ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01430598Updated Sep 8, 2011

Study Comparing Patient Function and Satisfaction With Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression Before and After Repair of Complete Rotator Cuff Tears

An interventional study of Rotator Cuff Repair and Subacromial Decompression and Questionnaire in Rotator Cuff Tear and Acromial Spur, sponsored by Ascension Health. Status unknown at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-09-08.

Sponsored by Ascension Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2011), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators aim to establish whether completing a subacromial decompression before or after repair of a complete rotator cuff tear has any clinical significance. Both the arthroscopic decompression and rotator cuff repair will be completed during the same surgical date. The investigators null hypothesis contends that full-thickness rotator cuff tear repair performed before versus after subacromial decompression will not influence patient's post-operative pain or functionality.

Read the detailed description

All patients with a diagnosed full thickness rotator cuff tear and symptomatic subacromial decompression will be consulted about arthroscopic subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair. The possible risks and benefits will be discussed with the patient in detail by the operating surgeon. If a patient agrees to undergo surgical intervention (i.e. arthroscopic subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair in the same surgical setting), they will be approached and informed regarding involvement in the study. This is a single blind study so participants will not know into which arm they have been randomized.

Once consented, the subject will be randomized into one of two treatment arms. Those in Arm A will have subacromial decompression before repair of a complete rotator cuff and those in Arm B will have subacromial decompression after repair of a complete rotator cuff.

Prior to surgical intervention all patients will complete two separate questionnaires in the waiting room. The results of the questionnaires will be later used to compare pre-operative and post-operative changes following shoulder surgery.

On the date of surgery, the operative surgeon will ensure a full-thickness rotator cuff tear is present with an associated acromial spur. If both are present, the operative surgeon will perform the surgical intervention in the previously assigned order according to the patient's treatment arm. All acromial spurs will be burred to a level flush with the remaining non-pathologic acromion. The full-thickness rotator cuff will be repaired utilizing sutures and suture anchors. The specific pattern of repair will be determined intra-operatively. This is standard procedure for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and subacromial decompression. There is no known risks within the orthopedic literature with performing subacromial decompression before versus after rotator cuff repair. As such, this study aims to identify any significance of the order of surgery if it exists.

Post-operatively all patients will be placed within a Berg SlingShot®. All patients will undergo a period of immobilization within the sling. Patients will be evaluated at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks post-operatively. The shoulder range of motion and relative strength, compared to the contralateral limb, will be assessed. They will be prescribed formal physical therapy in the outpatient setting. At the 12 week visit each subject will complete the questionnaires once again. The scores will be tabulated and inserted in the Excel spreadsheet.

The pre-operative and post-operative scores will be compared. The change in score from each treatment arm will be averaged and analyzed for statistically significant difference. Also, the pre- and post-operative forward flexion, abduction range of motion will be compared. The external and internal rotation strengths will be compared from the pre- and post-operative evaluations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rotator Cuff Tear
  • Acromial Spur

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear and Acromial Spur
03

In context

Rotator Cuff Injuries

745 studies on the registry are indexed under Rotator Cuff Injuries; 163 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 60 across 547 interventional studies indexed under Rotator Cuff Injuries.

Browse Rotator Cuff Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Ascension Health is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-65
  • Symptomatic patients with MRI positive full thickness rotator cuff tears
  • Clinically and/or radiographically positive subacromial impingement/spur with associated rotator cuff tendonitis and bursitis
  • Patients who have failed outpatient conservative therapy, including, but not limited to physical therapy and subacromial injection with steroid and local anesthetic

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with radiographic evidence of glenohumeral degenerative joint disease or rotator cuff arthropathy
  • Patients with a prior history of joint sepsis
  • Patients who have had previous shoulder surgery on the anticipated operative limb
  • Patients with a diagnosed pathology causing associated pain and/or weakness to the anticipated operative limb
  • Patient deemed unable to complete the post-operative rehabilitation protocol
  • Patients diagnosed, either intra-operatively or by MRI, as having irreparable rotator cuff tears
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    A

    Subacromial decompression before repair of a complete rotator cuff tear.

    Procedure: Rotator Cuff Repair and Subacromial Decompression · Other: Questionnaire

  • Active comparator
    B

    Subacromial decompression after repair of a complete rotator cuff repair.

    Procedure: Rotator Cuff Repair and Subacromial Decompression · Other: Questionnaire

Interventions

  • ProcedureRotator Cuff Repair and Subacromial Decompression

    Arthroscopic decompression and rotator cuff repair will be completed during the same surgical date.

  • OtherQuestionnaire

    Patients will be asked to complete two separate questionnaires prior to the surgical intervention. Patients will be asked to complete the same two questionnaires at 12 weeks post surgery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pre and Post Surgery Pain and Satisfaction

    Both arms will complete an identical baseline and post-operative pain and functionality survey. The data will be analyzed to determine the rate of change between the pre and post surgery results. The results from the two groups will be compared to determine if there is a significant difference in pain and functionality between subjects in Arm A and Arm B.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Genesys Regional Medical Center-General Surgery Center
    Grand Blanc, Michigan 48439, United States
    • Stephen Nystrom, DO · Contact · 810-606-5000
    • Stephen Nystrom, DO · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Greater Flint Sports Medicine
    Grand Blanc, Michigan 48439, United States
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2011, a primary completion of Aug 2012 and a completion of Aug 2012. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 29, 2011
First posted
Sep 8, 2011
Start
Aug 2011
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2012
CompletionEst.
Aug 2012
Last update
Sep 8, 2011
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01430598
Lead sponsor
Ascension Health
Responsible party
Lauren Suchy (Academic Research Coordinator, Ascension Health) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 8, 2011
Start date
Aug 2011
Primary completion
Aug 2012 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2012 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 8, 2011

Study contacts

Stephen Nystrom, DO
Contact
stephen.nystrom@genesys.org
810-606-5000
Lauren E Suchy, MPA
Contact
lauren.suchy@genesys.org
810-606-7878

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion