CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01467427paradigm™5Updated Dec 23, 2025Results posted

Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of NNC-0156-0000-0009 in Previously Treated Children With Haemophilia B.

A Phase 3 interventional study of nonacog beta pegol in Congenital Bleeding Disorder and Haemophilia B, sponsored by Novo Nordisk A/S. Completed at 51 sites in 12 countries. Open to male participants aged 0 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-23.

Sponsored by Novo Nordisk A/S · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
0 Years to 12 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This trial is conducted in Asia, Europe and North America. The aim of the trial is to evaluate safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics (the exposure of the trial drug in the body) of NNC-0156-0000-0009 (nonacog beta pegol, N9-GP) in previously treated children with Haemophilia B.

02

Conditions studied

  • Congenital Bleeding Disorder
  • Haemophilia B

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hemophilia B

271 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemophilia B; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is close to the median of 25 across 156 interventional studies indexed under Hemophilia B.

Browse Hemophilia B studies →

Lead sponsor

Novo Nordisk A/S is the lead sponsor of 1,370 studies on the registry; 102 are open to participants now.

Of its 198 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 94 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male patients with moderately severe or severe congenital haemophilia B with a Factor IX activity level below or equal to 2% according to medical records
  • Age below or equal to 12 years (until patient turns 13 years, at time of inclusion)
  • Body weight above or equal to 10 kg
  • History of at least 50 exposure days (EDs) to other FIX products
  • The patient and/or parent(s)/caregiver are capable of assessing a bleeding episode, keeping an electronic diary (eDiary), capable of conducting home treatment and otherwise able to follow trial procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known history of FIX inhibitors
  • Current FIX inhibitors above or equal to 0.6 Bethesda Units (BU)
  • Congenital or acquired coagulation disorder other than haemophilia B
  • Platelet count below 50,000/mcL at screening
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) above 3 times the upper limit of normal reference ranges at screening
  • Creatinine level above or equal to 1.5 times above the upper normal limit of normal reference ranges at screening
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive, defined by medical records, and with a CD4+ lymphocyte count below or equal to 200/mcL
  • Immune modulating or chemotherapeutic medication (except single pulse treatment, inhaled and topical steroids)
  • Previous arterial thrombotic events (myocardial infarction and intracranial thrombosis, as defined by medical records)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NNC-0156-000-0009

    Drug: nonacog beta pegol

Interventions

  • Drugnonacog beta pegol

    A single dose of 40 U/kg will be administered intravenously, i.v. (into the vein) once weekly.

    Also known as: NNC-0156-0000-0009

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against Coagulation Factor IX (FIX) Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 Bethesda Units (BU)

    Inhibitors were analysed with either the Nijmegen modified factor IX Bethesda assay or a heat/cold Nijmegen modified factor IX Bethesda assay. Number of participants who developed inhibitory antibodies against factor IX are reported.

    Time frame: From week 0 to week 52

  2. Incidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against Coagulation Factor IX (FIX) Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 Bethesda Units (BU)

    Inhibitors were analysed with either the Nijmegen modified factor IX Bethesda assay or a heat/cold Nijmegen modified factor IX Bethesda assay. Number of participants who developed inhibitory antibodies against factor IX are reported.

    Time frame: From week 52 to End of trial (EOT) (approximately week 544)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Bleeding Episodes During Prophylaxis

    The number of bleeding episodes per participant during routine prophylaxis was assessed using the individual annualised bleeding rates (bleeding episodes per participant per year).

    Time frame: From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)

  2. Haemostatic Effect of N9-GP in Treatment of Bleeding Episodes by 4-point Categorical Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate and Poor)

    Description of the haemostatic effect of nonacog beta pegol when used for treatment of bleeding episodes was measured and listed according to the four point scale for haemostatic response as below: 1. Excellent - abrupt pain relief and/or clear improvement in objective signs of bleeding within 8 hours after a single infusion. 2. Good - noticeable pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within 8 hours after a single injection. 3. Moderate - probable or slight beneficial effect within the first 8 hours after the first injection but requiring more than one infusion within 8 hours. 4. Poor - no improvement, or worsening of symptoms within 8 hours after two injections. A success rate was calculated based on counting good or excellent as successes and poor and moderate as failures.

    Time frame: From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)

  3. Incremental Recovery at 30 Minutes (IR30min)

    The incremental recovery was calculated by dividing the baseline-subtracted factor IX activity Units per milliliter (U/mL) measured in plasma 30 min after dosing by the dose injected at time 0 expressed as units per kilogram (U/kg) body weight.

    Time frame: Week 0 (30 minutes after first exposure)

  4. Trough Level (Single-dose )

    The mean pre-dose factor IX levels was measured with the one-stage clotting assay during the trial. Geometric mean of the lowest activity of factor IX recorded at week 0 (immediately before next dose was given).

    Time frame: Week 0 (one week after first exposure)

  5. Terminal Half-life (t1/2)

    Terminal half life is presented at week 0, 30 minutes until one week after first exposure.

    Time frame: Week 0 (30 minutes until one week after first exposure)

  6. Trough Level (Steady State)

    The mean pre-dose factor IX levels was measured with the one-stage clotting assay during the trial. The estimated mean of the lowest activity recorded immediately before next dose was given from week 4 to EOT approximately (week 544). Data is reported for specific age groups in which participants were a part of at any time from week 4 to EOT, not at specific time points assessed from week 4 to EOT. The analysis is based on a mixed model on the log-transformed plasma concentrations with participant as a random effect and the mean trough level is presented back-transformed to the natural scale. Considering the time frame, actual age groups (adolescents and adults) are added for this outcome measure.

    Time frame: From week 4 to EOT (approximately week 544)

  7. Number of Adverse Events

    An adverse event (AE) was any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Here, data is presented for all adverse events (serious adverse events and other adverse events) from week 0 to EOT approximately (week 544). Data is reported for specific Age Groups in which participants were a part of at any time from week 0 to EOT, not at specific time points assessed from week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544). Considering the time frame, actual age groups (adolescents and adults) are added for this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)

  8. Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    A SAE was an experience that at any dose resulted in any of the following: death, a life-threatening experience a), In-patient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation b) a persistent or significant disability/incapacity c) a congenital anomaly/birth defect, Important medical events d) that did not result in death, were life-threatening a) or required hospitalization. Here, data is presented from week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544). Data is reported for specific Age Groups in which participants were a part of at any time from week 0 to EOT, not at specific time points assessed from week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544). Considering the time frame, actual age groups (adolescents and adults) are added for this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)

  9. Medical Events of Special Interest (MESI)

    The following events were defined as MESIs: -Medication errors concerning trial products, -Administration of wrong drug, * Wrong route of administration, * Administration of a high dose with the intention to cause harm, e.g. suicide attempt, * Administration of an accidental overdose: more than 20 % from the intended dose, * Inhibitor formation against factor IX (FIX), * Thromboembolic events, * Anaphylactic reaction. * Allergic reaction including, but not limited to, any acute immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated reaction or delayed type hypersensitivity. Here, data is presented from week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544). Data is reported for specific Age Groups in which participants were a part of at any time from week 0 to EOT, not at specific time points assessed from week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544). Considering the time frame, actual age groups (adolescents and adults) are added for this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)

  10. Development of Host Cell Protein (HCP) Antibodies

    Participants were examined for the development of antibodies against HCP. Number of participants who developed antibodies against HCP is presented.

    Time frame: From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)

  11. FIX Consumption Described as Frequency of Dose/kg for Prophylaxis Use for the Treatment of Bleeding Episodes

    Consumption of nonacog beta pegol for treatment of bleeding episodes International units per kilogram per year (IU/Kg/year) per participant is presented from week 0 to EOT approximately (week 544). Data is reported for specific Age Groups in which participants were a part of at any time from week 0 to EOT, not at specific time points assessed from week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544). Considering the time frame, actual age groups (adolescents and adults) are added for this outcome measure.

    Time frame: From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)

  12. FIX Consumption Described as Amount Consumed for the Treatment of Bleeding Episodes

    Average dose of nonacog beta pegol for treatment of bleed from start to stop of bleed is presented from week 0 to EOT approximately (week 544) in international units per kilogram per bleed (IU/Kg/bleed). Data is reported for specific Age Groups in which participants were a part of at any time from week 0 to EOT, not at specific time points assessed from week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544). Considering the time frame, actual age groups (adolescents and adults) are added for this outcome measure.

    Time frame: From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)

  13. Number of Doses of FIX Consumed for the Treatment of Bleeding Episodes

    Number of doses of FIX consumed for the treatment of bleeding episodes is presented from week 0 to EOT approximately (week 544). Here, data of number of doses of FIX for the treatment of bleeding episodes is reported among all the participants in an arm. Data is reported for specific Age Groups in which participants were a part of at any time from week 0 to EOT, not at specific time points assessed from week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544). Considering the time frame, actual age groups (adolescents and adults) are added for this outcome measure.

    Time frame: From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)

  14. Area Under the Curve Activity Versus Time Profile From Time Zero to 168 Hours Post Dose (AUC(0-168))

    Area under the curve activity versus time profile from time zero to 168 hours post dose of nonacog beta pegol is presented.

    Time frame: 0-168 hours post-dosing at week 0

  15. Clearance (CL)

    Clearance of nonacog beta pegol after single dose is presented.

    Time frame: 0-168 hours post-dosing at week 0

  16. Mean Residence Time (MRT)

    Mean residence time (MRT) of nonacog beta pegol after single dose is presented.

    Time frame: 0-168 hours post-dosing at week 0

  17. Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)

    Volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) of nonacog beta pegol is presented.

    Time frame: 0-168 hours post-dosing at week 0

  18. FIX Activity at 30 Minutes (C30min) (Single Dose)

    FIX activity (international units per milliliter (IU/mL)) at 30 minutes after single dose is presented.

    Time frame: 30 min post-dosing at week 0

  19. FIX Activity at 30 Minutes (C30min) (Steady State)

    Mean FIX activity at 30 minutes post-dosing from week 4 to EOT approximately (week 544) (C30min) (steady state) is presented.

    Time frame: 30 min post-dosing from week 4 to EOT (approximately week 544)

  20. TNO-AZL Preschool Quality of Life (TAPQOL)

    The Dutch institute of Prevention and Health and the Leiden University Hospital (TNO-AZL) preschool quality of life clustered into 12 multi-item scales is used to assess the health-related quality of life, such as children's motor, communication, emotions, and body structure. Suitable for children from 6 months to 6 years old (TAPQOL). Parents fill in according to the child's condition. Higher score (range 0-100) represents better outcome. The scale range for each of 12 multi-item scales was (0-100) with high score representing better outcome. In this study, the TAPQOL was assessed for children of age 0-3 years.

    Time frame: Screening (Week -6), week 52, week 176 approximately (visit 17)

  21. Number of Participants With Health Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of General Hospitalisation

    Number of participants with health economic impact of N9-GP treatment through characterisation of general hospitalisation is presented. Number of participants hospitalised for 0 \& 1 day is presented.

    Time frame: From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)

  22. Health Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of Intensive Care Hospitalisation

    Health economic impact of N9-GP treatment is presented through number of intensive care hospitalization days.

    Time frame: From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)

  23. Health Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of Bleedings Caused Missing School or Studies

    Health economic impact of N9-GP treatment through number of days bleedings caused missing school or studies. Number of participants who missed school or studies for 0,1 and 2 days are presented.

    Time frame: From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)

  24. Health Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of Number of Days Bleedings Caused Using of Mobility Aids

    Health economic impact of N9-GP treatment through number of days the patient used mobility aids (wheelchair and/or crutches) is presented.

    Time frame: From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)

  25. Health Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of Number of Days Bleedings Caused Parents to Miss Work

    Health economic impact of N9-GP treatment through number of days bleeding caused parents to miss work is presented from week 0 to EOT approximately (week 544).

    Time frame: From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)

  26. Haemophilia-quality of Life (HAEMO-QOL)

    Haemophilia quality of life clustered into 11 multi-item scale which is used to assess haemophilia related quality of life such as children's physical health, feeling, family, friends, sport, treatment, dealing with haemophilia, view of a patient. Here, HAEMO-QOL was assessed for the children of age group 8-12 years. The scale range for each of 11 multi-item scale was 0-100 with high scores indicating low quality of life. Multi-item scores and total score were calculated using the following formula: 1/4(Sum of answered items / number of answered items - 1) x 100. HAEMO-QOL scores range from a 0 to 100 scale where high scores (nearing 100) indicate a low quality of life rating.

    Time frame: Screening (week -6), week 52, EOT (approximately week 544)

  27. Hemophilia Treatment Satisfaction (HEMO-SAT)

    Haemophilia treatment satisfaction change from baseline (screening week -6) to week 176 (visit 17) is presented. The treatment satisfaction of a bleed with N8-GP was assessed using HEMO-SAT assessment tool which contains a questionnaire with 6 domains (Ease and convenience, efficacy, burden, specialist/nurses, centre/hospital, general satisfaction). The scale range for each 6 domains was (0-100) with lower score indicating higher treatment satisfaction. HEMO-SAT was assessed for the children of age group 4-7 years and 8-12 years. Domain score and total score were calculated using following formula - 1/4 (sum of answered items / Number of answered item - 1) x 100. HEMO-SAT scores range from 0-100, where low scores reflecting greater treatment satisfaction.

    Time frame: Screening (Week -6), week 176 (visit 17)

07

Results

Posted Nov 17, 2017

Participant flow

Of the 19 sites that screened participants, 17 sites enrolled participants. The trial was therefore conducted at 17 sites in 8 countries, as follows: Canada: 1 site; Germany: 1 site; Italy: 1 site; Japan: 3 sites; Malaysia: 1 site; Taiwan: 1 site; United Kingdom: 3 sites; United States: 6 sites

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
Started1213
Completed main phase1113
Entered extension phase1111
Completed64
Not completed69
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Withdrew: Not continuing in extension phase02
Withdrew: Withdrawal during extension phase,- non-compliance01
Withdrew: Withdrawal during extension phase, withdrawal criteria02
Withdrew: Withdrawal during extension phase, withdrawal of consent21
Withdrew: Withdrawal during extension phase, other33

Outcome measures

PrimaryIncidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against Coagulation Factor IX (FIX) Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 Bethesda Units (BU)

Inhibitors were analysed with either the Nijmegen modified factor IX Bethesda assay or a heat/cold Nijmegen modified factor IX Bethesda assay. Number of participants who developed inhibitory antibodies against factor IX are reported.

Time frame:
From week 0 to week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against Coagulation Factor IX (FIX) Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 Bethesda Units (BU)
ParticipantsYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
Incidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against Coagulation Factor IX (FIX) Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 Bethesda Units (BU)00
PrimaryIncidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against Coagulation Factor IX (FIX) Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 Bethesda Units (BU)

Inhibitors were analysed with either the Nijmegen modified factor IX Bethesda assay or a heat/cold Nijmegen modified factor IX Bethesda assay. Number of participants who developed inhibitory antibodies against factor IX are reported.

Time frame:
From week 52 to End of trial (EOT) (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against Coagulation Factor IX (FIX) Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 Bethesda Units (BU)
ParticipantsYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
Incidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against Coagulation Factor IX (FIX) Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 Bethesda Units (BU)00
SecondaryNumber of Bleeding Episodes During Prophylaxis

The number of bleeding episodes per participant during routine prophylaxis was assessed using the individual annualised bleeding rates (bleeding episodes per participant per year).

Time frame:
From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Median · bleeds/participant/year
Number of Bleeding Episodes During Prophylaxis
bleeds/participant/yearYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
Number of Bleeding Episodes During Prophylaxis0.33 (0.05 to 0.87)0.78 (0.35 to 1.73)
SecondaryHaemostatic Effect of N9-GP in Treatment of Bleeding Episodes by 4-point Categorical Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate and Poor)

Description of the haemostatic effect of nonacog beta pegol when used for treatment of bleeding episodes was measured and listed according to the four point scale for haemostatic response as below: 1. Excellent - abrupt pain relief and/or clear improvement in objective signs of bleeding within 8 hours after a single infusion. 2. Good - noticeable pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within 8 hours after a single injection. 3. Moderate - probable or slight beneficial effect within the first 8 hours after the first injection but requiring more than one infusion within 8 hours. 4. Poor - no improvement, or worsening of symptoms within 8 hours after two injections. A success rate was calculated based on counting good or excellent as successes and poor and moderate as failures.

Time frame:
From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of bleeding episodes
Haemostatic Effect of N9-GP in Treatment of Bleeding Episodes by 4-point Categorical Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate and Poor)
percentage of bleeding episodesYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
Success90.389.5
Failure9.710.5
SecondaryIncremental Recovery at 30 Minutes (IR30min)

The incremental recovery was calculated by dividing the baseline-subtracted factor IX activity Units per milliliter (U/mL) measured in plasma 30 min after dosing by the dose injected at time 0 expressed as units per kilogram (U/kg) body weight.

Time frame:
Week 0 (30 minutes after first exposure)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · (U/mL)/(U/kg)
Incremental Recovery at 30 Minutes (IR30min)
(U/mL)/(U/kg)Younger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
Incremental Recovery at 30 Minutes (IR30min)0.015 ± 7.310.016 ± 16.18
SecondaryTrough Level (Single-dose )

The mean pre-dose factor IX levels was measured with the one-stage clotting assay during the trial. Geometric mean of the lowest activity of factor IX recorded at week 0 (immediately before next dose was given).

Time frame:
Week 0 (one week after first exposure)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · U/mL
Trough Level (Single-dose )
U/mLYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
Trough Level (Single-dose )0.084 ± 16.280.109 ± 18.89
SecondaryTerminal Half-life (t1/2)

Terminal half life is presented at week 0, 30 minutes until one week after first exposure.

Time frame:
Week 0 (30 minutes until one week after first exposure)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · hours
Terminal Half-life (t1/2)
hoursYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
Terminal Half-life (t1/2)69.576 ± 15.7976.323 ± 25.48
SecondaryTrough Level (Steady State)

The mean pre-dose factor IX levels was measured with the one-stage clotting assay during the trial. The estimated mean of the lowest activity recorded immediately before next dose was given from week 4 to EOT approximately (week 544). Data is reported for specific age groups in which participants were a part of at any time from week 4 to EOT, not at specific time points assessed from week 4 to EOT. The analysis is based on a mixed model on the log-transformed plasma concentrations with participant as a random effect and the mean trough level is presented back-transformed to the natural scale. Considering the time frame, actual age groups (adolescents and adults) are added for this outcome measure.

Time frame:
From week 4 to EOT (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Mean · U/mL
Trough Level (Steady State)
U/mLYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)Adolescents(13-17 Years)Adult (18-70 Years)
Trough Level (Steady State)0.146 (0.127 to 0.166)0.193 (0.171 to 0.218)0.220 (0.192 to 0.252)0.316 (0.254 to 0.394)
SecondaryNumber of Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) was any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Here, data is presented for all adverse events (serious adverse events and other adverse events) from week 0 to EOT approximately (week 544). Data is reported for specific Age Groups in which participants were a part of at any time from week 0 to EOT, not at specific time points assessed from week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544). Considering the time frame, actual age groups (adolescents and adults) are added for this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Number · Events
Number of Adverse Events
EventsYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)Adolescents(13-17 Years)Adult (18-70 Years)
Number of Adverse Events2523428110
SecondaryNumber of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

A SAE was an experience that at any dose resulted in any of the following: death, a life-threatening experience a), In-patient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation b) a persistent or significant disability/incapacity c) a congenital anomaly/birth defect, Important medical events d) that did not result in death, were life-threatening a) or required hospitalization. Here, data is presented from week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544). Data is reported for specific Age Groups in which participants were a part of at any time from week 0 to EOT, not at specific time points assessed from week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544). Considering the time frame, actual age groups (adolescents and adults) are added for this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Number · Events
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
EventsYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)Adolescents(13-17 Years)Adult (18-70 Years)
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)3510
SecondaryMedical Events of Special Interest (MESI)

The following events were defined as MESIs: -Medication errors concerning trial products, -Administration of wrong drug, * Wrong route of administration, * Administration of a high dose with the intention to cause harm, e.g. suicide attempt, * Administration of an accidental overdose: more than 20 % from the intended dose, * Inhibitor formation against factor IX (FIX), * Thromboembolic events, * Anaphylactic reaction. * Allergic reaction including, but not limited to, any acute immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated reaction or delayed type hypersensitivity. Here, data is presented from week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544). Data is reported for specific Age Groups in which participants were a part of at any time from week 0 to EOT, not at specific time points assessed from week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544). Considering the time frame, actual age groups (adolescents and adults) are added for this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Number · Events
Medical Events of Special Interest (MESI)
EventsYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)Adolescents(13-17 Years)Adult (18-70 Years)
Medical Events of Special Interest (MESI)1351
SecondaryDevelopment of Host Cell Protein (HCP) Antibodies

Participants were examined for the development of antibodies against HCP. Number of participants who developed antibodies against HCP is presented.

Time frame:
From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Development of Host Cell Protein (HCP) Antibodies
ParticipantsYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
Yes10
No1113
SecondaryFIX Consumption Described as Frequency of Dose/kg for Prophylaxis Use for the Treatment of Bleeding Episodes

Consumption of nonacog beta pegol for treatment of bleeding episodes International units per kilogram per year (IU/Kg/year) per participant is presented from week 0 to EOT approximately (week 544). Data is reported for specific Age Groups in which participants were a part of at any time from week 0 to EOT, not at specific time points assessed from week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544). Considering the time frame, actual age groups (adolescents and adults) are added for this outcome measure.

Time frame:
From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Mean · IU/kg/year
FIX Consumption Described as Frequency of Dose/kg for Prophylaxis Use for the Treatment of Bleeding Episodes
IU/kg/yearYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)Adolescents(13-17 Years)Adult (18-70 Years)
FIX Consumption Described as Frequency of Dose/kg for Prophylaxis Use for the Treatment of Bleeding Episodes2209.3 ± 79.32324.9 ± 83.52257.6 ± 121.11959.5 ± 533.4
SecondaryFIX Consumption Described as Amount Consumed for the Treatment of Bleeding Episodes

Average dose of nonacog beta pegol for treatment of bleed from start to stop of bleed is presented from week 0 to EOT approximately (week 544) in international units per kilogram per bleed (IU/Kg/bleed). Data is reported for specific Age Groups in which participants were a part of at any time from week 0 to EOT, not at specific time points assessed from week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544). Considering the time frame, actual age groups (adolescents and adults) are added for this outcome measure.

Time frame:
From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Mean · IU/kg/bleed
FIX Consumption Described as Amount Consumed for the Treatment of Bleeding Episodes
IU/kg/bleedYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)Adolescents(13-17 Years)Adult (18-70 Years)
FIX Consumption Described as Amount Consumed for the Treatment of Bleeding Episodes53.6 ± 32.250.1 ± 19.484.3 ± 110.259.9 ± 32.7
SecondaryNumber of Doses of FIX Consumed for the Treatment of Bleeding Episodes

Number of doses of FIX consumed for the treatment of bleeding episodes is presented from week 0 to EOT approximately (week 544). Here, data of number of doses of FIX for the treatment of bleeding episodes is reported among all the participants in an arm. Data is reported for specific Age Groups in which participants were a part of at any time from week 0 to EOT, not at specific time points assessed from week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544). Considering the time frame, actual age groups (adolescents and adults) are added for this outcome measure.

Time frame:
From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Number · Doses of FIX
Number of Doses of FIX Consumed for the Treatment of Bleeding Episodes
Doses of FIXYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)Adolescents(13-17 Years)Adult (18-70 Years)
Number of Doses of FIX Consumed for the Treatment of Bleeding Episodes176842012740747
SecondaryArea Under the Curve Activity Versus Time Profile From Time Zero to 168 Hours Post Dose (AUC(0-168))

Area under the curve activity versus time profile from time zero to 168 hours post dose of nonacog beta pegol is presented.

Time frame:
0-168 hours post-dosing at week 0
Reported as:
Mean · Units*hour per milliliter (U*h/mL)
Area Under the Curve Activity Versus Time Profile From Time Zero to 168 Hours Post Dose (AUC(0-168))
Units*hour per milliliter (U*h/mL)Younger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
Area Under the Curve Activity Versus Time Profile From Time Zero to 168 Hours Post Dose (AUC(0-168))37.764 ± 4.58644.192 ± 7.300
SecondaryClearance (CL)

Clearance of nonacog beta pegol after single dose is presented.

Time frame:
0-168 hours post-dosing at week 0
Reported as:
Mean · Milliliters/hour/kilogram (mL/h/kg)
Clearance (CL)
Milliliters/hour/kilogram (mL/h/kg)Younger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
Clearance (CL)0.764 ± 0.1020.664 ± 0.147
SecondaryMean Residence Time (MRT)

Mean residence time (MRT) of nonacog beta pegol after single dose is presented.

Time frame:
0-168 hours post-dosing at week 0
Reported as:
Mean · Hour (h)
Mean Residence Time (MRT)
Hour (h)Younger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
Mean Residence Time (MRT)96.332 ± 12.995108.16 ± 29.937
SecondaryVolume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)

Volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) of nonacog beta pegol is presented.

Time frame:
0-168 hours post-dosing at week 0
Reported as:
Mean · Milliliters per kilogram (mL/kg)
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)
Milliliters per kilogram (mL/kg)Younger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)73.046 ± 10.84369.752 ± 15.253
SecondaryFIX Activity at 30 Minutes (C30min) (Single Dose)

FIX activity (international units per milliliter (IU/mL)) at 30 minutes after single dose is presented.

Time frame:
30 min post-dosing at week 0
Reported as:
Mean · IU/mL
FIX Activity at 30 Minutes (C30min) (Single Dose)
IU/mLYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
FIX Activity at 30 Minutes (C30min) (Single Dose)0.544 ± 0.0400.600 ± 0.074
SecondaryFIX Activity at 30 Minutes (C30min) (Steady State)

Mean FIX activity at 30 minutes post-dosing from week 4 to EOT approximately (week 544) (C30min) (steady state) is presented.

Time frame:
30 min post-dosing from week 4 to EOT (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · IU/mL
FIX Activity at 30 Minutes (C30min) (Steady State)
IU/mLYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
FIX Activity at 30 Minutes (C30min) (Steady State)0.174 (0.146 to 0.208)0.197 (0.166 to 0.234)
SecondaryTNO-AZL Preschool Quality of Life (TAPQOL)

The Dutch institute of Prevention and Health and the Leiden University Hospital (TNO-AZL) preschool quality of life clustered into 12 multi-item scales is used to assess the health-related quality of life, such as children's motor, communication, emotions, and body structure. Suitable for children from 6 months to 6 years old (TAPQOL). Parents fill in according to the child's condition. Higher score (range 0-100) represents better outcome. The scale range for each of 12 multi-item scales was (0-100) with high score representing better outcome. In this study, the TAPQOL was assessed for children of age 0-3 years.

Time frame:
Screening (Week -6), week 52, week 176 approximately (visit 17)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on scale
TNO-AZL Preschool Quality of Life (TAPQOL)
Score on scaleYounger Children (0-3 Years)
Screening (week -6) : Sleeping problems80.4 ± 15.3
Week 52: Sleeping problems76.0 ± 15.5
Screening (week -6) : Appetite91.7 ± 11.8
Week 52: Appetite90.3 ± 15.2
Screening (week -6) : Lung problems100.0 ± 0.0
Week 52: Lung problems93.2 ± 13.2
Screening (week -6) : Stomach problems93.0 ± 12.1
Week 52: Stomach problems90.3 ± 15.2
Screening (week -6) : Skin problems88.1 ± 17.9
Week 52: Skin problems90.3 ± 16.3
Screening (week -6) : Motor functioning98.0 ± 4.9
Week 52: Motor functioning98.0 ± 4.9
Screening (week -6): Social functioning97.2 ± 6.9
Week 52: Social functioning97.2 ± 6.9
Screening (week -6) : Problem behavior58.1 ± 40.8
Week 52: Problem behavior53.7 ± 29.6
Screening (week -6) : Communication92.8 ± 14.8
Week 52: Communication87.5 ± 14.2
Screening (week -6) : Anxiety76.1 ± 16.1
Week 52: Anxiety75.0 ± 22.9
Screening (week -6) : Positive mood92.9 ± 18.9
Week 52: Positive mood100.0 ± 0.0
Screening (week -6) : Liveliness97.6 ± 6.4
Week 52: Liveliness100.0 ± 0.0
Approximately week 176: sleeping problem89.7 ± 15.0
Approximately week 176: Appetite94.5 ± 10.1
Approximately week 176: Lung problems97.2 ± 6.9
Approximately week 176: Stomach problems83.2 ± 10.4
Approximately week 176: Skin problems84.7 ± 20.0
Approximately week 176: Motor functioning99.0 ± 2.4
Approximately week 176: Social functioning86.2 ± 22.1
Approximately week 176: Problem behavior58.3 ± 19.3
Approximately week 176: Communication95.8 ± 10.2
Approximately week 176: Anxiety80.2 ± 18.1
Approximately week 176: Positive mood100.0 ± 0.0
Approximately week 176: Liveliness94.3 ± 8.8
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Health Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of General Hospitalisation

Number of participants with health economic impact of N9-GP treatment through characterisation of general hospitalisation is presented. Number of participants hospitalised for 0 \& 1 day is presented.

Time frame:
From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Health Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of General Hospitalisation
ParticipantsYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
0 Days35
1 Day10
SecondaryHealth Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of Intensive Care Hospitalisation

Health economic impact of N9-GP treatment is presented through number of intensive care hospitalization days.

Time frame:
From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Health Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of Intensive Care Hospitalisation
DaysYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
Health Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of Intensive Care Hospitalisation0.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
SecondaryHealth Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of Bleedings Caused Missing School or Studies

Health economic impact of N9-GP treatment through number of days bleedings caused missing school or studies. Number of participants who missed school or studies for 0,1 and 2 days are presented.

Time frame:
From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Health Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of Bleedings Caused Missing School or Studies
ParticipantsYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
0 days911
1 day10
2 days12
SecondaryHealth Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of Number of Days Bleedings Caused Using of Mobility Aids

Health economic impact of N9-GP treatment through number of days the patient used mobility aids (wheelchair and/or crutches) is presented.

Time frame:
From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Health Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of Number of Days Bleedings Caused Using of Mobility Aids
DaysYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
Health Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of Number of Days Bleedings Caused Using of Mobility Aids0.4 ± 0.71.0 ± 3.3
SecondaryHealth Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of Number of Days Bleedings Caused Parents to Miss Work

Health economic impact of N9-GP treatment through number of days bleeding caused parents to miss work is presented from week 0 to EOT approximately (week 544).

Time frame:
From week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Health Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of Number of Days Bleedings Caused Parents to Miss Work
DaysYounger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)
Health Economic Impact of N9-GP Treatment Through Characterisation of Number of Days Bleedings Caused Parents to Miss Work0.3 ± 0.60.5 ± 0.9
SecondaryHaemophilia-quality of Life (HAEMO-QOL)

Haemophilia quality of life clustered into 11 multi-item scale which is used to assess haemophilia related quality of life such as children's physical health, feeling, family, friends, sport, treatment, dealing with haemophilia, view of a patient. Here, HAEMO-QOL was assessed for the children of age group 8-12 years. The scale range for each of 11 multi-item scale was 0-100 with high scores indicating low quality of life. Multi-item scores and total score were calculated using the following formula: 1/4(Sum of answered items / number of answered items - 1) x 100. HAEMO-QOL scores range from a 0 to 100 scale where high scores (nearing 100) indicate a low quality of life rating.

Time frame:
Screening (week -6), week 52, EOT (approximately week 544)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on scale
Haemophilia-quality of Life (HAEMO-QOL)
Score on scaleYounger Children (8-12 Years)
Screening (week -6) : physical health19.8 ± 19.1
Week 52: physical health18.2 ± 17.0
EOT approximately week 544: physical health7.0 ± 9.9
Screening (week -6) : feeling15.5 ± 19.3
Week 52: feeling12.8 ± 22.9
EOT approximately week 544: feeling12.5 ± 17.7
Screening (week -6) : view25.8 ± 18.6
Week 52: view20.1 ± 22.5
EOT approximately week 544: view23.5 ± 33.2
Screening (week -6) : family25.0 ± 16.5
Week 52: family16.3 ± 20.4
EOT approximately week 544: family17.5 ± 24.7
Screening (week -6): friends54.3 ± 23.0
Week 52: friends49.0 ± 22.3
EOT approximately week 544: friends43.5 ± 53.0
Screening (week -6) : perceived support72.5 ± 26.1
Week 52: perceived support71.5 ± 32
EOT approximately week 544: perceived support34.5 ± 48.8
Screening (week -6) : others14.3 ± 12.5
Week 52: others14.5 ± 17.3
EOT approximately week 544: others8.5 ± 12.0
Screening (week -6) : sport20.8 ± 19.4
Week 52: sport22.8 ± 18.7
EOT approximately week 544: sport28.0 ± 26.9
Screening (week -6) : dealing56.5 ± 27.4
Week 52: dealing49.6 ± 22.0
EOT approximately week 544: dealing41.5 ± 53.0
Screening (week -6) : treatment34.7 ± 16.7
Week 52: treatment25.1 ± 19.8
EOT approximately week 544: treatment11.0 ± 0.0
Screening (week -6) : total31.7 ± 10.1
Week 52: total28.0 ± 12.5
EOT approximately week 544: total21.5 ± 26.2
SecondaryHemophilia Treatment Satisfaction (HEMO-SAT)

Haemophilia treatment satisfaction change from baseline (screening week -6) to week 176 (visit 17) is presented. The treatment satisfaction of a bleed with N8-GP was assessed using HEMO-SAT assessment tool which contains a questionnaire with 6 domains (Ease and convenience, efficacy, burden, specialist/nurses, centre/hospital, general satisfaction). The scale range for each 6 domains was (0-100) with lower score indicating higher treatment satisfaction. HEMO-SAT was assessed for the children of age group 4-7 years and 8-12 years. Domain score and total score were calculated using following formula - 1/4 (sum of answered items / Number of answered item - 1) x 100. HEMO-SAT scores range from 0-100, where low scores reflecting greater treatment satisfaction.

Time frame:
Screening (Week -6), week 176 (visit 17)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on scale
Hemophilia Treatment Satisfaction (HEMO-SAT)
Score on scaleYounger Children (4-7 Years)Older Children (8-12 Years)
Ease and convenience-6.5 ± 19.4-13.4 ± 16.2
Efficacy-3.8 ± 21.3-14.5 ± 23.8
Burden-15.8 ± 16.0-8.5 ± 13.0
Specialist/nurses-1.8 ± 2.1-0.6 ± 2.1
Centre/hospital5.0 ± 13.5-2.3 ± 6.1
General satisfaction-6.3 ± 12.5-3.5 ± 8.1

Adverse events

Collected over Week 0 to EOT (approximately week 544).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Younger Children (0 - 6 Years)0/12 (0%)2/12 (16.7%)11/12 (91.7%)
Older Children (7 - 12 Years)0/23 (0%)4/23 (17.4%)20/23 (87%)
Adolescents (13 - 17 Years)0/14 (0%)1/14 (7.1%)12/14 (85.7%)
Adults (18 - 70 Years)0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)4/6 (66.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventYounger Children (0 - 6 Years)Older Children (7 - 12 Years)Adolescents (13 - 17 Years)Adults (18 - 70 Years)
Catheter site infectionInfections and infestations1/120/230/140/6
Tourette's disorderCongenital, familial and genetic disorders1/120/230/140/6
Viral upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations1/120/230/140/6
HaemoptysisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/120/231/140/6
CryptorchismCongenital, familial and genetic disorders0/121/230/140/6
Food poisoningGastrointestinal disorders0/121/230/140/6
Gastroenteritis viralInfections and infestations0/121/230/140/6
MigraineNervous system disorders0/121/230/140/6
Radius fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/121/230/140/6
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 124
Most frequent other events
EventYounger Children (0 - 6 Years)Older Children (7 - 12 Years)Adolescents (13 - 17 Years)Adults (18 - 70 Years)
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders10/125/231/141/6
PyrexiaGeneral disorders7/126/232/140/6
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations5/124/232/140/6
Skin abrasionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications4/123/230/140/6
ContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/127/231/140/6
Head injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/126/231/140/6
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/126/232/140/6
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders3/122/230/140/6
Ear infectionInfections and infestations3/122/230/140/6
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/124/230/140/6

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Younger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)Total
Mean3.1 ± 1.79.6 ± 1.66.5 ± 3.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Younger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)Total
Female000
Male121325
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Younger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)Total
Hispanic or Latino022
Not Hispanic or Latino121123
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Younger Children (0-6 Years)Older Children (7-12 Years)Total
Race — Asian448
Race — Black or African American011
Race — White8513
Race — Other033
08

Study locations

51 sites
  • Children's Hospital Los Angeles - Endocrinology
    Los Angeles, California 90027, United States
  • UC Davis Medical Center
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
  • Colorado Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Childrens National Medical Ctr
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20010-2978, United States
  • University of Miami Hospital & Clinics
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Emory University_Atlanta_1
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Augusta University
    Augusta, Georgia 30912, United States
  • University Of Iowa
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
  • University Of Louisville_Louisville_0
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Johns Hopkins University_Baltimore_3
    Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Michigan
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • Children's Hospitals And Clinics Of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404, United States
  • The Children's Mercy Hospital
    Kansas City, Missouri 64108-4619, United States
  • Univ of NE Med Center_Omaha
    Omaha, Nebraska 68198, United States
  • Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
    New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, United States
  • Maimonides Medical Center
    Brooklyn, New York 11220, United States
  • Mount Sinai Medical Center
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • Univ Hosp Cleveland Med Ctr
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital
    Columbus, Ohio 43205, United States
  • Dayton Children Hemostati Ctr
    Dayton, Ohio 45404, United States
  • Univ Oklahoma Sci Ctr OK City
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
  • Children's Hosptl Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Vanderbilt Hemostasis Thrombosis Clinic
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • Children's Medical Center_Dallas
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • Texas Children's Hospital_Houston
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Univ TX Hlth Sci Ctr Houston
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Nucleo de Pesquisa Instituto Pele Pequeno Principe
    Curitiba, Paraná 80250-060, Brazil
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas
    Campinas, São Paulo 13081-970, Brazil
  • Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP
    São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, Brazil
  • Hemorio-Fundarj
    Rio de Janeiro, 20211-030, Brazil
  • The Hospital for Sick Children
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada
  • Clinical Hospital Centre Split, Firule, Paediatric Haem. Dpt
    Split, 21 000, Croatia
  • Ap-Hp-Hopital de Bicetre-1
    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275, France
  • Hôpital de la Timone
    Marseille, 13385, France
  • Ap-Hp-Hopital Necker-1
    Paris, 75015, France
  • Coagulation Research Center
    Duisburg, 47051, Germany
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover - Pädiatrische Hämato-, Onko- und Hämostasiologie
    Hanover, 30625, Germany
  • Istituto di Medicina Int. A. Bianchi Bonomi Univ. Milano
    Milan, MI 20124, Italy
  • St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital_Pediatrics
    Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
  • Shizuoka Children's Hospital, Hematology-Oncology
    Shizuoka, 420-8660, Japan
  • Ogikubo Hospital_Pediatries & Blood
    Tokyo, 167-0035, Japan
  • National Blood Centre
    Kuala Lumpur, 50400, Malaysia
  • National Taiwan University Children's Hospital
    Taipei, 100, Taiwan
  • Necmettin Erbakan University Pediatric Hematology
    Konya, 42090, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hospital - Centre for Haemophilia, Haemostasis and Thrombosis
    Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, United Kingdom
  • Birmingham Children's Hospital
    Birmingham, B4 6NH, United Kingdom
  • Leicester Royal Infirmary - Haemostasis & Thrombosis Unit
    Leicester, LE1 5WW, United Kingdom
  • Leicester Royal Infirmary
    Leicester, LE1 5WW, United Kingdom
  • St Thomas' Hospital - Haemostasis and Thrombosis Centre
    London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
  • St Thomas' Hospital
    London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
  • John Radcliffe Hospital
    Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) in prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes in previously treated pediatric hemophilia B patients. Carcao M, Zak M, Abdul Karim F, Hanabusa H, Kearney S, Lu M-Y, Persson P, Rangarajan S, Santagostino E. Presented 06-Dec-2014 at the American Society of Hematology - 56th Annual Meeting - held in San Francisco, CA, US (poster #1513)
  • Carcao M, Zak M, Abdul Karim F, Hanabusa H, Kearney S, Lu MY, Persson P, Rangarajan S, Santagostino E. Nonacog beta pegol in previously treated children with hemophilia B: results from an international open-label phase 3 trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Aug;14(8):1521-9. doi: 10.1111/jth.13360. Epub 2016 Jun 22. PubMed 27174727 ↗
  • Carcao M, Kearney S, Lu MY, Taki M, Rubens D, Shen C, Santagostino E. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Nonacog Beta Pegol (N9-GP) Administered for at Least 5 Years in Previously Treated Children with Hemophilia B. Thromb Haemost. 2020 May;120(5):737-746. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709521. Epub 2020 May 5. PubMed 32369845 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 27, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — According to the Novo Nordiskdisclosure commitment on novonordisk-trials.com

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 23, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01467427
Lead sponsor
Novo Nordisk A/S
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 8, 2011
Start date
May 16, 2012
Primary completion
Nov 17, 2023
Completion
Nov 17, 2023
Results posted
Nov 17, 2017
Last update
Dec 23, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion