ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01525485EstimUpdated Jun 9, 2016

Vaginal Electrical Stimulation Versus Neuromodulation

An observational study in Refractory Overactive Bladder, sponsored by University of Oklahoma. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 21 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-06-09.

Sponsored by University of Oklahoma · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
34
Ages
21 Years to 99 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This prospective study compares quality of life measures of patients with refractory overactive bladder, between two modes of neuromodulation: vaginal electrical stimulation (Group A) and sacral nerve stimulation (Group B).

The specific aims are:

1. To characterize patient symptom bother score, quality of life, and body image scores in patients obtaining sacral nerve stimulation, as compared to vaginal electrical stimulation.

- Hypothesis 1: Both modes of neuromodulation will impact patients' scores in quality of life, patient symptoms, and body image questionnaires.

Read the detailed description

All participants will have a standardized intake history which will include age, weight, history of prior treatment for incontinence, medication list, obstetric and gynecologic history, medical history, and surgical history, as well as a complete review of systems. The physical examination will include vital signs (including BMI), genitourinary exam, including Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ), and neurologic exam. All patients will undergo spontaneous uroflowmetry, urine dipstick from catheterized specimen, multichannel urodynamics, and 3-day voiding diary. Measurement of post-void residual will also be obtained. Completion of the UDI-69, King's Health Questionnaire10, and the Modified Body Image Perception Scale (MBIS) will also be part of the initial visit 11,12.

All participants taking anticholinergics will undergo a 2 week flush-out period prior to the intake assessment. After the intake assessment, the provider will determine which treatment option is appropriate to the participant, and they will then be assigned to one of the two treatment arms: Group A will use vaginal electrical stimulation using the Empi Intravaginal Stimulation Unit Minnova (Empi, St. Paul, MN, USA) and participants in Group B will receive sacral neuromodulation using InterStim (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

02

Conditions studied

  • Refractory Overactive Bladder
03

In context

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

864 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive; 125 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 34 is below the median of 109 across 167 observational studies indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive.

Browse Urinary Bladder, Overactive studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Oklahoma is the lead sponsor of 432 studies on the registry; 100 are open to participants now.

Of its 42 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (38%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The projected sample size is 48 patients. We anticipate the recruitment of 16 patients for the InterStim arm of this study and 32 patients who will undergo vaginal electrical stimulation. Participants will be drawn from the University of Oklahoma Urogynecology clinics. Our catchment area includes OU Physicians clinic (private clinic) and Presbyterian Professional Building (resident clinic). Our referral area includes all of Oklahoma as well as the surrounding states. Participants will be recruited by physician referrals as well as by campus advertisements.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of refractory OAB (+/- UUI)*
  • Female Gender
  • Eligible for both treatment interventions
  • Available for 8 weeks of follow-up
  • Able to complete study assessments
  • Must discontinue anticholinergics within 2 weeks of intervention

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 21
  • Pregnancy
  • Stage 3 or 4 pelvic organ prolapse
  • Current use of anticholinergics
  • Urinary tract infection
  • Undergoing concurrent treatment for pelvic organ prolapse
  • Unstable or serious cardiac arrhythmia
  • Implanted pacemaker
  • Postvoid residual > 100ml
  • Unstable seizure disorder
  • Dementia or inability to follow instructions
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Electrical Stimulation

    Participants will have a dedicated visit with a pelvic floor physical therapist during which instructions on usage and technique for the Minnova unit will be given. The electrical parameters selected will be: 10 Hertz frequency, 5-second on/10=second off cycle, and a pulse width of 0.4 milliseconds. The bipolar square will be delivered over a range that varies from 0 to 100 milliamps, depending on the maximum current intensity comfortably tolerated by the patient. The participant will perform each treatment session for 20 minutes twice daily for 8 weeks. Participants will be asked to keep a log recording the dates, times, and duration of each treatment session.

  • Interstim device

    Participants assigned to the sacral neuromodulation group will undergo InterStim device placement by one of the three Urogynecologists at OUHSC using a staged implant technique according to manufacturer's specifications.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Symptom improvement

    \>50% improvement in symptoms and decrease in frequency of voids and episodes of nocturia. Subjective outcomes will be measured by improvement in scores on the UDI-6, KHG, and MBIS.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Mar 2011, a primary completion of Apr 2016 and a completion of Apr 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 19, 2012
First posted
Feb 3, 2012
Start
Mar 2011
Primary completionActual
Apr 2016
CompletionActual
Apr 2016
Last update
Jun 9, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01525485
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 3, 2012
Start date
Mar 2011
Primary completion
Apr 2016
Completion
Apr 2016
Last update
Jun 9, 2016

Study contacts

S. Abbas Shobeiri, MD
principal investigator · Univerisity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion