ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01505634Updated May 24, 2019Results posted

Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of MK-7655 (Relebactam) + Imipenem/Cilastatin Versus Imipenem/Cilastatin Alone for Treating Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) (MK-7655-003)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Relebactam 250 mg and Relebactam 125 mg in Urinary Tract Infections and Pyelonephritis, sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-24.

Sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (part of Merck & Co., Inc) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
302
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of adding 125 mg or 250 mg doses of MK-7655 (relebactam) to imipenem/cilastatin in adults 18 years or older with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI). The primary hypothesis is that the relebactam + imipenem/cilastatin treatment regimen is non-inferior to imipenem/cilastatin with respect to the proportion of participants with a favorable microbiological response at completion of intravenous (IV) study therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Tract Infections
  • Pyelonephritis

Keywords

  • Relebactam; MK-7655; Imipenem; Urinary Tract Infections; Pyelonephritis; Urologic Diseases; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; Anti-Bacterial and Anti-Infective Agent
03

In context

Urinary Tract Infections

803 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Tract Infections; 133 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 302 is above the median of 131 across 560 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Tract Infections.

Browse Urinary Tract Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC is the lead sponsor of 2,166 studies on the registry; 132 are open to participants now.

Of its 501 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 370 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinically suspected and/or bacteriologically documented cUTI or acute

pyelonephritis judged by the investigator to be serious (requiring hospitalization and treatment with IV antibiotic therapy)

  • Pyuria, determined by a midstream clean-catch (MSCC) or catheterized

(indwelling or straight catheter) urine specimen with greater than or equal to 10 white blood cells (WBCs) per high-power field (hpf) on standard examination of urine sediment or greater than or equal to 10 WBCs/mm3 in unspun urine

  • One positive urine culture within 48 hours of enrollment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Complete obstruction of any portion of the urinary tract (requiring a

permanent indwelling urinary catheter or instrumentation), a known ileal loop, or intractable vesico-ureteral reflux

  • A temporary indwelling urinary catheter is in place and cannot be removed at study entry.
  • Perinephric or intrarenal abscess or known or suspected prostatitis
  • Uncomplicated UTI
  • Any history of recent accidental trauma to the pelvis or urinary tract
  • Any amount of effective antibiotic therapy after obtaining the urine culture for admission to this study and prior to the administration of the first dose of IV study therapy
  • An infection which has been treated with greater than 24 hours of systemic antibiotic therapy known to be effective against the presumed or documented etiologic pathogen(s) within the 72-hour period immediately prior to consideration for entry into the study
  • History of serious allergy, (e.g., anaphylaxis), or any

serious reaction to carbapenem antibiotics, any cephalosporins, penicillins, or other beta (β)-lactam agents

  • History of serious allergy, hypersensitivity (e.g., anaphylaxis), or any serious reaction to other beta-lactam inhibitors (e.g., tazobactam, sulbactam, clavulanic acid)
  • History of a seizure disorder
  • Currently being treated with valproic acid or has received treatment with

valproic acid in the 2 weeks prior to screening.

  • Rapidly progressive or terminal illness unlikely to survive the approximately 6 to 8 week study period
  • Pregnant or expecting to conceive, breast feeding, or plans to breast feed

during the study

  • A response to all study therapy (IV study therapy or subsequent oral

ciprofloxacin) within the timeframe of treatment specified in this protocol is

considered unlikely.

  • Concurrent infection that would interfere with evaluation of response to

the study antibiotics

  • Need for concomitant systemic antimicrobial agents in addition to those

designated in the various study treatment groups (use of vancomycin, daptomycin, or linezolid is allowed for certain infections)

  • cUTI due to a confirmed fungal pathogen
  • Currently receiving therapy, including use of high-dose

  • Prior recipient of a renal transplantation
  • Laboratory abnormalities as specified in protocol
  • History of any other illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, might

confound the results of the study or pose additional risk in administering the study drug

  • Currently participating in, or has participated in, any other clinical study

involving the administration of or experimental medication (not

licensed by regulatory agencies) at the time of presentation or during the previous 30 days prior to screening or is anticipated to participate in such a clinical study during the course of this trial

  • Estimated or actual of \<5 mL/minute, or is currently undergoing hemodialysis
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
302 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Relebactam 250 mg with imipenem/cilastatin

    Relebactam 250 mg IV co-administered with 500 mg of imipenem/cilastatin once every 6 hours for a minimum of 96 hours. After 96 hours of IV treatment, participants may be switched to 500 mg ciprofloxacin (as optional oral therapy following minimum duration of IV study drug), administered orally, twice daily for the remainder of the study. Antibiotic therapy (IV and oral combined) should not exceed 14 days.

    Drug: Relebactam 250 mg · Drug: imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg · Drug: Ciprofloxacin

  • Experimental
    Relebactam 125 mg with imipenem/cilastatin

    Relebactam 125 mg IV co-administered with 500 mg of imipenem/cilastatin once every 6 hours for a minimum of 96 hours. After 96 hours of IV treatment, participants may be switched to 500 mg ciprofloxacin (as optional oral therapy following minimum duration of IV study drug), administered orally, twice daily for the remainder of the study. Antibiotic therapy (IV and oral combined) should not exceed 14 days.

    Drug: Relebactam 125 mg · Drug: imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg · Drug: Ciprofloxacin

  • Placebo comparator
    Relebactam placebo with imipenem/cilastatin

    Matching placebo for relebactam (0.9% normal saline) IV co-administered with 500 mg dose of imipenem/cilastatin once every 6 hours for a minimum of 96 hours. After 96 hours of IV treatment, participants may be switched to 500 mg ciprofloxacin (as optional oral therapy following minimum duration of IV study drug), administered orally, twice daily for the remainder of the study. Antibiotic therapy (IV and oral combined) should not exceed 14 days.

    Drug: imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg · Drug: Placebo to relebactam · Drug: Ciprofloxacin

Interventions

  • Participants randomized to receive relebactam 250 mg will be administered a 250 mg dose of relebactam IV in a blinded fashion once every 6 hours with each dose infused over a 30-minute interval.

    Also known as: MK-7655

  • Participants randomized to receive relebactam 125 mg will be administered a 125 mg dose of relebactam IV in a blinded-treatment fashion once every 6 hours with each dose infused over a 30-minute interval.

    Also known as: MK-7655

  • Drugimipenem/cilastatin 500 mg

    Drug pages: Imipenem · Cilastatin

    A 500 mg dose of imipenem/cilastatin will be administered IV in an open-label fashion once every 6 hours with each dose infused over a 30-minute interval.

    Also known as: PRIMAXIN®, TIENAM®

  • DrugPlacebo to relebactam

    Participants randomized to receive imipenem/cilastatin alone will receive a placebo-matching infusion of IV normal saline (0.9%) once every 6 hours.

  • After at least 96 hours of IV treatment, participants may be switched, at the discretion of the investigator, to 500 mg ciprofloxacin, administered orally, twice daily

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Microbiological Response at Completion of IV Study Therapy

    Microbiological response (MR) was assessed based on results of bacterial cultures obtained at completion of IV study medication relative to cultures obtained at baseline. A favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication of all pathogens identified at baseline. Microbiological response was assessed separately for each participant and pathogen identified in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) population that included participants with a urine culture confirmed to be positive for at least 1 gram-negative and/or anaerobic pathogen(s) commonly isolated in UTI. The overall microbiological response was determined as "favorable" if all pathogens isolated from a participant at baseline demonstrated a "favorable" response (eradication) at the time point evaluated.

    Time frame: At time of last IV dose of study drug (up to post-randomization day 14)

  2. Percentage of Participants With an Elevated Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) or Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Laboratory Value That Was Greater Than or Equal to 5 Times the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)

    All randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment had AST and ALT levels measured up to 14 days following completion of all study medication. Participants who had 2 confirmed elevations of either AST or ALT that were 5 times ULN or greater were recorded.

    Time frame: Up to 14 days following completion of all study therapy (up to 28 days)

  3. Percentage of Participants With Elevated AST or ALT Laboratory Values ≥ 3 Times the ULN, as Well as Elevated Total Bilirubin ≥ 2 Times the ULN, and Alkaline Phosphatase Values That Were < 2 Times the ULN

    All randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment had AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) levels measured up to 14 days following completion of all study medication. Participants who had elevations of AST or ALT that were ≥3 times ULN, total bilirubin measurements that were ≥2 times ULN and, at the same time, an ALP measurement of \< 2X ULN were recorded.

    Time frame: Up to 14 days following completion of all study therapy (up to 28 days)

  4. Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition temporally associated with the use of the product was also an AE.

    Time frame: Up to 14 days following completion of all study therapy (up to 28 days)

  5. Percentage of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

    A SAE was an AE that resulted in death, was life threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in or prolonged an existing inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a cancer, was associated with an overdose, was another important medical event.

    Time frame: Up to 14 days following completion of all study therapy (up to 28 days)

  6. Percentage of Participants With Any Drug-related AE

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition temporally associated with the use of the product was also an AE. A drug-related (DR) AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product that the investigator determined to be possibly, probably, or definitely related to the treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 14 days following completion of all study therapy (up to 28 days)

  7. Percentage of Participants With a Drug-related SAE

    A serious, drug-related (DR) AE was an AE that resulted in death, was life threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in or prolonged an existing inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a cancer, was associated with an overdose, was another important medical event. The SAE was determined to be possibly, probably, or definitely related to the treatment by the investigator.

    Time frame: Up to 42 days following completion of all study therapy (up to 56 days)

  8. Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued IV Study Therapy Due to an AE

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition temporally associated with the use of the product was also an AE.

    Time frame: Up to 14 days

  9. Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued IV Study Therapy Due to a Drug-related AE

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition temporally associated with the use of the product was also an AE. A drug-related AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product that the investigator determined to be possibly, probably, or definitely related to the treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 14 days

  10. Percentage of Participants With Specific AEs With Incidence of >= 4 Participants in One Treatment Group

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition temporally associated with the use of the product was also an AE. Analysis includes specific adverse events with an incidence of ≥4 participants in one treatment group or system organ class.

    Time frame: Up to 14 days following completion of all study therapy (up to 28 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Microbiological Response at Completion of IV Study Therapy Who Had Imipenem-resistant, Gram-negative cUTI Infections.

    Microbiological response was assessed based on results of bacterial cultures obtained at completion of IV study medication relative to cultures obtained at baseline. A favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication of all pathogens identified at baseline. Microbiological response was assessed separately for each participant and pathogen identified in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) population that included participants with a urine culture confirmed to be positive for imipenem-resistant gram-negative or anaerobic infections at baseline. The overall microbiological response was determined as "favorable" if all pathogens isolated from a participant at baseline demonstrated a "favorable" response (eradication) at the time point evaluated.

    Time frame: At time of last IV dose of study drug (up to post-randomization day 14)

  2. Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Microbiological Response at Early Follow-up

    Microbiological response was assessed based on results of bacterial cultures obtained up to 9 days following completion of all study medication (IV and oral) relative to cultures obtained at baseline. A favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication of all pathogens identified at baseline. Microbiological response was assessed separately for each participant and pathogen identified in the ME population that included participants with a urine culture confirmed to be positive for at least 1 gram-negative and/or anaerobic pathogen(s) commonly isolated in UTI. The overall microbiological response was determined as "favorable" if all pathogens isolated from a participant at baseline demonstrated a "favorable" response (eradication) at the time point evaluated.

    Time frame: Up to 9 days following completion of all study IV and oral therapy (up to Day 23)

  3. Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Clinical Response at Completion of IV Study Therapy

    Clinical response was assessed as favorable (cured or improved) or unfavorable (failure) relative to baseline. Response determination was based on physical findings including fever (or history of fever), chills or rigors (accompanied by fever), flank pain, costovertebral angle tenderness, dysuria, urinary urgency, urinary frequency, suprapubic or pelvic pain, nausea, or vomiting. Clinical response was assessed in the ME population that included participants with a urine culture confirmed to be positive for at least 1 gram-negative and/or anaerobic pathogen(s) commonly isolated in UTI.

    Time frame: At time of last IV dose of study drug (up to postrandomization day 14)

  4. Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Clinical Response at Early Follow-up

    Clinical response was assessed as favorable (cured or improved) or unfavorable (failure) relative to baseline. Response determination was based on physical findings including fever (or history of fever), chills or rigors (accompanied by fever), flank pain, costovertebral angle tenderness, dysuria, urinary urgency, urinary frequency, suprapubic or pelvic pain, nausea, or vomiting. Clinical response was assessed in the ME population that included participants with a urine culture confirmed to be positive for at least 1 gram-negative and/or anaerobic pathogen(s) commonly isolated in UTI.

    Time frame: Up to 9 days following completion of all study IV and oral therapy (up to Day 23)

  5. Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Clinical Response at Late Follow-up

    Clinical response was assessed as favorable (cured or improved) or unfavorable (failure) relative to baseline. Response determination was based on physical findings including fever (or history of fever), chills or rigors (accompanied by fever), flank pain, costovertebral angle tenderness, dysuria, urinary urgency, urinary frequency, suprapubic or pelvic pain, nausea, or vomiting. Clinical response was assessed in the ME population that included participants with a urine culture confirmed to be positive for at least 1 gram-negative and/or anaerobic pathogen(s) commonly isolated in UTI.

    Time frame: Up to 42 days following completion of all study IV and oral therapy (up to Day 56)

  6. Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Microbiological Response at Late Follow-up

    Microbiological response was assessed based on results of bacterial cultures obtained up to 42 days following completion of all study medication (IV and oral) relative to cultures obtained at baseline. A favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication of all pathogens identified at baseline. Microbiological response was assessed separately for each participant and pathogen identified in the ME population that included participants with a urine culture confirmed to be positive for at least 1 gram-negative and/or anaerobic pathogen(s) commonly isolated in UTI. The overall microbiological response was determined as "favorable" if all pathogens isolated from a participant at baseline demonstrated a "favorable" response (eradication) at the time point evaluated.

    Time frame: Up to 42 days following completion of all study IV and oral therapy (up to Day 56)

07

Results

Posted May 24, 2019

Participant flow

Participants were enrolled with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) or acute pyelonephritis judged by the investigator to be serious (requiring hospitalization and intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy); pyuria; and 1 positive urine culture within 48 hours of enrollment.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Started101101100
Treated9999100
Completed929194
Not completed9106
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject251
Withdrew: Physician decision110
Withdrew: Adverse event100
Withdrew: Insufficient supply of drug at site100
Withdrew: Protocol violation200
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up144
Withdrew: Death100
Withdrew: In a conflict zone001

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With a Favorable Microbiological Response at Completion of IV Study Therapy

Microbiological response (MR) was assessed based on results of bacterial cultures obtained at completion of IV study medication relative to cultures obtained at baseline. A favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication of all pathogens identified at baseline. Microbiological response was assessed separately for each participant and pathogen identified in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) population that included participants with a urine culture confirmed to be positive for at least 1 gram-negative and/or anaerobic pathogen(s) commonly isolated in UTI. The overall microbiological response was determined as "favorable" if all pathogens isolated from a participant at baseline demonstrated a "favorable" response (eradication) at the time point evaluated.

Time frame:
At time of last IV dose of study drug (up to post-randomization day 14)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Microbiological Response at Completion of IV Study Therapy
Percentage of ParticipantsRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Microbiological Response at Completion of IV Study Therapy95.5 (87.5 to 99.1)98.6 (92.4 to 100.0)98.7 (92.8 to 100.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Relebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Miettinen and Nurminen · p = 0.005 · Percent difference: -3.1 · 95% CI -11.2 to 3.2Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Miettinen and Nurminen · p = < 0.001 · Percent difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -6.4 to 5.9Relebactam minus Placebo
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With an Elevated Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) or Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Laboratory Value That Was Greater Than or Equal to 5 Times the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)

All randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment had AST and ALT levels measured up to 14 days following completion of all study medication. Participants who had 2 confirmed elevations of either AST or ALT that were 5 times ULN or greater were recorded.

Time frame:
Up to 14 days following completion of all study therapy (up to 28 days)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an Elevated Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) or Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Laboratory Value That Was Greater Than or Equal to 5 Times the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Percentage of participantsRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Percentage of Participants With an Elevated Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) or Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Laboratory Value That Was Greater Than or Equal to 5 Times the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)1.01.00
Statistical analysis
  • Relebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Miettinen and Nurminen · p = 0.315 · Percent difference: 1.0 · 95% CI -2.7 to 5.5Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Miettinen and Nurminen · p = 0.315 · Percent difference: 1.0 · 95% CI -2.7 to 5.5Relebactam minus Placebo
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Elevated AST or ALT Laboratory Values ≥ 3 Times the ULN, as Well as Elevated Total Bilirubin ≥ 2 Times the ULN, and Alkaline Phosphatase Values That Were < 2 Times the ULN

All randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment had AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) levels measured up to 14 days following completion of all study medication. Participants who had elevations of AST or ALT that were ≥3 times ULN, total bilirubin measurements that were ≥2 times ULN and, at the same time, an ALP measurement of \< 2X ULN were recorded.

Time frame:
Up to 14 days following completion of all study therapy (up to 28 days)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Elevated AST or ALT Laboratory Values ≥ 3 Times the ULN, as Well as Elevated Total Bilirubin ≥ 2 Times the ULN, and Alkaline Phosphatase Values That Were < 2 Times the ULN
Percentage of participantsRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Percentage of Participants With Elevated AST or ALT Laboratory Values ≥ 3 Times the ULN, as Well as Elevated Total Bilirubin ≥ 2 Times the ULN, and Alkaline Phosphatase Values That Were < 2 Times the ULN000
Statistical analysis
  • Relebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Miettinen and Nurminen · p = > 0.999 (No participants met the criteria for ECI #2.) · Percent difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -3.7 to 3.8Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Miettinen and Nurminen · p = > 0.999 (No participants met the criteria for ECI #2.) · Percent difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -3.7 to 3.8Relebactam minus Placebo
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition temporally associated with the use of the product was also an AE.

Time frame:
Up to 14 days following completion of all study therapy (up to 28 days)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE)
Percentage of participantsRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE)28.329.330.0
Statistical analysis
  • Relebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: -1.7 · 95% CI -14.3 to 10.9Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: -0.7 · 95% CI -13.4 to 12.0Relebactam minus Placebo
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

A SAE was an AE that resulted in death, was life threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in or prolonged an existing inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a cancer, was associated with an overdose, was another important medical event.

Time frame:
Up to 14 days following completion of all study therapy (up to 28 days)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Percentage of participantsRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Percentage of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)3.01.03.0
Statistical analysis
  • Relebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -5.8 to 5.9Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: -2.0 · 95% CI -7.6 to 2.8Relebactam minus Placebo
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Any Drug-related AE

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition temporally associated with the use of the product was also an AE. A drug-related (DR) AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product that the investigator determined to be possibly, probably, or definitely related to the treatment.

Time frame:
Up to 14 days following completion of all study therapy (up to 28 days)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Any Drug-related AE
Percentage of participantsRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Percentage of Participants With Any Drug-related AE10.19.19.0
Statistical analysis
  • Relebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: 1.1 · 95% CI -7.5 to 9.8Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: 0.1 · 95% CI -8.4 to 8.6Relebactam minus Placebo
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With a Drug-related SAE

A serious, drug-related (DR) AE was an AE that resulted in death, was life threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in or prolonged an existing inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a cancer, was associated with an overdose, was another important medical event. The SAE was determined to be possibly, probably, or definitely related to the treatment by the investigator.

Time frame:
Up to 42 days following completion of all study therapy (up to 56 days)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Drug-related SAE
Percentage of participantsRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Percentage of Participants With a Drug-related SAE1.001.0
Statistical analysis
  • Relebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -4.5 to 4.6Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: -1.0 · 95% CI -5.5 to 2.8Relebactam minus Placebo
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued IV Study Therapy Due to an AE

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition temporally associated with the use of the product was also an AE.

Time frame:
Up to 14 days
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued IV Study Therapy Due to an AE
Percentage of participantsRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued IV Study Therapy Due to an AE3.01.02.0
Statistical analysis
  • Relebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: 1.0 · 95% CI -4.4 to 6.8Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: -1.0 · 95% CI -6.1 to 3.7Relebactam minus Placebo
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued IV Study Therapy Due to a Drug-related AE

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition temporally associated with the use of the product was also an AE. A drug-related AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product that the investigator determined to be possibly, probably, or definitely related to the treatment.

Time frame:
Up to 14 days
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued IV Study Therapy Due to a Drug-related AE
Percentage of participantsRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued IV Study Therapy Due to a Drug-related AE2.01.01.0
Statistical analysis
  • Relebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: 1.0 · 95% CI -3.6 to 6.2Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -4.5 to 4.6Relebactam minus Placebo
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Specific AEs With Incidence of >= 4 Participants in One Treatment Group

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition temporally associated with the use of the product was also an AE. Analysis includes specific adverse events with an incidence of ≥4 participants in one treatment group or system organ class.

Time frame:
Up to 14 days following completion of all study therapy (up to 28 days)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Specific AEs With Incidence of >= 4 Participants in One Treatment Group
Percentage of participantsRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Diarrhoea5.12.04.0
Nausea4.06.14.0
Bacteriuria1.02.04.0
White blood cells urine positive1.01.04.0
Headache7.13.04.0
Statistical analysis
  • Relebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: 1.1 · 95% CI -5.5 to 7.8Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: -2.0 · 95% CI -8.1 to 3.6Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -6.4 to 6.5Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: 2.1 · 95% CI -4.6 to 9.2Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: -3.0 · 95% CI -9.0 to 1.9Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: -2.0 · 95% CI -8.1 to 3.6Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: -3.0 · 95% CI -9.0 to 1.9Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: -3.0 · 95% CI -9.0 to 1.9Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: 3.1 · 95% CI -3.7 to 10.4Relebactam minus Placebo
  • Relebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin vs Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin · Percent difference: -1.0 · 95% CI -7.2 to 5.1Relebactam minus Placebo
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Favorable Microbiological Response at Completion of IV Study Therapy Who Had Imipenem-resistant, Gram-negative cUTI Infections.

Microbiological response was assessed based on results of bacterial cultures obtained at completion of IV study medication relative to cultures obtained at baseline. A favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication of all pathogens identified at baseline. Microbiological response was assessed separately for each participant and pathogen identified in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) population that included participants with a urine culture confirmed to be positive for imipenem-resistant gram-negative or anaerobic infections at baseline. The overall microbiological response was determined as "favorable" if all pathogens isolated from a participant at baseline demonstrated a "favorable" response (eradication) at the time point evaluated.

Time frame:
At time of last IV dose of study drug (up to post-randomization day 14)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Microbiological Response at Completion of IV Study Therapy Who Had Imipenem-resistant, Gram-negative cUTI Infections.
Percentage of participantsRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Microbiological Response at Completion of IV Study Therapy Who Had Imipenem-resistant, Gram-negative cUTI Infections.100.0 (69.2 to 100.0)100.0 (59.0 to 100.0)100.0 (54.1 to 100.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Favorable Microbiological Response at Early Follow-up

Microbiological response was assessed based on results of bacterial cultures obtained up to 9 days following completion of all study medication (IV and oral) relative to cultures obtained at baseline. A favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication of all pathogens identified at baseline. Microbiological response was assessed separately for each participant and pathogen identified in the ME population that included participants with a urine culture confirmed to be positive for at least 1 gram-negative and/or anaerobic pathogen(s) commonly isolated in UTI. The overall microbiological response was determined as "favorable" if all pathogens isolated from a participant at baseline demonstrated a "favorable" response (eradication) at the time point evaluated.

Time frame:
Up to 9 days following completion of all study IV and oral therapy (up to Day 23)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Microbiological Response at Early Follow-up
Percentage of participantsRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Microbiological Response at Early Follow-up61.5 (48.6 to 73.3)68.1 (56.0 to 78.6)70.4 (58.4 to 80.7)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Favorable Clinical Response at Completion of IV Study Therapy

Clinical response was assessed as favorable (cured or improved) or unfavorable (failure) relative to baseline. Response determination was based on physical findings including fever (or history of fever), chills or rigors (accompanied by fever), flank pain, costovertebral angle tenderness, dysuria, urinary urgency, urinary frequency, suprapubic or pelvic pain, nausea, or vomiting. Clinical response was assessed in the ME population that included participants with a urine culture confirmed to be positive for at least 1 gram-negative and/or anaerobic pathogen(s) commonly isolated in UTI.

Time frame:
At time of last IV dose of study drug (up to postrandomization day 14)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Clinical Response at Completion of IV Study Therapy
Percentage of participantsRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Clinical Response at Completion of IV Study Therapy97.1 (89.9 to 99.6)98.7 (93.1 to 100.0)98.8 (93.2 to 100.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Favorable Clinical Response at Early Follow-up

Clinical response was assessed as favorable (cured or improved) or unfavorable (failure) relative to baseline. Response determination was based on physical findings including fever (or history of fever), chills or rigors (accompanied by fever), flank pain, costovertebral angle tenderness, dysuria, urinary urgency, urinary frequency, suprapubic or pelvic pain, nausea, or vomiting. Clinical response was assessed in the ME population that included participants with a urine culture confirmed to be positive for at least 1 gram-negative and/or anaerobic pathogen(s) commonly isolated in UTI.

Time frame:
Up to 9 days following completion of all study IV and oral therapy (up to Day 23)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Clinical Response at Early Follow-up
Percentage of ParticipantsRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Clinical Response at Early Follow-up89.1 (78.8 to 95.5)91.8 (83.0 to 96.9)93.4 (85.3 to 97.8)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Favorable Clinical Response at Late Follow-up

Clinical response was assessed as favorable (cured or improved) or unfavorable (failure) relative to baseline. Response determination was based on physical findings including fever (or history of fever), chills or rigors (accompanied by fever), flank pain, costovertebral angle tenderness, dysuria, urinary urgency, urinary frequency, suprapubic or pelvic pain, nausea, or vomiting. Clinical response was assessed in the ME population that included participants with a urine culture confirmed to be positive for at least 1 gram-negative and/or anaerobic pathogen(s) commonly isolated in UTI.

Time frame:
Up to 42 days following completion of all study IV and oral therapy (up to Day 56)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Clinical Response at Late Follow-up
Percentage of participantsRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Clinical Response at Late Follow-up88.7 (78.1 to 95.3)87.3 (77.3 to 94.0)88.2 (78.7 to 94.4)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Favorable Microbiological Response at Late Follow-up

Microbiological response was assessed based on results of bacterial cultures obtained up to 42 days following completion of all study medication (IV and oral) relative to cultures obtained at baseline. A favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication of all pathogens identified at baseline. Microbiological response was assessed separately for each participant and pathogen identified in the ME population that included participants with a urine culture confirmed to be positive for at least 1 gram-negative and/or anaerobic pathogen(s) commonly isolated in UTI. The overall microbiological response was determined as "favorable" if all pathogens isolated from a participant at baseline demonstrated a "favorable" response (eradication) at the time point evaluated.

Time frame:
Up to 42 days following completion of all study IV and oral therapy (up to Day 56)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Microbiological Response at Late Follow-up
Percentage of participantsRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Microbiological Response at Late Follow-up68.3 (55.3 to 79.4)65.2 (52.8 to 76.3)62.5 (50.3 to 73.6)

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 42 days following completion of all study therapy for drug-related serious adverse events (up to 56 days); and up to 14 days following completion of all study therapy for all-cause serious and non-serious adverse events (up to 28 days).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Relebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin2/99 (2%)5/99 (5.1%)11/99 (11.1%)
Relebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/Cilastatin0/99 (0%)2/99 (2%)9/99 (9.1%)
Relebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin0/100 (0%)3/100 (3%)7/100 (7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent serious events
EventRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
Cardiac arrestCardiac disorders1/990/990/100
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/990/991/100
Duodenal ulcerGastrointestinal disorders1/990/990/100
Duodenal ulcer perforationGastrointestinal disorders1/990/990/100
PeritonitisInfections and infestations1/990/990/100
Pyelonephritis acuteInfections and infestations1/990/990/100
UrosepsisInfections and infestations0/991/990/100
Postoperative wound complicationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/991/990/100
Renal cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/990/990/100
Renal neoplasmNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/990/990/100
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventRelebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/Cilastatin
HeadacheNervous system disorders7/993/994/100
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders4/996/994/100

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Relebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/CilastatinTotal
Mean57.9 ± 17.355.9 ± 17.555.7 ± 19.256.5 ± 18.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Relebactam 250 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam 125 mg With Imipenem/CilastatinRelebactam Placebo With Imipenem/CilastatinTotal
Female516042153
Male504158149
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Sims M, Mariyanovski V, McLeroth P, Akers W, Lee YC, Brown ML, Du J, Pedley A, Kartsonis NA, Paschke A. Prospective, randomized, double-blind, Phase 2 dose-ranging study comparing efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin plus relebactam with imipenem/cilastatin alone in patients with complicated urinary tract infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Sep 1;72(9):2616-2626. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx139. PubMed 28575389 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

Data sharing details ↗ · engagezone.msd.com

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2012 to primary completion in Jul 2015, 38 months.

Results were first posted in May 2019, 3 years 9 months after primary completion.

Of 30 phase 2 interventional studies under Urinary Tract Infections, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 38. This study's 38 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 4, 2012
First posted
Jan 6, 2012
StartActual
May 16, 2012
Primary completionActual
Jul 28, 2015
CompletionActual
Jul 28, 2015
Results first posted
May 24, 2019
Last update
May 24, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 24, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01505634
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 6, 2012
Start date
May 16, 2012
Primary completion
Jul 28, 2015
Completion
Jul 28, 2015
Results posted
May 24, 2019
Last update
May 24, 2019

Study contacts

Medical Director
study director · Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Relebactam

Start the discussion