ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01395251TryCortUpdated May 18, 2015

Diagnostic Value of Oral Prednisolone Test for Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Prednisolone in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-05-18.

Sponsored by Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
130
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rheumatoid arthritis is an inflammatory joint disease often leading to progressive joint destruction. To prevent disability caused by inflamed joints early diagnosis is important. Early diagnosis might be a challenge because the diagnosis is mostly based on clinical signs like swelling of small joints. In clinical practice a therapy with prednisolone is started although the patients do not have an exact diagnosis. In this cases the prednisolone might serve as a diagnostic test for an inflammatory process.

The objective of this study is to investigate the diagnostic value of oral prednisolone test for rheumatoid arthritis.

Read the detailed description

Rheumatoid arthritis is with a prevalence of 2% an important inflammatory joint disease which often leads to impaired functioning and reduced quality of life. Early diagnosis is an important step forward to prevent progressive joint destruction. The classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis published in 2010 are based on clinical signs (such as swelling) and laboratory findings (such as rheumatoid factor) (Aletaha D 2010). Because its diagnosis is based on clinical signs the early diagnosis for rheumatoid arthritis might be a challenge in daily clinical care.

In clinical practice a therapy with prednisolone is started although the patients do not have an exact diagnosis. It has been shown that the start of early low-dose prednisolone decreases the rate of joint destruction after two years of therapy (Kirwan JR 1995, Wassenberg S 2005). Thus, prednisolone might have effects comparable to that of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

The objective of this study is to investigate the diagnostic value of oral prednisolone test for rheumatoid arthritis. The hypothesis is that in patients with rheumatoid arthritis the prednisolone test will be positive in 80% of the patients whereas positive in just 20% of patients with osteoarthritis of the hand. Positive prednisolone test is defined as a 30% improvement of the symptoms in finger and wrist on a numeric rating scale from 0-100.

Patients with suspicious of rheumatoid arthritis will undergo a prednisolone test with 20 mg per day for 3 days after 2 days of therapy with paracetamol 500 mg twice. After this period the patients will be asked to rate their benefit in improving pain and reducing swelling of wrist and finger joints on a numeric rating scale (0-100 % improvement in steps of 20%). A positive response In addition, demographics and clinical parameter including the compound measure for disease activity DAS-28 will be collected. A patient with a positive prednisolone test will receive standard care for rheumatoid arthritis onward. Patients with a negative prednisolone test will receive standard care for hand and finger osteoarthritis onward. At week 12 all patients will be seen again to reassess the former diagnosis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • diagnosis
  • sensitivity
  • glucocorticoids
03

In context

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

2,962 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis, Rheumatoid; 396 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 130 is above the median of 94 across 2,027 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis, Rheumatoid.

Browse Arthritis, Rheumatoid studies →

Lead sponsor

Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • pain in wrist and fingers without known diagnosis since more than 6 weeks, minimum of pain on a numerical rating scale 4 (out of 10)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • psoriatic arthritis
  • psoriasis vulgaris
  • vasculitis
  • gouty arthritis
  • Current glucocorticoidmedication
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
130 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Prednisolone

    Patients with suspicious of rheumatoid arthritis will undergo a prednisolone test with 20 mg per day for 3 days after 2 days of therapy with paracetamol 500 mg twice for 2 days.

    Drug: Prednisolone

Interventions

  • prednisolone 20 mg once a day per os for 3 subsequent days

    Also known as: glucocorticoids

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of true diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis after positive prednisolone test

    Positive prednisolone test: change of more than 40% (on a NRS 0-100%) in painful joints after 3 days of therapy with prednisolone 20 mg/d

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Rate of true negative diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis after positive prednisolone test

    Positive prednisolone test: change of more than 40% (on a NRS 0-100%) in painful joints after 3 days of therapy with prednisolone 20 mg/d

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Negative predictive value

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Positive predictive value

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. clinical characteristics of patients with early RA

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. change of disease activity

    assessed with DAS-28

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. change of functioning

    assessed with HAQ

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet
    Herne, 44652, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd, Birnbaum NS, Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Cohen MD, Combe B, Costenbader KH, Dougados M, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Hazes JM, Hobbs K, Huizinga TW, Kavanaugh A, Kay J, Kvien TK, Laing T, Mease P, Menard HA, Moreland LW, Naden RL, Pincus T, Smolen JS, Stanislawska-Biernat E, Symmons D, Tak PP, Upchurch KS, Vencovsky J, Wolfe F, Hawker G. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Sep;62(9):2569-81. doi: 10.1002/art.27584. PubMed 20872595 ↗
  • Wassenberg S, Rau R, Steinfeld P, Zeidler H. Very low-dose prednisolone in early rheumatoid arthritis retards radiographic progression over two years: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Nov;52(11):3371-80. doi: 10.1002/art.21421. PubMed 16255011 ↗
  • Kirwan JR. The effect of glucocorticoids on joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. The Arthritis and Rheumatism Council Low-Dose Glucocorticoid Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995 Jul 20;333(3):142-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199507203330302. PubMed 7791815 ↗
  • Kiltz U, von Zabern C, Baraliakos X, Heldmann F, Mintrop B, Sarholz M, Krause D, Dybowski F, Kalthoff L, Braun J. Diagnostic value of a 3-day course of prednisolone in patients with possible rheumatoid arthritis - the TryCort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017 Apr 7;19(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1279-z. PubMed 28388956 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2012, a primary completion of Nov 2014 and a completion of Dec 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 12, 2011
First posted
Jul 15, 2011
Start
Feb 2012
Primary completionActual
Nov 2014
CompletionActual
Dec 2014
Last update
May 18, 2015
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 18, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01395251
Lead sponsor
Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet
Responsible party
Prof. Dr. med. Jürgen Braun (Professor of Rheuamtology, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 15, 2011
Start date
Feb 2012
Primary completion
Nov 2014
Completion
Dec 2014
Last update
May 18, 2015

Study contacts

Juergen Braun, MD
principal investigator · Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Prednisolone

Start the discussion