CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT01385176NECTAR-HFUpdated Sep 25, 2026Results posted

Neural Cardiac Therapy for Heart Failure Study (NECTAR-HF)

An interventional study of Implant of investigational device system and Titration during the randomization phase in Heart Failure and Congestive Heart Failure, sponsored by Boston Scientific Corporation. Active, not recruiting at 21 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by Boston Scientific Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
118
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The NECTAR-HF feasibility trial is designed to evaluate the application of right vagal nerve stimulation in heart failure patients with a New York Heart Association Class III, an ejection fraction equal to or less than 35 %, and a narrow QRS duration equal to or less than 130 ms.

Read the detailed description

The objectives of this study are to assess the impact of right vagal nerve stimulation on left ventricular remodeling, functional capacity, quality of life, and other measures in heart failure patients over a 6-month period. In addition, the study will assess the safety of the NECTAR-HF study system over an 18-month period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure
  • Congestive Heart Failure

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Heart failure
  • Congestive heart failure
  • New York Heart Association Class II-III
  • Vagal therapy
  • Vagal nerve stimulation
03

In context

Heart Failure

5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,219 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 118 is above the median of 72 across 3,733 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Boston Scientific Corporation is the lead sponsor of 517 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.

Of its 64 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 56 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 or above, and of legal age to give informed consent specific to national laws
  • Willing and capable of providing informed consent
  • Capable of participating in all testing associated with this clinical investigation
  • Stable symptomatic heart failure NYHA class II-III
  • Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction equal or smaller than 35 %
  • Left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) of 5.5 cm or greater
  • Prescribed to optimal pharmacologic therapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • QRS larger than 130 ms
  • Patients who have been hospitalized for heart failure and who required the use of HF IV therapy within 30 days before enrollment
  • Patients unable to tolerate anesthesia required for implant
  • Patients with unstable angina, myocardial infarction, PTCA, coronary artery bypass graft, cerebral vascular accident, or transient ischemic attack within previous 90 days before enrollment
  • Patients whose primary cause of heart failure is mitral or aortic valve disease, with a severe classification
  • Patients with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation within 90 days prior to enrollment
  • Pacemaker indicated patients
  • Patients whose heart failure is due to congenital heart disease
  • Patients who have started treatment for sleep apnea or sleep disordered breathing with therapies to maintain airway patency (e.g., CPAP, Bi-PAP,APAP) with or without oxygen supplementation within the previous 6 months prior to enrollment
  • Patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy or infiltrative cardiomyopathy (e.g. amyloidosis, sarcoidosis)
  • Patients with documented chronic obstructive lung disease
  • Patients on or indicated for renal dialysis
  • Type 1 diabetic patients
  • Type 2 diabetic patients that have been treated with insulin for more than 5 years prior to enrollment
  • Patients with a life expectancy of less than 12 months per physician judgment
  • Patients involved in any concurrent clinical investigation
  • Women of childbearing potential who are or might be pregnant at the time of the study or breastfeeding
  • Patients with a prior cardiac transplant or expecting a heart transplant operation within the next 12 months
  • Patients with a prior vagotomy
  • Patients with prior or existing vagal nerve stimulation treatment
  • Patients implanted with any active implantable medical device other than a left sided single or dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) with bipolar sensing, or a left sided CRT device with each sensing channel programmed to either bipolar sensing or no sensing. All CRT patients must have had CRT for at least 1 year prior to enrollment. The total number of CRT patients will not exceed 30
  • Patients with locally implanted semi-/permanent devices such as vascular catheters, etc. that would interfere with the NECTAR-HF study system
  • Patients with previously implanted devices on the right side that became infected before removal
  • Patients with previous neck surgery and resultant scar formation that interferes with the ability to implant the study system on the right side of the neck (Thyroid/parathyroid, carotid artery etc)
  • Patients with known recurrent nerve paralysis
  • Patients who have undergone radiotherapy for thyroid disease/cancer
  • Patients who have existing or prior tracheotomy
  • Patients with severe vertebral cervical disease and limited mobility in the neck; includes those that frequently wear a brace
  • Patients with carotid murmur/vascular bruit/carotid artery lesion
  • Patients with known/suspected vascular malformation in carotid/vertebral circulatory bed
  • Patients who are likely to need an MRI of the neck area because of previous medical conditions
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
118 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Therapy

    Implant of investigational device system for vagus nerve stimulation. Patients were randomized in a 2 : 1 ratio to receive therapy (VNS ON) or control (VNS OFF) for a 6-month period. The experimental arm was receiving vagus nerve stimulation during the first 6 months after implant. Titration during the randomization phase with delivery of highest tolerable by patient stimulation current. Blood Draw before implant and 6 months after implant. Titration after the randomization phase with adjustments of the chronically highest tolearble by patient current.

    Device: Implant of investigational device system · Procedure: Titration during the randomization phase · Procedure: Titration after the randomization phase · Diagnostic Test: Blood Draw

  • Sham comparator
    Control

    Implant of investigational device system for vagus nerve stimulation. Control group was implanted with study system like the experimental arm, but was not receiving experimental vagus nerve stimulation therapy during the first 6 months after implant. 6-month after implant a cross-over took place and the control arm also started to receive experimental vagus nerve stimulation. Blood Draw before implant and 6 months after implant. Titration after the randomization phase with adjustments of the chronically highest tolearble by patient current.

    Device: Implant of investigational device system · Procedure: Titration after the randomization phase · Diagnostic Test: Blood Draw

Interventions

  • DeviceImplant of investigational device system

    Vagus nerve stimulation lead was wrapped around the right cervical vagus nerve and then connected to a stimulator permanently implanted in the right pectoral region.

  • ProcedureTitration during the randomization phase

    Amplitude of the chronically delivered vagus nerve stimulation in the experimental arm was adjusted to the highest tolerable by patient value. No chronically delivered vagus nerve stimulation in the control arm during the randomization phase.

  • ProcedureTitration after the randomization phase

    Amplitude of the chronically delivered vagus nerve stimulation was adjusted to the highest tolerable by patient value in all patients in both arms of the study.

  • Diagnostic testBlood Draw

    Blood draw before implant and 6 months after implant at the end of the randomization phase.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Left Ventricular End-systolic Dimension (LVESD)

    Change in the Left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD) between Baseline and the value at the end of the randomization phase (6 months after Baseline) i.e. 6 months after vagus nerve stimulation in the THERAPY Arm. No Vagus nerve stimulation during that time window in the CONTROL Arm. The sign (- ) indicates a reduction in the LVESD. Minus means a reduction in LVESD. The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point (e.g., value at 6 months minus value at baseline).

    Time frame: LVESD at Baseline and at 6-months post Baseline

  2. Percentage of Surviving Participants

    As pre-specified in the study protocol, the All-cause Survival endpoint combined both groups into one analysis population. Subjects contributed data according to the follow-up period during they received VNS therapy (Implant through 18 months for Therapy subjects, 6 through 18 months for Control subjects). Control patients who exited the study in the first 6 months, or who did not have a 6 month visit, were excluded.

    Time frame: 18-months

Secondary outcomes

  1. LVEF, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

    LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.

    Time frame: LVEF at Baseline and at 6-months after Baseline

  2. Exercise Capacity, Peak VO2

    Assessment of functional capacity (e.g., peak VO2) as measures related to patient heart failure status.

    Time frame: Measurements at Baseline and at 6-months after Baseline

  3. LVESV, Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume

    Measurements of LVESV, left ventricular end systolic volume at Baseline and 6 months after Baseline in the Control Arm and in the Therapy Arm

    Time frame: At Baseline and at 6-months after Baseline

07

Results

Posted Jan 6, 2020
Limitations and caveats
Inappropriate patient selection may have also contributed to the neutral findings. In the present study, therapy patients experienced side effects (e.g. neck pain, coughing), which limited programming to low stimulation amplitudes.

Participant flow

Enrollment Start: 21-Sep-2011. First implant: 28-Sep-2011.Last Implant: 20-June-2013. 118 patients enrolled, 96 were found to be eligible and were implanted across 24 centres (7 sites with 5-10 implants, 1 site with 13 implants). 95 patients were randomized.

Randomization Phase
Participant flow — Randomization Phase
MilestoneTherapyControl
Started6332
Completed6230
Not completed12
Withdrew: Death12
6-18 Month All VNS Active
Participant flow — 6-18 Month All VNS Active
MilestoneTherapyControl
Started6230
Completed5827
Not completed43
Withdrew: Death12
Withdrew: Physician decision01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject20
Withdrew: Heart transplant10

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Left Ventricular End-systolic Dimension (LVESD)

Change in the Left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD) between Baseline and the value at the end of the randomization phase (6 months after Baseline) i.e. 6 months after vagus nerve stimulation in the THERAPY Arm. No Vagus nerve stimulation during that time window in the CONTROL Arm. The sign (- ) indicates a reduction in the LVESD. Minus means a reduction in LVESD. The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point (e.g., value at 6 months minus value at baseline).

Time frame:
LVESD at Baseline and at 6-months post Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · cm
Change in Left Ventricular End-systolic Dimension (LVESD)
cmTherapyControl
Change in Left Ventricular End-systolic Dimension (LVESD)-0.04 ± 0.25-0.08 ± 0.32
PrimaryPercentage of Surviving Participants

As pre-specified in the study protocol, the All-cause Survival endpoint combined both groups into one analysis population. Subjects contributed data according to the follow-up period during they received VNS therapy (Implant through 18 months for Therapy subjects, 6 through 18 months for Control subjects). Control patients who exited the study in the first 6 months, or who did not have a 6 month visit, were excluded.

Time frame:
18-months
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants surving
Percentage of Surviving Participants
Percentage of participants survingAll Patients in Active VNS Periods
Percentage of Surviving Participants95 (91 to 99)
SecondaryLVEF, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.

Time frame:
LVEF at Baseline and at 6-months after Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · % of blood ejected from ventricle
LVEF, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
% of blood ejected from ventricleTherapyControl
Baseline30.5 ± 6.030.8 ± 4.2
6 months after Baseline32.7 ± 6.432.1 ± 5.6
SecondaryExercise Capacity, Peak VO2

Assessment of functional capacity (e.g., peak VO2) as measures related to patient heart failure status.

Time frame:
Measurements at Baseline and at 6-months after Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · ml/kg/min
Exercise Capacity, Peak VO2
ml/kg/minTherapyControl
Baseline15.6 ± 3.915.2 ± 3.3
6 months after Baseline15.8 ± 4.414.7 ± 3.6
SecondaryLVESV, Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume

Measurements of LVESV, left ventricular end systolic volume at Baseline and 6 months after Baseline in the Control Arm and in the Therapy Arm

Time frame:
At Baseline and at 6-months after Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · ml
LVESV, Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume
mlTherapyControl
Baseline154.7 ± 58.5164.0 ± 39.2
6 months after Baseline142.5 ± 57.1152.1 ± 43.8

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events information collected during the randomization phase, (6 month) is referred to. During this time period the primary efficicacy endpoint measurements were done and information collected. Only during these initial 6 months there were two goups of patients. After 6 month all patients had received vagus nerve stimulation. An additional Arm/Group ("All Patients - 6 to 18 Months" ) was added to present AEs collected from end of randomization phase until end of safety endpoint period.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Therapy1/63 (1.6%)21/63 (33.3%)32/63 (50.8%)
Control2/32 (6.3%)18/32 (56.3%)15/32 (46.9%)
All Patients - 6 to 18 Months3/92 (3.3%)44/92 (47.8%)66/92 (71.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent serious events
EventTherapyControlAll Patients - 6 to 18 Months
Other Non Cardiocascular, anticipatedGeneral disorders7/637/3222/92
HF hospitalization, anticipatedCardiac disorders7/635/3218/92
Cardiovascular - Non Heart Failure, anticipatedCardiac disorders7/635/3216/92
Investigational device system related, anticipatedProduct Issues9/634/322/92
Pulmonary Serious Adverse Events, anticipatedRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/633/325/92
Genitourinary, anticipatedRenal and urinary disorders1/632/321/92
Death, anticipatedCardiac disorders1/632/323/92
Investigational device system related, unanticipatedProduct Issues0/630/321/92
Heart Failure Hospitalizations, unanticipatedCardiac disorders0/630/320/92
Cardiovascular - Non Heart Failure, unanticipatedCardiac disorders0/630/320/92
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventTherapyControlAll Patients - 6 to 18 Months
Investigational System-Related anticipatedInvestigations32/6311/3225/92
Cardiovascular - not HF related, anticipatedCardiac disorders21/6313/3228/92
Other Non-cardiovascular, anticipatedGeneral disorders19/6313/3234/92
Cardiovascular HF related, anticipatedCardiac disorders15/637/3221/92
Pulmonary non serious adverse events, anticipatedRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/632/328/92
Genitourinary, anticipatedRenal and urinary disorders1/631/323/92
Cardiovascular HF related, unanticipatedCardiac disorders0/630/320/92
Cardiovascular - not HF related, unanticipatedCardiac disorders0/630/320/92
Pulmonary non serious adverse events, unanticipatedRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/630/320/92
Genitourinary, unanticipatedRenal and urinary disorders0/630/320/92

Baseline characteristics

Patients had a documented LVejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤ 35%, an LV end diastolic dimension (LVEDD) of ≥55 mm, and a New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification of II or III. Patients also had been treated with medical therapy per European heart failure guidelines for at least 30 days prior to enrolment.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)TherapyControlTotal
Mean59.8 ± 12.259.3 ± 10.159.5 ± 11.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TherapyControlTotal
Female7613
Male562682
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)TherapyControlTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)TherapyControlTotal
Netherlands13619
Czech Republic6410
Belgium112
United Kingdom12416
Italy5510
France437
Germany12416
Spain10515
Body mass index
Body mass index(kg/m^2)TherapyControlTotal
Mean28.6 ± 5.931.2 ± 5.129.9 ± 5.5
Loop diuretics
Loop diuretics(Participants)TherapyControlTotal
Count of participants543286
Statin
Statin(Participants)TherapyControlTotal
Count of participants501969
08

Study locations

21 sites
  • UCL Bruxelles
    Brussels, 1200, Belgium
  • Nemocnice Na Homolce
    Prague, 15030, Czechia
  • Centre d'Investigation Clinique Pierre Drouin, CHU de Nancy
    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy 54500, France
  • CHRU de Lille - Hôpital Cardiologique
    Lille, 59037, France
  • Immanuel Klinikum Bernau Herzzentrum Brandenburg
    Bernau bei Berlin, Brandenburg 16321, Germany
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
    Göttingen, 37075, Germany
  • Universitäres Herzzentrum GmbH, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
    Hamburg, 20246, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
    Leipzig, 04103, Germany
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Niguarda Cà Granda
    Milan, 20162, Italy
  • A. O. Dei Colli - Monaldi
    Naples, 80131, Italy
  • Policlinico San Matteo
    Pavia, 27100, Italy
  • Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
    Eindhoven, 5623EJ, Netherlands
  • UMC Utrecht
    Utrecht, 3584CX, Netherlands
  • Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Avenida Pio XII s/n
    Pamplona, Navarre 31008, Spain
  • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
    Barcelona, 08036, Spain
  • Hospital Doce de Octubre
    Madrid, 28041, Spain
  • University Hospitals Bristol, NHS Foundation Trust
    Bristol, England BS2 8HW, United Kingdom
  • Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust
    Liverpool, England L14 3PD, United Kingdom
  • The Heart Hospital, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust
    London, England W1G 8PH, United Kingdom
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Mary's Hospital
    London, England W2 1NY, United Kingdom
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
    London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • De Ferrari GM, Tuinenburg AE, Ruble S, Brugada J, Klein H, Butter C, Wright DJ, Schubert B, Solomon S, Meyer S, Stein K, Ramuzat A, Zannad F. Rationale and study design of the NEuroCardiac TherApy foR Heart Failure Study: NECTAR-HF. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Jun;16(6):692-9. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.80. Epub 2014 May 20. PubMed 24846173 ↗
  • Zannad F, De Ferrari GM, Tuinenburg AE, Wright D, Brugada J, Butter C, Klein H, Stolen C, Meyer S, Stein KM, Ramuzat A, Schubert B, Daum D, Neuzil P, Botman C, Castel MA, D'Onofrio A, Solomon SD, Wold N, Ruble SB. Chronic vagal stimulation for the treatment of low ejection fraction heart failure: results of the NEural Cardiac TherApy foR Heart Failure (NECTAR-HF) randomized controlled trial. Eur Heart J. 2015 Feb 14;36(7):425-33. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu345. Epub 2014 Aug 31. PubMed 25176942 ↗
  • De Ferrari GM, Stolen C, Tuinenburg AE, Wright DJ, Brugada J, Butter C, Klein H, Neuzil P, Botman C, Castel MA, D'Onofrio A, de Borst GJ, Solomon S, Stein KM, Schubert B, Stalsberg K, Wold N, Ruble S, Zannad F. Long-term vagal stimulation for heart failure: Eighteen month results from the NEural Cardiac TherApy foR Heart Failure (NECTAR-HF) trial. Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;244:229-234. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.036. Epub 2017 Jun 10. PubMed 28663046 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date
1 update, last Sep 25, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01385176
Lead sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 30, 2011
Start date
Sep 21, 2011
Primary completion
May 2014
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Results posted
Jan 6, 2020
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Faiez Zannad, M.D.
principal investigator · Centre d'Investigation Clinique (CIC), Batiment Louis Mathieu, CHU de Nancy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion