CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01434667Updated Oct 23, 2018Results posted

Risk Evaluation and Education for Alzheimer's Disease (REVEAL) IV

An interventional study of APOE genotype and Alzheimer's disease risk disclosure and Alzheimer's disease risk disclosure in Mild Cognitive Impairment, sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-23.

Sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
146
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is intended to examine the impact of receiving a genetic risk assessment for Alzheimer's disease (AD) among individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).

Read the detailed description

Alzheimer's disease is a common condition affecting memory and thinking. Genes can sometimes be used to provide risk estimates for the eventual development of certain common diseases. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) is one gene which can provide information about a person's chances of developing Alzheimer's disease.

Some people with a diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) are curious to learn more about the chance of developing Alzheimer's disease. In the REVEAL IV Study, we are examining the psychological and behavioral impact of learning genetic risk information pertaining to the chance for an individual with MCI to progress to dementia of the Alzheimer's type within three years.

Participation in this study requires an initial phone call which will elicit some demographic information about the participant and his or her study partner. A first in-person visit to the research clinic will consist of an education session, the administration of knowledge and attitudinal surveys and some tests to assess memory and thinking skills. This visit will take approximately 2-3 hours. Participants with MCI will have their blood drawn for genetic testing. Participants will then be randomized to one of two groups. Those in the intervention arm will receive a three-year risk estimate for the chance of progressing to dementia of the Alzheimer's type based on age, the diagnosis of MCI and their own APOE gene test result. Those in the comparison arm will receive a three-year risk estimate for the chance of progressing to dementia of the Alzheimer's type based on age and the diagnosis of MCI, without the APOE gene test result. Participants randomized to the comparison arm will have the opportunity to learn their own APOE gene test result at the end of the study. Participants and their study partners will be followed for 6 months following disclosure of results with 1 additional clinic visit and 1 additional phone interviews.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

  • Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
  • Alzheimer's disease (AD)
  • APOE
  • genetics
  • risk assessment
  • education
  • genetic counseling
  • Mild Cognitive Impairment, So Stated
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,678 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 872 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 146 is above the median of 70 across 2,808 interventional studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Brigham and Women's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,236 studies on the registry; 224 are open to participants now.

Of its 116 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 64 (55%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals (55-90 years old) with Mild Cognitive Impairment (amnestic-MCI as defined by the Petersen criteria)
  • Individuals who have a close friend, relative or spouse (18+) willing to be a study partner. Study partners attend each study visit with the participant and also complete surveys and interviews.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with current, untreated anxiety or depression
  • Individuals who do not meet the criteria for amnestic-MCI
  • Individuals who have the diagnosis of dementia or Alzheimer's disease
  • Individuals not fluent in English
  • Individuals who do not have a study partner
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
146 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    APOE Genotype Non-Disclosure

    Subjects will receive Alzheimer's disease risk disclosure. This assessment is based on age and MCI status alone.

    Behavioral: Alzheimer's disease risk disclosure

  • Experimental
    APOE Genotype Disclosure

    Subjects will receive both APOE genotype and Alzheimer's disease risk disclosure. The assessment is based on age, MCI status, and genotype.

    Behavioral: APOE genotype and Alzheimer's disease risk disclosure

Interventions

  • BehavioralAPOE genotype and Alzheimer's disease risk disclosure

    Subjects with MCI will learn their own APOE genotype and a three-year numerical risk estimate for the chance of progressing to dementia of the Alzheimer's type.

  • BehavioralAlzheimer's disease risk disclosure

    Subjects with MCI will learn a three-year numerical risk estimate for the chance of progressing to dementia of the Alzheimer's type.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Geriatric Depression Scale

    A 15-item self-report assessment used to identify depression in the elderly. GDS scores ranged from 0-15. Higher scores indicated greater depression.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks post-disclosure, and 6 months post-disclosure

  2. Mini State Trait Anxiety Inventory

    Validated introspective psychological inventory consisting of 6 self-report items pertaining to anxiety affect. Responses are transformed into scores that range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks post-disclosure, and 6 months post-disclosure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Impact of Event Scale (IES)

    The Impact of Event assesses intrusive thoughts and avoidance related to a specific stressful life event. It is a 15-item self-report measure with scores that range from 0 to 75, with greater scores indicating greater distress about the event.

    Time frame: 1-3 Days, 6 Weeks and 6 Months Post-disclosure

  2. Psychological Impact of Test Disclosure (IGT-AD)

    A 15-item scale measuring distress specific to the test results received. Scores range from 0-75, with higher scores indicating greater test-related distress. Higher scores indicate greater distress about the risk assessment.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks and 6 Months Post-disclosure

  3. Recall and Comprehension of Risk Information

    Several measures to assess participant recall and comprehension of personalized risk information for AD. The sum number correct of the two items that were presented to both randomization arms ("What form of APOE increases risk for Alzheimer's disease?", and "What percentage were you given as your 3-year risk of developing Alzheimer's disease?") are summarized here.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks and 6 Months Post-disclosure

  4. Participant Satisfaction

    How well participants' expectations about information, explanations, reassurance, advice, and help in decision making were met. Participants rated satisfaction for each dimension on a 1-7 scale, with higher scores indicating that expectations were met better.

    Time frame: 6 Weeks and 6 Months Post-disclosure

  5. User Ratings of Risk Assessment Experience

    Subjective ratings of the impact of risk assessment. Participants provided ratings on a 1-5 scale, with 1 being "very negative" and 5 being "very positive"

    Time frame: 6 Weeks and 6 Months Post-disclosure

  6. Health Behavior and Insurance Changes

    AD prevention behaviors enacted within the prior two weeks.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks post-disclosure, and 6 months post-disclosure

  7. Insurance and Advance Planning Changes

    A series of yes/no questions that ask whether the risk assessment motivated changes to insurance or advance planning.

    Time frame: 6 months post-disclosure

  8. Participation in Alzheimer's Disease-related Research After Receiving the Alzheimer's Disease Risk Estimate.

    Yes/no response to the question, "Since receiving your Alzheimer's disease risk estimate, have you joined any other Alzheimer's disease-related research studies?"

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 6 months post-disclosure

07

Results

Posted Oct 23, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneApolipoprotein E (APOE) Genotype Non-DisclosureApolipoprotein E (APOE) Genotype Disclosure
Started3975
Completed3465
Not completed510
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up510

Outcome measures

PrimaryGeriatric Depression Scale

A 15-item self-report assessment used to identify depression in the elderly. GDS scores ranged from 0-15. Higher scores indicated greater depression.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 weeks post-disclosure, and 6 months post-disclosure
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Geriatric Depression Scale
score on a scaleAPOE Genotype Non-DisclosureAPOE Genotype Disclosure
Baseline2.6 ± 2.62.1 ± 2.0
6 Weeks Post-Disclosure2.8 ± 2.71.9 ± 1.6
6 Months Post-Disclosure2.1 ± 2.22.0 ± 2.1
PrimaryMini State Trait Anxiety Inventory

Validated introspective psychological inventory consisting of 6 self-report items pertaining to anxiety affect. Responses are transformed into scores that range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 weeks post-disclosure, and 6 months post-disclosure
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mini State Trait Anxiety Inventory
score on a scaleAPOE Genotype Non-DisclosureAPOE Genotype Disclosure
Baseline36.3 ± 12.036.5 ± 10.9
6 Weeks Post-Disclosure39.0 ± 13.636.6 ± 11.8
6 Months Post-Disclosure36.2 ± 12.336.2 ± 13.4
SecondaryImpact of Event Scale (IES)

The Impact of Event assesses intrusive thoughts and avoidance related to a specific stressful life event. It is a 15-item self-report measure with scores that range from 0 to 75, with greater scores indicating greater distress about the event.

Time frame:
1-3 Days, 6 Weeks and 6 Months Post-disclosure
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Impact of Event Scale (IES)
score on a scaleAPOE Genotype Non-DisclosureAPOE Genotype Disclosure
1-3 Days Post-Disclosure8.2 ± 8.78.1 ± 9.4
6 Weeks Post-Disclosure13.1 ± 11.411.5 ± 12.6
6 Months Post-Disclosure12.5 ± 11.912.4 ± 12.0
SecondaryPsychological Impact of Test Disclosure (IGT-AD)

A 15-item scale measuring distress specific to the test results received. Scores range from 0-75, with higher scores indicating greater test-related distress. Higher scores indicate greater distress about the risk assessment.

Time frame:
6 Weeks and 6 Months Post-disclosure
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Psychological Impact of Test Disclosure (IGT-AD)
score on a scaleAPOE Genotype Non-DisclosureAPOE Genotype Disclosure
6 Weeks Post-Disclosure24.7 ± 10.019.5 ± 11.5
6 Months Post-Disclosure24.1 ± 10.820.3 ± 11.2
SecondaryRecall and Comprehension of Risk Information

Several measures to assess participant recall and comprehension of personalized risk information for AD. The sum number correct of the two items that were presented to both randomization arms ("What form of APOE increases risk for Alzheimer's disease?", and "What percentage were you given as your 3-year risk of developing Alzheimer's disease?") are summarized here.

Time frame:
6 Weeks and 6 Months Post-disclosure
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Recall and Comprehension of Risk Information
score on a scaleAPOE Genotype Non-DisclosureAPOE Genotype Disclosure
6 Weeks Post-Disclosure0.8 ± 0.71.2 ± 0.8
6 Months Post-Disclosure1.0 ± 0.71.2 ± 0.7
SecondaryParticipant Satisfaction

How well participants' expectations about information, explanations, reassurance, advice, and help in decision making were met. Participants rated satisfaction for each dimension on a 1-7 scale, with higher scores indicating that expectations were met better.

Time frame:
6 Weeks and 6 Months Post-disclosure
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Participant Satisfaction
score on a scaleAPOE Genotype Non-DisclosureAPOE Genotype Disclosure
Information: 6 Weeks Post-Disclosure6.0 ± 1.16.1 ± 1.2
Explanation: 6 Weeks Post-Disclosure5.9 ± 1.26.2 ± 1.2
Reassurance: 6 Weeks Post-Disclosure5.5 ± 1.56.0 ± 1.3
Advice: 6 Weeks Post-Disclosure5.6 ± 1.45.4 ± 1.7
Help in decision making: 6 Weeks Post-Disclosure5.2 ± 1.75.3 ± 1.6
Information: 6 Months Post-Disclosure5.6 ± 1.46.1 ± 1.2
Explanation: 6 Months Post-Disclosure5.7 ± 1.36.2 ± 1.0
Reassurance: 6 Months Post-Disclosure5.5 ± 1.25.8 ± 1.3
Advice: 6 Months Post-Disclosure5.4 ± 1.35.6 ± 1.4
Help in decision making: 6 Months Post-Disclosure5.2 ± 1.35.6 ± 1.4
SecondaryUser Ratings of Risk Assessment Experience

Subjective ratings of the impact of risk assessment. Participants provided ratings on a 1-5 scale, with 1 being "very negative" and 5 being "very positive"

Time frame:
6 Weeks and 6 Months Post-disclosure
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
User Ratings of Risk Assessment Experience
score on a scaleAPOE Genotype Non-DisclosureAPOE Genotype Disclosure
6 Weeks Post-Disclosure3.5 ± 0.93.6 ± 1.0
6 Months Post-Disclosure3.0 ± 0.83.5 ± 1.0
SecondaryHealth Behavior and Insurance Changes

AD prevention behaviors enacted within the prior two weeks.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 weeks post-disclosure, and 6 months post-disclosure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Health Behavior and Insurance Changes
ParticipantsAPOE Genotype Non-DisclosureAPOE Genotype Disclosure
Baseline: Diet617
Baseline: Physical activity1626
Baseline: Dietary supplements715
Baseline: Mental activities1337
Baseline: Stress management110
Baseline: Medications826
6 Weeks post-disclosure: Diet916
6 Weeks post-disclosure: Physical activity1630
6 Weeks post-disclosure: Dietary supplements925
6 Weeks post-disclosure: Mental activities1238
6 Weeks post-disclosure: Stress management620
6 Weeks post-disclosure: Medications724
6 Months post-disclosure: Diet620
6 Months post-disclosure: Physical activity1223
6 Months post-disclosure: Dietary supplements916
6 Months post-disclosure: Mental activities1540
6 Months post-disclosure: Stress management318
6 Months post-disclosure: Medications422
SecondaryInsurance and Advance Planning Changes

A series of yes/no questions that ask whether the risk assessment motivated changes to insurance or advance planning.

Time frame:
6 months post-disclosure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Insurance and Advance Planning Changes
ParticipantsAPOE Genotype Non-DisclosureAPOE Genotype Disclosure
Health insurance change21
Life insurance change01
Short-term disability insurance change00
Long-term disability insurance00
Long-term care insurance00
Change to will00
Change to living will11
Change to durable power of attorney00
SecondaryParticipation in Alzheimer's Disease-related Research After Receiving the Alzheimer's Disease Risk Estimate.

Yes/no response to the question, "Since receiving your Alzheimer's disease risk estimate, have you joined any other Alzheimer's disease-related research studies?"

Time frame:
6 weeks and 6 months post-disclosure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participation in Alzheimer's Disease-related Research After Receiving the Alzheimer's Disease Risk Estimate.
ParticipantsAPOE Genotype Non-DisclosureAPOE Genotype Disclosure
6 Weeks post-disclosure06
6 Months post-disclosure210

Adverse events

Collected over From enrollment through 6 months after the Alzheimer's disease risk assessment.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
APOE Genotype Non-Disclosure0/39 (0%)0/39 (0%)16/39 (41%)
APOE Genotype Disclosure0/75 (0%)0/75 (0%)18/75 (24%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAPOE Genotype Non-DisclosureAPOE Genotype Disclosure
Increased monitoring due to high scores on anxiety, depression or hopelessness scalesPsychiatric disorders16/3917/75
Delayed disclosure sessionInvestigations0/391/75

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)APOE Genotype Non-DisclosureAPOE Genotype DisclosureTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years31114
>=65 years3664100
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)APOE Genotype Non-DisclosureAPOE Genotype DisclosureTotal
Mean75.1 ± 8.173.3 ± 7.373.9 ± 7.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)APOE Genotype Non-DisclosureAPOE Genotype DisclosureTotal
Female183957
Male213657
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)APOE Genotype Non-DisclosureAPOE Genotype DisclosureTotal
Hispanic or Latino213
Not Hispanic or Latino3672108
Unknown or Not Reported123
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)APOE Genotype Non-DisclosureAPOE Genotype DisclosureTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American91120
White306494
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)APOE Genotype Non-DisclosureAPOE Genotype DisclosureTotal
United States3975125
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Howard University
    Washington, District of Columbia 20060, United States
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Roberts JS, Karlawish JH, Uhlmann WR, Petersen RC, Green RC. Mild cognitive impairment in clinical care: a survey of American Academy of Neurology members. Neurology. 2010 Aug 3;75(5):425-31. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181eb5872. PubMed 20679636 ↗
  • Roberts JS, Christensen KD, Green RC. Using Alzheimer's disease as a model for genetic risk disclosure: implications for personal genomics. Clin Genet. 2011 Nov;80(5):407-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01739.x. Epub 2011 Jul 18. PubMed 21696382 ↗
  • Guan Y, Roter DL, Wolff JL, Gitlin LN, Christensen KD, Roberts JS, Green RC, Erby LH. The impact of genetic counselors' use of facilitative strategies on cognitive and emotional processing of genetic risk disclosure for Alzheimer's disease. Patient Educ Couns. 2018 May;101(5):817-823. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.11.019. Epub 2017 Nov 27. PubMed 29203084 ↗
  • Guan Y, Roter DL, Erby LH, Wolff JL, Gitlin LN, Roberts JS, Green RC, Christensen KD. Disclosing genetic risk of Alzheimer's disease to cognitively impaired patients and visit companions: Findings from the REVEAL Study. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 May;100(5):927-935. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 14. PubMed 28012682 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 23, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01434667
Lead sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Collaborators
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), University of Michigan, University of Pennsylvania, Howard University
Responsible party
Robert C. Green, MD, MPH (Principal Investigator, The REVEAL Study, Brigham and Women's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 15, 2011
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Jul 2014
Completion
Jul 2014
Results posted
Oct 23, 2018
Last update
Oct 23, 2018

Study contacts

Robert C Green, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion