ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01543490ISV-305Updated Nov 19, 2021Results posted

Comparative Study to Evaluate ISV-305 Compared to Vehicle in Blepharitis Subjects

A Phase 3 interventional study of ISV-305 and Vehicle in Active, Symptomatic Blepharitis, sponsored by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 1 Year and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-19.

Sponsored by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
558
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Year and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 2,858 studies in Motor Activity with a site in United States — 423 open to participants now, 564 under way, 9 of them phase 3. Motor Activity · United States.

Enrollment
140th of 2,605
558 · median 55
Started
2018
with 169 others
Phase 3
58 of 2,858
5 open now
Registered
630th of 2,858
by date

Among the 2,858 studies in Motor Activity with a site in United States, this one is the 140th largest by enrollment of the 2,605 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 170 that started in 2018, is one of 58 in phase 3, and was the 630th registered.

Motor Activity

9,798 studies on the registry are indexed under Motor Activity; 1,910 are open to participants now.

Browse Motor Activity studies →

Open to participants now

423 of the 2,858 studies in Motor Activity with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

418 more — sign in →

All 423 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 1,201 Motor Activity studies recruiting now, 517 (43%) set no upper age limit and 535 (45%) stop at 75 or younger; 180 take children under 18; 420 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 1 Year and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 2,858 studies in Motor Activity with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ISV-305 (Dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2) compared to Vehicle in the treatment of subjects with active, symptomatic Blepharitis.

03

Conditions studied

  • Active, Symptomatic Blepharitis

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Are at least 1 years of age and have a clinical diagnosis of active, symptomatic blepharitis
  • Signature of the subject or parent(s) or legally authorized representative on the Form, and when appropriate the minor's assent in accordance with local regulations
  • Are willing and able to follow all instructions and attend all study visits (this applies to parent or caregiver for subjects too young to self-apply product)
  • Are willing to avoid disallowed medication for the duration of the study
  • If female is of , agree to and submit a urine sample for pregnancy testing (prior to enrollment and at the end of the study) and use effective for the duration of the study
  • Male subjects whose female partners are not must agree to one of the following: 1) completely abstain from sexual intercourse, 2) use a barrier method (condoms) with spermicide during sexual intercourse for the duration of the study, 3) provide documentation for having had a vasectomy (with documented infertility)
  • Additional inclusion criteria also apply

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have known sensitivity or poor tolerance to any component of the study drugs
  • Have had eyelid surgery in the study eye within twelve (12) months prior to Visit 1 or plan to have eyelid surgery during the study
  • Have an acute ocular infection (bacterial, viral or fungal) or active ocular inflammation other than blepharitis in the study eye
  • Have used topical medications on the eyelids or topical ophthalmic medications or systemic use of a corticosteroid mediation within 14 days prior to dosing and/or plan to use them throughout the duration of the study
  • Be currently pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy; or be a woman who has a positive urine pregnancy test
  • Have prior (within 30 days prior to dosing) or anticipated concurrent use of an drug or device
  • Have a condition or a situation which, in the investigator's opinion, may put the subject at increased risk, confound study data, or interfere significantly with the subject's study participation
  • Additional exclusion criteria also apply
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
558 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ISV-305

    0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2

    Drug: ISV-305

  • Placebo comparator
    Vehicle

    DuraSite® 2 vehicle

    Other: Vehicle

Interventions

  • Dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2 twice daily for 2 weeks

  • OtherVehicle

    Vehicle twice daily for 2 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants in the ITT Population With a Reduction in the Day 1 (Baseline) Total Clinical Signs and Symptom Score by at Least 2 Units at Day 15 With No Worsening of Any Sign or Symptom

    The clinical signs of blepharitis (eyelid swelling, eyelid redness, eyelid debris) were evaluated at every visit and scored by the investigator using a 0 to 3 grading scale (in general 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The symptom of eyelid irritation was also evaluated at every visit and graded by the participant using a 0 to 3 grading scale (0 = almost none of the time - ≤ 25% of the time, 1 = occasionally - 26-50% of the time, 2 = frequently - 51-75% of the time, 3 = almost all of the time - ≥ 76% of the time). For each visit, the total clinical signs and symptom score was obtained by adding each of the individual scores for each domain (eyelid swelling, eyelid redness, eyelid debris, and eyelid irritation). Participants with a decrease in total clinical signs and symptom score at Day 15 by at least 2 units from Day 1 (baseline) with no increase in any sign and symptom were defined as Responders, and those not meeting these criteria were defined as Non-responders.

    Time frame: Day 15

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Eyelid Irritation (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF]) on Day 15 in ITT Population

    Complete resolution of eyelid irritation, which was defined as eyelid irritation with grading of 0, at Day 15 was analyzed. The symptoms of eyelid irritation were graded by the participant using a 0 to 3 grading scale, where 0 = almost none of the time - ≤ 25% of the time, 1 = occasionally - 26-50% of the time, 2 = frequently - 51-75% of the time, 3 = almost all of the time - ≥ 76% of the time.

    Time frame: Day 15

07

Results

Posted Mar 23, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneISV-305Vehicle
Started368190
Completed352185
Not completed165
Withdrew: Adverse event40
Withdrew: Physician decision10
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy33
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up50
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject20
Withdrew: Other-various administrative reasons12

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants in the ITT Population With a Reduction in the Day 1 (Baseline) Total Clinical Signs and Symptom Score by at Least 2 Units at Day 15 With No Worsening of Any Sign or Symptom

The clinical signs of blepharitis (eyelid swelling, eyelid redness, eyelid debris) were evaluated at every visit and scored by the investigator using a 0 to 3 grading scale (in general 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The symptom of eyelid irritation was also evaluated at every visit and graded by the participant using a 0 to 3 grading scale (0 = almost none of the time - ≤ 25% of the time, 1 = occasionally - 26-50% of the time, 2 = frequently - 51-75% of the time, 3 = almost all of the time - ≥ 76% of the time). For each visit, the total clinical signs and symptom score was obtained by adding each of the individual scores for each domain (eyelid swelling, eyelid redness, eyelid debris, and eyelid irritation). Participants with a decrease in total clinical signs and symptom score at Day 15 by at least 2 units from Day 1 (baseline) with no increase in any sign and symptom were defined as Responders, and those not meeting these criteria were defined as Non-responders.

Time frame:
Day 15
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants in the ITT Population With a Reduction in the Day 1 (Baseline) Total Clinical Signs and Symptom Score by at Least 2 Units at Day 15 With No Worsening of Any Sign or Symptom
ParticipantsISV-305Vehicle
Responders276129
Non-responders7756
Statistical analysis
  • ISV-305 vs Vehicle · Fisher Exact · p = 0.0354 (The p-value was from a 2-sided Fisher's exact test.) · Risk difference (rd): 8.5 · 95% CI 0.2 to 16.6The risk difference was obtained by taking the difference in proportions (ISV-305 minus Vehicle). A 2-sided exact unconditional 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Complete Resolution of Eyelid Irritation (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF]) on Day 15 in ITT Population

Complete resolution of eyelid irritation, which was defined as eyelid irritation with grading of 0, at Day 15 was analyzed. The symptoms of eyelid irritation were graded by the participant using a 0 to 3 grading scale, where 0 = almost none of the time - ≤ 25% of the time, 1 = occasionally - 26-50% of the time, 2 = frequently - 51-75% of the time, 3 = almost all of the time - ≥ 76% of the time.

Time frame:
Day 15
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Eyelid Irritation (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF]) on Day 15 in ITT Population
ParticipantsISV-305Vehicle
With Complete Resolution12752
Without Complete Resolution241138
Statistical analysis
  • ISV-305 vs Vehicle · Fisher Exact · p = 0.1036 (The p-value was from a 2-sided Fisher's exact test.) · Risk difference (rd): 7.1 · 95% CI -1.3 to 15.0The risk difference was obtained by taking the difference in proportions (ISV-305 minus Vehicle). A 2-sided exact unconditional 95% CI was calculated.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator, observed up to 41 days.. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
ISV-3050/367 (0%)4/367 (1.1%)7/367 (1.9%)
Vehicle0/188 (0%)0/188 (0%)5/188 (2.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventISV-305Vehicle
SyncopeNervous system disorders1/3670/188
Transient global amnesiaNervous system disorders1/3670/188
Retinal detachmentEye disorders1/3670/188
CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders1/3670/188
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders1/3670/188
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventISV-305Vehicle
Conjunctival hyperaemiaEye disorders7/3675/188

Baseline characteristics

Demographics were summarized for the Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population, which included all randomized participants regardless of whether post-baseline measures were collected or study treatment was received.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)ISV-305VehicleTotal
< 17 years000
17 to < 65 years14666212
≥ 65 years222124346
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ISV-305VehicleTotal
Female209107316
Male15983242
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)ISV-305VehicleTotal
African American or Black20222
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian639
White334184518
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander202
Mixed101
Other516
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)ISV-305VehicleTotal
United States368190558
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinical Research Center
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Feb 2020, 22 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2021, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

Of 33 phase 3 interventional studies under Motor Activity, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 47. This study's 22 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 28, 2012
First posted
Mar 5, 2012
StartActual
Mar 30, 2018
Primary completionActual
Feb 4, 2020
CompletionActual
Feb 4, 2020
Results first posted
Mar 23, 2021
Last update
Nov 19, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 19, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01543490
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 5, 2012
Start date
Mar 30, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 4, 2020
Completion
Feb 4, 2020
Results posted
Mar 23, 2021
Last update
Nov 19, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Dexamethasone

Start the discussion