An interventional study of In-person counseling and Workbook in Melanoma, sponsored by Northwestern University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-07-12.
Sponsored by Northwestern University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening
The almost 724,000 Americans survivors of melanoma are estimated to have 4 first degree relatives per case; thus, 2.8 million Americans are at increased risk of developing melanoma in comparison to the general public. Skin self-examination (SSE) with the assistance of a partner by these individuals could improve survival. If effective, the workbook tested in this proposal could be distributed to people at risk of developing melanoma by large scale means in physicians office.
Population based registries document that survival from melanoma, a growing public health problem with approximately 70,000 new melanoma cases and an estimated 8,600 deaths in 2010, is dependent on the thickness of the melanoma. By facilitating seeking medical care, skin self-examinations (SSEs) by individuals with a prior history of melanoma, who are at risk to develop subsequent melanomas, may lead to the early detection and treatment of melanoma when it is usually more effective. Thus, further research that enhances early detection is warranted and our application directly tests novel methods of training high-risk melanoma patients and their partners on how to conduct SSEs to promote early detection. Our proposed research builds upon the strengths of the R21 that: a) established that in-person training to conduct SSE with a partner significantly enhanced SSE performance 4 months after the intervention, and b) developed and pilot tested a manualized take-home workbook training approach (WORKBOOK). Our pilot work on the WORKBOOK with partners suggests that patient-partner dyads (n = 21) perceived it to be readable, useful, and in the short term 4 month follow-up, empirically equivalent in promoting SSE knowledge, skills, and behaviors compared with patient-partner dyads in the in-person partner training condition (n = 19). Our proposed research builds on our NCI funded studies by conducting a formal examination with 430 pairs (860 subjects) randomized to either the in-person or workbook training vs. an assessment only control group that receives standard of care over a 2 year longitudinal study with 4 month interval evaluations. An additional group of 70 pairs (140 subjects) has been added to test a tablet computer-based program.
Our proposed research directly tests novel methods of training Stage I and IIB melanoma patients, who have a 5 year survival of 80-90%, and their partners, on how to conduct SSEs. We will compare the efficacy of the in-person training vs. workbook for patients and partners vs. controls on SSE knowledge/skill acquisition and retention, and SSE performance and accuracy on a short (4 and 8 months post baseline) and long term basis (12, 16, 20, and 24 months post baseline) and examine whether partner-patient relationship-qualities moderate the relationship between the training approaches and SSEs knowledge/skill acquisition and retention, and SSE performance and accuracy. The tablet computer-based program will also be tested for efficacy and compared with the previous groups.
Establishing health promotion partnerships is important to those at risk to develop melanoma because SSE is difficult to successfully perform as an individual. It is expected that the workbook will promote SSE at least as well as and perhaps better than in-person training and become an easily disseminated SSE training approach that is not dependent on the time and teaching skills of the non-MD clinical office staff.
3,006 studies on the registry are indexed under Melanoma; 520 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 38 across 2,351 interventional studies indexed under Melanoma.
Browse Melanoma studies →Northwestern University is the lead sponsor of 1,396 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.
Of its 102 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (72%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
1.Subjects overburdened with other co- morbid diseases, medical treatments (e.g. chemotherapy), unable to participate in a conversation at a sixth grade language level due to cognitive impairment (e.g. by a stroke), or prior participation in SSE research.
In the in-person training the Research Assistant demonstrates the use of a mm ruler, a lighted magnifying lens, a set of body maps and a scorecard, 4 pens, ABCDE rule on the skin exam card and discusses the ABCDE rule by pointing to the color examples on the skin exam card. 165 pairs (330 subjects) are randomized to this arm.
Behavioral: In-person counseling
The workbook, which includes all of the information delivered in the in-person intervention, is 39 pages in length, and has 76 color figures. Each element of the in-person training represents a chapter in the workbook. The introduction explores the partners' understanding of melanoma and their personal risk of developing another melanoma, and attitudes about the benefit of early detection assisted by a partner. The early detection segment uses a skin diagram to illustrate the difference between thin and thick melanoma and presents the treatment based on the depth of the melanoma. 165 pairs (330 subjects) are randomized to this arm.
Behavioral: Workbook
Education and counseling as usually delivered in clinical practice. 100 pairs (200 subjects) are randomized to this arm.
Education will be given by an interactive tablet app. Each pair will view video recordings of certain parts of the in-person presentation as well as select slides from the in-person PowerPoint presentation. Parts of the workbook will be incorporated as well. 70 pairs (140 subjects) are randomized into this arm.
Behavioral: Tablet Computer-Based Education
The design is a 3 \[in-person training of patients and partners (PARTNER) vs. workbook training of patients and partners (WORKBOOK) vs. an assessment only group that receives education and treatment as usual care\] X 7 \[baseline, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 month follow-up\] study. Standard education of melanoma patients, which are to be performed with the study partner, includes a recommendation to check moles and mark ones to remember on a body map. All participants receive the same measures and will be recruited using the same procedures, thus, yielding equivalence across conditions. Pairs will observe how to use their skin check tools and be asked to demonstrate their competence in using them.
Participants will read a workbook and perform skills training exercises.
Participants will receive their education from an interactive app designed for a tablet computer.
Self-Efficacy in Performing SSE
To compare the self-efficacy of the in-person training vs. workbook for patients and partners by self-report on a survey at 4-month intervals over 24 months.
Time frame: 24 months
Accuracy
Accurate identification of concerning lesions (melanoma) by participants performing SSE in comparison with the dermatologist's assessment.
Time frame: 24 months
Plan to share: Yes — publication of results with listing in My NCBI
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Northwestern University