An interventional study of Implant of investigational device system and Titration during the randomization phase in Heart Failure and Congestive Heart Failure, sponsored by Boston Scientific Corporation. Active, not recruiting at 21 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.
Sponsored by Boston Scientific Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The NECTAR-HF feasibility trial is designed to evaluate the application of right vagal nerve stimulation in heart failure patients with a New York Heart Association Class III, an ejection fraction equal to or less than 35 %, and a narrow QRS duration equal to or less than 130 ms.
The objectives of this study are to assess the impact of right vagal nerve stimulation on left ventricular remodeling, functional capacity, quality of life, and other measures in heart failure patients over a 6-month period. In addition, the study will assess the safety of the NECTAR-HF study system over an 18-month period.
5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,219 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 118 is above the median of 72 across 3,733 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.
Browse Heart Failure studies →Boston Scientific Corporation is the lead sponsor of 517 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.
Of its 64 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 56 (88%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Implant of investigational device system for vagus nerve stimulation. Patients were randomized in a 2 : 1 ratio to receive therapy (VNS ON) or control (VNS OFF) for a 6-month period. The experimental arm was receiving vagus nerve stimulation during the first 6 months after implant. Titration during the randomization phase with delivery of highest tolerable by patient stimulation current. Blood Draw before implant and 6 months after implant. Titration after the randomization phase with adjustments of the chronically highest tolearble by patient current.
Device: Implant of investigational device system · Procedure: Titration during the randomization phase · Procedure: Titration after the randomization phase · Diagnostic Test: Blood Draw
Implant of investigational device system for vagus nerve stimulation. Control group was implanted with study system like the experimental arm, but was not receiving experimental vagus nerve stimulation therapy during the first 6 months after implant. 6-month after implant a cross-over took place and the control arm also started to receive experimental vagus nerve stimulation. Blood Draw before implant and 6 months after implant. Titration after the randomization phase with adjustments of the chronically highest tolearble by patient current.
Device: Implant of investigational device system · Procedure: Titration after the randomization phase · Diagnostic Test: Blood Draw
Vagus nerve stimulation lead was wrapped around the right cervical vagus nerve and then connected to a stimulator permanently implanted in the right pectoral region.
Amplitude of the chronically delivered vagus nerve stimulation in the experimental arm was adjusted to the highest tolerable by patient value. No chronically delivered vagus nerve stimulation in the control arm during the randomization phase.
Amplitude of the chronically delivered vagus nerve stimulation was adjusted to the highest tolerable by patient value in all patients in both arms of the study.
Blood draw before implant and 6 months after implant at the end of the randomization phase.
Change in Left Ventricular End-systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Change in the Left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD) between Baseline and the value at the end of the randomization phase (6 months after Baseline) i.e. 6 months after vagus nerve stimulation in the THERAPY Arm. No Vagus nerve stimulation during that time window in the CONTROL Arm. The sign (- ) indicates a reduction in the LVESD. Minus means a reduction in LVESD. The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point (e.g., value at 6 months minus value at baseline).
Time frame: LVESD at Baseline and at 6-months post Baseline
Percentage of Surviving Participants
As pre-specified in the study protocol, the All-cause Survival endpoint combined both groups into one analysis population. Subjects contributed data according to the follow-up period during they received VNS therapy (Implant through 18 months for Therapy subjects, 6 through 18 months for Control subjects). Control patients who exited the study in the first 6 months, or who did not have a 6 month visit, were excluded.
Time frame: 18-months
LVEF, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.
Time frame: LVEF at Baseline and at 6-months after Baseline
Exercise Capacity, Peak VO2
Assessment of functional capacity (e.g., peak VO2) as measures related to patient heart failure status.
Time frame: Measurements at Baseline and at 6-months after Baseline
LVESV, Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume
Measurements of LVESV, left ventricular end systolic volume at Baseline and 6 months after Baseline in the Control Arm and in the Therapy Arm
Time frame: At Baseline and at 6-months after Baseline
Enrollment Start: 21-Sep-2011. First implant: 28-Sep-2011.Last Implant: 20-June-2013. 118 patients enrolled, 96 were found to be eligible and were implanted across 24 centres (7 sites with 5-10 implants, 1 site with 13 implants). 95 patients were randomized.
| Milestone | Therapy | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 63 | 32 |
| Completed | 62 | 30 |
| Not completed | 1 | 2 |
| Withdrew: Death | 1 | 2 |
| Milestone | Therapy | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 62 | 30 |
| Completed | 58 | 27 |
| Not completed | 4 | 3 |
| Withdrew: Death | 1 | 2 |
| Withdrew: Physician decision | 0 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 2 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Heart transplant | 1 | 0 |
Change in the Left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD) between Baseline and the value at the end of the randomization phase (6 months after Baseline) i.e. 6 months after vagus nerve stimulation in the THERAPY Arm. No Vagus nerve stimulation during that time window in the CONTROL Arm. The sign (- ) indicates a reduction in the LVESD. Minus means a reduction in LVESD. The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point (e.g., value at 6 months minus value at baseline).
| cm | Therapy | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Left Ventricular End-systolic Dimension (LVESD) | -0.04 ± 0.25 | -0.08 ± 0.32 |
As pre-specified in the study protocol, the All-cause Survival endpoint combined both groups into one analysis population. Subjects contributed data according to the follow-up period during they received VNS therapy (Implant through 18 months for Therapy subjects, 6 through 18 months for Control subjects). Control patients who exited the study in the first 6 months, or who did not have a 6 month visit, were excluded.
| Percentage of participants surving | All Patients in Active VNS Periods |
|---|---|
| Percentage of Surviving Participants | 95 (91 to 99) |
LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.
| % of blood ejected from ventricle | Therapy | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 30.5 ± 6.0 | 30.8 ± 4.2 |
| 6 months after Baseline | 32.7 ± 6.4 | 32.1 ± 5.6 |
Assessment of functional capacity (e.g., peak VO2) as measures related to patient heart failure status.
| ml/kg/min | Therapy | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 15.6 ± 3.9 | 15.2 ± 3.3 |
| 6 months after Baseline | 15.8 ± 4.4 | 14.7 ± 3.6 |
Measurements of LVESV, left ventricular end systolic volume at Baseline and 6 months after Baseline in the Control Arm and in the Therapy Arm
| ml | Therapy | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 154.7 ± 58.5 | 164.0 ± 39.2 |
| 6 months after Baseline | 142.5 ± 57.1 | 152.1 ± 43.8 |
Collected over Adverse events information collected during the randomization phase, (6 month) is referred to. During this time period the primary efficicacy endpoint measurements were done and information collected. Only during these initial 6 months there were two goups of patients. After 6 month all patients had received vagus nerve stimulation. An additional Arm/Group ("All Patients - 6 to 18 Months" ) was added to present AEs collected from end of randomization phase until end of safety endpoint period.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Therapy | 1/63 (1.6%) | 21/63 (33.3%) | 32/63 (50.8%) |
| Control | 2/32 (6.3%) | 18/32 (56.3%) | 15/32 (46.9%) |
| All Patients - 6 to 18 Months | 3/92 (3.3%) | 44/92 (47.8%) | 66/92 (71.7%) |
| Event | Therapy | Control | All Patients - 6 to 18 Months |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other Non Cardiocascular, anticipatedGeneral disorders | 7/63 | 7/32 | 22/92 |
| HF hospitalization, anticipatedCardiac disorders | 7/63 | 5/32 | 18/92 |
| Cardiovascular - Non Heart Failure, anticipatedCardiac disorders | 7/63 | 5/32 | 16/92 |
| Investigational device system related, anticipatedProduct Issues | 9/63 | 4/32 | 2/92 |
| Pulmonary Serious Adverse Events, anticipatedRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 0/63 | 3/32 | 5/92 |
| Genitourinary, anticipatedRenal and urinary disorders | 1/63 | 2/32 | 1/92 |
| Death, anticipatedCardiac disorders | 1/63 | 2/32 | 3/92 |
| Investigational device system related, unanticipatedProduct Issues | 0/63 | 0/32 | 1/92 |
| Heart Failure Hospitalizations, unanticipatedCardiac disorders | 0/63 | 0/32 | 0/92 |
| Cardiovascular - Non Heart Failure, unanticipatedCardiac disorders | 0/63 | 0/32 | 0/92 |
| Event | Therapy | Control | All Patients - 6 to 18 Months |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investigational System-Related anticipatedInvestigations | 32/63 | 11/32 | 25/92 |
| Cardiovascular - not HF related, anticipatedCardiac disorders | 21/63 | 13/32 | 28/92 |
| Other Non-cardiovascular, anticipatedGeneral disorders | 19/63 | 13/32 | 34/92 |
| Cardiovascular HF related, anticipatedCardiac disorders | 15/63 | 7/32 | 21/92 |
| Pulmonary non serious adverse events, anticipatedRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 2/63 | 2/32 | 8/92 |
| Genitourinary, anticipatedRenal and urinary disorders | 1/63 | 1/32 | 3/92 |
| Cardiovascular HF related, unanticipatedCardiac disorders | 0/63 | 0/32 | 0/92 |
| Cardiovascular - not HF related, unanticipatedCardiac disorders | 0/63 | 0/32 | 0/92 |
| Pulmonary non serious adverse events, unanticipatedRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 0/63 | 0/32 | 0/92 |
| Genitourinary, unanticipatedRenal and urinary disorders | 0/63 | 0/32 | 0/92 |
Patients had a documented LVejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤ 35%, an LV end diastolic dimension (LVEDD) of ≥55 mm, and a New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification of II or III. Patients also had been treated with medical therapy per European heart failure guidelines for at least 30 days prior to enrolment.
| Age, Continuous(years) | Therapy | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 59.8 ± 12.2 | 59.3 ± 10.1 | 59.5 ± 11.1 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Therapy | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 7 | 6 | 13 |
| Male | 56 | 26 | 82 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants) | Therapy | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | — | — | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Therapy | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 13 | 6 | 19 |
| Czech Republic | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| Belgium | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 4 | 16 |
| Italy | 5 | 5 | 10 |
| France | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Germany | 12 | 4 | 16 |
| Spain | 10 | 5 | 15 |
| Body mass index(kg/m^2) | Therapy | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 28.6 ± 5.9 | 31.2 ± 5.1 | 29.9 ± 5.5 |
| Loop diuretics(Participants) | Therapy | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | 54 | 32 | 86 |
| Statin(Participants) | Therapy | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | 50 | 19 | 69 |
Plan to share: No
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Boston Scientific Corporation