CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01525849REMODELUpdated Feb 24, 2017Results posted

Randomized Evaluation of Maxillary Antrostomy Versus Ostial Dilation Efficacy Through Long-Term Follow-Up

An interventional study of Balloon Sinus Dilation and Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Chronic Sinusitis, sponsored by Entellus Medical, Inc.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-24.

Sponsored by Entellus Medical, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
151
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to show that long-term symptom improvement after sinus balloon dilation is not worse than symptom improvement after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and that fewer postoperative debridements are required after balloon dilation than after FESS.

Read the detailed description

This is a postmarket, multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial conducted at up to 15 US clinical sites comparing the efficacy of balloon sinus dilation with traditional endoscopic sinus surgery. The primary hypotheses were to demonstrate that: 1) long-term change in sinus symptoms after balloon dilation is not worse (non-inferior) than after FESS, and 2) balloon dilation is superior to FESS for a reduction in the number of postoperative debridements per patient. A minimum of 36 participants per arm is required to test the primary hypotheses. All participants will be followed through a minimum of 12 months post treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Sinusitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Sinusitis

415 studies on the registry are indexed under Sinusitis; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 151 is above the median of 60 across 313 interventional studies indexed under Sinusitis.

Browse Sinusitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Entellus Medical, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older
  • maxillary sinus disease
  • chronic sinusitis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • fungal disease
  • Samter's triad
  • hemophilia
  • prior sinus surgery
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
151 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Balloon Sinus Dilation

    XprESS Multi-Sinus Dilation Balloon, FinESS Sinus Treatment

    Device: Balloon Sinus Dilation

  • Active comparator
    Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

    Traditional endoscopic sinus surgery (maxillary antrostomy and uncinectomy with optional anterior ethmoidectomy) using cutting, grasping, and microdebrider tools.

    Procedure: Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Interventions

  • DeviceBalloon Sinus Dilation

    Balloon sinus dilation using the XprESS Multi-Sinus Dilation Tool or the FinESS SInus Treatment

  • ProcedureFunctional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

    Endoscopic sinus surgery, specifically, maxillary antrostomy and uncinectomy with optional anterior ethmoidectomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sinus Symptom Improvement

    Change from baseline in overall 20-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20) score. The SNOT-20 is a validated patient reported survey of 20 items related to sinonasal symptoms and severity assessed over the previous 2 weeks. Each item is scored from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The individual item scores are averaged to provide and overall score that ranges from 0 (best) to 5 (worst).

    Time frame: Baseline and 1-year

  2. Debridements

    Number of postoperative debridements per participant

    Time frame: 1-year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Revision Rate

    Number of participants requiring repeat sinus procedures

    Time frame: 1-year

  2. Complication Rate

    Number of participants experiencing 1 or more serious adverse events related to the device and/or procedure

    Time frame: Duration of study (minimum of 12 months)

  3. Recovery Time

    Mean time (days) after procedure for participants to return to normal activities

    Time frame: 6-months

07

Results

Posted Feb 24, 2017

Participant flow

Participants were screened, randomized, treated, and followed at 14 US centers from June 2011 to May 2014.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBalloon Sinus DilationFunctional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
Started7675
Treated7461
6-months7360
Completed7159
Not completed516
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up32
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject19
Withdrew: Unrelated medical issue (not treated)12
Withdrew: Anatomic exclusion criteria identified03

Outcome measures

PrimarySinus Symptom Improvement

Change from baseline in overall 20-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20) score. The SNOT-20 is a validated patient reported survey of 20 items related to sinonasal symptoms and severity assessed over the previous 2 weeks. Each item is scored from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The individual item scores are averaged to provide and overall score that ranges from 0 (best) to 5 (worst).

Time frame:
Baseline and 1-year
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Sinus Symptom Improvement
units on a scaleBalloon Sinus DilationFunctional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
Change from baseline-1.59 ± 1.08-1.60 ± 1.00
Mean overall SNOT-20 score at 1-year0.88 ± 0.910.88 ± 0.76
Statistical analysis
  • Balloon Sinus Dilation vs Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery · t-test, 1 sided · p = <0.001
PrimaryDebridements

Number of postoperative debridements per participant

Time frame:
1-year
Reported as:
Mean · debridements per participant
Debridements
debridements per participantBalloon Sinus DilationFunctional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
Debridements0.23 ± 0.651.03 ± 0.87
Statistical analysis
  • Balloon Sinus Dilation vs Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery · t-test, 1 sided · p = <0.0001
SecondaryRevision Rate

Number of participants requiring repeat sinus procedures

Time frame:
1-year
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Revision Rate
ParticipantsBalloon Sinus DilationFunctional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
Revision Rate11
Statistical analysis
  • Balloon Sinus Dilation vs Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.628
SecondaryComplication Rate

Number of participants experiencing 1 or more serious adverse events related to the device and/or procedure

Time frame:
Duration of study (minimum of 12 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Complication Rate
ParticipantsBalloon Sinus DilationFunctional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
Complication Rate00
SecondaryRecovery Time

Mean time (days) after procedure for participants to return to normal activities

Time frame:
6-months
Reported as:
Mean · days
Recovery Time
daysBalloon Sinus DilationFunctional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
Recovery Time1.7 ± 1.35.0 ± 5.9
Statistical analysis
  • Balloon Sinus Dilation vs Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.0001

Adverse events

Collected over Duration of study (minimum of 1-year) for all treated participants.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Balloon Sinus Dilation—1/76 (1.3%)0/76 (0%)
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery—2/75 (2.7%)0/75 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventBalloon Sinus DilationFunctional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
Atypical Chest PainCardiac disorders0/761/75
InfectionInfections and infestations0/761/75
Acute GastroenteritisGastrointestinal disorders1/760/75

Baseline characteristics

All treated participants

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Balloon Sinus DilationFunctional Endoscopic Sinus SurgeryTotal
Mean46.1 ± 13.647.8 ± 14.146.9 ± 13.8
Gender
Gender(Participants)Balloon Sinus DilationFunctional Endoscopic Sinus SurgeryTotal
Female483684
Male262551
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Balloon Sinus DilationFunctional Endoscopic Sinus SurgeryTotal
Hispanic or Latino6511
Not Hispanic or Latino6856124
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Balloon Sinus DilationFunctional Endoscopic Sinus SurgeryTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian415
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American246
White6556121
More than one race303
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Balloon Sinus DilationFunctional Endoscopic Sinus SurgeryTotal
United States7461135
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20) overall score
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20) overall score(units on a scale)Balloon Sinus DilationFunctional Endoscopic Sinus SurgeryTotal
Mean2.49 ± 0.882.52 ± 0.832.50 ± 0.85
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Entellus Medical
    Plymouth, Minnesota 55447, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Cutler J, Bikhazi N, Light J, Truitt T, Schwartz M; REMODEL Study Investigators. Standalone balloon dilation versus sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013 Sep-Oct;27(5):416-22. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3970. Epub 2013 Aug 5. PubMed 23920419 ↗
  • Bikhazi N, Light J, Truitt T, Schwartz M, Cutler J; REMODEL Study Investigators. Standalone balloon dilation versus sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014 Jul-Aug;28(4):323-9. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4064. Epub 2014 May 12. PubMed 24823902 ↗
  • Chandra RK, Kern RC, Cutler JL, Welch KC, Russell PT. REMODEL larger cohort with long-term outcomes and meta-analysis of standalone balloon dilation studies. Laryngoscope. 2016 Jan;126(1):44-50. doi: 10.1002/lary.25507. Epub 2015 Jul 30. PubMed 26228589 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01525849
Lead sponsor
Entellus Medical, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 3, 2012
Start date
Dec 2011
Primary completion
Feb 2014
Completion
May 2014
Results posted
Feb 24, 2017
Last update
Feb 24, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion