An interventional study of Photodynamic therapy with light dose of 70 J/cm2 using a broad-band red light source and Photodynamic therapy with 100J/cm2 light dose using a broad-band red light source in Actinic Keratosis, sponsored by Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. Completed at 1 site in Lithuania. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-09-04.
Sponsored by Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Aim of the study: To evaluate clinical effectiveness of two different light doses when treating actinic keratoses with photodynamic therapy with 20% 5-aminolevulinic acid.
To determine and compare clinical and histological effectiveness of different (70 J/cm2 ir 100 J/cm2) light doses when treating actinic keratoses with photodynamic therapy.
To determine pain intensity during photodynamic therapy with visual analogue scale and factors influencing pain during the procedure.
369 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratosis, Actinic; 30 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 38 is below the median of 60 across 318 interventional studies indexed under Keratosis, Actinic.
Browse Keratosis, Actinic studies →Lithuanian University of Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with actinic keratosis (AK) on the left and right sides of face/scalp region treated with photodynamic therapy using 20% 5-aminolevulinic acid.
Device: Photodynamic therapy with light dose of 70 J/cm2 using a broad-band red light source
Patients with actinic keratosis (AK) on the left and right sides of the face/scalp region treated with photodynamic therapy using 20% 5-aminolevulinic acid.
Procedure: Photodynamic therapy with 100J/cm2 light dose using a broad-band red light source
Patients take part in intraindividual (left-right) comparison study when having at least 2 non-hyperkeratotic actinic keratoses (AK) on the left and right sides of the face/scalp. Punch biopsies in 3.5 millimetres diameter performed to confirm the diagnosis of AK. Patients randomized so that half of them would receive a light dose of 70J/cm2 as their first split face/scalp treatment on the left side. Photodynamic therapy with the light dose of 70 J/cm2 using a broad-band red light source (570-670 nm,Curelight®, PhotoCure, Oslo, Norway) and 20% 5-ALA. Treatment repeated twice with two weeks interval.
Patients take part in intraindividual (left-right) comparison study when having at least 2 non-hyperkeratotic actinic keratoses (AK) on the left and right sides of the face/scalp. Punch biopsies in 3.5 millimetres diameter performed to confirm the diagnosis of AK. Patients randomized so that half of them would receive a light dose of 100J/cm2 as their first split face/scalp treatment on the left side. Photodynamic therapy with the light dose of 70 J/cm2 using a broad-band red light source (570-670 nm,Curelight®, PhotoCure, Oslo, Norway) and 20% 5-ALA.Treatment repeated twice with two weeks interval.
Clinically cleared actinic keratosis with histological evaluation when clinically suspicious for relapse
All treated actinic keratoses evaluated by two investigators for clinical/histological relapse at months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 after treatment
Time frame: 3 months
Pain during the treatment
Patients inform a present investigator about pain severity at the beginning, in the middle, at the end of the session and move a counter of visual analogue scale.
Time frame: 2 years
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences →