CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01501630FLUPROSTICUpdated Oct 14, 2015

Role of PET/CT With Fluorine-18 Tracers of Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer

An observational study in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-10-14.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Observational

Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
112
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Compare PET/CT and MRI for the early detection of bone metastases of prostate cancer: diagnostic performance and impact on the patient management.Determine the lowest cost strategy according to the precise clinical circumstances.

Read the detailed description

In patients with high risk prostate cancer and high PSA levels, PET/CT with fluoride (18F) and FLUOROCHOLINE (18F) and whole-body MRI will be performed within one month.

Data of a 6 month follow-up after those examination will be made available to a panel of independent experts. They will determine the standard of truth (SOT) concerning the invasion of the skeleton and also of soft tissue by prostate cancer tissue, the impact of each imaging modality on patient management and the adequacy of the decisions. In some cases (anti-hormone treatment without histology), it will not be possible to determine the SOT.

By comparison of the results of blind readings for each imaging modality with the standard of truth, the diagnostic performance will be determined.

By simulation, several strategies will be constructed concerning the best examinations to be performed and the sequence according to the precise clinical circumstances. Their cost and effectiveness will be evaluated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Comparison of imaging modalities
  • Impact on patient management
  • Optimisation of cost of the diagnostic strategy
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,370 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,400 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 112 is below the median of 200 across 1,181 observational studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Prostate cancer

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18
  • Histologically proven prostate cancer.
  • Abnormal plasmatic level of prostate specific antigen dating less than 3 months, initial Gleason score available
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other active cancer or bone infection.
  • Chemotherapy or change in hormone therapy since the last PSA assay
  • Contraindication to MRI without contrast agent (claustrophobia, pace maker, metallic foreign body, some cardiac valves). Metallic joint prostheses are NOT a contraindication.
  • Allergic reaction to radiopharmaceuticals that will be used.
  • Patient who seems not capable of staying in the gantry of the machines during the examinations without moving.
05

Study design

Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
112 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • PET/CT and MRI

    all patients will benefit from PET/CT and MRI

    Device: performance of PET/CT and whole-body MRI

Interventions

  • Deviceperformance of PET/CT and whole-body MRI

    For PET/CT radiopharmaceuticals, both registered in France:Fluoride (18F)FLUOROCHOLINE (18F)No contrast agent scheduled for MRI in the study RadiopharmaceuticalsSingle use, 2-4 MBq/kg body weight, IV infusion

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. bone metastases

    Follow up data (histology, imaging, PSA levels) during 6 months to determine the standard of truth and the adequacy of the management decided on basis of imaging modalities.

    Time frame: within 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Service Médecine Nucléaire - Hôpital TENON
    Paris, 75020, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gauthe M, Zarca K, Aveline C, Lecouvet F, Balogova S, Cussenot O, Talbot JN, Durand-Zaleski I. Comparison of 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT, 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for the detection of bone metastases in recurrent prostate cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis in France. BMC Med Imaging. 2020 Mar 2;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12880-020-00425-y. PubMed 32122345 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 14, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01501630
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 29, 2011
Start date
Dec 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2014
Completion
Dec 2014
Last update
Oct 14, 2015

Study contacts

Jean-Noël TALBOT, MD,PhD
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion