CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01394458Updated Dec 4, 2015

Efficacy and Safety of an Ethanol/Sodium Citrate Locking Solution: A Pilot Study

An interventional study of 30 % ethanol / 4% sodium citrate catheter locking solution and Heparin 1000 u / ml in Catheter Related Infection and Bacteremia, sponsored by University of Manitoba. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-12-04.

Sponsored by University of Manitoba · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Currently in Canada, either 4% sodium citrate or heparin 1,000-10,000 U/ml solutions are "locked" into hemodialysis catheters between dialysis sessions to prevent thrombosis. The use of an ethanol/sodium citrate locking solution may have advantages over either of these agents alone. The investigators hypothesize that the 30 % ethanol/4% sodium citrate catheter locking solution is safe and effective in the prevention of catheter-related infections and thrombosis.

Read the detailed description

The pilot study will utilize a prospective, randomized design. After meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria and providing written informed consent, patients will be randomly assigned to a 30 % ethanol/ 4% sodium citrate locking solution or heparin 1000 U/ml. Patients will be enrolled from the Health Sciences Centre and the Sherbrook Dialysis Units in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

02

Conditions studied

  • Catheter Related Infection
  • Bacteremia

Keywords

  • catheter related infection
  • bacteremia
  • hemodialysis
03

In context

Infections

6,688 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 120 across 4,201 interventional studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Manitoba is the lead sponsor of 542 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (42%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with Stage V chronic kidney disease preparing to start hemodialysis
  • Exchange of an existing catheter to a cuffed, tunneled catheter OR planned vascular access with a cuffed, tunneled catheter
  • CVC used for hemodialysis made of alcohol-resistant polymers ie. carbothane

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving catheters not made of alcohol resistant polymers
  • Critically ill patients in ICU setting
  • Patients with acute renal failure, who will likely not require prolonged vascular access ( ie. > months)
  • Patients with maturing fistulas/graft creation within 2 months
  • Patients with planned antibiotic treatment courses lasting longer than 4 weeks from the date of new catheter insertion
  • Patients receiving a new cuffed, tunneled catheter over a guide wire, if a fibrin sheath angioplasty was not performed after removing the previous dysfunctional catheter
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    30 % ethanol/ 4 % sodium citrate group

    For patients randomized to the 30% ethanol /4 % sodium citrate group, the lock solution will be provided in pre-filled syringes for single use only. After each dialysis session, the locking solution will be instilled into both catheter lumens, the lumens clamped and caps tightly secured to the hubs. Any remaining 30% ethanol/4% sodium citrate solution in each syringe will be discarded. The locking solution will be withdrawn from the catheter lumens before the next dialysis session.

    Other: 30 % ethanol / 4% sodium citrate catheter locking solution

  • Experimental
    Heparin 1000 U/ml

    For patients randomized to the heparin group, the heparin will be provided in 10 ml glass vials. Two, 3 ml syringes will be used to draw up the required volume of heparin to fill each lumen. A separate syringe will be used to fill each catheter lumen. The necessary volume should match the lumen volume with no overfill. The locking solution will be instilled into both catheter lumens, the lumens clamped and caps tightly secured to the hubs. The locking solution will be withdrawn from the catheter lumens before the next dialysis session.

    Drug: Heparin 1000 u / ml

Interventions

  • Other30 % ethanol / 4% sodium citrate catheter locking solution

    This solution is locked into the lumens of hemodialysis catheters between treatments to prevent infection and thrombosis. Before each dialysis session, the solution should be removed and discarded.

    Also known as: Citra Lok Plus

  • DrugHeparin 1000 u / ml

    In the control group, heparin 1000 u / ml will be locking into the hemodialysis catheters between treatments to prevent thrombosis. The heparin solution should be removed and discarded before each dialysis session.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Documentation of Serious Adverse Events (SAE) with the use of a 30% ethanol / 4% sodium citrate catheter locking solution.

    This outcome will monitor the safety of the ethanol/sodium citrate catheter locking solution.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of catheter-related infections per 1000 catheter days with the 30% ethanol / 4% sodium citrate catheter locking solution compared to heparin.

    This outcome will primarily investigate efficacy of the ethanol/sodium citrate locking solution and help to describe effect size for the design of a larger more definitive study.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Rate of catheter dysfunction / 1000 catheter days with the 30% ethanol / 4% sodium citrate catheter locking solution compared to heparin.

    Catheter function, defined as blood flow \<300 ml/min for 50% of each dialysis session over two consecutive sessions, will be monitored prospectively.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Rate of alteplase use / 1000 catheter days with the 30% ethanol / 4% sodium citrate catheter locking solution compared to heparin.

    Need for alteplase use to manage dysfunctional catheters will be documented.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Health Sciences Centre
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3A 1R9, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Vercaigne LM, Allan DR, Armstrong SW, Zacharias JM, Miller LM. An ethanol/sodium citrate locking solution compared to heparin to prevent hemodialysis catheter-related infections: a randomized pilot study. J Vasc Access. 2016 Jan-Feb;17(1):55-62. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000486. Epub 2015 Dec 7. PubMed 26660041 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 4, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01394458
Lead sponsor
University of Manitoba
Collaborators
MED XL Inc, Winnipeg Regional Health Authority
Responsible party
Dr. Lavern M. Vercaigne (Professor, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 14, 2011
Start date
Aug 2011
Primary completion
Nov 2013
Completion
Nov 2013
Last update
Dec 4, 2015

Study contacts

Lavern Vercaigne, Pharm.D.
principal investigator · University of Manitoba
Lisa Miller, MD
principal investigator · University of Manitoba

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion