CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01542125Updated Jul 12, 2016Results posted

The Effect of Liposomal Lidocaine on Perceived Pain in Children During Percutaneous Interosseous Pin Removal in the Outpatient Setting

A Phase 4 interventional study of Liposomal Lidocaine and Placebo in Pain, sponsored by University of Alberta. Completed. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 16 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-07-12.

Sponsored by University of Alberta · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
281
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 16 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The removal of smooth, percutaneous pins (Perc Pins), which are used for fracture fixation, occurs once adequate bone healing has taken place. At the Stollery Children's Hospital (SCH), this frequently performed procedure is currently done without anesthetic, making it a painful and uncomfortable experience for the child and their caregiver(s). Liposomal Lidocaine is a relatively new effective and "needle-free" topical anesthetic. The investigators were interested in examining its effectiveness in pain reduction in children undergoing Perc Pin removal. Objective: To determine if Liposomal Lidocaine is effective in reducing pain in a pediatric population undergoing Perc Pin removal compared to a placebo. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that Liposomal Lidocaine would significantly reduce pain during Perc Pin removal compared to a placebo. Research Design: This was a triple-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial with 281 patients (140 patients each in the Maxilene and 141 in the Placebo groups). Pain measurements, using the Oucher Scale (children) and a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (parents and caregivers) were collected prior to randomization and immediately after Perc Pin removal. Data was analyzed using a Student's t-test and the Wilcoxon signed ranks test.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain

Keywords

  • Patients aged 3 to 16 years presenting for
  • removal of smooth percutaneous interosseus pins
  • after orthopeadic surgery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Alberta is the lead sponsor of 800 studies on the registry; 168 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 16 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Children between 3 and 16 years of age (i.e. up to but not including the 17th birthday) who present to the Pediatric Plaster Room at the SCH for Perc Pin removal were eligible for inclusion in this study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient with Perc Pins that are threaded (not smooth), as these pins require a more difficult removal process, oftentimes in the operating room instead of the orthopedic clinic.
  • Infection around the Perc Pins: This is considered a relative contraindication to the use of topical anesthetic as it is usually less effective in this situation.
  • Any parents/patients unable to exhibit understanding of the Oucher/VAS -- due to language barriers or developmental delay in the patient (e.g. severe cerebral palsy).
  • The presence of an open wound in the vicinity of the pins that could not be excluded from the area to which the topical anesthetic cream is to be applied.
  • Present use of analgesic or anxiolytic medications (within 24 hours prior to pin removal)
  • Known allergies or adverse reactions to Maxilene
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
281 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Liposomal Lidocaine group

    Patients in this groups received 4% Liposomal Lidocaine that was applied to the area immediately surrounding the pin site(s) and was covered with an opaque Tegaderm dressing

    Drug: Liposomal Lidocaine

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Group

    This group received a placebo that was applied to the area immediately surrounding the pin site(s) and was covered with an opaque Tegaderm dressing.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugLiposomal Lidocaine

    4% Liposomal Lidocaine

    Also known as: Maxilene

  • DrugPlacebo

    Tubes were visually identical to the Liposomal Lidocaine tubes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain

    A horizontal 100 mm anchored Visual Analogue Scale (0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain) was used by the adult caregiver and the orthopedic technician to document the pain associated with Perc Pin removal for participant children. The Oucher Scale was used to assess pain intensity in participant children and included two separate scales. 6 photographs were assigned scores of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 (in increasing increments of pain), such that these would be the scores averaged for participants unable to count by number. Children able to count to 100 by ones or tens and who could identify the larger of 2 numbers used the second scale; a vertical numeric one (0-100) that was printed next to the faces.

    Time frame: Before the application of Liposomal Lidocaine and immediately after Pin Perc removal, approximately 30 minutes

07

Results

Posted May 23, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLiposomal Lidocaine GroupPlacebo Group
Started140141
Completed140141
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPain

A horizontal 100 mm anchored Visual Analogue Scale (0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain) was used by the adult caregiver and the orthopedic technician to document the pain associated with Perc Pin removal for participant children. The Oucher Scale was used to assess pain intensity in participant children and included two separate scales. 6 photographs were assigned scores of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 (in increasing increments of pain), such that these would be the scores averaged for participants unable to count by number. Children able to count to 100 by ones or tens and who could identify the larger of 2 numbers used the second scale; a vertical numeric one (0-100) that was printed next to the faces.

Time frame:
Before the application of Liposomal Lidocaine and immediately after Pin Perc removal, approximately 30 minutes
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain
units on a scaleLiposomal Lidocaine GroupPlacebo Group
Pre-Pin Removal - Children, Oucher - Mean in mm0.70 ± 1.360.88 ± 1.9
Pre-Pin Removal - Parent, VAS - Mean in mm1.04 ± 1.630.87 ± 1.46
Pre-Pin Removal - Orthopedic Tec, VAS - Mean in mm0.27 ± 0.620.38 ± 0.92
Post-Pin Removal - Children, Oucher - Mean in mm3.03 ± 2.692.93 ± 2.94
Post-Pin Removal - Parent, VAS - Mean in mm3 ± 2.523.1 ± 2.60
Pos-Pin Removal - Orthopedic Tec, VAS - Mean in mm2.09 ± 1.932.06 ± 2.04

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Liposomal Lidocaine Group—0/140 (0%)0/140 (0%)
Placebo Group—0/141 (0%)0/141 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Liposomal Lidocaine GroupPlacebo GroupTotal
Mean7.89 ± 3.717.74 ± 3.747.81 ± 3.71
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Liposomal Lidocaine GroupPlacebo GroupTotal
Female6063123
Male8078158
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 12, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01542125
Lead sponsor
University of Alberta
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 2, 2012
Start date
Sep 2008
Primary completion
Feb 2011
Completion
Feb 2011
Results posted
May 23, 2016
Last update
Jul 12, 2016

Study contacts

Sukhdeep Dulai, FRCSC
principal investigator · University of Alberta

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion