ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01521728Updated Apr 19, 2016

Trial of Resistance and Endurance Exercise in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

An interventional study of Resistance Exercise and Endurance Exercise in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-19.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The first questions asked by patients with a new diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) often include: "Does exercise help slow the progression of the disease?", "Is there any harm in exercising?", or "What type of exercise (endurance or resistance) is most appropriate?" At this time, however, there is a lack of answers for people who suffer from an illness that affects their strength above all else. Yet the beneficial effects of exercise in both healthy people as well as people with other diseases have been extensively studied and resulted in recommendations about the types of exercise that are beneficial. In this study the investigators will ask participants with ALS to exercise in one of three ways: weightlifting (resistance exercise), stationary bicycling (endurance exercise), and range of motion exercise (the current "standard of care" for ALS patients). The investigators will use several different types of tests to determine whether one type of exercise is tolerated better and is safer than another. The investigators will also collect information about how the body responds to exercise in ALS. This study will help in the development of a larger national study to understand how exercise can be combined with other treatments to potentially improve strength and alter the course of the disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Keywords

  • ALS
  • Exercise
  • Resistance
  • Endurance
03

In context

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

1,000 studies on the registry are indexed under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; 284 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is above the median of 37 across 678 interventional studies indexed under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Browse Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,809 studies on the registry; 314 are open to participants now.

Of its 208 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 144 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Participants with familial or sporadic ALS diagnosed as possible, laboratory-supported probable, probable, or definite according to the WFN El Escorial criteria
  2. Participants who are ages 18-80, inclusive.
  3. Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) must be equal to or greater than 70% of predicted value
  4. ALSFRS-R score >30.
  5. Patients who are currently on any medications must be on a stable dose for the past 30 days.
  6. Participants must provide informed consent prior to completion of any study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants who are already performing >30 min. of endurance exercise/day for ≥ 3x/week (Borg scale-- "hard" or "somewhat hard") within 30 days of screening.
  2. Participants who are already performing resistance exercise ≥ 3x/week within 30 days of screening.
  3. Neurologic

    • Participants with history of ALS symptoms over 5 years duration
    • Inability to obtain consent (psychiatric or dementing illness)
    • History of neuromuscular dysfunction not related to ALS
  4. Cardiac

    • Patents with clinically significant ECG abnormalities
    • Uncontrolled hypertension (SBP>160 or DBP>110)
    • Recent history of angina (within the last 2 years)
    • Recent history of abnormal stress test (within the last 2 years)
    • Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis
    • Active endocarditis
    • Symptomatic heart failure
  5. Respiratory

    • Subjects with a history of respiratory dysfunction not related to ALS (i.e. COPD)
  6. General

    • Subjects with chronic infectious disease including HIV, hepatitis B or C.
    • History of substance abuse within the past year
    • Patients who have a history of poor compliance to medical regimens or study requirements.
    • Uncontrolled diabetes
    • Recent embolism (within the last 6 months)
    • Severe orthopedic conditions that would prohibit exercise
  7. Pregnancy

    • Female subjects who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant.
    • Female subjects of childbearing potential who are not practicing contraception.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Resistance Exercise

    Resistance will be administered using a series of adjustable cuff weights for the upper limbs and hip flexion. Knee flexion and extension will be administered with a weight bench using a leg exercise attachment and free weights.

    Other: Resistance Exercise

  • Active comparator
    Endurance Exercise

    Endurance will be administered using a minicycle. It can be used from a sitting position (chair or wheelchair) for lower limb exercise and then placed on a tabletop for upper limb use.

    Other: Endurance Exercise

  • Active comparator
    Stretching/Range-of-Motion Exercise

    In ALS, stretching and range of motion are routinely recommended for the prevention of "frozen shoulder syndrome" and contractures resulting from weakness. The problem is compounded in ALS where upper motor neuron dysfunction may result in spasticity and incapacitating contractures with pain. Therefore, maintaining an aggressive program for stretching and range of motion exercise is widely accepted as a "standard of care" for ALS management.

    Other: Stretching/Range-of-Motion

Interventions

  • OtherResistance Exercise

    Resistance will be administered using a series of adjustable cuff weights for the upper limbs and hip flexion. Knee flexion and extension will be administered with a weight bench using a leg exercise attachment and free weights.

  • OtherEndurance Exercise

    Endurance will be administered using a minicycle. It can be used from a sitting position (chair or wheelchair) for lower limb exercise and then placed on a tabletop for upper limb use.

  • OtherStretching/Range-of-Motion

    Stretching and range of motion exercise is widely accepted as a "standard of care" for ALS management.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Resistance Exercise Tolerability

    Evaluate the tolerability of RESISTANCE exercise in ALS subjects as measured by their ability to complete a 6 month study of a resistance exercise regimen.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Endurance Exercise Tolerability

    Evaluate the tolerability of ENDURANCE exercise in ALS subjects as measured by their ability to complete a 6 month study of an endurance exercise regimen.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Vital Capacity

    Evaluate the effect of resistance and endurance exercise on slow vital capacity (SVC)

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. ALS Functional Rating Scores

    Evaluate the effect of resistance and endurance exercise on patients scores of the ALS Functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R)

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Muscle Strength

    Evaluate the effect of resistance and endurance exercise on measures of muscle strength

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Spasticity

    Evaluate the effect of resistance and endurance exercise on spasticity

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Fatigue

    Evaluate the effect of resistance and endurance exercise on fatigue

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Quality of Life

    Evaluate the effect of resistance and endurance exercise on patient quality of life

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • Johns Hopkins University
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129, United States
  • Carolinas Medical Center
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28207, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2012, a primary completion of Feb 2016 and a completion of Feb 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 24, 2012
First posted
Jan 31, 2012
Start
Jan 2012
Primary completionActual
Feb 2016
CompletionActual
Feb 2016
Last update
Apr 19, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 19, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01521728
Collaborators
ALS Association
Responsible party
Nicholas Maragakis, MD (Associate Professor, Johns Hopkins University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 31, 2012
Start date
Jan 2012
Primary completion
Feb 2016
Completion
Feb 2016
Last update
Apr 19, 2016

Study contacts

Nicholas M Maragakis, MD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion