An observational study in Kidney Transplant and Kidney/Pancreas Transplant, sponsored by Providence Health & Services. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-08-04.
Sponsored by Providence Health & Services · Observational
Advances in transplant pharmacotherapy have led to improved one-year patient and graft survival in kidney transplant recipients, but have not translated to enhanced long-term survival. An explanation for the disparity in outcomes is the negative role of antibodies in transplant graft survival. There currently does not exist maintenance immunosuppression that targets antibodies and standard of practice aims at removing circulating donor specific antibodies upon detection of antibody mediated graft damage but not prior to the detection of rejection. There exists an insufficiency of data regarding patient and donor characteristics, changes in immunosuppression, the risk of viral donor and patient seropositivity and the risk of non-compliance on the development of antibodies. By measuring antibody levels in the blood at specific time periods after transplant, we may have a better understanding of what types of patients will develop antibodies, when these antibodies appear and how changes to transplant medications may affect antibodies.
The proposed project will examine the multifactorial risks associated with the development and appearance of donor-specific antibodies in the first year post-kidney transplant. The data collected will provide a historical perspective and preliminary pilot data to support a proposal for prospective antibody monitoring and to justify pre-emptively treating the antibodies in the absence of clinical signs of rejection.
Organ transplantation is an effective treatment for several end-stage organ diseases. Preventing rejection of transplanted organs remains the premier challenge. According to the humoral theory, donor specific antibodies (DSA) are the major cause of chronic rejection and allograft loss. Despite this, and evidence that links human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies to allograft dysfunction and loss, doubt remains about the cause-and-effect relationship and confirmation of this evidence is necessary to help facilitate change in transplant practice. Prospective monitoring for de novo DSA in the serum of patients who have received a transplant may allow for earlier detection, evaluation, and characterization of factors leading to the development of antibodies prior to the development of clinical manifestations of graft dysfunction.
The contribution of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Class I and Class II antibodies to transplant outcomes is well documented. However, there is emerging evidence that antibody mediated rejection and the severity of outcomes may involve proteins and antibodies that go beyond HLA Class I and II. A number of assays are available for testing for these additional antibodies and proteins but they are currently not used for widespread patient monitoring in part due to lack of data justifying their commercial use. This pilot study will prospectively evaluate for the presence and/or emergence of these unique antibodies, (I.E. MICA antigen, IgG3 and C1Q) in serial samples of serum, and confirm or reject the utility of incorporating these assays into routine patient monitoring which might provide earlier evidence of emerging rejection. Serum samples will be stored indefinitely for future kidney transplant research projects.
Providence Health & Services is the lead sponsor of 83 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.
Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (80%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Males and females aged 18-70 years old receiving a living donor or deceased donor kidney or kidney/pancreas transplant
Exclusion Criteria:
Proportion of patients who develop DSA within the first year post-transplant
Time frame: 1 year
Risk factors for developing DSA
Patient demographics and immunosuppression regimen to be collected: Age at transplant Date of transplant Gender Race Cause of renal failure Donor type Repeat transplant (yes/no) Transplant current panel reactive antibody (PRA) Transplant flow crossmatch Previous crossmatch Serum creatinine at baseline DSA Class I/Class II, MICA, IgG3, C1Q Induction and maintenance immunosuppressant therapy Cytomegalovirus, BK virus, and Epstein Barr virus patient and donor seropositivity
Time frame: 1 year
Change in allograft function at 1 year post-transplant compared to baseline (measured by Cockcroft-Gault)
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of patient survival at 1 year
Time frame: 1 year
Proportion of patients who are DSA negative at 1 year
Time frame: 1 year
Percent change of DSA from baseline to 1 year
Time frame: 1 year
Proportion of Class I versus Class II detectable DSA that progress to antibody mediated rejection
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of allograft survival at 1 year
Time frame: 1 year
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Providence Health & Services