CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01480102PRONEUpdated Mar 14, 2019

Paravertebral Block for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

An interventional study of Group A-Paravertebral block and Group B- No block in Post Operative Pain, sponsored by Loyola University. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-03-14.

Sponsored by Loyola University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2019), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will compare post-operative pain levels in patients who receive paravertebral block prior to Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) surgery versus those who do not receive the block. We hypothesize that patients who receive the block will have lower post-operative pain scores and require less narcotics.

Read the detailed description

The strategies used to manage nephrolithiasis including medical expulsive therapy, extracorporeal shock wave (ESWL), ureteroscopy, open surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PCNL in an inpatient procedure performed in two steps. Step 1, is the placement of a drainage line (nephrostomy tube) from the back into the collecting system of the kidney. This step is typically performed by interventional radiologists under conscious sedation. Step 2 is performed by urologists and involves dilating the tract of the nephrostomy tube, placement of an access sheath and actual removal of the stone using endoscopic equipment. The minimally invasive approach of PCNL is well accepted to be as effective as open procedures for stone removal with less morbidity. Post-operative pain management remains challenging and can lead to extended hospital stays.

This randomized, double-blinded trial designed to assess the effects of paravertebral block on intra-operative and post-operative pain control.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post Operative Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • Paravertebral block
  • bupivacaine
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,089 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,137 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 46 is below the median of 75 across 4,341 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Loyola University is the lead sponsor of 132 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Of its 26 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Consent to undergo percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • Between the ages of 18 and 75
  • Able to consent, fill out study documents, and complete all study procedures and follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Will have bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • Have an infection at the site of the proposed block
  • Have anatomy that prevents ability to perform block
  • Have a coagulopathy which may increase their chances of bleeding from the block
  • Have a known allergy to local anesthetics
  • Are unable to fill out the VAS scale due to physical or mental conditions
  • Are unable to use a patient controlled analgesia (PCA) device due to physical or mental conditions
  • Are pregnant
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
46 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Group B- No Block

    Participants randodmized to this arm will have a local anesthetic injection and pressure applied to the paravertebral space. A paravertebral injection will not be conducted.

    Other: Group B- No block

  • Active comparator
    Group A- Paravertebral block

    Participants randodmized to this arm will have a local anesthetic (Bupivicaine 0.5% without epinephrine) injection and will be given a paravetebral block into the T10 paravertebral space..

    Drug: Group A-Paravertebral block

Interventions

  • DrugGroup A-Paravertebral block

    Bupivicaine 0.5% without epinephrine (100mg)20cc will be injected into the T10 paravertebral space. Active Group

    Also known as: Group A-Paravertebral block Active Group

  • OtherGroup B- No block

    direct pressure for 5 minutes will be held at the site of the where the local anesthetic was applied to mimic the application of the block.

    Also known as: Placebo Group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Score

    post-operative pain will be measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS.

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Opiod Use

    All patients will receive the same post-operative pain control, which does not deviate from our standard protocol for patients receiving PCNL. All patients will be immediately given a PCA in recovery. Patients allergic to morphine/dilaudid will be given a narcoticopioid substitute (that will be converted to morphine equivalents for the purpose of the study). Nurses will be allowed to administer IV boluses of morphine PRN for inadequate pain control. If four boluses did not yield adequate analgesia, fentayl 50mcg will be used until adequate pain control is achieved.

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Loyola University Medical Center
    Maywood, Illinois 60153, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 14, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01480102
Lead sponsor
Loyola University
Responsible party
Thomas Turk (Professor, Loyola University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 28, 2011
Start date
Aug 2011
Primary completion
Aug 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 14, 2019

Study contacts

Thomas Turk
principal investigator · Loyola Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion