CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01535599Updated Jul 8, 2014Results posted

Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Topical AL-60371 Otic Suspension, 0.3% in the Treatment of Acute Otitis Externa

A Phase 3 interventional study of AL-60371, 0.3% Otic Suspension and AL-60371 Vehicle in Acute Otitis Externa, sponsored by Alcon Research. Completed. Open to participants aged 6 Months and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-07-08.

Sponsored by Alcon Research · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
768
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Months and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the superiority of AL-60371, 0.3% Otic Suspension relative to AL-60371 Vehicle based on clinical cures at test-of-cure (TOC) for the treatment of acute otitis externa (AOE).

Read the detailed description

Patients were evaluated for safety and efficacy during the visits conducted at Day 3 (on-therapy), Day 8 (end-of-therapy), and Day 11 (TOC). Patients or parents/legal guardians completed a telephone diary twice daily to record assessments of ear pain, ear pain medication use, and the impact of ear pain on sleep and other daily activities.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Otitis Externa

Keywords

  • Acute Otitis Externa
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • At least 6 months of age.
  • Clinical diagnosis of acute otitis externa (AOE) based on clinical observation and of presumed bacterial origin in at least one ear.
  • Combined numerical score of ≥4 in at least one affected ear at the Day 1 exam for tenderness, erythema, and edema.
  • Agree to refrain from water immersion of the ears during the conduct of the entire study.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Duration of signs or symptoms of AOE greater than 28 days in the affected ear(s) as reported by patient or parent/guardian.
  • Presence of a tympanostomy tube or perforated tympanic membrane in the affected ear(s).
  • Clinically diagnosed otic disease other than AOE (eg, malignant otitis externa) in the affected ear(s).
  • Known or suspected ear infection of yeast, fungal or mycobacterial origin in the affected ear(s).
  • Prior otologic surgery within 6 months of study entry in the affected ear(s).
  • Known or suspected allergy or hypersensitivity to quinolones or other ingredients present in the medications to be used in the study.
  • Patients who use ear plugs, head phones or ear buds and are unwilling to discontinue their use during the study period.
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
768 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AL-60371

    AL-60371, 0.3% Otic Suspension, 4 drops to the affected ear(s) twice daily for 7 days

    Drug: AL-60371, 0.3% Otic Suspension

  • Placebo comparator
    Vehicle

    AL-60371 Vehicle, 4 drops to the affected ear(s) twice daily for 7 days

    Other: AL-60371 Vehicle

Interventions

  • DrugAL-60371, 0.3% Otic Suspension
  • OtherAL-60371 Vehicle

    Inactive ingredients used as a placebo comparator

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cures at the Day 11 (TOC) Visit

    An otoscopic exam was conducted by the physician. Clinical cure was considered attained if the sum of the numerical scores of the 3 signs and symptoms of AOE (tenderness, erythema, and edema) was 0 at Day 11. In this analysis, the clinical cure outcome at Day 11 (TOC) was considered a failure for all pathogen positive patients who did not complete the study (for any reason). Proportion of patients is reported as a percentage.

    Time frame: Day 11

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients With Microbiological Successes at the Day 11 (TOC) Visit

    Microbiological success was considered attained if all pretherapy bacteria were absent from the exit otic specimen. The presence of fungi and/or yeast was not considered in the determination of microbiological success. In this analysis, the microbiological success value at Day 11 (TOC) was considered a failure for all pathogen positive patients who did not complete the study (for any reason). Proportion of patients is reported as a percentage.

    Time frame: Day 11

  2. Median Time to Cessation of Ear Pain as Reported by the Patient or Parent/Legal Guardian Via the Telephone Diary

    Cessation of ear pain was defined as occurring on the first time point that ear pain was absent (morning or evening) and did not return in any subsequent diary entries. Day 1 was the starting point for this time-to-event analysis. For this analysis, all patients who did not complete the study and ear pain never ceased had their ear pain considered as being present throughout the planned duration of the study.

    Time frame: Time to event, up to Day 11

06

Results

Posted Jun 18, 2014

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from 68 investigational centers located in the United States, Puerto Rico, and Canada.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAL-60371Vehicle
Started347346
Completed297250
Not completed5096
Withdrew: Adverse event615
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up34
Withdrew: Subj decision unrelated to adverse event43
Withdrew: Treatment failure3366
Withdrew: Bl culture + for group a strep01
Withdrew: Bl culture + for yeast//fungi01
Withdrew: Randomized in error24
Withdrew: Did not use product10
Withdrew: Other10
Withdrew: Stopped medication01
Withdrew: Noncompliance01

Outcome measures

PrimaryProportion of Patients With Clinical Cures at the Day 11 (TOC) Visit

An otoscopic exam was conducted by the physician. Clinical cure was considered attained if the sum of the numerical scores of the 3 signs and symptoms of AOE (tenderness, erythema, and edema) was 0 at Day 11. In this analysis, the clinical cure outcome at Day 11 (TOC) was considered a failure for all pathogen positive patients who did not complete the study (for any reason). Proportion of patients is reported as a percentage.

Time frame:
Day 11
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cures at the Day 11 (TOC) Visit
percentage of participantsAL-60371Vehicle
Proportion of Patients With Clinical Cures at the Day 11 (TOC) Visit71.733.3
SecondaryProportion of Patients With Microbiological Successes at the Day 11 (TOC) Visit

Microbiological success was considered attained if all pretherapy bacteria were absent from the exit otic specimen. The presence of fungi and/or yeast was not considered in the determination of microbiological success. In this analysis, the microbiological success value at Day 11 (TOC) was considered a failure for all pathogen positive patients who did not complete the study (for any reason). Proportion of patients is reported as a percentage.

Time frame:
Day 11
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Proportion of Patients With Microbiological Successes at the Day 11 (TOC) Visit
percentage of participantsAL-60371Vehicle
Proportion of Patients With Microbiological Successes at the Day 11 (TOC) Visit66.913.0
SecondaryMedian Time to Cessation of Ear Pain as Reported by the Patient or Parent/Legal Guardian Via the Telephone Diary

Cessation of ear pain was defined as occurring on the first time point that ear pain was absent (morning or evening) and did not return in any subsequent diary entries. Day 1 was the starting point for this time-to-event analysis. For this analysis, all patients who did not complete the study and ear pain never ceased had their ear pain considered as being present throughout the planned duration of the study.

Time frame:
Time to event, up to Day 11
Reported as:
Median · days
Median Time to Cessation of Ear Pain as Reported by the Patient or Parent/Legal Guardian Via the Telephone Diary
daysAL-60371Vehicle
Median Time to Cessation of Ear Pain as Reported by the Patient or Parent/Legal Guardian Via the Telephone Diary4.0 ± 0.27.0 ± 0.4

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events (AE) were collected for the duration of the study (1 year, 2 months). An AE was considered to be any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who was exposed to the study medication, regardless of causal relationship.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
AL-60371—0/344 (0%)0/344 (0%)
Vehicle—1/342 (0.3%)0/342 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAL-60371Vehicle
AnxietyPsychiatric disorders0/3441/342
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations0/3441/342

Baseline characteristics

This reporting group includes all randomized participants who were treated with study medication (686). Note: 6 participants were randomized in error and did not receive study medication (3 in AL-60371 and 3 in Vehicle). Additionally 1 participant randomized to Vehicle exited the study at Visit 2 without dosing the study medication.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)AL-60371VehicleTotal
Infants/Toddlers (18 days to 23 months)325
Children (2 to 11 years)6183144
Adolescents (12 to 17 years)6442106
Adults (18 to 64 years)195186381
Elderly (≥ 65 years)212950
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AL-60371VehicleTotal
Female202183385
Male142159301
07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01535599
Lead sponsor
Alcon Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 20, 2012
Start date
Mar 2012
Primary completion
May 2013
Completion
May 2013
Results posted
Jun 18, 2014
Last update
Jul 8, 2014

Study contacts

Sally Scheib, Sr. Clinical Project Lead
study director · Alcon Research

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion