CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01396421VECTORUpdated Oct 29, 2015Results posted

Study of the Effectiveness of Three Different Doses of OPC-34712 in the Treatment of Adults With Acute Schizophrenia

A Phase 3 interventional study of OPC-34712 [Brexpiprazole] High Dose and Experimental: OPC-34712 [Brexpiprazole] Middle Dose in Acute Schizophrenia, sponsored by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.. Completed at 60 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-10-29.

Sponsored by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
636
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of three different doses of OPC-34712 with placebo in the treatment of acute schizophrenia in adults.

Read the detailed description

Schizophrenia is a severely debilitating mental illness that affects approximately 1% of the world population. Hallucinations and delusions are the most striking characteristic positive symptoms of schizophrenia; however, more subtle negative symptoms (eg, social withdrawal and lack of emotion, energy, and motivation) may also be present. The first antipsychotics developed for the treatment of schizophrenia were effective against positive symptoms, but showed little efficacy for negative symptoms and were also associated with a high incidence of side effects. Second generation antipsychotics, represent a significant advancement in the treatment of psychotic disorders because they are effective and at the same time exhibit fewer side effects than first generation antipsychotics. Although generally safer than first generation antipsychotics, the second-generation antipsychotics are not devoid of undesirable side effects such as Hyperprolactinemia and weight gain. In addition, the safety of these drugs vary considerably.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Schizophrenia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,471 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 472 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 636 is above the median of 70 across 2,872 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 289 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Of its 104 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 69 (66%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female subjects between 18 and 65 years of age, with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) criteria
  2. Subjects who have been recently hospitalized or who would benefit from hospitalization for an acute relapse of schizophrenia
  3. Subjects experiencing an acute exacerbation of psychotic symptoms
  4. Other protocol specific inclusion criteria may apply

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Females who are breast-feeding and/or who have a positive pregnancy test result prior to receiving study drug
  2. Subjects with a current DSM-IV-TR Axis I diagnosis of:

    • Schizoaffective disorder
    • Major depressive disorder (MDD)
    • Bipolar disorder
    • Delirium, dementia, amnestic or other cognitive disorder
    • Borderline, paranoid, histrionic, schizotypal, schizoid or antisocial personality disorder
  3. Subjects presenting with a first episode of schizophrenia
  4. Other protocol specific exclusion criteria may apply
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
636 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    OPC-34712 [Brexpiprazole] High Dose

    Higher Dose, tablet, once daily, for six weeks

    Drug: OPC-34712 [Brexpiprazole] High Dose

  • Experimental
    OPC-34712 [Brexpiprazole] Middle Dose

    Middle Dose, tablet, once daily, for six weeks

    Drug: Experimental: OPC-34712 [Brexpiprazole] Middle Dose

  • Experimental
    OPC-34712 [Brexpiprazole] Low Dose

    Lower Dose, tablet, once daily, for six weeks

    Drug: Experimental: OPC-34712 [Brexpiprazole] Low Dose

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo, once daily, for six weeks

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugOPC-34712 [Brexpiprazole] High Dose

    Higher dose, tablet, once daily, for six weeks

  • DrugExperimental: OPC-34712 [Brexpiprazole] Middle Dose

    Middle dose, tablet, once daily, for six weeks

  • DrugExperimental: OPC-34712 [Brexpiprazole] Low Dose

    Lower dose, tablet, once daily, for six weeks

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo, once daily, for six weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score.

    The PANSS consists of 3 subscales (positive subscale, negative subscale and general psychology subscale) containing a total of 30 symptom constructs and was administered using the Structured Clinical Interview (SCI)-PANSS. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicating the absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicating extremely severe symptoms. The PANSS total score ranged from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) Score.

    The severity of illness was rated using the CGI-S which is the key secondary endpoint. To perform this assessment, the rater or study physician answered the following question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?" Response choices included: 0=not assessed; 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; and 7=among the most extremely ill participant.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

  2. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score.

    The PANSS consists of 3 subscales (positive subscale, negative subscale and general psychology subscale) containing a total of 30 symptom constructs and was administered using the Structured Clinical Interview (SCI)-PANSS. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicating the absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicating extremely severe symptoms. The PANSS total score ranged from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

  3. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 in Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) Score.

    The severity of illness was rated using the CGI-S. To perform this assessment, the rater or study physician answered the following question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?" Response choices included: 0=not assessed; 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; and 7=among the most extremely ill participant.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

  4. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP)

    The PSP is a clinician-rated scale that measures personal and social functioning in 4 domains: socially useful activities (eg, work and study), personal and social relationships, self-care, and disturbing and aggressive behaviors. Impairment in each of these domains was rated as absent, mild, manifest, marked, severe, or very severe. These ratings were then converted to a total score based on a 100-point scale using algorithms to identify the appropriate 10-point interval, and the rater's judgment to determine the total score within the 10-point interval. Participants with a PSP total score of 71 to 100 were considered to have mild functional difficulty. Scores of 31 to 70 represented manifest disabilities of various degrees and ratings of 1 to 30 indicated minimal functioning that required intense support and/or supervision.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

  5. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive Subscale Score

    For each symptom construct of the PANSS Positive Subscale, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicating the absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicating extremely severe symptoms. The symptom constructs were as follows: delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. The PANSS Positive Subscale Score for each participant was calculated as the sum of the rating assigned to each of the 7 subscale items, and ranged from 7 to 49 with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

  6. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Negative Subscale Score

    For each symptom construct of the PANSS Negative Subscale, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicating the absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicating extremely severe symptoms. The symptom constructs were as follows: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. The PANSS Negative Subscale Score for each participant was calculated as the sum of the rating assigned to each of the 7 subscale items, and ranged from 7 to 49 with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

  7. Clinical Global Impression- Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Score at Week 6

    The participant's overall improvement was rated using the CGI-I. The rater or study physician rated the participant's total improvement whether or not it was due entirely to drug treatment. All responses were compared with the participant's condition at screening/baseline. Response choices were: 0=not assessed, 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, and 7=very much worse.

    Time frame: Week 6

  8. Response Rate at Week 6

    Response rate was defined as improvement in mean change of ≥30% from baseline in PANSS Total Score at Week 6 or CGI-I score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) at Week 6.

    Time frame: Week 6

  9. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Excited Component (PEC) Score

    The PEC consists of 5 PANSS items (excitement \[P4\], hostility \[P7\], tension \[G4\], uncooperativeness \[G8\], and poor impulse control \[G14\]). Each rated on a scale of 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme). The PEC for participants was calculated as the sum of the rating assigned to each of the 5 items, and ranged from 5 to 35 with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

  10. Discontinuation Rate for Lack of Efficacy at Week 6

    Time frame: Week 6

  11. Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Factor Score - Positive Symptoms Score

    The PANSS Marder Factor score - Positive Symptoms Score consists of 8 PANSS items (delusions \[P1\], hallucinatory behaviour \[P3\], grandiosity \[P5\], suspiciousness \[P6\], stereotyped thinking \[N7\], somatic concern \[G1\], unusual thought content \[G9\], lack of judgment and insight \[G10\]. Each was rated on a scale of 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme). The PANSS Marder Factor score - Positive Symptoms Score for participants was calculated as the sum of the rating assigned to each of the 8 items, and ranged from 8 to 42 with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

  12. Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Factor Score - Negative Symptoms Score

    The PANSS Marder Factor score - Negative Symptoms Score consists of 7 PANSS items (blunted effect \[N1\], emotional withdrawal \[N2\], poor rapport \[N3\], passive/apathetic social withdrawal \[N4\], lack of spontaneity and conversation flow \[N6\], motor retardation \[G7\], active social avoidance \[G16\]). The PANSS Marder Factor score - Negative Symptoms Score for participants was calculated as the sum of the rating assigned to each of the 7 items, and ranged from 7 to 49 with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

  13. Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Disorganised Thought Score

    The PANSS Marder Factor score -Disorganized Thought Score consists of 7 PANSS items (conceptual disorganization \[P2\], difficulty in abstract thinking \[N5\], mannerisms and posturing \[G5\], disorientation \[G10\], poor attention \[G11\], disturbance of violation \[G13\], preoccupation \[G15\]). The PANSS Marder Factor score - Disorganized Thought Score for participants was calculated as the sum of the rating assigned to each of the 7 items, and ranged from 7 to 49 with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

  14. Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Uncontrolled Hostility/Excitement Score

    The PANSS Marder Factor score - Uncontrolled Hostility/Excitement Score consists of 4 PANSS items (excitement \[P4\], hostility \[P7\], uncooperativeness \[G8\], poor impulse control \[G14\]). The PANSS Marder Factor score - Uncontrolled Hostility/Excitement Score for participants was calculated as the sum of the rating assigned to each of the 4 items, and ranged from 4 to 28 with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

  15. Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Anxiety Depression Score

    The PANSS Marder Factor score - Anxiety/Depression Score consists of 4 PANSS items (anxiety \[G2\], guilt feelings \[G3\], tension \[G4\], depression \[G6\]). The PANSS Marder Factor score - Anxiety/Depression Score for participants was calculated as the sum of the rating assigned to each of the 4 items, and ranged from 4 to 28 with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

07

Results

Posted Oct 29, 2015

Participant flow

The trial was conducted in 636 participants from 65 trial sites in 10 countries.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBrexpiprazole 4 mgBrexpiprazole 2mgBrexpiprazole 0.25mgPlacebo
Started18018290184
Completed12112456109
Not completed59583475
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up0001
Withdrew: Adverse event17151232
Withdrew: Participant met withdrawal criteria1010
Withdrew: Physician decision1103
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject31241321
Withdrew: Protocol deviation2110
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy717718

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 6 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score.

The PANSS consists of 3 subscales (positive subscale, negative subscale and general psychology subscale) containing a total of 30 symptom constructs and was administered using the Structured Clinical Interview (SCI)-PANSS. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicating the absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicating extremely severe symptoms. The PANSS total score ranged from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome).

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score.
Units on a scaleBrexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2 mgBrexpiprazole 0.25 mgPlacebo
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score.-19.65 ± 1.54-20.73 ± 1.55-14.90 ± 2.23-12.01 ± 1.60
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Brexpiprazole 2 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 (Primary analysis was performed by fitting a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) which included fixed class effect terms for treatment, trial site, visit week, and an interaction term of treatment by visit week.) · Treatment difference: -8.18 · 95% CI -12.0 to -4.40MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0006 · Treatment difference: -7.64 · 95% CI -12.0 to -3.30MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.
  • Brexpiprazole 2 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Traetment difference: -8.72 · 95% CI -13.1 to -4.37MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.2910 · Treatment difference: -2.89 · 95% CI -8.27 to 2.49MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) Score.

The severity of illness was rated using the CGI-S which is the key secondary endpoint. To perform this assessment, the rater or study physician answered the following question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?" Response choices included: 0=not assessed; 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; and 7=among the most extremely ill participant.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) Score.
Units on a scaleBrexpiprazole 4 mgBrexpiprazole 2 mgBrexpiprazole 0.25 mgPlacebo
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) Score.-1.20 ± 0.08-1.15 ± 0.08-0.85 ± 0.12-0.82 ± 0.09
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 4 mg vs Brexpiprazole 2 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0006 · Treatment difference: -0.36 · 95% CI -0.56 to -0.15MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.
  • Brexpiprazole 4 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0012 · Treatment difference: -0.38 · 95% CI -0.61 to -0.15MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.
  • Brexpiprazole 2 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0056 · Treatment difference: -0.33 · 95% CI -0.56 to -0.10MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25 mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.8491 · Treatment difference: -0.03 · 95% CI -0.31 to 0.26MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score.

The PANSS consists of 3 subscales (positive subscale, negative subscale and general psychology subscale) containing a total of 30 symptom constructs and was administered using the Structured Clinical Interview (SCI)-PANSS. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicating the absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicating extremely severe symptoms. The PANSS total score ranged from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome).

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score.
Units on a scaleBrexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2mgBrexpiprazole 0.25mgPlacebo
Week 1-4.38 ± 0.60-4.87 ± 0.59-2.52 ± 0.83-2.87 ± 0.60
Week 2-9.51 ± 0.93-8.86 ± 0.93-3.28 ± 1.32-5.11 ± 0.95
Week 3-12.78 ± 1.15-11.08 ± 1.16-5.71 ± 1.65-7.64 ± 1.18
Week 4-16.50 ± 1.32-14.06 ± 1.32-8.86 ± 1.90-8.89 ± 1.35
Week 5-18.61 ± 1.42-17.90 ± 1.43-11.87 ± 2.05-10.75 ± 1.47
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0644 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -1.50 · 95% CI -3.09 to 0.09Week 1
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0139 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -1.99 · 95% CI -3.58 to -0.41Week 1
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.7231 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: 0.35 · 95% CI -1.61 to 2.32Week 1
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0018 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -5.14 · 95% CI -8.36 to -1.93Week 3
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0045 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates) · Treatment difference: -3.75 · 95% CI -6.33 to -1.17Week 2
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.2568 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: 1.84 · 95% CI -1.34 to 5.02Week 2
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0009 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -4.40 · 95% CI -6.97 to -1.82Week 2
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0360 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -3.45 · 95% CI -6.67 to -0.23Week 3
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.9876 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: 0.04 · 95% CI -4.53 to 4.60Week 4
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -7.61 · 95% CI -11.3 to -3.93Week 4
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0062 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates) · Treatment difference: -5.16 · 95% CI -8.85 to -1.47Week 4
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.3407 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: 1.93 · 95% CI -2.05 to 5.90Week 3
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0001 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates) · Treatment difference: -7.86 · 95% CI -11.9 to -3.86Week 5
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0005 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -7.15 · 95% CI -11.2 to -3.14Week 5
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.6570 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -1.12 · 95% CI -6.07 to 3.83Because only the comparison of brexpiprazole 4 mg/day versus placebo met the threshold in the primary analysis, the following analysis is not part for the formal statistical testing and is descriptive only.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 in Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) Score.

The severity of illness was rated using the CGI-S. To perform this assessment, the rater or study physician answered the following question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?" Response choices included: 0=not assessed; 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; and 7=among the most extremely ill participant.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 in Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) Score.
Units on a scaleBrexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2mgBrexpiprazole 0.25mgPlacebo
Week 1-0.16 ± 0.04-0.16 ± 0.04-0.11 ± 0.05-0.14 ± 0.04
Week 2-0.46 ± 0.05-0.43 ± 0.05-0.18 ± 0.07-0.30 ± 0.05
Week 3-0.72 ± 0.06-0.60 ± 0.06-0.33 ± 0.09-0.51 ± 0.07
Week 4-0.96 ± 0.07-0.73 ± 0.07-0.58 ± 0.11-0.54 ± 0.08
Week 5-1.08 ± 0.08-1.03 ± 0.08-0.73 ± 0.11-0.69 ± 0.08
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.6553 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -0.02 · 95% CI -0.13 to 0.08Week 1
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.6170 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -0.03 · 95% CI -0.13 to 0.08Week 1
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.6446 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates..) · Treatment difference: 0.03 · 95% CI -0.10 to 0.15Week 1
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0347 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -0.15 · 95% CI -0.29 to -0.01Week 2
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0825 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Leasr squares mean: -0.12 · 95% CI -0.27 to 0.02
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1678 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: 0.12 · 95% CI -0.05 to 0.30Week 2
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0219 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -0.21 · 95% CI -0.39 to -0.03Week 3
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.3275 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Least squares mean: -0.09 · 95% CI -0.27 to 0.09Week 3
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1173 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: 0.18 · 95% CI -0.04 to 0.40Week 3
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -0.42 · 95% CI -0.63 to -0.21Week 4
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0662 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Least squares mean: -0.19 · 95% CI -0.40 to 0.01Week 4
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.7587 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -0.04 · 95% CI -0.30 to 0.22Week 4
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0006 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -0.39 · 95% CI -0.61 to -0.17Week 5
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0032 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Least squares mean: -0.34 · 95% CI -0.56 to -0.11Week 5
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.7619 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -0.04 · 95% CI -0.32 to 0.23Week 5
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP)

The PSP is a clinician-rated scale that measures personal and social functioning in 4 domains: socially useful activities (eg, work and study), personal and social relationships, self-care, and disturbing and aggressive behaviors. Impairment in each of these domains was rated as absent, mild, manifest, marked, severe, or very severe. These ratings were then converted to a total score based on a 100-point scale using algorithms to identify the appropriate 10-point interval, and the rater's judgment to determine the total score within the 10-point interval. Participants with a PSP total score of 71 to 100 were considered to have mild functional difficulty. Scores of 31 to 70 represented manifest disabilities of various degrees and ratings of 1 to 30 indicated minimal functioning that required intense support and/or supervision.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP)
Units on a scaleBrexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2mgBrexpiprazole 0.25mgPlacebo
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP)12.72 ± 0.9313.15 ± 0.9311.84 ± 1.3310.26 ± 0.98
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0557 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: 2.46 · 95% CI -0.06 to 4.98Week 6
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0250 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: 2.89 · 95% CI 0.37 to 5.42Week 6
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.3264 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: 1.58 · 95% CI -1.58 to 4.74Week 6
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive Subscale Score

For each symptom construct of the PANSS Positive Subscale, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicating the absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicating extremely severe symptoms. The symptom constructs were as follows: delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. The PANSS Positive Subscale Score for each participant was calculated as the sum of the rating assigned to each of the 7 subscale items, and ranged from 7 to 49 with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive Subscale Score
Units on a scaleBrexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2mgBrexpiprazole 0.25mgPlacebo
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive Subscale Score-6.78 ± 0.51-6.57 ± 0.52-5.46 ± 0.74-4.35 ± 0.54
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0010 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -2.44 · 95% CI -3.88 to -0.99
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0029 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -2.22 · 95% CI -3.67 to -0.77
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.2227 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -1.11 · 95% CI -2.90 to 0.68
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Negative Subscale Score

For each symptom construct of the PANSS Negative Subscale, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicating the absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicating extremely severe symptoms. The symptom constructs were as follows: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. The PANSS Negative Subscale Score for each participant was calculated as the sum of the rating assigned to each of the 7 subscale items, and ranged from 7 to 49 with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Negative Subscale Score
Units on a scaleBrexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2mgBrexpiprazole 0.25mgPlacebo
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Negative Subscale Score-3.65 ± 0.36-4.02 ± 0.36-3.31 ± 0.53-2.24 ± 0.38
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0069 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -1.41 · 95% CI -2.44 to 0.39
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0007 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Least squares mean: -1.78 · 95% CI -2.81 to -0.76
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0996 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatmetn difference: -1.07 · 95% CI -2.33 to 0.20
SecondaryClinical Global Impression- Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Score at Week 6

The participant's overall improvement was rated using the CGI-I. The rater or study physician rated the participant's total improvement whether or not it was due entirely to drug treatment. All responses were compared with the participant's condition at screening/baseline. Response choices were: 0=not assessed, 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, and 7=very much worse.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression- Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Score at Week 6
Units on a scaleBrexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2mgBrexpiprazole 0.25mgPlacebo
Clinical Global Impression- Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Score at Week 62.94 ± 1.292.94 ± 1.343.37 ± 1.463.48 ± 1.47
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0004 (The Cochran-Mantel-Haenzel (CMH) row mean scores differ test controlling for trial center was applied to CGI-I score.) · Treatment difference: -0.50 · 95% CI -0.77 to -0.22
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0002 (The CMH row mean scores differ test controlling for trial center was applied to CGI-I score.) · Treatment difference: -0.54 · 95% CI -0.82 to -0.26
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4505 (The CMH row mean scores differ test controlling for trial center was applied to CGI-I score.) · Treatment difference: -0.14 · 95% CI -0.50 to 0.22
SecondaryResponse Rate at Week 6

Response rate was defined as improvement in mean change of ≥30% from baseline in PANSS Total Score at Week 6 or CGI-I score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) at Week 6.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Response Rate at Week 6
Percentage of participantsBrexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2mgBrexpiprazole 0.25mgPlacebo
Response Rate at Week 646.0747.7839.0830.34
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0032 (CMH general association test controlling for trial was applied to the analysis of response rate.) · Relative risk: 1.48 · 95% CI 1.14 to 1.91
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0004 (CMH general association test controlling for trial was applied to the analysis of response rate.) · Relative risk: 1.59 · 95% CI 1.23 to 2.05
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1576 (CMH general association test controlling for trial was applied to the analysis of response rate.) · Relative risk: 1.27 · 95% CI 0.92 to 1.76
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Excited Component (PEC) Score

The PEC consists of 5 PANSS items (excitement \[P4\], hostility \[P7\], tension \[G4\], uncooperativeness \[G8\], and poor impulse control \[G14\]). Each rated on a scale of 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme). The PEC for participants was calculated as the sum of the rating assigned to each of the 5 items, and ranged from 5 to 35 with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Excited Component (PEC) Score
Units on a scaleBrexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2mgBrexpiprazole 0.25mgPlacebo
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Excited Component (PEC) Score-2.75 ± 0.34-2.87 ± 0.34-1.99 ± 0.49-1.64 ± 0.36
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0246 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -1.10 · 95% CI -2.06 to -0.14
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0131 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -1.22 · 95% CI -2.19 to -0.26
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.5706 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -0.34 · 95% CI -1.53 to 0.85
SecondaryDiscontinuation Rate for Lack of Efficacy at Week 6
Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Discontinuation Rate for Lack of Efficacy at Week 6
Percentage of participantsBrexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2mgBrexpiprazole 0.25mgPlacebo
Discontinuation Rate for Lack of Efficacy at Week 63.939.448.0510.11
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0143 · Relative risk: 0.39 · 95% CI 0.18 to 0.85CMH general association test controlling for trial center was applied to the analysis of discontinuation rate.
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.6606 (CMH general association test controlling for trial center was applied to the analysis of discontinuation rate.) · Relative risk: 0.87 · 95% CI 0.46 to 1.65
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.5115 (CMH general association test controlling for trial center was applied to the analysis of discontinuation rate.) · Relative risk: 0.77 · 95% CI 0.35 to 1.68
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Factor Score - Positive Symptoms Score

The PANSS Marder Factor score - Positive Symptoms Score consists of 8 PANSS items (delusions \[P1\], hallucinatory behaviour \[P3\], grandiosity \[P5\], suspiciousness \[P6\], stereotyped thinking \[N7\], somatic concern \[G1\], unusual thought content \[G9\], lack of judgment and insight \[G10\]. Each was rated on a scale of 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme). The PANSS Marder Factor score - Positive Symptoms Score for participants was calculated as the sum of the rating assigned to each of the 8 items, and ranged from 8 to 42 with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Factor Score - Positive Symptoms Score
Units on a scaleBrexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2mgBrexpiprazole 0.25mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Factor Score - Positive Symptoms Score-7.23 ± 0.51-7.37 ± 0.51-5.78 ± 0.73-4.89 ± 0.53
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0014 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -2.34 · 95% CI -3.77 to -0.91
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0008 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -2.47 · 95% CI -3.91 to -1.04
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.3263 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates) · Treatment difference: -0.89 · 95% CI -2.66 to 0.89
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Factor Score - Negative Symptoms Score

The PANSS Marder Factor score - Negative Symptoms Score consists of 7 PANSS items (blunted effect \[N1\], emotional withdrawal \[N2\], poor rapport \[N3\], passive/apathetic social withdrawal \[N4\], lack of spontaneity and conversation flow \[N6\], motor retardation \[G7\], active social avoidance \[G16\]). The PANSS Marder Factor score - Negative Symptoms Score for participants was calculated as the sum of the rating assigned to each of the 7 items, and ranged from 7 to 49 with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Factor Score - Negative Symptoms Score
Units on a scaleBrexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2mgBrexpiprazole 0.25mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Factor Score - Negative Symptoms Score-4.10 ± 0.37-4.48 ± 0.37-3.66 ± 0.54-2.80 ± 0.38
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0155 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -1.30 · 95% CI -2.35 to -0.25
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0019 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -1.68 · 95% CI -2.73 to -0.62
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1956 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -0.86 · 95% CI -2.17 to 0.44
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Disorganised Thought Score

The PANSS Marder Factor score -Disorganized Thought Score consists of 7 PANSS items (conceptual disorganization \[P2\], difficulty in abstract thinking \[N5\], mannerisms and posturing \[G5\], disorientation \[G10\], poor attention \[G11\], disturbance of violation \[G13\], preoccupation \[G15\]). The PANSS Marder Factor score - Disorganized Thought Score for participants was calculated as the sum of the rating assigned to each of the 7 items, and ranged from 7 to 49 with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Disorganised Thought Score
Units on a scaleBrexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2mgBrexpiprazole 0.25mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Disorganised Thought Score-3.72 ± 0.36-3.94 ± 0.36-2.69 ± 0.52-1.97 ± 0.37
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0007 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -1.75 · 95% CI -2.76 to -0.75
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0001 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -1.98 · 95% CI -2.98 to -0.97
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.2572 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -0.72 · 95% CI -1.96 to 0.52
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Uncontrolled Hostility/Excitement Score

The PANSS Marder Factor score - Uncontrolled Hostility/Excitement Score consists of 4 PANSS items (excitement \[P4\], hostility \[P7\], uncooperativeness \[G8\], poor impulse control \[G14\]). The PANSS Marder Factor score - Uncontrolled Hostility/Excitement Score for participants was calculated as the sum of the rating assigned to each of the 4 items, and ranged from 4 to 28 with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Uncontrolled Hostility/Excitement Score
Units on a scaleBrexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2mgBrexpiprazole 0.25mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Uncontrolled Hostility/Excitement Score-1.90 ± 0.28-1.91 ± 0.28-1.15 ± 0.41-0.82 ± 0.30
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0085 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -1.07 · 95% CI -1.87 to -0.28
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0081 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -1.08 · 95% CI -1.88 to -0.28
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.5172 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -0.33 · 95% CI -1.31 to 0.66
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Anxiety Depression Score

The PANSS Marder Factor score - Anxiety/Depression Score consists of 4 PANSS items (anxiety \[G2\], guilt feelings \[G3\], tension \[G4\], depression \[G6\]). The PANSS Marder Factor score - Anxiety/Depression Score for participants was calculated as the sum of the rating assigned to each of the 4 items, and ranged from 4 to 28 with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Anxiety Depression Score
Units on a scaleBrexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2mgBrexpiprazole 0.25mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Marder Anxiety Depression Score-3.40 ± 0.25-3.70 ± 0.25-3.27 ± 0.35-3.05 ± 0.26
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 4mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.3284 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -0.34 · 95% CI -1.03 to 0.35
  • Brexpiprazole 2mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0655 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -0.65 · 95% CI -1.34 to 0.04
  • Brexpiprazole 0.25mg vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.6251 (MMRM with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center, visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, baseline visit interaction as covariates.) · Treatment difference: -0.21 · 95% CI -1.07 to 0.64

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were recorded from the time the participant signs the informed consent form, throughout the 6-week treatment period and until 30 days after the last dose of study medication.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Brexpiprazole 4mg—2/180 (1.1%)64/180 (35.6%)
Brexpiprazole 2 mg—4/182 (2.2%)53/182 (29.1%)
Brexpiprazile 0.25 mg—4/90 (4.4%)25/90 (27.8%)
Placebo—7/184 (3.8%)65/184 (35.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventBrexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2 mgBrexpiprazile 0.25 mgPlacebo
SchizophreniaPsychiatric disorders2/1802/1822/902/184
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/1800/1821/900/184
Psychotic disorderPsychiatric disorders0/1801/1821/902/184
RhabdomyolysisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/1801/1820/900/184
Gastric ulcerGastrointestinal disorders0/1800/1820/901/184
Grand mal convulsionNervous system disorders0/1800/1820/901/184
Schizophrenia, paranoid typePsychiatric disorders0/1800/1820/901/184
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBrexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2 mgBrexpiprazile 0.25 mgPlacebo
HeadacheNervous system disorders22/18017/1829/9015/184
AgitationPsychiatric disorders13/18011/1824/9019/184
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders15/18016/1828/9018/184
SchizophreniaPsychiatric disorders10/1807/1826/9018/184
AkathisiaNervous system disorders13/1808/1820/904/184
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders7/1803/1825/903/184
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders6/18010/1821/908/184

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Brexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2mgBrexpiprazole 0.25 mgPlaceboTotal
Mean40.8 ± 11.039.6 ± 10.240.5 ± 11.439.7 ± 10.840.1 ± 10.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Brexpiprazole 4mgBrexpiprazole 2mgBrexpiprazole 0.25 mgPlaceboTotal
Female69712966235
Male11111161118401
08

Study locations

60 sites
  • Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • Garden Grove, California 92845, United States
  • Glendale, California 91206, United States
  • Oakland, California 94612, United States
  • Oceanside, California 92056, United States
  • San Diego, California 92102, United States
  • San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Bradenton, Florida 34208, United States
  • Miami Springs, Florida 33166, United States
  • Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Fresh Meadows, New York 11423, United States
  • Jamaica, New York 11432, United States
  • Dayton, Ohio 45417, United States
  • Charleston, South Carolina 29405, United States
  • Charleston, South Carolina 29407, United States
  • Austin, Texas 78754, United States
  • Kirkland, Washington 98033, United States
  • Burlington, Ontario L7R 4E2, Canada
  • Chatham, Ontario N7L 1B7, Canada
  • Chatham, Ontario N7M 5L9, Canada
  • Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa-Ken 251-8530, Japan
  • Kunigami-gun, Okinawa-Ken 904-1201, Japan
  • Sakai-shi, Osaka-Fu 590-0018, Japan
  • Setagaya-ku, Tokyo-To 156-0057, Japan
  • Kumamoto-shi, 861-8002, Japan
  • Incheon, 400-711, Korea, Republic of
  • Incheon, 405-760, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul, 136-705, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul, 137-710, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul, 143-711, Korea, Republic of
  • Daugavpils, LV-5417, Latvia
  • Jelgava, LV-3008, Latvia
  • Liepaja, LV-3401, Latvia
  • Riga, LV-1005, Latvia
  • Strenci, LV-4730, Latvia
  • Choroszcz, 16-070, Poland
  • Gdansk, 80-282, Poland
  • Gdansk, 80-952, Poland
  • Lodz, 91-229, Poland
  • Arad, 310022, Romania
  • Bucuresti, 010825, Romania
  • Bucuresti, 030442, Romania
  • Bucuresti, 041914, Romania
  • Cluj-Napoca, 400012, Romania
  • Focsani, 620165, Romania
  • Pitesti, 110069, Romania
  • Targoviste, 130086, Romania
  • Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
  • Kragujevac, 34000, Serbia
  • Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia
  • Chernihiv, 14000, Ukraine
  • Dnipropetrovsk, 49005, Ukraine
  • Dnipropetrovsk, 49115, Ukraine
  • Glevakha, 08631, Ukraine
  • Kherson, Vil. Stepanivka, 73488, Ukraine
  • Kyiv, 02660, Ukraine
  • Kyiv, 04080, Ukraine
  • Lviv, 79021, Ukraine
  • Simferopol, 95006, Ukraine
  • Vinnytsia, 21005, Ukraine
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Correll CU, He Y, Therrien F, MacKenzie E, Meehan SR, Weiss C, Hefting N, Hobart M. Effects of Brexpiprazole on Functioning in Patients With Schizophrenia: Post Hoc Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Studies. J Clin Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 1;83(2):20m13793. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20m13793. PubMed 35235720 ↗
  • Marder SR, Meehan SR, Weiss C, Chen D, Hobart M, Hefting N. Effects of Brexpiprazole Across Symptom Domains in Patients With Schizophrenia: Post Hoc Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Studies. Schizophr Bull Open. 2021 May 1;2(1):sgab014. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgab014. eCollection 2021 Jan. PubMed 34901863 ↗
  • Newcomer JW, Eriksson H, Zhang P, Weiller E, Weiss C. Changes in metabolic parameters and body weight in brexpiprazole-treated patients with acute schizophrenia: pooled analyses of phase 3 clinical studies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Dec;34(12):2197-2205. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1498779. Epub 2018 Jul 27. PubMed 29985680 ↗
  • Kane JM, Skuban A, Hobart M, Ouyang J, Weiller E, Weiss C, Correll CU. Overview of short- and long-term tolerability and safety of brexpiprazole in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2016 Jul;174(1-3):93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 May 14. PubMed 27188270 ↗
  • Correll CU, Skuban A, Ouyang J, Hobart M, Pfister S, McQuade RD, Nyilas M, Carson WH, Sanchez R, Eriksson H. Efficacy and Safety of Brexpiprazole for the Treatment of Acute Schizophrenia: A 6-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2015 Sep 1;172(9):870-80. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.14101275. Epub 2015 Apr 16. PubMed 25882325 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 29, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01396421
Lead sponsor
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 18, 2011
Start date
Jul 2011
Primary completion
Jan 2014
Completion
Jan 2014
Results posted
Oct 29, 2015
Last update
Oct 29, 2015

Study contacts

Aleksandar Skuban, M.D.
study director · Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion