CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01536496Updated Jan 8, 2019Results posted

Comparison of Rapid Thrombelastography and Conventional Coagulation Testing for Haemostatic Resuscitation in Trauma

An interventional study of Blood product transfusion based on conventional coagulation tests. and Blood product transfusion based on rapid thrombelastography (r-TEG) results. in Acute Coagulopathy, sponsored by Denver Health and Hospital Authority. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-08.

Sponsored by Denver Health and Hospital Authority · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
114
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare rapid thrombelastography (r-TEG) with conventional coagulation testing for diagnosing and treating coagulation abnormalities in severely injured patients who are likely to require transfusion therapy.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized study comparing rapid thrombelastography (r-TEG) with conventional coagulation testing for diagnosing post-injury coagulopathy and guiding haemostatic resuscitation strategy in severely injured patients arriving at the trauma center who are likely to require transfusion therapy.

Our global hypothesis is that:

  1. r-TEG is an effective tool for early identification of specific coagulation abnormalities via real time analysis, providing rapid results at the point of care (POC),
  2. r-TEG can be used to guide resuscitation strategy by permitting transfusion based upon individual patient deficits,
  3. r-TEG will result in appropriate transfusion of plasma, cryoprecipitate, and platelets in the individual trauma patient,
  4. r-TEG will result in reduced transfusion requirements in patients with post-injury coagulopathy.

Our specific study aims are:

  1. To compare r-TEG parameters [TEG-ACT, alpha angle, K value, MA (maximum amplitude), G value (clot strength), and fibrinolysis (EPL=estimated percent lysis)] with conventional coagulation testing [aPTT, INR, platelet count, fibrinogen level, D-dimer] in their ability to diagnose and monitor coagulation abnormalities in the trauma patient specifically.
  2. To compare blood product administration (packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate and apheresis platelets) in the first 24 hours post-injury when transfusion is guided by r-TEG versus conventional coagulation tests.
  3. To determine whether normalization of r-TEG values predicts cessation of coagulopathic bleeding better than normalization of conventional clinical coagulation tests based upon clinical impressions of the treating surgeons and review of operative records and outcome.
  4. To determine and compare patterns of transfusion ratios of packed red blood cells: fresh frozen plasma: platelets for resuscitation of patients with post-injury coagulopathy in the r-TEG versus conventional coagulation test guided groups for the first 24 hours post-injury.
  5. To determine and compare the timeframes of blood product administration throughout the first 24 hours post-injury when transfusion is guided by r-TEG versus conventional coagulation testing.
  6. To compare the incidence of hemorrhage-related deaths as: very early mortality (\<2 hours post-injury), early (2\<6 hours post-injury) and delayed (6-24 post-injury) based upon review of death/autopsy records for date, time and cause of death in patients whose resuscitation is guided by r-TEG versus conventional coagulation testing.
  7. To compare a) the incidence of transfusion associated lung injury (TRALI), transfusion associated circulatory overload (TACO), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and multiple organ failure (MOF); b) the length of stay in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) and the number of ventilator free days in the SICU; and c) late mortality (>24 hour to Day 30), including day number and cause of death, in patients whose resuscitation is guided by r-TEG versus conventional coagulation testing.
02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Coagulopathy

Keywords

  • trauma
  • hemorrhagic shock
  • thrombelastography
  • coagulopathy
  • transfusion
  • resuscitation
03

In context

Hemostatic Disorders

502 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemostatic Disorders; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 114 is above the median of 52 across 252 interventional studies indexed under Hemostatic Disorders.

Browse Hemostatic Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Denver Health and Hospital Authority is the lead sponsor of 84 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (89%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female, age >18 years admitted to Denver Health Medical Center.
  2. Blunt or penetrating trauma sustained \< 6 hours before admission, with Injury Severity Score > 15 (ISS>15), likely to require transfusion of RBC within 6 hours from admission as indicated by clinical assessment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age \< 18 years.
  2. Documented chronic liver disease (total bilirubin >2.0 mg/dL). Advanced cirrhosis discovered on laparotomy will be a criterion for study withdrawal and exclusion of conventional coagulation or r-TEG/TEG data from the analysis).
  3. Known inherited defects of coagulation function (e.g. hemophilia, Von Willebrand's disease).
  4. Prisoner.
  5. Pregnancy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
114 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control (INR, PTT, fibrinogen, D-dimer)

    Patients randomized to the Control Group will receive blood component therapy guided by conventional coagulation tests per usual clinical practice. The control arm involves the use of conventional coagulation tests (aPTT, INR, fibrinogen level, D-dimer) to diagnose and describe post-injury coagulopathy and to guide blood product replacement. In the Control Group, blood will be drawn for conventional coagulation testing (aPTT, INR, platelet count, fibrinogen level, D-dimer) at Baseline (as defined above), then twice more during the first six hours at the discretion of the treating team, then again at 12 hours and at 24 hours post-injury. The current institutional massive transfusion protocol will be followed. Only the results pertinent to the group to which randomized will be released to the treating team, unless otherwise requested.

    Biological: Blood product transfusion based on conventional coagulation tests.

  • Active comparator
    Test (r-TEG)

    Patients randomized to the r-TEG guided haemostatic resuscitation group (Test Group) will receive blood component therapy per usual clinical practice. The test arm involves the use of rapid-TEG to diagnose and describe post-injury coagulopathy and to guide blood product replacement per institutional algorithm. In the Test Group, blood for r-TEG will be collected on admission, or upon entering the operating room, depending on the acuity of the injury (Baseline), and this will be followed by two additional r-TEG analyses during the first six hours at the discretion of the treating team (attending surgeon, anesthesiologist) and then two further r-TEG analyses at 12 hours and at 24 hours post-injury respectively. The current institutional massive transfusion protocol will be followed. Only the results pertinent to the group to which randomized will be released to the treating team, unless otherwise requested.

    Biological: Blood product transfusion based on rapid thrombelastography (r-TEG) results.

Interventions

  • BiologicalBlood product transfusion based on conventional coagulation tests.

    Transfusion of blood products.

  • BiologicalBlood product transfusion based on rapid thrombelastography (r-TEG) results.

    Transfusion of blood products.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 28 Day In-hospital Mortality

    Time frame: 28 days in hospital

Secondary outcomes

  1. Deaths Specified as Early Mortality (<6 Hours Post-injury) and Delayed Mortality (6-24 Hours Post-injury).

    Time frame: Within 24 hours post-injury.

  2. Deaths Related to Coagulopathic Bleeding Based Upon Clinical Impressions of the Treating Surgeons and Review of Operative Records and Outcome (Hours Since Injury).

    Time frame: Up to 28 days post-injury.

  3. Time to Death From Injury in Hours.

    Time frame: From time of injury to 28th day of hospitalization.

  4. Change in INR Test Results.

    A high International Normalized Ratio (INR) indicates a higher risk of bleeding, while a low INR suggests a higher risk of developing a clot.

    Time frame: Within first 6 hours post-injury, 12 and 24 hours post-injury.

  5. Change in Fibrinogen Test Results.

    Time frame: Within first 6 hours post-injury, 12 and 24 hours post-injury.

  6. Change in Platelet Count Test Results.

    Time frame: Within first 6 hours post-injury, 12 and 24 hours post-injury.

  7. Change in D-dimer Test Results.

    Time frame: Within first 6 hours post-injury, 12 and 24 hours post-injury.

  8. Change in r-TEG ACT (Activated Clotting Time) Test Results.

    Time frame: Within first 6 hours post-injury, 12 and 24 hours post-injury.

  9. Change in r-TEG Angle Test Results.

    Time frame: Within first 6 hours post-injury, 12 and 24 hours post-injury.

  10. Change in r-TEG Maximal Amplitude (MA) Test Results.

    Time frame: Within first 6 hours post-injury, 12 and 24 hours post-injury.

  11. Change in r-TEG LY30 Test Results.

    Time frame: Within first 6 hours post-injury, 12 and 24 hours post-injury.

  12. Composition and Quantity of Blood Products Transfused at 24 Hours Post-injury

    Amount of blood product (red blood cells, plasma, cryoprecipitate and platelets) in units.

    Time frame: 24 hours post-injury

  13. Length of Stay (Days) in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) Reported as ICU-free Days and Number of Days on the Ventialator Reported as Ventilator Free Days.

    Time frame: 28 days.

  14. Number of Participants With Multiple Organ Failure (MOF) During This Hospitalization.

    Multiple Organ Failure (MOF) score (Denver method) was calculated for the participants. This score rates the dysfunction of four organ systems (pulmonary, renal, hepatic, and cardiac), which are evaluated daily throughout the patient's intensive care unit stay and graded on a scale from 0 to 3, with the total score ranging from 0-12. Higher values on the score represent worse outcome. Participants with score above 3 were considered to have MOF.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days post-injury.

07

Results

Posted Feb 17, 2016

Participant flow

The first patient was enrolled on 09/25/2010 and the last one was enrolled on 03/21/2014. The patients were enrolled when they met the inclusion criteria for the study, which were the criteria that activate the massive transfusion protocol. Enrollment occured upon arrival either in Emergency Room or in Operating Room.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControl (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)
Started5757
Completed5556
Not completed21

Outcome measures

Primary28 Day In-hospital Mortality
Time frame:
28 days in hospital
Reported as:
Number · participants
28 Day In-hospital Mortality
participantsControl (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)
28 Day In-hospital Mortality2011
Statistical analysis
  • Control (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer) vs Test (r-TEG) · Chi-squared · p = 0.04
SecondaryDeaths Specified as Early Mortality (<6 Hours Post-injury) and Delayed Mortality (6-24 Hours Post-injury).
Time frame:
Within 24 hours post-injury.
Reported as:
Number · deaths
Deaths Specified as Early Mortality (<6 Hours Post-injury) and Delayed Mortality (6-24 Hours Post-injury).
deathsControl (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)
Number of deaths <6 hours from injury124
Number of deaths 6-24 hours from injury87
SecondaryDeaths Related to Coagulopathic Bleeding Based Upon Clinical Impressions of the Treating Surgeons and Review of Operative Records and Outcome (Hours Since Injury).
Time frame:
Up to 28 days post-injury.
Reported as:
Number · deaths
Deaths Related to Coagulopathic Bleeding Based Upon Clinical Impressions of the Treating Surgeons and Review of Operative Records and Outcome (Hours Since Injury).
deathsControl (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)
Deaths Related to Coagulopathic Bleeding Based Upon Clinical Impressions of the Treating Surgeons and Review of Operative Records and Outcome (Hours Since Injury).115
SecondaryTime to Death From Injury in Hours.
Time frame:
From time of injury to 28th day of hospitalization.
Reported as:
Median · hours
Time to Death From Injury in Hours.
hoursControl (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)
Time to Death From Injury in Hours.4.2 (1.2 to 9.9)10.4 (4.5 to 200.3)
SecondaryChange in INR Test Results.

A high International Normalized Ratio (INR) indicates a higher risk of bleeding, while a low INR suggests a higher risk of developing a clot.

Time frame:
Within first 6 hours post-injury, 12 and 24 hours post-injury.
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Change in INR Test Results.
units on a scaleControl (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)
INR at 6 hours1.5 (1.3 to 2.2)1.8 (1.3 to 2.1)
INR at 12 hours1.4 (1.2 to 1.6)1.4 (1.3 to 1.9)
INR at 24 hours1.5 (1.4 to 1.7)1.4 (1.3 to 2)
SecondaryChange in Fibrinogen Test Results.
Time frame:
Within first 6 hours post-injury, 12 and 24 hours post-injury.
Reported as:
Median · mg/dL
Change in Fibrinogen Test Results.
mg/dLControl (INR, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)
fibrinogen at 6 hours161.5 (112 to 175)153 (111 to 180)
fibrinogen at 12 hours185.5 (159 to 232)159 (111 to 214)
fibrinogen at 24 hours233 (218 to 256)203 (150 to 266)
SecondaryChange in Platelet Count Test Results.
Time frame:
Within first 6 hours post-injury, 12 and 24 hours post-injury.
Reported as:
Median · k/uL
Change in Platelet Count Test Results.
k/uLControl (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)
platelet count at 6 hours90 (60 to 144)100 (89 to 140)
platelet count at 12 hours116 (75 to 157)110 (90 to 139)
platelet count at 24 hours96.5 (72 to 128)109 (91 to 130)
SecondaryChange in D-dimer Test Results.
Time frame:
Within first 6 hours post-injury, 12 and 24 hours post-injury.
Reported as:
Median · ug/mL
Change in D-dimer Test Results.
ug/mLControl (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)
D-dimer at 6 hours8.3 (1 to 15)8.7 (2 to 13)
D-dimer at 12 hours8 (2 to 13)6.4 (3 to 13)
D-dimer at 24 hours5.4 (2 to 13)5 (3 to 13)
SecondaryChange in r-TEG ACT (Activated Clotting Time) Test Results.
Time frame:
Within first 6 hours post-injury, 12 and 24 hours post-injury.
Reported as:
Median · seconds
Change in r-TEG ACT (Activated Clotting Time) Test Results.
secondsControl (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)
r-TEG ACT at 6 hours124 (113 to 142)121 (117 to 144)
r-TEG ACT at 12 hours128 (121 to 144)121 (113 to 140)
r-TEG ACT at 24 hours128 (121 to 128)128 (121 to 136)
SecondaryChange in r-TEG Angle Test Results.
Time frame:
Within first 6 hours post-injury, 12 and 24 hours post-injury.
Reported as:
Median · degrees
Change in r-TEG Angle Test Results.
degreesControl (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)
r-TEG Angle at 6 hours70.8 (64 to 72)68.2 (60 to 73)
r-TEG Angle at 12 hours68.5 (60 to 70)65.5 (57 to 73)
r-TEG Angle at 24 hours69.1 (61 to 71)71.3 (64 to 74)
SecondaryChange in r-TEG Maximal Amplitude (MA) Test Results.
Time frame:
Within first 6 hours post-injury, 12 and 24 hours post-injury.
Reported as:
Median · mm
Change in r-TEG Maximal Amplitude (MA) Test Results.
mmControl (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)
r-TEG MA at 6 hours53.8 (49 to 59)51 (46 to 57)
r-TEG MA at 12 hours55 (52 to 57)56.9 (49 to 58)
r-TEG MA at 24 hours56.5 (46 to 62)56.9 (54 to 61)
SecondaryChange in r-TEG LY30 Test Results.
Time frame:
Within first 6 hours post-injury, 12 and 24 hours post-injury.
Reported as:
Median · percent of clot lysis at 30 min.
Change in r-TEG LY30 Test Results.
percent of clot lysis at 30 min.Control (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)
r-TEG LY30 at 6 hours0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 1.5)
r-TEG LY30 at 12 hours0.3 (0 to 0.5)0.1 (0.1 to 1.5)
r-TEG LY30 at 24 hours0.7 (0.2 to 1.6)0.7 (0.7 to 1.7)
SecondaryComposition and Quantity of Blood Products Transfused at 24 Hours Post-injury

Amount of blood product (red blood cells, plasma, cryoprecipitate and platelets) in units.

Time frame:
24 hours post-injury
Reported as:
Median · units
Composition and Quantity of Blood Products Transfused at 24 Hours Post-injury
unitsControl (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)
Red blood cell units11.0 (6 to 16)9.5 (5 to 16)
Plasma units6.0 (4 to 9)5 (3 to 9)
Cryoprecipitate units1.0 (0 to 2)0 (0 to 2)
Platelet units1 (0 to 2)1 (0 to 2)
SecondaryLength of Stay (Days) in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) Reported as ICU-free Days and Number of Days on the Ventialator Reported as Ventilator Free Days.
Time frame:
28 days.
Reported as:
Median · days
Length of Stay (Days) in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) Reported as ICU-free Days and Number of Days on the Ventialator Reported as Ventilator Free Days.
daysControl (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)
ICU-free days.8.5 (0 to 19.5)16 (0 to 22)
Ventilator-free days.13 (0 to 22)18 (0 to 25)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Multiple Organ Failure (MOF) During This Hospitalization.

Multiple Organ Failure (MOF) score (Denver method) was calculated for the participants. This score rates the dysfunction of four organ systems (pulmonary, renal, hepatic, and cardiac), which are evaluated daily throughout the patient's intensive care unit stay and graded on a scale from 0 to 3, with the total score ranging from 0-12. Higher values on the score represent worse outcome. Participants with score above 3 were considered to have MOF.

Time frame:
Up to 30 days post-injury.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Multiple Organ Failure (MOF) During This Hospitalization.
participantsControl (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)
Number of Participants With Multiple Organ Failure (MOF) During This Hospitalization.32

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 28 days of hospitalization.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)—0/55 (0%)55/55 (100%)
Test (r-TEG)—0/56 (0%)56/56 (100%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventControl (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)
Abnormal laboratory findingBlood and lymphatic system disorders55/5556/56

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Control (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)Total
Median38 (25 to 55)41 (28 to 54)39 (28 to 55)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Control (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)Total
Female141933
Male413778
Injury Severity Score (ISS)
Injury Severity Score (ISS)(Scores on a scale)Control (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)Total
Median33 (25 to 43)29.5 (23 to 41)30 (24 to 43)
Base Deficit (BD)
Base Deficit (BD)(mEq/L)Control (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)Total
Median13.7 (9 to 18)11.0 (9 to 16)12.0 (9 to 18)
International Normalized Ratio (INR)
International Normalized Ratio (INR)(units on a scale)Control (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)Total
Median1.46 (1.2 to 2.3)1.45 (1.2 to 1.7)1.45 (1.2 to 1.9)
Platelet count
Platelet count(k/uL)Control (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)Total
Median214 (165 to 279)214 (145 to 318)214 (150 to 291)
Fibrinogen
Fibrinogen(mg/dL)Control (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)Total
Median113 (68 to 139)132 (94 to 240)122 (75 to 201)
D-dimer
D-dimer(ug/mL)Control (INR, PTT, Fibrinogen, D-dimer)Test (r-TEG)Total
Median12.9 (6 to 20)10.3 (2 to 20)11.1 (4 to 20)

4 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Denver Health Medical Center
    Denver, Colorado 80204, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 8, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01536496
Lead sponsor
Denver Health and Hospital Authority
Collaborators
Haemonetics Corporation
Responsible party
Ernest E. Moore, MD (Director, Surgery/Trauma Service, Denver Health and Hospital Authority) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 22, 2012
Start date
Sep 2010
Primary completion
Apr 2014
Completion
Jul 2014
Results posted
Feb 17, 2016
Last update
Jan 8, 2019

Study contacts

Ernest E. Moore, M.D.
principal investigator · Denver Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion