ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01485133Updated Nov 7, 2012

Water Method Colonoscopy in Patients With Prior Surgery

An observational study in Intubation, Surgery and Adenoma, sponsored by Air Force Military Medical University, China. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-11-07.

Sponsored by Air Force Military Medical University, China · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
110
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Water method with water exchange has been shown to reduce medication requirement and pain experienced during colonoscopy. It increases the success rate of cecal intubation in sedated and unsedated patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. Exchange of water during scope insertion minimizes distension of the colonic lumen and decreases loop formation. Exclusion of air from the colon during insertion by omission of air insufflations and suction removal of residual air prevent elongation of the colon. These maneuvers facilitate colonoscopy insertion in average patients and may enhance the success of difficult colonoscopy.

Prior abdominal or pelvic surgery is an independent factor for difficult colonoscopy, the probable adhesion may change the anatomy and increase the discomfort of patients. We postulate that these patients may benefit from using the water method for colonoscopy. In this proposal we test the hypothesis that compared with conventional air insufflations the water method with water exchange significantly enhances the success rate of cecal intubation in patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery.

The aim of the study is to compare the outcome of colonoscopy using the water method versus the conventional air method in patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery. The primary outcome is cecal intubation success rate. The secondary outcomes include cecal intubation time, maximum pain score during colonoscopy, overall pain score after colonoscopy and adenoma detection rate.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intubation
  • Surgery
  • Adenoma
  • Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • colonoscopy
  • water
  • surgery
  • unsedated
03

In context

Adenoma

662 studies on the registry are indexed under Adenoma; 101 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 110 is below the median of 300 across 230 observational studies indexed under Adenoma.

Browse Adenoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Air Force Military Medical University, China is the lead sponsor of 178 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery undergoing unsedated colonoscopy will be recruited in this study.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery,

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of colorectal surgery
  • Severe colonic stricture or obstructing tumor
  • Patients who cannot give informed consent and those who are hemodynamically unstable
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
110 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Air colonoscopy

    Colonoscopy will be performed without medications and with judicious air insufflation during colonoscope insertion.

  • Water colonoscopy

    Colonoscopy will be performed without medications and aided by water infusion in-lieu of air insufflation during insertion of the colonoscope. The water infusion involves putting warm sterile water into the colon to open up the colon for advancement of the colonoscope until the end of the colon (cecum) is reached. The water is delivered via a needle adaptor or the built-in scope irrigation channel by an infusion pump equipped with a foot switch which will be controlled by the endoscopist. Infused water used to cleanse residual fecal matter will be suctioned as needed to clear the colonic lumen.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cecal intubation success rate

    Insertion of a colonoscope to the cecum

    Time frame: up to ten months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adenoma detection rate

    The proportion of participants with at least one adenoma in each group

    Time frame: up to ten months

  2. Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale

    0 = no pain, to 10 = most severe pain

    Time frame: up to ten months

  3. Cecum intubation time

    Total time of colonoscope intubation from anus to cecum

    Time frame: up to ten months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Endoscopic center, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
    Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Leung FW. Water exchange may be superior to water immersion for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Dec;9(12):1012-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Sep 22. No abstract available. PubMed 21946120 ↗
  • Leung FW, Leung JW, Mann SK, Friedland S, Ramirez FC. The water method significantly enhances patient-centered outcomes in sedated and unsedated colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2011 Sep;43(9):816-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256407. Epub 2011 May 24. PubMed 21611947 ↗
  • Leung FW, Harker JO, Jackson G, Okamoto KE, Behbahani OM, Jamgotchian NJ, Aharonian HS, Guth PH, Mann SK, Leung JW. A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):693-700. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.05.020. Epub 2010 Jul 8. PubMed 20619405 ↗
  • Leung CW, Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R, Wu KK, Leung FW, Friedland S. Water immersion versus standard colonoscopy insertion technique: randomized trial shows promise for minimal sedation. Endoscopy. 2010 Jul;42(7):557-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244231. Epub 2010 Jun 30. PubMed 20593332 ↗
  • Leung JW, Mann SK, Siao-Salera R, Ransibrahmanakul K, Lim B, Cabrera H, Canete W, Barredo P, Gutierrez R, Leung FW. A randomized, controlled comparison of warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation versus air insufflation for aiding colonoscopy insertion in sedated patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.253. Epub 2009 Jun 24. PubMed 19555938 ↗
  • Luo H, Zhang L, Liu X, Leung FW, Liu Z, Wang X, Xue L, Wu K, Fan D, Pan Y, Guo X. Water exchange enhanced cecal intubation in potentially difficult colonoscopy. Unsedated patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 May;77(5):767-73. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.12.007. Epub 2013 Feb 5. PubMed 23394837 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 7, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01485133
Responsible party
Yanglin Pan (Associated professor, Air Force Military Medical University, China) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 5, 2011
Start date
Nov 2011
Primary completion
Jul 2012
Completion
Nov 2012
Last update
Nov 7, 2012

Study contacts

Yanglin Pan, MD
principal investigator · Air Force Military Medical University, China

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion