CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01515540Updated Jul 30, 2013Results posted

Brain Imaging of Lidoderm for Chronic Back Pain

A Phase 4 interventional study of lidocaine and placebo in Low Back Pain, sponsored by Northwestern University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-07-30.

Sponsored by Northwestern University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
38
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators tested whether pain decrease can be observed centrally with non-invasive brain imaging in CBP subjects receiving Lidoderm. The investigators first tested effects of 5% Lidoderm patched in an open labelled trial. Next the investigators compared the effects of Lidocaine versus Placebo patches. Three time points were evaluated: baseline (before treatment) and 6 hours and 2 weeks after treatment. The latter trial was a 2 arm, double blind, placebo controlled trial, where participants either received Lidoderm or placebo patches, without cross over.

Read the detailed description

Previous data showed that Lidoderm patches that contain 5% Lidocaine applied to the affected area for a period of 1-2 weeks decreased chronic pain. We conducted a preliminary open-label trial in chronic back pain patients and found that the patients reported reduction in pain intensity and associated brain activity (measured with fMRI). As a next step, we conducted a double blind clinical trial where the drug was tested against placebo to determine whether the effects on CBP were mediated by a pharmacological mechanism. For this we obtained psychophysical measurements of pain and measures of brain activity using fMRI. Two scans after treatment (6 hour and 2 weeks after treatment) were conducted to observe the effects of short term and long term use.

Brain activity was measured by the non-invasive method of functional imaging (fMRI), which enables examination of cortical blood flow during pain rating. These brain scans were acquired in chronic back pain patients while they rated their ongoing chronic pain using a finger span device. In a control task, each patient also rated the changes in the length of a bar n a screen (a visual control task). Anatomical scans were also acquired.

The general design of the study was that CBP subjects were assesses with fmri for brain responses for ongoing pain at three time points. The initial (baseline) scan occurred after a minimum of 48 hour period during which the patients refrained from taking analgesic medication. The patients were next scanned at 6 hours after treatment and again after 2 weeks of continuous treatment. Subjects were randomised to placebo or Lidoderm (both Lidoderm and placebo patches were supplied by Endo Pharmaceuticals).

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain

Keywords

  • chronic back pain
  • placebo
  • fmri
  • brain imaging
03

In context

Back Pain

2,373 studies on the registry are indexed under Back Pain; 284 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 38 is below the median of 60 across 1,941 interventional studies indexed under Back Pain.

Browse Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University is the lead sponsor of 1,396 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 102 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or Female 18 years or older of age
  2. Pain in the location of the lower back
  3. Pain duration for a minimum of 6 months on a continuous basis
  4. Pain intensity of at least 3 out of 10 on most days of the week over the past six months
  5. Manifestations of radicular element of pain: radiation below knee (examples towards thigh, buttocks).
  6. Right handedness

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Applying for or currently receiving workers' compensation or disability status.
  2. Back pain secondary to spinal cord injury
  3. Back pain secondary to any systemic condition (e.g ankylosing spondylitis0
  4. Diabetes mellitus
  5. Back pain secondary to tumors.
  6. Standard MRI criteria re: claustrophobia, metal objects etc.
  7. Subjects with cognitive deficits such as dementia, psychiatric illness including depression with a BDI score of more than 19 (moderate to severe depression), history of brain injury, history of chronic disease
  8. Pregnant and/or lactating women
  9. Left handedness
  10. Active cancer
  11. Other serious painful condition (e.g., arthritis)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
38 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    lidocaine

    5% lidoderm patch

    Drug: lidocaine

  • Placebo comparator
    control

    placebo patch

    Drug: placebo

Interventions

  • Druglidocaine

    5% lidoderm patch

    Also known as: Lidoderm (Endo Pharmaceuticals), 5% lidocaine patch

  • Drugplacebo

    placebo

    Also known as: sham patch

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The Scale Had Values From 0-100, Where 0 Represents "no Pain" and 100 Was the "Worst Pain Imaginable".

    the primary hypothesis was that the lidoderm 5% patch was expected to decrease pain intensity post treatment greater than placebo patch. A lower value on the 0-100 scale is considered to represent less pain. Higher values represent more pain. Greater than 20%-30% decrease in pain is considered clinically meaningful.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jul 30, 2013

Participant flow

38 patients were recruited for the brain imaging and treatment study. Data from 7 subjects was not analyzed due to failure to attend the repeat sessions for non specific reasons and data from 1 subject was excluded from analysis due to technical faults. Thus, data from a total of 30 subjects was included in the brain imaging analysis.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLidocaineControl
Started2018
Completed1515
Not completed53

Outcome measures

PrimaryPain Intensity on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The Scale Had Values From 0-100, Where 0 Represents "no Pain" and 100 Was the "Worst Pain Imaginable".

the primary hypothesis was that the lidoderm 5% patch was expected to decrease pain intensity post treatment greater than placebo patch. A lower value on the 0-100 scale is considered to represent less pain. Higher values represent more pain. Greater than 20%-30% decrease in pain is considered clinically meaningful.

Time frame:
2 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · peak pain intensity
Pain Intensity on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The Scale Had Values From 0-100, Where 0 Represents "no Pain" and 100 Was the "Worst Pain Imaginable".
peak pain intensityLidocaineControl
Pain Intensity on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The Scale Had Values From 0-100, Where 0 Represents "no Pain" and 100 Was the "Worst Pain Imaginable".51.0 ± 7.651.6 ± 7.1

Adverse events

Collected over 2 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Lidocaine—0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)
Control—0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)LidocaineControlTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years201838
>=65 years000
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)LidocaineControlTotal
Mean53 ± 7.749.73 ± 10.2751.36 ± 9.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)LidocaineControlTotal
Female8917
Male12921
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)LidocaineControlTotal
United States201838
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Northwestern University
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Baliki MN, Geha PY, Jabakhanji R, Harden N, Schnitzer TJ, Apkarian AV. A preliminary fMRI study of analgesic treatment in chronic back pain and knee osteoarthritis. Mol Pain. 2008 Oct 25;4:47. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-4-47. PubMed 18950528 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01515540
Lead sponsor
Northwestern University
Collaborators
Endo Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Apkar Apkarian (Professor, Northwestern University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 24, 2012
Start date
Jan 2004
Primary completion
Jun 2010
Completion
Jun 2010
Results posted
Jul 30, 2013
Last update
Jul 30, 2013

Study contacts

Apkar V. Apkarian, PhD
principal investigator · Northwestern University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion