CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01417091Updated May 11, 2021

Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of BPS804 in Osteogenesis Imperfecta

A Phase 2 interventional study of BPS804 in Osteogenesis Imperfecta, sponsored by Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. Completed at 6 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-11.

Sponsored by Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized, open label intra-patient dose escalation study to evaluate safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of BPS804 in adults with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI).

Pharmacodynamic effect will be determined by serological biomarkers and radiologic assessments. In addition, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) will be evaluated.

Read the detailed description

This study was previously posted by Mereo BioPharma and was transferred to Ultragenyx in February 2021.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteogenesis Imperfecta

Keywords

  • Brittle bone disease
  • inherited
  • connective tissue disorder
  • fracture
03

In context

Osteogenesis Imperfecta

85 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteogenesis Imperfecta; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 26 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

Browse Osteogenesis Imperfecta studies →

Lead sponsor

Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc is the lead sponsor of 63 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 11 (85%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Osteogenesis imperfecta
  • Two or more previous fractures
  • Bone mineral density Z-score of ≤ -1.0 and > -4.0

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open epiphyses
  • Fracture within last 2 weeks
  • Treatment with bisphosphonates/teriparatide (last 6 months)
  • Surgery within last year

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment group

    Drug: BPS804

  • No intervention
    Untreated reference group

Interventions

  • DrugBPS804
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety and tolerability (composite outcome: standard laboratory, (serious) adverse events)

    The assessment of safety will be based on primarily on the frequency of adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, and serious adverse events suspected by the investigators to be related to study treatments. The AE collection period extends from the time of first study drug administration drug until study completion. The intensity of each AE will be characterized and classified into 1 of the 3 generic categories (mild, moderate, or severe). The number and percentage of patients with adverse events will be tabulated by treatment group, body system and preferred term. The periods for adverse event tabulation will be from dose administration up to next dose administration if a further dose is given, and from dose administration to EOS for the last dose administration of a patient.

    Time frame: Day 1 through 141

  2. Determination of pharmacodynamic effect by means of biomarkers

    Biomarker data from serum bone formation biomarkers: procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide, procollagen type I C-terminal propeptide, osteocalcin, and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and from serum bone resporption mbiomarkers: C-telopeptides of type I collagen cross-links, and N-telopeptides of type I collagen cross-links will be reported as concentration results, measured using a specific assay with a working range defined by the Lower limit of quantification and Upper limit of quantification. It will be considered a sign for efficacy, if any of the above show significant (2-sided, alpha=0.05) increase versus baseline in the BPS804 group on day 43.

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 43

  3. Change in Z-score from baseline to Day 141

    Bone mineral density will be assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine. Analysis will include four vertebral levels from L1 to L4. Individual vertebral levels may be excluded due to artifact. Bone mineral density Z-scores will be used as these are a comparison of a patient's BMD to that of a patient of the same age, sex, and ethnicity. The comparison of change from baseline with the matching change in the reference group will be done by 2-sample t-tests (1-sided). It will be considered a sign for efficacy, if any of the above show significant (2-sided, alpha=0.05) increase versus baseline in the BPS804 group on day 141.

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 141

Secondary outcomes

  1. Determination of the serum concentration-time profiles of BPS804

    Individual and overlaying individual serum concentration-time profiles of BPS804 will be constructed from the serial sampling on Day 1 (prior to administration and 3x after administration) and Days 2, 8, 15 (2x), 16, 29 (4x), 30, 36, 43, 57, 85, 113,141. In addition arithmetic and geometric mean serum concentration-time profiles of BPS804 will be constructed from the above data points.

    Time frame: Day 1 (prior to administration and 3x after administration) and Days 2, 8, 15 (2x), 16, 29 (4x), 30, 36, 43, 57, 85, 113,141

  2. Determination of the area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval tau after the first dose

    The area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval tau after the first dose will be derived using using non-compartmental methods from data collected on Day 1 (4x) and Days 2, and 8.

    Time frame: Day 1 (prior to administration and 3x after administration) and Days 2, and 8

  3. Determination of the maximal concentration after the first dose

    The maximal concentration after the first dose will be derived using using non-compartmental methods from data collected Day 1 (4x) and Days 2, and 8.

    Time frame: Day 1 (prior to administration and 3x after administration) and Days 2, and 8

  4. Determination of the time of maximal concentration after the first dose

    The time of maximal concentration after the first dose will be derived using using non-compartmental methods from data collected Day 1 (4x) and Days 2, and 8.

    Time frame: Day 1 (prior to administration and 3x after administration) and Days 2, and 8

  5. Determination of the maximal concentration after the second dose

    The maximal concentration after the second dose will be derived using using non-compartmental methods from data collected from days 15 (2x) and 16.

    Time frame: Day 15 (prior to administration and 1x after administration) and Day 16

  6. Determination of the time of maximal concentration after the second dose

    The time of maximal concentration after the second dose will be derived using using non-compartmental methods from data collected from days 15 (2x) and 16.

    Time frame: Day 15 (prior to administration and 1x after administration) and Day 16

  7. Determination of the area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity after the third dose

    The area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval tau after the third dose will be derived using non-compartmental methods from data collected on Days 29 (4x), 30, 36, 43, 57, 85, 113, and 141.

    Time frame: Days 29 (prior to administration and 3x after administration) and 30, 36, 43, 57, 85, 113, and 141

  8. Determination of the area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration after the third dose

    The area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration after the third dose will be derived using non-compartmental methods from data collected on Days 29 (4x), 30, 36, 43, 57, 85, 113, and 141.

    Time frame: Days 29 (prior to administration and 3x after administration) and 30, 36, 43, 57, 85, 113, and 141

  9. Determination of the area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval tau after the third dose

    The area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval tau after the third dose will be derived using non-compartmental methods from data collected on Days 29 (4x), 30, 36, 43, 57, 85, 113, and 141.

    Time frame: Days 29 (prior to administration and 3x after administration) and 30, 36, 43, 57, 85, 113, and 141

  10. Determination of the maximal serum concentration after the third dose

    The maximal serum concentration after the third dose will be derived using using non-compartmental methods from data collected on Days 29 (4x), 30, 36, 43, 57, 85, 113, and 141.

    Time frame: Days 29 (prior to administration and 3x after administration) and 30, 36, 43, 57, 85, 113, and 141

  11. Determination of the time of maximal concentration after the third dose

    The time of maximal concentration after the third dose will be derived using using non-compartmental methods from data collected on Days 29 (4x), 30, 36, 43, 57, 85, 113, and 141.

    Time frame: Days 29 (prior to administration and 3x after administration) and 30, 36, 43, 57, 85, 113, and 141

  12. Determination of the terminal elimination half-life after the third dose

    The terminal elimination half-life after the third dose will be derived from data collected on Days 29 (4x), 30, 36, 43, 57, 85, 113, and 141 using a compound-specific modeling approach.

    Time frame: Days 29 (prior to administration and 3x after administration) and 30, 36, 43, 57, 85, 113, and 141

  13. Determination of the concentration of total sclerostin in serum

    The function of sclerostin is described as an endogenous negative regulator of bone formation. Total serum sclerostin will be measured from samples collected at screening and on days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36, 43, 57, 85, 113, and 141

    Time frame: Screening, Days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36, 43, 57, 85, 113, 141

  14. Immunogenicity evaluation in serum

    Immunogenicity will only be assessed in patients randomized to the treatment group. Anti-BPS804 antibodies will be measured in human serum on Days 1, 29, 85, and 141 An immunogenicity positive patient at end of study will be followed up until anti-BPS804 antibody levels are back to levels measured on Day 1.

    Time frame: Days 1, 29, 85, and 141

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Anaheim, California 92801, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Miramar, Florida 33025, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bruxelles, 1200, Belgium
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Gent, 9000, Belgium
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Montreal, Quebec H3GIA6, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Wuerzburg, 97074, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Glorieux FH. Osteogenesis imperfecta. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2008 Mar;22(1):85-100. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2007.12.012. PubMed 18328983 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 11, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01417091
Lead sponsor
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 16, 2011
Start date
Jun 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2012
Completion
Dec 2012
Last update
May 11, 2021

Study contacts

Medical Director
study director · Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion