ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01463644Updated Sep 24, 2025Results posted

Mepolizumab in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases (COPD) With Eosinophilic Bronchitis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Mepolizumab and placebo in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases, Chronic Airways Limitation and Bronchitis, sponsored by McMaster University. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-24.

Sponsored by McMaster University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Some patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) have large number of specific white blood cells called eosinophils in their airways. These cells are also responsible for causing episodes of worsened respiratory symptoms (exacerbations) and often cause irreversible damage to the airways . This subset of COPD patients often require oral steroids to bring down the number of eosinophils in their airways. Steroids have harmful effects on several of our body systems like bones, blood pressure, blood glucose control and can cause recurrent infections. Mepolizumab is a drug that specifically targets eosinophils reducing the number in the airway. This drug has been shown to be effective in decreasing exacerbation rates and time to exacerbation in asthma patients with eosinophils in their airways. Targeting eosinophils in COPD patients has been shown to reduce severe exacerbations. Hence it is likely that COPD patients with eosinophils in their airways will benefit similarly and have reduced rates and time to exacerbation.

Study Hypothesis:Does mepolizumab decrease sputum eosinophils in patients with fixed airflow obstruction (COPD) and eosinophilic bronchitis?

Read the detailed description

It is thus likely that a specific treatment such as anti-IL5 directed against eosinophils would be superior to the current standard treatment in decreasing sputum eosinophil counts and exacerbations and decrease structural changes (remodelling) in patients with COPD who continue to have eosinophils in their airway and whose airway disease has an eosinophil-driven component as evidenced by persistent airway eosinophilia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases
  • Chronic Airways Limitation
  • Bronchitis

Keywords

  • Mepolizumab
  • COPD
  • eosinophilic bronchitis
  • exacerbation
  • anti-interleukin 5 (IL5)
03

In context

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

5,520 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 856 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 62 across 3,839 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

McMaster University is the lead sponsor of 741 studies on the registry; 127 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (43%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis: An established clinical history of in accordance with the definition by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society as follows: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a preventable and treatable disease state characterized by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible. The airflow limitation is usually progressive and is associated with an abnormal inflammatory response of the lungs to noxious particles or gases, primarily caused by cigarette smoking. Although COPD affects the lungs, it also produces significant systemic consequences
  • Sputum eosinophils > 3% at randomization and on at least one occasion in the past 2 years. If this historic data is not available, documented improvement in Forced expired volume in 1 second () of at least 12% with a course of prednisone in the past 2 years will be used as a surrogate for the presence of airway eosinophilia
  • FEV1/Vital Capacity (VC) \< 70% and FEV1 \< 60% of predicted normal values calculated using NHANES III reference equations at Screening Visit
  • At least one major exacerbation requiring prednisone in the preceding 12 months. If patients are currently well controlled by optimizing their sputum cell counts (eosinophils \< 2%), they should have documented history of exacerbations when their eosinophilia was uncontrolled.
  • A signed and dated written prior to study participation.
  • Smoking History: Current or former cigarette smokers with a history of cigarette smoking of greater than 10 pack-years [number of pack years = (number of cigarettes per day/20) x number of years smoked (e.g., 20 cigarettes per day for 10 years, or 10 cigarettes per day for 20 years]. Former smokers are defined as those who have stopped smoking for at least 6 months prior to Screening Visit
  • Male or female adults. A female is eligible to enter and participate in the study if she is either of Non-child bearing potential or is of child bearing age and has a negative pregnancy test at screening, and agrees to acceptable methods used consistently and correctly

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current asthma (12% reversibility to a bronchodilator)
  • Sputum eosinophils \< 3% on fluticasone (or equivalent) of 250µg bid.
  • Inability to use salmeterol or tiotropium
  • Significant co-morbidity that prevents from participating in the study
  • Known bronchiectasis or immune deficiency disorders that would predispose the patients to recurrent infections.
  • Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant and lactating females
  • Drug or Alcohol Abuse: A known or suspected history of alcohol or drug abuse within 2 years prior to Screening Visit
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    mepolizumab

    Drug: Mepolizumab

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo

    Drug: placebo

Interventions

  • This is an anti IL-5 which is given once a month intravenously at the dose of 750 mg.

    Also known as: SB-240563

  • Drugplacebo

    The placebo will consist of 100 mL normal saline solution (0.9%, 154 mmol/L sodium chloride).

    Also known as: Normal saline

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage Decrease of Sputum Eosinophils From Baseline to End of Therapy (6 Months)

    The results will be expressed as absolute changes in percent sputum eosinophil counts from baseline to end of therapy (at 6 months). Change is difference in sputum eosinophils between baseline/time zero to end of therapy/6 months. A larger number represents a greater degree in the reduction of sputum eosinophils.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients With a Major Exacerbation.

    Exacerbation: a sustained worsening of the patient's respiratory condition, from the stable state and beyond normal day-to-day variations, necessitating a change in regular medication in a patient with underlying COPD Major exacerbation will be defined as a symptomatic deterioration requiring treatment with antibiotics, oral or intravenous corticosteroids, hospitalization, or a combination of these.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

07

Results

Posted Sep 24, 2025
Limitations and caveats
There were recruitment challenges forcing us to restrict our sample size, which reduced the study power to approximately 60%.

Participant flow

Patients who met eligibility criteria after the screening visit entered a 24 week double-blind treatment period followed by one follow-up visit.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMepolizumabPlacebo
Started810
Completed89
Not completed01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage Decrease of Sputum Eosinophils From Baseline to End of Therapy (6 Months)

The results will be expressed as absolute changes in percent sputum eosinophil counts from baseline to end of therapy (at 6 months). Change is difference in sputum eosinophils between baseline/time zero to end of therapy/6 months. A larger number represents a greater degree in the reduction of sputum eosinophils.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage
Percentage Decrease of Sputum Eosinophils From Baseline to End of Therapy (6 Months)
percentageMepolizumabPlacebo
Percentage Decrease of Sputum Eosinophils From Baseline to End of Therapy (6 Months)11.28 ± 6.607.07 ± 11.49
SecondaryProportion of Patients With a Major Exacerbation.

Exacerbation: a sustained worsening of the patient's respiratory condition, from the stable state and beyond normal day-to-day variations, necessitating a change in regular medication in a patient with underlying COPD Major exacerbation will be defined as a symptomatic deterioration requiring treatment with antibiotics, oral or intravenous corticosteroids, hospitalization, or a combination of these.

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Proportion of Patients With a Major Exacerbation.
participantsMepolizumabPlacebo
Proportion of Patients With a Major Exacerbation.47

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events (AEs), including Serious adverse events (SAEs), in the on-study period were defined as those with onset between day of the first dose of study treatment (Day 0) and last scheduled follow-up visit, 4 months following final infusion (10 months).. Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Mepolizumab0/8 (0%)2/8 (25%)4/8 (50%)
Placebo0/10 (0%)1/10 (10%)4/10 (40%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventMepolizumabPlacebo
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders1/80/10
C3 distal humeral fracture with a left trochlear fractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/80/10
COPD exacerbation - hospital admissionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/81/10
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventMepolizumabPlacebo
Infective bronchitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/84/10
Urinary tract infectionRenal and urinary disorders1/80/10

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)MepolizumabPlaceboTotal
Mean65 ± 6.3167 ± 5.8966 ± 5.97
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)MepolizumabPlaceboTotal
Female415
Male4913
Total cell count/g of sputum
Total cell count/g of sputum(cells per gram of sputum)MepolizumabPlaceboTotal
Median4.10 (0.90 to 33.10)11.6 (1.60 to 32.50)8.20 (0.9 to 33.10)
Sputum eosinophil count (%)
Sputum eosinophil count (%)(percentage of eosinophils)MepolizumabPlaceboTotal
Median11 (3.00 to 23.30)7.35 (3.70 to 37.70)10.10 (3.00 to 37.70)
Sputum neutrophil count (%)
Sputum neutrophil count (%)(percentage)MepolizumabPlaceboTotal
Mean54.5 ± 15.270.9 ± 15.763.6 ± 17.22
Blood eosinophil count
Blood eosinophil count(cells/mm^3)MepolizumabPlaceboTotal
Mean0.69 ± 0.500.33 ± 0.290.5 ± 0.42
Pre bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)
Pre bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)(forced expiratory volume in litres)MepolizumabPlaceboTotal
Mean1.35 ± 0.490.99 ± 0.281.10 ± 0.42
Pre bronchodilator FEV1%
Pre bronchodilator FEV1%(percentage)MepolizumabPlaceboTotal
Median55.00 (29.00 to 69.00)29.50 (27.00 to 47.00)34.00 (27.00 to 69.00)

13 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Firestone Institute of Respiratory Health, St Joseph's Hospital
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N 4A6, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Dasgupta A, Kjarsgaard M, Capaldi D, Radford K, Aleman F, Boylan C, Altman LC, Wight TN, Parraga G, O'Byrne PM, Nair P. A pilot randomised clinical trial of mepolizumab in COPD with eosinophilic bronchitis. Eur Respir J. 2017 Mar 15;49(3):1602486. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02486-2016. Print 2017 Mar. No abstract available. PubMed 28298405 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2012, a primary completion of Aug 2015 and a completion of Sep 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Sep 2025, 10 years 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 28, 2011
First posted
Nov 2, 2011
Start
Jan 2012
Primary completionActual
Aug 2015
CompletionActual
Sep 2015
Results first posted
Sep 24, 2025
Last update
Sep 24, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01463644
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 2, 2011
Start date
Jan 2012
Primary completion
Aug 2015
Completion
Sep 2015
Results posted
Sep 24, 2025
Last update
Sep 24, 2025

Study contacts

Parameswaran Nair, MD,PhD,FRCP
principal investigator · Associate Professor of Medicine,Division of Respirology, McMaster University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Mepolizumab

Start the discussion