6.724 to -5.902)-5.561 (-5.909 to -5.213)
Statistical analysis
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = 0.024 · Mean difference (net): -0.576 · 95% CI -1.078 to -0.075
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = 0.002 · Mean difference (net): -0.752 · 95% CI -1.238 to -0.267
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count

A tender joint count (TJC) is the most specific clinical method to quantify abnormalities in participants with RA. It is associated with the level of pain. Twenty-eight joints were assessed for tenderness. Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 28.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Number of tender joints
Mean Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count
Number of tender jointsTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Change from BL to Week 24, n = 289, 554-7.922 (-8.593 to -7.251)-7.302 (-7.868 to -6.736)
Change from BL to Week 52, n = 259, 501-8.421 (-9.122 to -7.720)-7.205 (-7.799 to -6.610)
Statistical analysis
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = 0.123 · Mean difference (net): -0.620 · 95% CI -1.408 to 0.169
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = 0.004 · Mean difference (net): -1.216 · 95% CI -2.039 to -0.393
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index and Simplified Disease Activity Index Score

Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was calculated as the sum of the following parameters: SJC + TJC + VAS Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity + VAS Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity. VAS assessments involved a 10-cm horizontal scale from 'no disease activity' to 'maximum disease activity'. CDAI scores ranged from 0 to 76, with higher scores indicating increased disease activity. Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) was calculated as the sum of the following parameters: SJC +TJC + Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity + Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity + CRP. SDAI scores ranged from 0 to 86, with higher scores also indicating increased disease activity.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index and Simplified Disease Activity Index Score
units on a scaleTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
CDAI, Change from BL to Week 24, n = 176, 286-20.251 (-21.934 to -18.568)-16.776 (-18.280 to -15.271)
CDAI, Change from BL to Week 52, n = 162, 267-22.846 (-24.634 to -21.058)-18.246 (-19.823 to -16.669)
SDAI, Change from BL to Week 24, n = 93, 193-21.394 (-23.668 to -19.120)-18.164 (-20.051 to -16.278)
SDAI, Change from BL to Week 52, n = 91, 169-22.294 (-24.791 to -19.797)-19.048 (-21.128 to -16.969)
Statistical analysis
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -3.475 · 95% CI -5.481 to -1.469
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -4.600 · 95% CI -6.708 to -2.492
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = 0.014 · Mean difference (net): -3.229 · 95% CI -5.806 to -0.652
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = 0.027 · Mean difference (net): -3.245 · 95% CI -6.121 to -0.370
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Score

The Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity was assessed using a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). Change from baseline = scores at observation minus score at baseline. An increase in score from baseline represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Score
scores on a scaleTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Change from BL to Week 24, n = 183, 300-35.581 (-38.656 to -32.506)-26.551 (-29.293 to -23.809)
Change from BL to Week 52, n = 174, 287-37.359 (-40.631 to -34.087)-27.122 (-30.042 to -24.202)
Statistical analysis
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -9.030 · 95% CI -12.655 to -5.404
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -10.237 · 95% CI -14.130 to -6.345
SecondaryLoss of Efficacy or Development of Intolerance to Biologic Therapy

Events that are clearly consistent with the expected pattern of progression of the underlying disease may contribute to lack of efficacy. Lack of efficacy was one of the reasons for termination of biology therapy. The number of participants showing lack of efficacy to biologic therapy is presented.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Number · participants
Loss of Efficacy or Development of Intolerance to Biologic Therapy
participantsTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Loss of Efficacy or Development of Intolerance to Biologic Therapy15106
SecondaryProportion of Participants Who Terminated Biologic Treatment

The proportion of participants who discontinued biologic treatment was compared between tocilizumab-treated and TNF inhibitor-treated participants.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Proportion of Participants Who Terminated Biologic Treatment
Percentage of participantsTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Proportion of Participants Who Terminated Biologic Treatment14.927.4
SecondaryReasons for Treatment Discontinuation

The reasons for discontinuation of tocilizumab or TNF inhibitor is presented.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Number · participants
Reasons for Treatment Discontinuation
participantsTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Adverse event2487
Lack of efficacy15106
Other2423
SecondaryCumulative Number of Participants Who Discontinued Biologic Therapy at the End of Each Study Period

The total number of participants who discontinued biologic therapy at the end of each study period (Week 0 - 24, Week 24 - 52, Week 52 - 57 and Week 57 - end of treatment) is presented. Participants who did not have a biologic therapy discontinuation or discontinued before having one, were considered as 'censored' at the date study termination.

Time frame:
Up to end of treatment
Reported as:
Number · participants
Cumulative Number of Participants Who Discontinued Biologic Therapy at the End of Each Study Period
participantsTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Week 0 -2436119
Week 24 - 5261208
Week 52 - 5762212
Week 57 - End of treatment63216
Statistical analysis
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · Log Rank · p = <0.001
SecondaryNumber of Participants of Infusion Reactions or Injection Site Reactions During the Study Following the Start of the First Biologic Therapy

An infusion reaction was defined as an adverse event (AE) occurring during and within 24 hours after the infusion, which may include hypersensitivity reactions or anaphylactic reactions. Injection site reactions were included in the summaries for infusion reactions.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants of Infusion Reactions or Injection Site Reactions During the Study Following the Start of the First Biologic Therapy
participantsTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Participants with Non-Serious infusion reaction3375
Participants with Serious infusion reaction43
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Non-serious Adverse Events

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Non-serious Adverse Events
participantsTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Participants with AE208449
Participants with SAE2264
Participants with non-serious AE196421
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events of Special Interest, Including Infections, During the Study

Adverse events of special interest (AESI) for this study included: infections (including opportunistic infections), myocardial infarction/acute coronary syndrome, gastrointestinal perforation and related events, malignancies, anaphylaxis / hypersensitivity reactions, demyelinating disorders, stroke, bleeding events and hepatic events. Based on seriousness criteria, they were categorized as serious and non-serious adverse events of special interest.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events of Special Interest, Including Infections, During the Study
participantsTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Participants with Serious AESI1327
Participants with Non-Serious AESI2216
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index Score

The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0 to 3 (0=no difficulty and 3=inability to perform a task in that area). HAQ-DI total scores expressed as overall mean score with range 0-3: 0-0.25=normal functioning; 0.25-0.5=mild functional limitation; 0.5-1=moderate functional limitation; more than 1=significant functional limitation.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Scores on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index Score
Scores on a scaleTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Change from BL to Week 24, n = 169, 301-0.591 (-0.694 to -0.488)-0.445 (-0.538 to -0.352)
Change from BL to Week 52, n = 152, 255-0.593 (-0.710 to -0.476)-0.430 (-0.539 to -0.320)
Statistical analysis
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = 0.020 · Mean difference (net): -0.146 · 95% CI -0.269 to -0.024
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = 0.020 · Mean difference (net): -0.164 · 95% CI -0.301 to -0.026
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Score

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the participant's fatigue. The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Score
scores on a scaleTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Change from BL to Week 24, n = 64, 86-7.153 (-10.003 to -4.304)-3.260 (-6.279 to -0.242)
Change from BL to Week 52, n = 50, 77-4.566 (-7.822 to -1.310)-1.779 (-5.096 to 1.538)
Statistical analysis
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = 0.032 · Mean difference (net): -3.893 · 95% CI -7.457 to -0.329
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = 0.168 · Mean difference (net): -2.787 · 95% CI -6.763 to 1.189
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale Pain Score

VAS is a 100 mm scale. Intensity of pain range: 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. Change from baseline =scores at observation minus score at baseline. An increase in score from baseline represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale Pain Score
units on a scaleTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Change from BL to Week 24, n = 204, 378-29.308 (-32.922 to -25.694)-23.647 (-26.664 to -20.630)
Change from BL to Week 52, n = 183, 336-32.957 (-36.711 to -29.202)-23.155 (-26.386 to -19.923)
Statistical analysis
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = 0.009 · Mean difference (net): -5.661 · 95% CI -9.912 to -1.411
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -9.802 · 95% CI -14.245 to -5.360
SecondaryShift From Baseline in Morning Stiffness

Shift tables presenting the number of participants in each bivariate category Week (W) 0 versus Week 24 and Week 52, with regards to morning stiffness at the different time points, was presented for each treatment arm. For participants who experienced joint stiffness while waking up in the morning, duration of morning stiffness was categorized as follows: Less than 30 minutes (min), Between 30 and 60 minutes, Between 60 and 120 minutes, Between 120 to 240 minutes, More than 240 minutes and the whole day. Baseline = BL

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Reported as:
Number · participants
Shift From Baseline in Morning Stiffness
participantsTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
BL, < 30 min; W 24, < 30 min1319
BL, < 30 min; W 24, 30-60 min18
BL, < 30 min; W 24, 60-120 min21
BL, < 30 min; W 24, 120-240 min01
BL, < 30 min; W 24, > 240 min00
BL, < 30 min; W 24, the whole day10
BL, between 30-60 min; W 24 < 30 min1949
BL, between 30-60 min; W 24, 30-60 min930
BL, between 30-60 min; W 24, 60-120 min13
BL, between 30-60 min; W 24, 120-240 min01
BL, between 30-60 min; W 24, > 240 min00
BL, between 30-60 min; W 24, the whole day00
BL, between 60-120 min; W 24, < 30 min2234
BL, between 60-120 min; W 24, 30-60 min1722
BL, between 60-120 min; W 24, 60-120 min47
BL, between 60-120 min; W 24, 120-240 min00
BL, between 60-120 min; W 24, > 240 min00
BL, between 60-120 min; W 24, the whole day01
BL, between 120-240 min; W 24, < 30 min1210
BL, between 120-240 min; W 24, 30-60 min69
BL, between 120-240 min; W 24, 60-120 min28
BL, between 120-240 min; W 24, 120-240 min34
BL, between 120-240 min; W 24, > 240 min01
BL, between 120-240 min; W 24, the whole day00
BL, more than 240 min; W 24, < 30 min07
BL, more than 240 min; W 24, 30-60 min22
BL, more than 240 min; W 24, 60-120 min00
BL, more than 240 min; W 24, 120-240 min00
BL, more than 240 min; W 24, > 240 min01
BL, more than 240 min; W 24, the whole day00
BL, the whole day; W 24, < 30 min12
BL, the whole day; W 24, 30-60 min32
BL, the whole day; W 24, 60-120 min25
BL, the whole day; W 24, 120-240 min01
BL, the whole day; W 24, > 240 min00
BL, the whole day; W 24, the whole day11
BL, < 30 min; W 52, < 30 min613
BL, < 30 min; W 52, 30-60 min24
BL, < 30 min; W 52, 60-120 min00
BL, < 30 min; W 52, 120-240 min21
BL, < 30 min; W 52, > 240 min01
BL, < 30 min; W 52, the whole day00
BL, between 30-60 min; W 52, < 30 min1743
BL, between 30-60 min; W 52, 30-60 min919
BL, between 30-60 min; W 52, 60-120 min15
BL, between 30-60 min; W 52, 120-240 min01
BL, between 30-60 min; W 52, > 240 min00
BL, between 30-60 min; W 52, the whole day00
BL, between 60-120 min; W 52, < 30 min2033
BL, between 60-120 min; W 52, 30-60 min821
BL, between 60-120 min; W 52, 60-120 min44
BL, between 60-120 min; W 52, 120-240 min03
BL, between 60-120 min; W 52, > 240 min02
BL, between 60-120 min; W 52, the whole day10
BL, between 120-240 min; W 52, < 30 min149
BL, between 120-240 min; W 52, 30-60 min66
BL, between 120-240 min; W 52, 60-120 min58
BL, between 120-240 min; W 52, 120-240 min13
BL, between 120-240 min; W 52, > 240 min01
BL, between 120-240 min; W 52, the whole day01
BL, more than 240 min; W 52, < 30 min05
BL, more than 240 min; W 52, 30-60 min24
BL, more than 240 min; W 52, 60-120 min00
BL, more than 240 min; W 52, 120-240 min10
BL, more than 240 min; W 52, > 240 min00
BL, more than 240 min; W 52, the whole day01
BL, the whole day; W 52, < 30 min23
BL, the whole day; W 52, 30-60 min12
BL, the whole day; W 52, 60-120 min22
BL, the whole day; W 52, 120-240 min01
BL, the whole day; W 52, > 240 min00
BL, the whole day; W 52, the whole day00
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity

The patient's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the participant. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity
scores on a scaleTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Change from BL to Week 24, n = 225, 423-29.633 (-32.994 to -26.273)-24.525 (-27.388 to -21.662)
Change from BL to Week 52, n = 206, 378-31.919 (-35.630 to -28.209)-24.153 (-27.385 to -20.921)
Statistical analysis
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = 0.010 · Mean difference (net): -5.108 · 95% CI -9.017 to -1.200
  • Tocilizumab vs TNF Inhibitor · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -7.767 · 95% CI -12.161 to -3.372

Adverse events

Collected over Up to Week 52. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Tocilizumab—22/423 (5.2%)132/423 (31.2%)
TNF Inhibitor—64/793 (8.1%)231/793 (29.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 81
Most frequent serious events
EventTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
Lower respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/4236/793
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/4236/793
PregnancyPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions2/4231/793
Chest painGeneral disorders0/4233/793
SepsisInfections and infestations0/4233/793
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/4233/793
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders0/4233/793
Acute coronary syndromeCardiac disorders0/4232/793
Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/4232/793
HypersensitivityImmune system disorders0/4232/793
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 25
Most frequent other events
EventTocilizumabTNF Inhibitor
LOWER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONInfections and infestations15/42335/793
URINARY TRACT INFECTIONInfections and infestations15/42326/793
NEUTROPENIABlood and lymphatic system disorders14/4233/793
NASOPHARYNGITISInfections and infestations13/42318/793
HEADACHENervous system disorders7/42323/793
RASHSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders9/42323/793
INJECTION SITE REACTIONGeneral disorders1/42322/793
BRONCHITISInfections and infestations11/42313/793
TRANSAMINASES INCREASEDInvestigations10/4234/793
HYPERTRIGLYCERIDAEMIAMetabolism and nutrition disorders10/4237/793

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics were described for the safety population. All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of a TNF inhibitor or tocilizumab during the study were included in the safety population.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)TocilizumabTNF InhibitorTotal
Mean54.26 ± 12.7555.16 ± 13.0554.85 ± 12.95
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TocilizumabTNF InhibitorTotal
Female351615966
Male72178250
08

Study locations

154 sites
  • Catamarca Capital, 4700, Argentina
  • Mendoza, 5500, Argentina
  • Mendoza, 5501, Argentina
  • Rosario, S2000PBJ, Argentina
  • Aalst, 9300, Belgium
  • Assebroek, 8310, Belgium
  • AYE, 6900, Belgium
  • Bruxelles, 1000, Belgium
  • Bruxelles, 1050, Belgium
  • Edegem, 2650, Belgium
  • Genk, 3600, Belgium
  • Gent, 9000, Belgium
  • Godinne, 5530, Belgium
  • Heusy, 4802, Belgium
  • Liège, 4000, Belgium
  • Oostende, 8400, Belgium
  • Verviers, 4800, Belgium
  • Westmalle, 2390, Belgium
  • Barranquilla, Colombia
  • Bogota, Colombia
  • Bucaramanga, Colombia
  • Medellin, Colombia
  • Cuenca, Ecuador
  • Esmeraldas, EC080150, Ecuador
  • Guayaquil, EC090114, Ecuador
  • Portoviejo, Ecuador
  • Quito, 005932, Ecuador
  • Quito, EC170135, Ecuador
  • Quito, EC170412, Ecuador
  • Aachen, 52064, Germany
  • Bad Aibling, 83043, Germany
  • Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler, 53474, Germany
  • Bayreuth, 95445, Germany
  • Berlin, 13055, Germany
  • Dresden, 01109, Germany
  • Erfurt, 99096, Germany
  • Erlangen, 91056, Germany
  • Fulda, 36043, Germany
  • Hamburg, 22147, Germany
  • Hamburg, 22767, Germany
  • Heidelberg, 69121, Germany
  • Herne, 44652, Germany
  • Köln, 50937, Germany
  • Ludwigsfelde, 14974, Germany
  • München, 80639, Germany
  • München, 81541, Germany
  • Passau, 94032, Germany
  • Rostock, 18059, Germany
  • Stuttgart, 70178, Germany
  • Traunstein, 83278, Germany
  • Wuppertal, 42105, Germany
  • Athens, 11527, Greece
  • Athens, 155 62, Greece
  • Patra, 26335, Greece
  • Thessaloniki, 544 65, Greece
  • Thessaloniki, 56429, Greece
  • Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala
  • Coppito, Abruzzo 67100, Italy
  • Pescara, Abruzzo 65100, Italy
  • Reggio Calabria, Calabria 89133, Italy
  • Avellino, Campania 83100, Italy
  • Napoli, Campania 80131, Italy
  • Napoli, Campania 80144, Italy
  • Salerno, Campania 84131, Italy
  • Udine, Friuli-Venezia Giulia 33100, Italy
  • Roma, Lazio 00133, Italy
  • Roma, Lazio 00189, Italy
  • Arenzano, Liguria 16011, Italy
  • Brescia, Lombardia 25123, Italy
  • Legnano, Lombardia 20025, Italy
  • Milano, Lombardia 20157, Italy
  • Milano, Lombardia 20162, Italy
  • Jesi Ancona, Marche 60035, Italy
  • Agnone, Molise 86081, Italy
  • Torino, Piemonte 10126, Italy
  • Torino, Piemonte 10128, Italy
  • Brindisi, Puglia 72100, Italy
  • Martina Franca, Puglia 74015, Italy
  • San Cesario Di Lecce, Puglia 73016, Italy
  • Catania, Sicilia 95124, Italy
  • Prato, Toscana 59100, Italy
  • Perugia, Umbria 06122, Italy
  • Guadalajara, 44600, Mexico
  • Guadalajara, 44650, Mexico
  • Guadalajara, 45040, Mexico
  • Mexicali, 21100, Mexico
  • Mexico Ctiy, 07760, Mexico
  • Panama City, 32400, Panama
  • Almada, 2801-951, Portugal
  • Amadora, 2720-276, Portugal
  • Lisboa, 1069-166, Portugal
  • Lisboa, 1649-035, Portugal
  • Porto, 4099-001, Portugal
  • Porto, 4200-319, Portugal
  • Vila Nova de Gaia, 4400-129, Portugal
  • Fuenlabrada, Madrid 28942, Spain
  • San Sebastian de los Reyes, Madrid 28702, Spain
  • Madrid, 28006, Spain
  • Madrid, 28007, Spain
  • Madrid, 28905, Spain

Showing the first 100 of 154 sites across 16 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Choy EH, Bernasconi C, Aassi M, Molina JF, Epis OM. Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis With Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor or Tocilizumab Therapy as First Biologic Agent in a Global Comparative Observational Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Oct;69(10):1484-1494. doi: 10.1002/acr.23303. Epub 2017 Sep 6. PubMed 28622454 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01543503
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 5, 2012
Start date
Feb 2012
Primary completion
Feb 2015
Completion
Feb 2015
Results posted
Feb 10, 2016
Last update
Feb 10, 2016

Study contacts

Clinical Trials
study director · Hoffmann-La Roche
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion