CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01464346Updated May 30, 2018Results posted

A Performance Evaluation of the Enlite Glucose Sensor to Support a Full 144 Hours(6Days) of Use

An interventional study of Enlite Sensor in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by Medtronic Diabetes. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-30.

Sponsored by Medtronic Diabetes · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the performance of the Enlite Sensor over an entire calibration and wear period of 146 hours (6 days) when inserted in the abdomen and buttock and used with the Revel 2.0 Pumps in subjects age 18 - 75 years.

Read the detailed description

The study is a multi-center, prospective single-sample correlational design without controls. Between 4 and 10 investigational sites will be used during this study. All subjects will be assigned to treatment. Each subject will wear the following devices:

  1. Enlite Sensors (2) connected to MiniLinks (2)
  2. Revel 2.0 Pumps (2)

During the study each subject will be wearing 2 sensors and 2 pumps simultaneously. The pumps will be differentiated by color, and will have different calibration requirements during the in-clinic portions of the study. During the Frequent Sampling Tests:

  • GREEN pump will be calibrated 3-4 times spread throughout the day
  • RED pump will have the minimum calibration requirements (every 12 hours after the second calibration)

During home use (outside the clinic) BOTH pumps will be calibrated 3-4 times spread throughout the day.

Sensors will be connected to the MiniLink (integrated with the Revel 2.0 Pumps)

Subjects will wear the devices for a 3-day training period, followed by a 6-day study period. During the study period, each subject will undergo three 12-hour Frequent Sampling Tests. During the Frequent Sampling Tests, IV blood samples will be drawn every 5-15 minutes and analyzed using the YSI. The Frequent Sampling Tests will occur during the following hours of sensor wear: hours 2-14, hours 14-26, hours 50-62 hours 62-74, and hours 122-134 hours 134-146 which is representative of a complete calibration and wear period to support the proposed labeling claim of 144 hours of use.

Even though participants were randomly assigned with respect to timing of frequent sample test and sensor insertion locations, data was collected as a whole and there was no intention to analyze the two groups separately. Please note that subjects were randomly assigned to one of 3 different sensor insertion site combinations: abdomen/abdomen, buttock/buttock, and abdomen/buttock

During each Frequent Sampling Test, subjects with an established insulin sensitivity ratio and insulin carbohydrate ratio will undergo a hypoglycemic challenge (glucose lowered to a target of 50-75 mg/dL for \~2 hours, including 30 minutes between 50-60 mg/dL) and a hyperglycemic challenge (glucose raised to a target of 180-400 mg/dL for \~2 hours, including 30 minutes between 350 -400 mg/dL). Subjects will continue with their current diabetes regimen (including glucose monitoring with their own meter when desired) independent of the study devices. The Revel 2.0 Pumps will not be used to infuse insulin or manage the subject's diabetes during this study. The Enlite Glucose sensor will not be used to manage the subject's diabetes during this study. The investigational Study Meter may be used for confirmation of alarms, treatment decisions and calibration of sensor.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

  • diabetes
  • glucose sensor
  • CGM
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,923 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,318 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 90 is above the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Medtronic Diabetes is the lead sponsor of 61 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 22 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 21 (95%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subject is 18 - 75 years of age at time of screening
  2. A clinical diagnosis of type 1 or 2 diabetes as determined by the

    Investigator, for a minimum of 12 months duration:

    • Criteria for type 1 diabetes:

      • Required: Age of onset \< 40 years of age
      • Required: History of insulin use only for management of diabetes
      • Required: history of normal weight or underweight at time of diagnosis.
      • Not required: Initial presentation of diabetic ketoacidosis.
      • Not required: History of diabetic ketoacidosis
      • Not required: Low fasting C-peptide
    • Criteria for type 2 diabetes:

      • Required: Age of onset \~ 40 years of age
      • Required: History of initial oral anti-diabetic use
      • Required: History of being overweight at time of diagnosis.

        • Type 2 insulin requiring is defined by type 2 diabetes subjects taking insulin with or without oral anti-diabetic agent and may also include: incretin mimetic, pramlintide or GLP agonist
        • Type 2 non-insulin requiring is defined by type 2 diabetes subjects who take oral medications and may also include: incretin mimetic, pramlintide or GLP agonist
  3. Adequate venous access as assessed by investigator or appropriate staff

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is unable to tolerate tape adhesive in the area of sensor placement.
  2. Subject has any unresolved adverse skin condition in the area of sensor or device placement (e.g., psoriasis, rash, Staphylococcus infection)
  3. Subject is actively participating in an investigational study (drug or device) wherein they have received treatment from an investigational study (drug or device) in the last 2 weeks
  4. Subject has a positive pregnancy screening test
  5. Subject is female and plans to become pregnant during the course of the study
  6. Subject has had a hypoglycemic seizure within the past 6 months
  7. Subject has a history of a seizure disorder
  8. Subject has central nervous system or cardiac disorder resulting in syncope
  9. Subject has a history of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass surgery, coronary artery stenting, transient ischemic attack (TIA), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), angina, congestive heart failure, ventricular rhythm disturbances or thromboembolic disease
  10. Subjects with hematocrit lower than 36%
  11. SUbjects with a history of any cardiac arrhythmia, including atrial arrhythmias
  12. Subjects with a history of adrenal insufficiency
  13. Subjects with migraines
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
90 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Enlite sensor, Abdomen/Abdomen

    Subjects wearing 2 Enlite sensors in Abdomen

    Device: Enlite Sensor

  • Experimental
    Enlite sensor, Abdomen/Buttock

    Subjects wearing 2 Enlite sensors in Abdomen/Buttock

    Device: Enlite Sensor

  • Experimental
    Enlite sensor, Buttock/Buttock

    Subjects wearing 2 Enlite sensors in Buttock/Buttock

    Device: Enlite Sensor

Interventions

  • DeviceEnlite Sensor

    This is the Enlite sensor (all subjects)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Daily Agreement (Percent of Sensor Values Within 30% of Reference Value) With Minimum Calibration, Combined Abdomen and Buttock Insertion Sites

    Primary endpoint is mean of daily percentage of sensor values within 30% of reference value (within 22.5 mg/dL if YSI \<75 mg/dL) with the minimum calibration (every 12 hour), combined abdomen and buttock insertion sites across all participants and all days.

    Time frame: Days 1, 3 and 6 of sensor wear

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Daily Agreement (Percent of Sensor Values Within 30% of Reference Value) With 3-4 Calibrations Per Day, Combined Abdomen and Buttock Insertion

    Secondary endpoint is mean of daily percentage of sensor values within 30% of reference value (within 22.5 mg/dL if YSI \<75 mg/dL) with 3-4 calibrations per day, combined abdomen and buttock insertion sites across all participants and all days.

    Time frame: Days 1, 3 and 6 of sensor wear

Other outcomes

  1. Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Sensor and YSI for Abdomen Insertion Site, With 3-4 Calibrations Throughout the Day

    This measure is the Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) between sensor glucose values and and paired YSI plasma glucose values for Abdomen insertion site, with 3-4 Calibrations, across all Abdomen insertion site participants and all days. MARD is calculated by absolute value of \[(sensor glucose value - YSI glucose value) / YSI glucose value\] \* 100

    Time frame: Days 1, 3 and 6 of sensor wear

  2. Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Sensor and YSI for Abdomen Insertion Site, With Calibration Every 12 Hours

    This is a measure of Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) between the sensor and the paired YSI plasma glucose value for sensors inserted in the Abdomen insertion site, with Calibration every 12 hours, across all Abdomen insertion site participants and all days. MARD is calculated by absolute value of \[(sensor glucose value - YSI glucose value) / YSI glucose value\] \* 100

    Time frame: Days 1, 3 and 6 of sensor wear

  3. Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Sensor and YSI for Buttock Insertion Site, With 3-4 Calibrations Throughout the Day

    This measure is the Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) between sensor glucose value and paired YSI plasma glucose measurement for sensors inserted in the Buttock insertion site, with 3-4 Calibrations, across all Buttock insertion site participants and all days. MARD is calculated by absolute value of \[(sensor glucose value - YSI glucose value) / YSI glucose value\] \* 100

    Time frame: Days 1, 3 and 6 of sensor wear

  4. Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Sensor and YSI for Buttock Insertion Site, With Calibration Every 12 Hours

    This measure is the Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) between sensor glucose values and paired YSI plasma glucose values for sensors inserted in the Buttock insertion site, with Calibration every 12 hours, across all Buttock insertion site participants and all days. MARD is calculated by absolute value of \[(sensor glucose value - YSI glucose value) / YSI glucose value\] \* 100

    Time frame: Days 1, 3 and 6 of sensor wear

07

Results

Posted May 30, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEnlite Sensor Abdomen/AbdomenEnlite Sensor Abdomen/ButtockEnlite Sensor Buttock/Buttock
Started293229
Completed293228
Not completed001
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject001

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Daily Agreement (Percent of Sensor Values Within 30% of Reference Value) With Minimum Calibration, Combined Abdomen and Buttock Insertion Sites

Primary endpoint is mean of daily percentage of sensor values within 30% of reference value (within 22.5 mg/dL if YSI \<75 mg/dL) with the minimum calibration (every 12 hour), combined abdomen and buttock insertion sites across all participants and all days.

Time frame:
Days 1, 3 and 6 of sensor wear
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of paired readings
Mean Daily Agreement (Percent of Sensor Values Within 30% of Reference Value) With Minimum Calibration, Combined Abdomen and Buttock Insertion Sites
percentage of paired readingsAll Subjects
Mean Daily Agreement (Percent of Sensor Values Within 30% of Reference Value) With Minimum Calibration, Combined Abdomen and Buttock Insertion Sites88.01 (85.69 to 90.33)
Statistical analysis
  • All Subjects · ANCOVA · p = <0.05 · Intercept from ancova as agreement rate: 88.01 · 95% CI 85.69 to 90.33Mixed effects model was used, with day of sensor wear(1,3 or 6) as covariate. Day was centered to 0 to permit interpretation of the model intercept
SecondaryMean Daily Agreement (Percent of Sensor Values Within 30% of Reference Value) With 3-4 Calibrations Per Day, Combined Abdomen and Buttock Insertion

Secondary endpoint is mean of daily percentage of sensor values within 30% of reference value (within 22.5 mg/dL if YSI \<75 mg/dL) with 3-4 calibrations per day, combined abdomen and buttock insertion sites across all participants and all days.

Time frame:
Days 1, 3 and 6 of sensor wear
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of paired readings
Mean Daily Agreement (Percent of Sensor Values Within 30% of Reference Value) With 3-4 Calibrations Per Day, Combined Abdomen and Buttock Insertion
percentage of paired readingsAll Subjects
Mean Daily Agreement (Percent of Sensor Values Within 30% of Reference Value) With 3-4 Calibrations Per Day, Combined Abdomen and Buttock Insertion90.52 (88.77 to 92.28)
Statistical analysis
  • All Subjects · ANCOVA · p = < 0.05 · Intercept from ancova as agreement rate: 90.52 · 95% CI 88.77 to 92.28Mixed effects model was used, with day of sensor wear(1,3 or 6) as covariate. Day was centered to 0 to permit interpretation of the model intercept
Other pre-specifiedMean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Sensor and YSI for Abdomen Insertion Site, With 3-4 Calibrations Throughout the Day

This measure is the Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) between sensor glucose values and and paired YSI plasma glucose values for Abdomen insertion site, with 3-4 Calibrations, across all Abdomen insertion site participants and all days. MARD is calculated by absolute value of \[(sensor glucose value - YSI glucose value) / YSI glucose value\] \* 100

Time frame:
Days 1, 3 and 6 of sensor wear
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of difference
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Sensor and YSI for Abdomen Insertion Site, With 3-4 Calibrations Throughout the Day
percentage of differenceAll Subjects With Abdomen Insertion
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Sensor and YSI for Abdomen Insertion Site, With 3-4 Calibrations Throughout the Day13.6 ± 13.6
Other pre-specifiedMean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Sensor and YSI for Abdomen Insertion Site, With Calibration Every 12 Hours

This is a measure of Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) between the sensor and the paired YSI plasma glucose value for sensors inserted in the Abdomen insertion site, with Calibration every 12 hours, across all Abdomen insertion site participants and all days. MARD is calculated by absolute value of \[(sensor glucose value - YSI glucose value) / YSI glucose value\] \* 100

Time frame:
Days 1, 3 and 6 of sensor wear
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of difference
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Sensor and YSI for Abdomen Insertion Site, With Calibration Every 12 Hours
percentage of differenceAll Subjects With Abdomen Insertion
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Sensor and YSI for Abdomen Insertion Site, With Calibration Every 12 Hours14.7 ± 13.7
Other pre-specifiedMean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Sensor and YSI for Buttock Insertion Site, With 3-4 Calibrations Throughout the Day

This measure is the Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) between sensor glucose value and paired YSI plasma glucose measurement for sensors inserted in the Buttock insertion site, with 3-4 Calibrations, across all Buttock insertion site participants and all days. MARD is calculated by absolute value of \[(sensor glucose value - YSI glucose value) / YSI glucose value\] \* 100

Time frame:
Days 1, 3 and 6 of sensor wear
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of difference
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Sensor and YSI for Buttock Insertion Site, With 3-4 Calibrations Throughout the Day
percentage of differenceAll Subjects With Buttock Insertion
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Sensor and YSI for Buttock Insertion Site, With 3-4 Calibrations Throughout the Day15.5 ± 16.0
Other pre-specifiedMean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Sensor and YSI for Buttock Insertion Site, With Calibration Every 12 Hours

This measure is the Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) between sensor glucose values and paired YSI plasma glucose values for sensors inserted in the Buttock insertion site, with Calibration every 12 hours, across all Buttock insertion site participants and all days. MARD is calculated by absolute value of \[(sensor glucose value - YSI glucose value) / YSI glucose value\] \* 100

Time frame:
Days 1, 3 and 6 of sensor wear
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of difference
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Sensor and YSI for Buttock Insertion Site, With Calibration Every 12 Hours
percentage of differenceAll Subjects With Buttock Insertion
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Sensor and YSI for Buttock Insertion Site, With Calibration Every 12 Hours18.2 ± 23.8

Adverse events

Collected over Severe adverse event data and adverse event data were collected during the 2-4 weeks study duration. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
All Completed Subjects0/90 (0%)0/90 (0%)17/90 (18.9%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent other events
EventAll Completed Subjects
Upper Respiratory InfectionInfections and infestations3/90
SinusitisInfections and infestations2/90
Pain in ArmMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/90
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/90
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders1/90
Chest PainGeneral disorders1/90
Application Site PainGeneral disorders1/90
Edema L HandGeneral disorders1/90
FluInfections and infestations1/90
Skin InfectionInfections and infestations1/90

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)All Subjects Entering the Study
<=18 years1
Between 18 and 65 years82
>=65 years7
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All Subjects Entering the Study
Mean44.4 ± 13.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Subjects Entering the Study
Female41
Male49
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)All Subjects Entering the Study
United States90
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • Profil Institute for Clinical Research
    Chula Vista, California 91911, United States
  • AMCR Institue
    Escondido, California 92026, United States
  • University of California, San Diego
    La Jolla, California 92093, United States
  • Diablo Clinical Research
    Walnut Creek, California 94598, United States
  • University of Colorado Denver/Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Oregon Health & Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Rainier Clinical Research Center
    Renton, Washington 98057, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 30, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01464346
Lead sponsor
Medtronic Diabetes
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 3, 2011
Start date
Nov 2011
Primary completion
Mar 2012
Completion
Mar 2012
Results posted
May 30, 2018
Last update
May 30, 2018

Study contacts

Scott Lee, MD
study director · Medtronic Diabetes

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion