CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01490073Updated Apr 26, 2019Results posted

The Effect of Nitroglycerin on the Intrauterine Device (IUD) Insertion Experience in Nulliparous Women

An interventional study of Insertion of nitroglycerin ointment and Insertion of placebo ointment in Contraception and Pain, sponsored by Oregon Health and Science University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-26.

Sponsored by Oregon Health and Science University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Increasing ease of access of long-acting birth control methods, like intrauterine devices (IUDs), is an important way to reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy. Unfortunately, fear of IUD insertion in women who have not had children is common among health care providers and women alike, and this limits IUD use. To increase acceptance of this highly effective birth control method, there is a need to explore new, low cost, and easily applied methods to improve the insertion experience. This is a pilot study to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of nitroglycerin ointment applied vaginally to improve the IUD insertion experience for both patient and provider. The investigators hypothesis is that nitroglycerin ointment will decrease the pain associated with IUD insertion.

Read the detailed description

Increasing acceptability and use of long acting reversible contraceptive methods like the intrauterine device (IUD) is an important strategy to reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy. Unfortunately, fear of IUD insertion in nulliparous women is common among health care providers and women alike, and this limits IUD use. While many health care providers assume that placement is more difficult in nulliparous women, there is no evidence that the risk of unsuccessful insertion is higher. Women worry about pain with insertion, and their fear is not unfounded as U.S. and international data have shown that nulliparous women report approximately twice as much pain with IUD insertion compared to parous women.

A key difference between nulliparous and multiparous women is the resistance of the cervix. While cervical dilation is uncommonly needed during IUD placement, force is often required to pass the insertion device through the internal os. Although misoprostol and ibuprofen have been studied as ways to improve the IUD insertion experience, neither has proved effective, and misoprostol actually has been shown to increase pain. Therefore, to increase acceptance of this highly effective contraceptive, there is a need to investigate novel, low cost, easily applied and accessible techniques to improve the insertion experience.

Nitric oxide (NO) donors, including nitroglycerin, nitroprusside, isosorbide mononitrate and isosorbide dinitrate, have effects on the animal and human cervix. Both nitroglycerin and isosorbide mononitrate tablets administered vaginally have been shown in RCTs to induce effective cervical ripening with minimal side effects for first trimester abortion compared to placebo. Nitroprusside and isosorbide dinitrate gel given intracervically prior to first trimester abortion also have showed minimal side effects in several RCTs, but with mixed results regarding effectiveness. Additional safety data about NO donors applied topically to skin and mucosal surfaces is well established through the routine use of topical nitroglycerin for treatment of anal fissures.

Although a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing nitroprusside gel to misoprostol for cervical ripening prior to first trimester surgical abortion found superior cervical dilation in the misoprostol group, there was no significant difference in cervical dilation up to 5 mm. While most studies of abortion are concerned with providing adequate dilation beyond 8 mm, the cervical remodeling that is necessary to help with IUD insertion is much less, as the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) inserter is only 4.75 mm in diameter. Since NO donors are smooth muscle relaxants, they are expected to induce cervical ripening without causing uterine cramping, which is the most significant side effect of misoprostol.

Nitroglycerin is inexpensive, stable at room temperature, and readily available in tablet and ointment form, as well as in a dextrose solution for intravenous administration. The ointment form is commonly applied topically for the treatment of anal fissures. We propose the following aims:

  1. To determine if nitroglycerin ointment applied vaginally 30-45 minutes prior to IUD insertion improves pain among nulliparous women compared to a placebo ointment. Self-reported pain scores on a 100 mm VAS will be assessed at multiple time points during and after the IUD insertion procedure. In addition, overall satisfaction and adverse effects will be evaluated.
  2. To determine if nitroglycerin ointment applied vaginally 30-45 minutes prior to IUD insertion improves ease of IUD insertion for the provider compared to a placebo ointment. In addition, need for additional dilation, additional pain medicine such as paracervical block, inability to place the IUD, and complications will be tracked.
  3. To determine if nitroglycerin ointment applied vaginally 30-45 minutes prior to IUD insertion is safe and well tolerated. Side effects related to treatment with nitroglycerin ointment or placebo will be compared. Blood pressure will be measured at multiple time points.
02

Conditions studied

  • Contraception
  • Pain

Keywords

  • Intrauterine device
  • Pain
  • Contraception
  • Nitroglycerin
  • Nitric oxide donor
  • Intrauterine device insertion
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Oregon Health and Science University is the lead sponsor of 676 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Of its 49 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 36 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. age 18-45 years,
  2. generally healthy,
  3. requesting a LNG-IUS for contraception as the primary indication

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous pregnancy beyond 20 weeks;
  2. previous IUD placement or attempted IUD placement;
  3. previous cervical cold knife cone (CKC) or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP);
  4. contraindication to LNG-IUS (including pregnancy, fibroids that distort the uterine cavity, exam consistent with PID, allergy to any component of the LNG-IUS, etc);
  5. concurrent use of any form of nitrate therapy or medications that interact with nitroglycerin (such as phosphodiesterase V inhibitors);
  6. known allergy to nitroglycerine or common topical ointment ingredients;
  7. known renal or hepatic impairment;
  8. history of hypertensive or hypotensive disorder;
  9. history of migraine, cluster headaches, or vascular headaches;
  10. history of myocardial infarction;
  11. uncontrolled congestive heart failure;
  12. unstable angina;
  13. tobacco or alcohol amblyopia;
  14. congenital optic atrophy;
  15. blood pressure less than 90/55 or greater than 150/100 in office prior to speculum exam
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active nitroglycerin ointment

    Drug: Insertion of nitroglycerin ointment

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo ointment

    Drug: Insertion of placebo ointment

Interventions

  • DrugInsertion of nitroglycerin ointment

    Nitroglycerin ointment inserted into the vagina 30-45 minutes prior to IUD insertion

  • DrugInsertion of placebo ointment

    Placebo ointment inserted into the vagina 30-45 minutes prior to IUD insertion

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient-reported Pain at Passage of Insertion Device Through Cervix, as Measured on a 100 mm VAS

    Patient-reported pain at passage of insertion device through cervix, as measured on a 100 mm VAS. VAS anchors: 0 indicates no pain, and 100 indicates worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: 30-45 minutes after insertion of nitroglycerin ointment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Provider Ease With Intrauterine Device Insertion Measured on a 100 mm VAS

    Provider ease with intrauterine device insertion measured on a 100 mm VAS. VAS (visual analog scale) anchors: 0 indicates easiest insertion imaginable, 100 indicates most difficult insertion imaginable

    Time frame: 30-45 minutes after insertion of nitroglycerin ointment

07

Results

Posted Apr 26, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneActive Nitroglycerin OintmentPlacebo Ointment
Started1212
Completed1212
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPatient-reported Pain at Passage of Insertion Device Through Cervix, as Measured on a 100 mm VAS

Patient-reported pain at passage of insertion device through cervix, as measured on a 100 mm VAS. VAS anchors: 0 indicates no pain, and 100 indicates worst pain imaginable.

Time frame:
30-45 minutes after insertion of nitroglycerin ointment
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Patient-reported Pain at Passage of Insertion Device Through Cervix, as Measured on a 100 mm VAS
mmActive Nitroglycerin OintmentPlacebo Ointment
Patient-reported Pain at Passage of Insertion Device Through Cervix, as Measured on a 100 mm VAS55.8 ± 25.253.9 ± 28.1
SecondaryProvider Ease With Intrauterine Device Insertion Measured on a 100 mm VAS

Provider ease with intrauterine device insertion measured on a 100 mm VAS. VAS (visual analog scale) anchors: 0 indicates easiest insertion imaginable, 100 indicates most difficult insertion imaginable

Time frame:
30-45 minutes after insertion of nitroglycerin ointment
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Provider Ease With Intrauterine Device Insertion Measured on a 100 mm VAS
mmActive Nitroglycerin OintmentPlacebo Ointment
Provider Ease With Intrauterine Device Insertion Measured on a 100 mm VAS29.4 ± 23.822.8 ± 29.9

Adverse events

Collected over 2 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active Nitroglycerin Ointment0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)
Placebo Ointment0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Active Nitroglycerin OintmentPlacebo OintmentTotal
Mean28.3 ± 6.925.7 ± 4.427.04 ± 5.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Active Nitroglycerin OintmentPlacebo OintmentTotal
Female121224
Male000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Active Nitroglycerin OintmentPlacebo OintmentTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White12921
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported033
Current smoker
Current smoker(Participants)Active Nitroglycerin OintmentPlacebo OintmentTotal
Count of participants437
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Planned Parenthood Columbia Willamette
    Portland, Oregon 97212, United States
  • Oregon Health & Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 26, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01490073
Lead sponsor
Oregon Health and Science University
Collaborators
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Bayer
Responsible party
Elizabeth Micks (Instructor and Fellow in Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 12, 2011
Start date
Mar 1, 2012
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2012
Completion
Nov 1, 2012
Results posted
Apr 26, 2019
Last update
Apr 26, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion