CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01419574Updated Dec 3, 2019

Ultrasound and Other Images of Artery Blockages

An observational study in Atherosclerosis, sponsored by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-03.

Sponsored by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
12
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

  • Treatments for partly blocked carotid arteries are determined by a person s symptoms and by tests that show how severe the blockage is. Studies show that the material that blocks an artery is more important in spotting future problems than how tight the blockage is. Researchers want to develop better imaging studies to find which blockages are more high-risk.

Objectives:

  • To use imaging studies to look at high-risk carotid artery blockages.

Eligibility:

  • Individuals at least 21 years of age whose ultrasound exams show a major carotid artery blockage.

Design:

  • Participants will be screened with a medical history, physical exam, blood and urine tests, , an ultrasound scan and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan.
  • Participants will have ultrasound and other scans to obtain pictures of the arteries. The scans will use drugs that may help study doctors get a better picture of the blood vessels and blockages.
  • Participants will have followup phone calls yearly for 3 years. If a participant later has surgery to remove the blockage, the surgeon will save part of it for future study.
Read the detailed description

Traditional evaluations of atherosclerotic disease in the carotid arteries and treatment recommendations have focused primarily on degree of obstruction. Emerging data from histologic series and advanced imaging studies suggests that anatomic features related to plaque biology, including inflammation, lipid accumulation, and angiogenesis, may be used to detect vulnerable plaques more likely to cause clinical effects. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a new technique that uniquely visualizes intraplaque neovascularization. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of carotid plaque lipid core and intraplaque hemorrhage has shown value in the prediction of future neurologic events. We propose a multimodal approach to assess plaque activity in subjects with known carotid disease using CEUS, MRI imaging, and serum biomarker evaluation. In subjects undergoing carotid endarterectomy, imaging findings will be validated by histology. Both imaging and histologic findings will be compared with prospective cardiovascular events.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atherosclerosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Carotid Artery Plaque
  • Contrast Agents
  • Vasa Vasorum
  • MRI
  • Intraplaque Hemorrhage
  • Solid Tumor
  • Metastatic Solid Tumor
03

In context

Atherosclerosis

1,567 studies on the registry are indexed under Atherosclerosis; 265 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 223 across 571 observational studies indexed under Atherosclerosis.

Browse Atherosclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) is the lead sponsor of 1,117 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Of its 57 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 49 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

  • INCLUSION CRITERIA:

Inclusion Criteria for Group A:

  • Adult subjects age greater than or equal to 21 years
  • Able to give written informed consent
  • Prior clinical ultrasound exam showing a carotid stenosis of greater than or equal to 50 percent

Inclusion Criteria for Group B:

  • Adult subjects age greater than or equal to 21 years
  • Able to give written informed consent
  • Prior clinical ultrasound exam showing a carotid stenosis suspected of causing symptoms and/or clinical recommendation to undergo carotid endarterectomy

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Atrial fibrillation or other irregular rhythm that would preclude adequate image acquisition
  • Subjects with a contraindication for the ultrasound contrast agent.
  • Subjects with pacemakers, defibrillators, cerebral aneurysm clips, neural stimulators, ear implants or other clinical contra-indications for magnetic resonance scanning will be excluded from the MRI portion of the study.
  • Subjects with an estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] less than 30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) body surface area will be excluded from the contrast MRI portion of the study but will still undergo non-contrast imaging.
  • The eGFR will be used to estimate renal function if reported by the laboratory. Otherwise, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) can be based on the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation (see below) in subjects with stable renal function. This formula is not applicable to subjects with acute renal insufficiency: eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m(2)) equal to 175 times (serum creatinine)-1.154 times (age)-0.203 times 0.742 (if the subject is female) times 1.212 (if the subject is black).
  • Pregnant or lactating women
05

Study design

Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)
06

Study locations

1 site
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, Badimon JJ, Stefanadis C, Moreno P, Pasterkamp G, Fayad Z, Stone PH, Waxman S, Raggi P, Madjid M, Zarrabi A, Burke A, Yuan C, Fitzgerald PJ, Siscovick DS, de Korte CL, Aikawa M, Juhani Airaksinen KE, Assmann G, Becker CR, Chesebro JH, Farb A, Galis ZS, Jackson C, Jang IK, Koenig W, Lodder RA, March K, Demirovic J, Navab M, Priori SG, Rekhter MD, Bahr R, Grundy SM, Mehran R, Colombo A, Boerwinkle E, Ballantyne C, Insull W Jr, Schwartz RS, Vogel R, Serruys PW, Hansson GK, Faxon DP, Kaul S, Drexler H, Greenland P, Muller JE, Virmani R, Ridker PM, Zipes DP, Shah PK, Willerson JT. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation. 2003 Oct 7;108(14):1664-72. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.97. PubMed 14530185 ↗
  • Lorenz MW, Markus HS, Bots ML, Rosvall M, Sitzer M. Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2007 Jan 30;115(4):459-67. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.628875. Epub 2007 Jan 22. PubMed 17242284 ↗
  • Costanzo P, Perrone-Filardi P, Vassallo E, Paolillo S, Cesarano P, Brevetti G, Chiariello M. Does carotid intima-media thickness regression predict reduction of cardiovascular events? A meta-analysis of 41 randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Dec 7;56(24):2006-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.059. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Apr 5;67(13):1660. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.011. PubMed 21126642 ↗
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 3, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01419574
Lead sponsor
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 18, 2011
Start date
Jul 29, 2011
Completion
Apr 27, 2016
Last update
Dec 3, 2019

Study contacts

Vandana Sachdev, M.D.
principal investigator · National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion