ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01526889Updated Jan 5, 2021Results posted

Safety,Tolerability and Efficacy of Intravitreal LFG316 in Patients With Active Non-infectious Intermediate-, posterior-or Panuveitis ,

A Phase 2 interventional study of LFG316 and Conventional Therapy in Non-infectious Intermediate Uveitis, Non-infectious Posterior Uveitis and Non-infectious Panuveitis, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 8 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-05.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals (part of Novartis) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This was a multi-center, randomized, active-controlled, open-label study. Approximately 24 patients with active, non-infectious intermediate-, posterior-, or panuveitis requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy were enrolled.

Safety, efficacy, and PK assessments occurred at scheduled visits over a 12-week period. Low-molecular-weight non-steroidal immunosuppressive medications were allowed up to the baseline day as long as the dose had not changed in the 3 weeks prior to baseline, except for corticosteroid doses for which might have changed.

Patients responding to treatment were offered up to 6 months of extended treatment. Assessments for safety included laboratory safety tests, ECGs, physical exams, ocular exams, vital signs and the monitoring of adverse events. Study participation varied from a minimum of 3 months to a maximum of 9 months.

Read the detailed description

Approximately 24 patients with active non-infectious uveitis, in at least one eye, requiring intensification of systemic immunosuppressive therapy were enrolled and randomized to receive intravitreal LFG316 or conventional therapy (investigator's discretion). Only one eye (the study eye) were treated with LFG316 and the other eye (fellow eye) were treated at the investigator's discretion.Throughout the study, the fellow eye might have been treated as needed; except that certain systemic medications were prohibited. There was 1 screening and 8 scheduled visits over 85 days for a total of 9 site visits for all patients.

At Day 85, patients receiving LFG316 treatment who met the criteria for a 'responder', were offered an additional 6 months of LFG316 treatment on a PRN basis. Additional 3 scheduled visits were attended by LFG316-responder patients during the extension period. However, patients could have unscheduled visits as needed and as determined by the investigator. Safety evaluation and ocular assessments were performed throughout the study duration. Patients in the treatment extension phase, who experienced a flare post their last dose and required treatment, might have received a dose of LFG316. These patients were assessed for a response at their next PRN visit as scheduled by the investigator. Visit frequency was determined by the investigator. If they continued to respond to LFG316 therapy, they might have remained in the PRN treatment arm. They might have received up to 7 additional doses of LFG316 in the PRN period. Throughout the trial LFG316 were not administered more frequently than monthly. Patients in the extension phase, who discontinued treatment prematurely were asked to return approximately 1 month after their last dose. Low molecular weight non-steroidal immunosuppressive medications were allowed up to the baseline day as long as the dose had not changed in the 3 weeks prior to baseline, except for corticosteroid doses which might have changed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-infectious Intermediate Uveitis
  • Non-infectious Posterior Uveitis
  • Non-infectious Panuveitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Non-infectious uveitis
  • Panuveitis
  • Visual acuity
  • Vitreous Haze
  • Inflammation of the uvea
  • inflammation of the middle, pigmented vascular structures of the eye, iris, ciliary body, choroid plexus
03

In context

Panuveitis

39 studies on the registry are indexed under Panuveitis; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 40 across 29 interventional studies indexed under Panuveitis.

Browse Panuveitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 2,718 studies on the registry; 221 are open to participants now.

Of its 585 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 438 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female patients 18 years or older
  • Active NIU, in at least one eye, as defined below, in patients requiring intensification of systemic therapy;
  • Vitreous haze at least 1+ on the scale of Nussenblatt et al 1985,or
  • Chorioretinal lesions due to uveitis (chorioretinal lesions due to infectious uveitis excluded)
  • Patients with a flare and at the time of the enrollment on systemic or non-steroidal immunosuppressants had their therapy tapered or stopped, respectively, at the time of intravitreal LFG316 administration.

Visual acuity (ETDRS method) of 20 letters (20/400 Snellen equivalent) or better in the study eye.

  • For female patients, must not be pregnant or lactating and must, unless , use effective .
  • Ability to provide and comply with the protocol.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uveitis so severe that, in the investigator's judgment, it was too risky to test an experimental drug
  • Any biologic immunosuppressive agent given via intravitreal, intravenous or subcutaneous route within 4-12 months depending on the agent.
  • History of infectious uveitis or endophthalmitis in either eye.
  • History of retinal detachment
  • Any intraocular surgery, intravitreal injection, periocular injection, or laser photocoagulation to the study eye within 90 days prior to dosing.
  • In the study eye, cataract expected to interfere with study conduct or require surgery during the study.
  • Forms of uveitis that may have spontaneously resolved
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    LFG316 -Intravitreal Injection

    Drug: LFG316

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Therapy

    Drug: Conventional Therapy

Interventions

  • DrugLFG316

    LFG316 administered intravitreally (IVT)

  • DrugConventional Therapy

    Conventional Therapy administered in accordance with its prescribing info.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Response Rate for the Individual Response Criteria - in the Study Eye

    Response rate as defined by: 1. An improvement of 2 or more steps in vitreous haze (scale of 0 to 4), relative to baseline OR 2. An improvement of 10 or more letters in visual acuity (VA), relative to baseline OR 3. An improvement of 2 or more steps in anterior chamber cells (ACC) score (scale of 0 to 4), relative to baseline OR 4. Absence of chorioretinal lesions as determined by the investigator

    Time frame: Day 85 (end of study)

  2. Number of Participants With Remission in Study Eye - Treatment Period

    Remission (complete response) was defined as any patient who had: * a vitreous haze score of 0 or 0.5 (scale of 0 to 4) in the study eye, AND * an anterior chamber cell score of 0 (scale of 0 to 4), AND * no chorioretinal lesions in the study eye, AND * was off all immune modulatory therapy (systemic, corticosteroids and topical), AND * without any worsening of uveitis during the trial.

    Time frame: Day 85 (end of study)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Vitreous Haze Score in Study Eye - Treatment Period

    Vitreous haze score (based on funduscopic exam): 0, 0.5/Trace, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+ Vitreous haze score (scale of 0 to 4) with a score of 4 being the most hazed.

    Time frame: Day 2, 8, 15, 29, 43, 57 and, 85 (end of the study)

  2. Mean Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in Study Eye - Treatment Period

    Visual acuity was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) eye charts under ETDRS conditions. ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity was obtained in each eye separately under certified ETDRS conditions. This assessment was to be performed prior to pupil dilation. The number of letters read correctly (for each eye) was recorded. BCVA is based on the number of letters read correctly.

    Time frame: Day 2, 8, 15, 29, 43, 57 and, 85 (end of the study)

  3. Number of Patients With Macular Edema in Study Eye - Treatment Period

    Macular edema is a sign of uveitis.

    Time frame: Day 85 (end of study)

  4. Number of Patients With Chorioretinal Lesions in Study Eye - Treatment Period

    Chorioretinal lesions is a sign of uveitis.

    Time frame: Day 2, 8, 15, 29, 43, 57 and, 85 (end of the study)

  5. Number of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cells Score in Study Eye - Treatment Period

    anterior chamber cells score (ACCS) with the scores being 0 (≤ 1 cell), 0.5 (1 to 5 aqueous cells), 1 (6 to 15 aqueous cells), 2 (16 to 25 aqueous cells), 3 (26 to 50 aqueous cells), 4 (\>50 aqueous cells).

    Time frame: Day 2, 8, 15, 29, 43, 57 and, 85 (end of the study)

  6. Number of Participants With or Without Anti-LFG316 Antibodies

    Blood will be collected at each visit for the profiling of serum drug concentrations. The summary of immunogenicity (IG) by visit . The immunogenicity data (presence/absence of anti-LFG316 antibodies \[anti-drug antibodies\]). NO: No immunogenicity; YES: Positive immunogenicity.

    Time frame: Throughout the study (treatment and extension period), up to day 271

  7. Mean Percent Change in Total C5 Concentrations in Serum - Treatment Period

    Percent change from baseline (using each patient's pre-dose value as baseline) in total C5 concentrations.

    Time frame: Day 2, 15, 29, 43, 57 and, 85 (end of the study)

07

Results

Posted Oct 31, 2018

Participant flow

Treatment Period
Participant flow — Treatment Period
MilestoneLFG316Conventional Therapy
Started187
Completed167
Not completed20
Withdrew: Adverse event20
Treatment Extension Period
Participant flow — Treatment Extension Period
MilestoneLFG316Conventional Therapy
Started50
Completed40
Not completed10
Withdrew: Administrative problems10

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Response Rate for the Individual Response Criteria - in the Study Eye

Response rate as defined by: 1. An improvement of 2 or more steps in vitreous haze (scale of 0 to 4), relative to baseline OR 2. An improvement of 10 or more letters in visual acuity (VA), relative to baseline OR 3. An improvement of 2 or more steps in anterior chamber cells (ACC) score (scale of 0 to 4), relative to baseline OR 4. Absence of chorioretinal lesions as determined by the investigator

Time frame:
Day 85 (end of study)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Response Rate for the Individual Response Criteria - in the Study Eye
ParticipantsLFG316Conventional Therapy
Improvement of vitreous haze ≥2 steps (N=15,6)33
Improvement of VA ≥ 10 letters (N=15,6)01
Improvement of ACC score ≥2 steps (N=7, 1)00
Resolution of chorioretinal lesions (N= 3, 0)0—
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Remission in Study Eye - Treatment Period

Remission (complete response) was defined as any patient who had: * a vitreous haze score of 0 or 0.5 (scale of 0 to 4) in the study eye, AND * an anterior chamber cell score of 0 (scale of 0 to 4), AND * no chorioretinal lesions in the study eye, AND * was off all immune modulatory therapy (systemic, corticosteroids and topical), AND * without any worsening of uveitis during the trial.

Time frame:
Day 85 (end of study)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Remission in Study Eye - Treatment Period
ParticipantsLFG316Conventional Therapy
Number of Participants With Remission in Study Eye - Treatment Period20
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Vitreous Haze Score in Study Eye - Treatment Period

Vitreous haze score (based on funduscopic exam): 0, 0.5/Trace, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+ Vitreous haze score (scale of 0 to 4) with a score of 4 being the most hazed.

Time frame:
Day 2, 8, 15, 29, 43, 57 and, 85 (end of the study)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Vitreous Haze Score in Study Eye - Treatment Period
ParticipantsLFG316Conventional Therapy
Day 2 — 000
Day 2 — 0.5/Trace21
Day 2 — 1+104
Day 2 — 2+11
Day 2 — 3+21
Day 2 — 4+00
Day 8 — 000
Day 8 — 0.5/Trace10
Day 8 — 1+41
Day 8 — 2+00
Day 8 — 3+10
Day 8 — 4+00
Day 15 — 021
Day 15 — 0.5/Trace31
Day 15 — 1+64
Day 15 — 2+31
Day 15 — 3+00
Day 15 — 4+20
Day 29 — 003
Day 29 — 0.5/Trace41
Day 29 — 1+103
Day 29 — 2+00
Day 29 — 3+00
Day 29 — 4+10
Day 43 — 062
Day 43 — 0.5/Trace13
Day 43 — 1+61
Day 43 — 2+00
Day 43 — 3+00
Day 43 — 4+10
Day 57 — 052
Day 57 — 0.5/Trace52
Day 57 — 1+43
Day 57 — 2+00
Day 57 — 3+00
Day 57 — 4+00
Day 85 (end of study) — 021
Day 85 (end of study) — 0.5/Trace63
Day 85 (end of study) — 1+32
Day 85 (end of study) — 2+30
Day 85 (end of study) — 3+10
Day 85 (end of study) — 4+00
SecondaryMean Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in Study Eye - Treatment Period

Visual acuity was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) eye charts under ETDRS conditions. ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity was obtained in each eye separately under certified ETDRS conditions. This assessment was to be performed prior to pupil dilation. The number of letters read correctly (for each eye) was recorded. BCVA is based on the number of letters read correctly.

Time frame:
Day 2, 8, 15, 29, 43, 57 and, 85 (end of the study)
Reported as:
Mean · letters
Mean Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in Study Eye - Treatment Period
lettersLFG316Conventional Therapy
Day 272.5 ± 19.3676.1 ± 0.7
Day 880.5 ± 11.6979.0 ± 79
Day 1568.8 ± 18.5378.9 ± 9.10
Day 2970.3 ± 19.3979.6 ± 9.47
Day 4365.5 ± 24.4577.3 ± 9.07
Day 5772.6 ± 14.7980.1 ± 10.35
Day 8572.1 ± 15.5376.7 ± 10.25
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Macular Edema in Study Eye - Treatment Period

Macular edema is a sign of uveitis.

Time frame:
Day 85 (end of study)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Macular Edema in Study Eye - Treatment Period
ParticipantsLFG316Conventional Therapy
Day 221
Day 811
Day 1530
Day 2920
Day 4320
Day 5720
Day 85 (end of study)20
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Chorioretinal Lesions in Study Eye - Treatment Period

Chorioretinal lesions is a sign of uveitis.

Time frame:
Day 2, 8, 15, 29, 43, 57 and, 85 (end of the study)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Chorioretinal Lesions in Study Eye - Treatment Period
ParticipantsLFG316Conventional Therapy
Day 230
Day 820
Day 1540
Day 2950
Day 4340
Day 5751
Day 85 (end of study)41
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cells Score in Study Eye - Treatment Period

anterior chamber cells score (ACCS) with the scores being 0 (≤ 1 cell), 0.5 (1 to 5 aqueous cells), 1 (6 to 15 aqueous cells), 2 (16 to 25 aqueous cells), 3 (26 to 50 aqueous cells), 4 (\>50 aqueous cells).

Time frame:
Day 2, 8, 15, 29, 43, 57 and, 85 (end of the study)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cells Score in Study Eye - Treatment Period
ParticipantsLFG316Conventional Therapy
Day 2 — 0; <1 cell20
Day 2 — 0.5; 1-5 cells41
Day 2 — 1; 6-15 cells10
Day 2 — 2; 16-25 cells00
Day 2 — 3; 26-50 cells00
Day 2 — 4; >50 cells00
Day 8 — 0; <1 cell20
Day 8 — 0.5; 1-5 cells41
Day 8 — 1; 6-15 cells00
Day 8 — 2; 16-25 cells00
Day 8 — 3; 26-50 cells00
Day 8 — 4; >50 cells00
Day 15 — 0; <1 cell31
Day 15 — 0.5; 1-5 cells40
Day 15 — 1; 6-15 cells10
Day 15 — 2; 16-25 cells00
Day 15 — 3; 26-50 cells00
Day 15 — 4; >50 cells00
Day 29 — 0; <1 cell21
Day 29 — 0.5; 1-5 cells50
Day 29 — 1; 6-15 cells00
Day 29 — 2; 16-25 cells00
Day 29 — 3; 26-50 cells00
Day 29 — 4; >50 cells00
Day 43 — 0; <1 cell51
Day 43 — 0.5; 1-5 cells00
Day 43 — 1; 6-15 cells10
Day 43 — 2; 16-25 cells10
Day 43 — 3; 26-50 cells00
Day 43 — 4; >50 cells00
Day 57 — 0; <1 cell51
Day 57 — 0.5; 1-5 cells11
Day 57 — 1; 6-15 cells20
Day 57 — 2; 16-25 cells00
Day 57 — 3; 26-50 cells00
Day 57 — 4; >50 cells00
Day 85 — 0; <1 cell43
Day 85 — 0.5; 1-5 cells50
Day 85 — 1; 6-15 cells00
Day 85 — 2; 16-25 cells00
Day 85 — 3; 26-50 cells00
Day 85 — 4; >50 cells00
SecondaryNumber of Participants With or Without Anti-LFG316 Antibodies

Blood will be collected at each visit for the profiling of serum drug concentrations. The summary of immunogenicity (IG) by visit . The immunogenicity data (presence/absence of anti-LFG316 antibodies \[anti-drug antibodies\]). NO: No immunogenicity; YES: Positive immunogenicity.

Time frame:
Throughout the study (treatment and extension period), up to day 271
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With or Without Anti-LFG316 Antibodies
ParticipantsLFG316
Day 1 — participants with anti-LFG316 antibodies3
Day 1 — participants without anti-LFG316 antibodies12
Day 29 — participants with anti-LFG316 antibodies3
Day 29 — participants without anti-LFG316 antibodies10
Day 85 (end of study) — participants with anti-LFG316 antibodies2
Day 85 (end of study) — participants without anti-LFG316 antibodies9
Day 169 — participants with anti-LFG316 antibodies1
Day 169 — participants without anti-LFG316 antibodies1
Day 253 — participants with anti-LFG316 antibodies0
Day 253 — participants without anti-LFG316 antibodies1
End of extension period — participants with anti-LFG316 antibodies1
End of extension period — participants without anti-LFG316 antibodies0
SecondaryMean Percent Change in Total C5 Concentrations in Serum - Treatment Period

Percent change from baseline (using each patient's pre-dose value as baseline) in total C5 concentrations.

Time frame:
Day 2, 15, 29, 43, 57 and, 85 (end of the study)
Reported as:
Mean · Percent change in C5
Mean Percent Change in Total C5 Concentrations in Serum - Treatment Period
Percent change in C5LFG316Conventional Therapy
Day 26.80 ± 14.51.02 ± 5.69
Day 158.21 ± 15.3-1.27 ± 19.7
Day 2910.6 ± 17.4-8.33 ± 17.5
Day 438.38 ± 13.46.46 ± 18.6
Day 576.73 ± 12.05.98 ± 40.9
Day 853.21 ± 22.11.28 ± 31.3

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Events (AEs) are collected from First Patient First Visit (FPFV) until Last Patient Last Visit (LPLV). All AEs reported in this record are from date of First Patient First Treatment until Last Patient Last Visit) up to approximately 5 years.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
LFG3160/18 (0%)1/18 (5.6%)11/18 (61.1%)
Conventional Therapy0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)5/7 (71.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLFG316Conventional Therapy
Retinal detachmentEye disorders1/180/7
Retinopathy proliferativeEye disorders1/180/7
Mycotic endophthalmitisInfections and infestations1/180/7
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 28
Most frequent other events
EventLFG316Conventional Therapy
Conjunctival haemorrhageEye disorders4/180/7
UveitisEye disorders4/180/7
Intraocular pressure increasedInvestigations3/180/7
Dry eyeEye disorders1/181/7
Hypotony of eyeEye disorders0/181/7
Macular fibrosisEye disorders1/181/7
Ocular hypertensionEye disorders0/181/7
Oral candidiasisInfections and infestations0/181/7
PharyngitisInfections and infestations0/181/7
Tooth infectionInfections and infestations0/181/7

Baseline characteristics

Safety analysis set (SAS): All patients who received study drug (LFG316 or conventional treatment) were included in the safety analysis set.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)LFG316Conventional TherapyTotal
Mean45.3 ± 14.8439.1 ± 14.8943.6 ± 14.81
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)LFG316Conventional TherapyTotal
Female7411
Male11314
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)LFG316Conventional TherapyTotal
Hispanic or Latino202
Not Hispanic or Latino16723
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)LFG316Conventional TherapyTotal
Caucasian17623
Black112
08

Study locations

8 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Omaha, Nebraska 68198-5540, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Teaneck, New Jersey 07666, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bristol, BS1 2LX, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    London, EC1V 2PD, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 5, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01526889
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 6, 2012
Start date
Dec 20, 2012
Primary completion
Feb 16, 2017
Completion
Aug 24, 2017
Results posted
Oct 31, 2018
Last update
Jan 5, 2021

Study contacts

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
study director · Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Tesidolumab

Start the discussion