ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01374906Updated May 22, 2018Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Pasireotide Administered Monthly in Patients With Cushing's Disease

A Phase 3 interventional study of pasireotide LAR and SOM230 LAR 30 mg in Cushing's Disease, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 82 sites in 20 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-22.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals (part of Novartis) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 37 studies in Pituitary ACTH Hypersecretion with a site in United States — 8 open to participants now, 10 under way, none of them phase 3. Pituitary ACTH Hypersecretion · United States.

Enrollment
5th of 29
150 · median 31
Started
2011
with 3 others
Phase 3
11 of 37
none open now
Registered
12th of 37
by date
Lead sponsor
8 of 37
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Among the 37 studies in Pituitary ACTH Hypersecretion with a site in United States, this one is the 5th largest by enrollment of the 29 interventional ones, is one of 4 that started in 2011, is one of 11 in phase 3, and was the 12th registered.

By phase

37 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 211 · 1 open
Phase 3this study11 · 0 open
Observational8 · 5 open
Phase 12 · 1 open
Phase 1/22 · 0 open
Phase 42 · 0 open
No phase1 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 1997; this study’s year is marked. 4 started in 2011.

Size and results

Median enrollment 31 across the 29 interventional studies, 196 across the 8 observational. Of the 24 that completed or were terminated, 18 (75%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 37 studies in Pituitary ACTH Hypersecretion with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase III study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 2 dosing regiments of Pasireotide long acting release (LAR) in patients with Cushing's disease.

03

Conditions studied

  • Cushing's Disease

Keywords

  • SOM230
  • Cushing's Disease
  • Mean Urinary Free Cortisol
  • Pasireotide
  • Pasireotide LAR
  • Pasireotide long-acting release
  • secondary hypercortisolism
  • secondary hypercorticism
  • Itsenko-Cushing disease
  • increased secretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)
  • hyperpituitarism
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • performance status ≥ 60 (i.e. requires occasional assistance, but is able to care for most of their personal needs)
  • For patients on medical treatment for Cushing's disease the following must be completed before screening assessments are performed

    • Inhibitors of steroidogenesis (ketoconazole, metyrapone): 1 week
    • Pituitary directed agents: Dopamine agonists (bromocriptine, cabergoline) and PPARγ agonists (rosiglitazone or pioglitazone): 4 weeks
    • Octreotide LAR, Lanreotide SR and Lanreotide autogel: 14 weeks
    • Octreotide (immediate release formulation): 1 week

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are considered candidates for surgical treatment at the time of study entry
  • Patients who have received pituitary irradiation within the last ten years prior to visit 1
  • Patients who have had any previous pasireotide treatment
  • Patients who have been treated with mitotane during the last 6 months prior to Visit 1
  • Diabetic patients on antihyperglycemic medications with poor glycemic control as evidenced by >8%
  • Patients with risk factors for torsade de pointes, i.e. patients with a baseline >470 ms, hypokalemia, uncontrolled hypothyroidism, family history of long QT syndrome, or concomitant medications known to prolong QT interval
  • Female patients who are pregnant or lactating, or are of (defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant) and not practicing an effective method of /birth control. Sexually active males must use a condom during intercourse while taking the drug and for 2 months after the last dose of study drug and should not father a child in this period. A condom is required to be used also by vasectomized men in order to prevent delivery of the drug via seminal fluid
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Washout period

A planned gap after a treatment, so that its effects can lessen before the study treatment or a study assessment. Ask the study team and the doctor who prescribed it before changing any medicine.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    10 mg LAR dose

    Randomization was stratified based on Screening mUFC to ensure balanced distribution of disease severity in the two dose arms.

    Drug: pasireotide LAR · Drug: SOM230 LAR 10 mg

  • Experimental
    30 mg LAR dose

    Randomization was stratified based on Screening mUFC to ensure balanced distribution of disease severity in the two dose arms.

    Drug: pasireotide LAR · Drug: SOM230 LAR 30 mg

Interventions

  • Pasireotide long-acting was administered as an intra-muscular depot intragluteal injection once every 28 days (±2 days). Patients were administered pasireotide long-acting 10 mg or 30 mg for four months, followed by either continuation of the starting dose, or dose up-titration (if mUFC was still \>1.5xULN unless titration was precluded by safety reasons).

    Also known as: SOM230

  • DrugSOM230 LAR 30 mg

    starting dose of 30 mg i.m. administered once every 28 days for 4 months, followed by dose up-titration or continuation of starting dose.

  • DrugSOM230 LAR 10 mg

    starting does of SOM230 LAR 10 mg i.m. administered once every 28 days for 4 months, followed by dose up-titration or continuation of the starting dose.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage Participants That Attained a mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN at Month 7 Regardless of Dose Titration

    Percentage of participants that attained a mean urinary free cortisol (mUFC) \<= 1.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN) at Month 7 regardless of dose up-titration at Month 4. Patients who discontinued before month 4 evaluations classed as non-responders. For patients missing month 7 mUFC assessments, the last available mUFC assessment at or after month 4 was carried forward as the month 7 mUFC assessment value.

    Time frame: Month 7

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants That Attained a mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN at Month 7 and Had Not Had a Dose Increase at Month 4

    Percentage of participants that attain a mUFC ≤ 1.0×ULN at Month 7 and had not had a dose increase at Month 4. Patients who had a dose increase prior to Month 7 were counted as non-responders in this analysis. Patients who discontinued before month 4 evaluations classed as non-responders. For patients missing month 7 mUFC assessments, the last available mUFC assessment at or after month 4 was carried forward as the month 7 mUFC assessment value. A responder was defined as a patient who attains mUFC ≤1.0 X ULN and had not had a dose increase at Month 4.

    Time frame: Month 7

  2. Actual Change in Mean Urinary Free Cortisol (mUFC) From Baseline

    Actual change in mUFC (nmol/24h) from baseline by randomized groups.

    Time frame: baseline, Month 7 (M7), Month 12 (M12), Month 24 (M24) , Month 36 (M36)

  3. Percentage Change in Mean Urinary Free Cortisol (mUFC) From Baseline

    Percentage change in mUFC (nmol/24h) from baseline by randomized groups.

    Time frame: M7, M12, M24, M36

  4. Percentage of Patients Who Attain mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN

    Controlled responder: mUFC ≤ 1.0×ULN by randomized groups.

    Time frame: M7, M12, M24, M36

  5. Percentage of Patients Who Attain mUFC ≤1.0 x ULN or Have at Least 50 % Reduction From Baseline in mUFC

    Controlled responder: mUFC ≤ 1.0×ULN. Partially controlled responder: at least 50% reduction in mUFC from Baseline, and mUFC \>1.0×ULN.

    Time frame: M7, M12, M24, M36

  6. Percentage of Patients Who Are Controlled Responders (mUFC ≤ 1.0 xULN) on at Least 4 of the 7 mUFC Assessments by Month 7 & on at Least 7 of the 12 mUFC Assessments by Month 12.

    Percentage of patients with mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN at a minimum of 4 months up to and including Month 7, and at a minimum of 7 months up to and including Month 12 by randomized groups.

    Time frame: Month 7, Month 12

  7. Percentage of Patients With Uncontrolled Response at Month 7 & Month 12 Within the Subset of Patients Who Had Uncontrolled Response at a) Months 1 and 2; b) Months 1, 2, and 3

    Percentage of patients with mUFC \> 1.0 xULN at Month 7 and Month 12 within the subset of patients who were uncontrolled at a) Months 1 \& 2, b) Months 1, 2, \& 3 by randomized groups.

    Time frame: Month 7, Month12

  8. Percent of Participants Attaining a mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN or at Least a 50% Reduction in mUFC From Baseline at Indicated Time Points

    Time to first achievement of attaining a mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN or at least a 50% reduction in mUFC from baseline by randomized groups.

    Time frame: Momth 7, Month 12

  9. Percent of Participants Attaining a Duration of Controlled or Partially Controlled Response at Indicated Time Points

    Duration of controlled or partially controlled response is defined as the period starting from the date of patient's first normalization (mUFC≤ 1.0 x ULN) or at least 50% reduction from baseline up to the date when the patient's mUFC \>1.0 x ULN and the reduction from baseline falls to less than 50% for the first time.

    Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18

  10. Percentage Change From Baseline on Plasma Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) Over Time

    Percentage change in ACTH (pmol/L) from Baseline by randomized groups.

    Time frame: Months 7, 12, 24 & 36

  11. Percentage Change From Baseline on Serum Cortisol Over Time

    Percentage change in serum cortisol (nmol/L) from Baseline by randomized groups.

    Time frame: Months 7, 12, 24 & 36

  12. Actual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Blood Pressure

    Change in blood pressure measurements from Baseline

    Time frame: Month 7

  13. Actual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Change in BMI measurements from Baseline

    Time frame: Month 7

  14. Actual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Weight

    Change in weight measurements from Baseline

    Time frame: Month 7

  15. Actual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Body Composition: Region

    Change in body composition: region measurements from Baseline

    Time frame: Month 7

  16. Actual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Waist Circumference

    Change in waist circumference measurements from Baseline

    Time frame: Month 7

  17. Actual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Cholesterol & Triglycerides

    Change in parameter measurements: cholesterol \& triglycerides from Baseline

    Time frame: Month 7

  18. Percentage Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time

    Percentage change in parameter measurements: blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, fasting serum lipid profile, weight, bone density and body composition (examined by DXA scan) from Baseline

    Time frame: Month 7

  19. Percentage of Participants Having a Favorable Shift From Baseline in Clinical Signs

    This includes patients with improvements in symptoms from baseline. Clinical signs over time include: facial rubor, fat pads, hirsutism, striae, (via photographs by a second local physician who was blinded to the treatment dose and time point of the photograph) and muscle strength.

    Time frame: Month 7

  20. Percentage of Participants That Attained a Mean Urinary Free Cortisol (mUFC) <= 1.0 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) at Month 7 Regardless of Dose Up-titration at Month 4.

    All of the participants who discontinued prior to month 4 evaluations were classed as non-responders. For participants missing month 7 mUFC assessments, the last available mUFC assessment at or after month 4 was carried forward as the month 7 mUFC assessment value. Analysis split by screening strata of mUFC Stratum 1: mUFC 1.5x to \< 2.0 x ULN Stratum 2: mUFC 2.0x to \<= 5.0 x ULN

    Time frame: Month 7

  21. Percentage of Patients That Attain a Reduction of at Least 50% in mUFC From Baseline

    All of the participants who discontinued prior to month 4 evaluations were classed as non-responders. For participants missing month 7 mUFC assessments, the last available mUFC assessment at or after month 4 was carried forward as the month 7 mUFC assessment value. Analysis split by screening strata of mUFC Stratum 1:

    Time frame: Months 7, 12, 24 & 36

  22. Percent of Participants Attaining a Time to First Achievement of at Least a 50% Reduction in mUFC From Baseline at Indicated Time Points

    Time to first achievement of a 5by randomized groups.0% reduction in mUFC from baseline

    Time frame: every month in the core phase and every 3 months in the extension phase) up to and including the cut-off date for the Month 12 CSR (10-Nov-2015)

  23. Percent of Participants With a Duration of at Least 50% Reduction in mUFC From Baseline at Indicated Time Points

    Duration of 50% reduction from baseline is defined as the period starting from the date of patient's first 50% reduction from baseline

    Time frame: Months 6, 12 & 18

  24. Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Ctrough

    Pasireotide trough levels (Ctrough) was 1 of the parameters used for PK assessments. Ctrough is the pre-dose PK concentration with an elapsed time from previous injection of 28+/-2 days. All patients randomized to the study had at least 1 PK observation \& were therefore included in the pharmacokinetic analysis set. PK observations with missing concentrations, missing dose, missing elapsed time or an elapsed time from previous injection outside of 28 ±2 days window were excluded. Given that SOM230 LAR was administered once a month, Ctrough was collected every 28 days and thus this provides a summary of Ctrough values provided by incident dose (last dose administered prior to PK sample collection), not by randomized dose, hence each column is equivalent to an incident dose \& not an arm/group. Patients randomized to either 10mg or 30mg could be titrated down to 5mg due to safety, or titrated up to 40mg, hence the 4 incident doses/columns that were allowed per protocol during this study.

    Time frame: Days 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309, 337

  25. Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax

    Pasireotide peak levels (Cmax) was one of the parameters used for PK assessments. Cmax is the post-dose PK concentration with an elapsed time from the previous injection of 21+/-2 days. All patients randomized to the study had at least one PK observation and were therefore included in the pharmacokinetic analysis set (PAS). Cmax PK observations ("Day 20" and "Day 104") with an elapsed time from the previous injection outside of 21+/-2 days window were excluded. Given that SOM230 LAR was administered once a month, the Cmax were collected every 28 days in this study, thus this provides a summary of Cmax values provided by incident dose (last dose administered prior to PK sample collection), not by randomized dose, hence each column is equivalent to an incident dose and not an arm/group. Patients randomized to either the 10mg or 30mg could be titrated down to 5mg due to safety, or titrated up to 40mg, hence the 4 incident doses/columns that were allowed per protocol during this study.

    Time frame: Days 22, 106, 190

  26. Actual Change in Standardized Score of Cushing's Disease HRQoL (CushingQOL) Score From Baseline

    CushingQol is a disease-specific patient-reported outcome instrument. It is a single-domain 12 item Cushing's disease quality of life instrument. The Cushing's syndrome quality of life (CushingQoL) questionnaire is a single domain questionnaire which includes 12 self-report items scored using a five point Likert scale anchored at (1=always/very much and 5=never/not at all). The patient is asked to report what they think or feel about their Cushing's syndrome and how much the illness has interfered in usual activities over the past 4 weeks. The total score is standardized on a 0-100 scale with lower scores indicating a greater impact on quality of life.

    Time frame: Months 7, 12, 24 & 36

  27. Actual Change in SF-12v2 Score From Baseline - Mental Component Summary

    SF-12v2 General Health Survey is a general patient reported outcome instrument over time. It is scored to provide eight health domain scores (Bodily Pain (BP), General Health (GH), Physical Functioning (PF), Role-Physical (RP), Social Functioning (SF), Role-Emotional (RE), Vitality (VT) and Mental Health (MH)). These eight domain scores can be combined to form two summary scores reflecting overall physical and mental health: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). The analyses reported here focus on PCS and MCS scores. The domain scores use a norm-based score, which standardizes the scores with respect to the mean and standard deviation of a nationally representative sample of United States (US) adults. These are the scores on the original scale which have not been transformed in any way. The possible range of scores is 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better outcomes.

    Time frame: Months 7, 12 & 24

  28. Actual Change in SF-12v2 Score From Baseline - Physical Component Summary

    SF-12v2 General Health Survey is a general patient reported outcome instrument over time. It is scored to provide eight health domain scores (Bodily Pain (BP), General Health (GH), Physical Functioning (PF), Role-Physical (RP), Social Functioning (SF), Role-Emotional (RE), Vitality (VT) and Mental Health (MH)). These eight domain scores can be combined to form two summary scores reflecting overall physical and mental health: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). The analyses reported here focus on PCS and MCS scores. The domain scores use a norm-based score, which standardizes the scores with respect to the mean and standard deviation of a nationally representative sample of United States (US) adults. These are the scores on the original scale which have not been transformed in any way. The possible range of scores is 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better outcomes.

    Time frame: Months 7, 12 & 24

07

Results

Posted Apr 11, 2018
Limitations and caveats
All analyses in this study were descriptive in nature. No comparisons were made between the two arms, and no p-values are reported. For the primary and key-secondary, success was based on estimating the response rate (and 95% CI) in each arm.

Participant flow

At least 148 patients (Pts.) were planned \& 150 were randomized \& analyzed. Pts. were all treated with either pasireotide long-acting 10 mg or pasireotide long-acting 30 mg. 81 Pts. completed the Core phase \& entered the Extension phase with 39 completing the Extension phase.

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
Started7476
Dc dur core phs at/prior to data cutoff2422
Completed core phase5054
Completed core/did not enter ext. phase1013
Completed core phase/entered ext. phase4041
Dc dur ext phs at/prior to data cutoff1626
Completed extension phase2415
Completed3428
Not completed4048
Withdrew: Abnormal laboratory value(s)03
Withdrew: Administrative problems22
Withdrew: Adverse event1011
Withdrew: Death02
Withdrew: Protocol violation22
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject159
Withdrew: Unsatisfactory therapeutic effect1119

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage Participants That Attained a mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN at Month 7 Regardless of Dose Titration

Percentage of participants that attained a mean urinary free cortisol (mUFC) \<= 1.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN) at Month 7 regardless of dose up-titration at Month 4. Patients who discontinued before month 4 evaluations classed as non-responders. For patients missing month 7 mUFC assessments, the last available mUFC assessment at or after month 4 was carried forward as the month 7 mUFC assessment value.

Time frame:
Month 7
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage Participants That Attained a mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN at Month 7 Regardless of Dose Titration
percentage of participants10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
Percentage Participants That Attained a mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN at Month 7 Regardless of Dose Titration41.9 (30.51 to 53.94)40.8 (29.65 to 52.67)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants That Attained a mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN at Month 7 and Had Not Had a Dose Increase at Month 4

Percentage of participants that attain a mUFC ≤ 1.0×ULN at Month 7 and had not had a dose increase at Month 4. Patients who had a dose increase prior to Month 7 were counted as non-responders in this analysis. Patients who discontinued before month 4 evaluations classed as non-responders. For patients missing month 7 mUFC assessments, the last available mUFC assessment at or after month 4 was carried forward as the month 7 mUFC assessment value. A responder was defined as a patient who attains mUFC ≤1.0 X ULN and had not had a dose increase at Month 4.

Time frame:
Month 7
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants That Attained a mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN at Month 7 and Had Not Had a Dose Increase at Month 4
percentage of participants10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
Percentage of Participants That Attained a mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN at Month 7 and Had Not Had a Dose Increase at Month 428.4 (18.50 to 40.05)31.6 (21.39 to 43.25)
SecondaryActual Change in Mean Urinary Free Cortisol (mUFC) From Baseline

Actual change in mUFC (nmol/24h) from baseline by randomized groups.

Time frame:
baseline, Month 7 (M7), Month 12 (M12), Month 24 (M24) , Month 36 (M36)
Reported as:
Mean · nmol/24h
Actual Change in Mean Urinary Free Cortisol (mUFC) From Baseline
nmol/24h10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
M7-192.4 ± 271.59-234.3 ± 362.86
M12-195.1 ± 282.46-247.6 ± 387.05
M24-236.2 ± 292.91-265.2 ± 313.47
M36-398.4 ± 136.09-164.6 ± 66.76
SecondaryPercentage Change in Mean Urinary Free Cortisol (mUFC) From Baseline

Percentage change in mUFC (nmol/24h) from baseline by randomized groups.

Time frame:
M7, M12, M24, M36
Reported as:
Mean · percentage change
Percentage Change in Mean Urinary Free Cortisol (mUFC) From Baseline
percentage change10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
M7-29.3 ± 102.76-33.2 ± 61.37
M12-30.3 ± 79.73-31.1 ± 78.41
M24-50.9 ± 76.48-51.2 ± 35.41
M36-71.6 ± 20.44-48.8 ± 11.36
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Attain mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN

Controlled responder: mUFC ≤ 1.0×ULN by randomized groups.

Time frame:
M7, M12, M24, M36
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Who Attain mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN
percentage of participants10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
M7 - Controlled responder39.2 (28.04 to 51.23)40.8 (29.65 to 52.67)
M12 - Controlled responder35.1 (24.39 to 47.11)25.0 (15.77 to 36.26)
M24 - Controlled responder39.7 (27.57 to 52.80)21.3 (11.86 to 33.68)
M36 - Controlled responder22.0 (11.53 to 35.96)4.0 (0.49 to 13.71)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Attain mUFC ≤1.0 x ULN or Have at Least 50 % Reduction From Baseline in mUFC

Controlled responder: mUFC ≤ 1.0×ULN. Partially controlled responder: at least 50% reduction in mUFC from Baseline, and mUFC \>1.0×ULN.

Time frame:
M7, M12, M24, M36
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Who Attain mUFC ≤1.0 x ULN or Have at Least 50 % Reduction From Baseline in mUFC
percentage of participants10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
M744.6 (33.02 to 56.61)53.9 (42.13 to 65.45)
M1245.9 (34.29 to 57.93)42.1 (30.86 to 53.98)
M2446.0 (33.39 to 59.06)27.9 (17.15 to 40.83)
M3628.0 (16.23 to 42.49)6.0 (1.25 to 16.55)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Are Controlled Responders (mUFC ≤ 1.0 xULN) on at Least 4 of the 7 mUFC Assessments by Month 7 & on at Least 7 of the 12 mUFC Assessments by Month 12.

Percentage of patients with mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN at a minimum of 4 months up to and including Month 7, and at a minimum of 7 months up to and including Month 12 by randomized groups.

Time frame:
Month 7, Month 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Who Are Controlled Responders (mUFC ≤ 1.0 xULN) on at Least 4 of the 7 mUFC Assessments by Month 7 & on at Least 7 of the 12 mUFC Assessments by Month 12.
percentage of participants10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
Month 725.7 (16.22 to 37.16)31.6 (21.39 to 43.25)
Month 1225.7 (16.22 to 37.16)25.0 (15.77 to 36.26)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Uncontrolled Response at Month 7 & Month 12 Within the Subset of Patients Who Had Uncontrolled Response at a) Months 1 and 2; b) Months 1, 2, and 3

Percentage of patients with mUFC \> 1.0 xULN at Month 7 and Month 12 within the subset of patients who were uncontrolled at a) Months 1 \& 2, b) Months 1, 2, \& 3 by randomized groups.

Time frame:
Month 7, Month12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With Uncontrolled Response at Month 7 & Month 12 Within the Subset of Patients Who Had Uncontrolled Response at a) Months 1 and 2; b) Months 1, 2, and 3
percentage of participants10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
Uncontrolled Resp @ M7: subset: M1 & 260.660.6
Uncontrolled Resp @ M7: subset: M1,2 & 361.365.5
Uncontrolled Resp @ M12: subset: M1 & 269.769.7
Uncontrolled Resp @ M12: subset: M1, 2 & 374.272.4
SecondaryPercent of Participants Attaining a mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN or at Least a 50% Reduction in mUFC From Baseline at Indicated Time Points

Time to first achievement of attaining a mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN or at least a 50% reduction in mUFC from baseline by randomized groups.

Time frame:
Momth 7, Month 12
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percent of Participants Attaining a mUFC ≤ 1.0 x ULN or at Least a 50% Reduction in mUFC From Baseline at Indicated Time Points
Percentage of participants10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
Month 786.2 (76.1 to 93.5)83.4 (72.6 to 91.8)
Month 1290.1 (80.7 to 96.2)94.5 (81.0 to 99.4)
SecondaryPercent of Participants Attaining a Duration of Controlled or Partially Controlled Response at Indicated Time Points

Duration of controlled or partially controlled response is defined as the period starting from the date of patient's first normalization (mUFC≤ 1.0 x ULN) or at least 50% reduction from baseline up to the date when the patient's mUFC \>1.0 x ULN and the reduction from baseline falls to less than 50% for the first time.

Time frame:
Month 6, 12, 18
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percent of Participants Attaining a Duration of Controlled or Partially Controlled Response at Indicated Time Points
Percentage of participants10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
Month 678.0 (66.5 to 87.7)72.9 (61.2 to 83.4)
Month 1284.0 (73.1 to 92.2)82.8 (71.5 to 91.5)
Month 1884.0 (73.1 to 92.2)87.1 (74.6 to 95.3)
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline on Plasma Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) Over Time

Percentage change in ACTH (pmol/L) from Baseline by randomized groups.

Time frame:
Months 7, 12, 24 & 36
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage change
Percentage Change From Baseline on Plasma Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) Over Time
Percentage change10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
M72.7 ± 57.14-13.5 ± 46.75
M12-10.2 ± 57.57-14.5 ± 38.72
M24-12.1 ± 43.512.5 ± 68.69
M36-15.4 ± 36.90-0.6 ± 48.13
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline on Serum Cortisol Over Time

Percentage change in serum cortisol (nmol/L) from Baseline by randomized groups.

Time frame:
Months 7, 12, 24 & 36
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage change
Percentage Change From Baseline on Serum Cortisol Over Time
Percentage change10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
M7-8.2 ± 37.83-5.1 ± 40.20
M12-12.1 ± 29.69-0.4 ± 35.91
M24-15.6 ± 30.67-7.4 ± 38.37
M360.6 ± 55.67-23.2 ± 31.19
SecondaryActual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Blood Pressure

Change in blood pressure measurements from Baseline

Time frame:
Month 7
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Actual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Blood Pressure
mmHg10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
Supine systolic blood pressure (SBP)-6.8 ± 15.64-4.6 ± 14.51
Supine diastolic blood (DBP) pressure-4.8 ± 12.06-3.0 ± 12.12
SecondaryActual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Body Mass Index (BMI)

Change in BMI measurements from Baseline

Time frame:
Month 7
Reported as:
Mean · kg/m2
Actual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Body Mass Index (BMI)
kg/m210 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
Actual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Body Mass Index (BMI)-0.7 ± 1.60-1.8 ± 2.05
SecondaryActual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Weight

Change in weight measurements from Baseline

Time frame:
Month 7
Reported as:
Mean · kg
Actual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Weight
kg10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
Actual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Weight-1.8 ± 4.16-4.6 ± 5.08
SecondaryActual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Body Composition: Region

Change in body composition: region measurements from Baseline

Time frame:
Month 7
Reported as:
Mean · percentage fat
Actual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Body Composition: Region
percentage fat10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
Actual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Body Composition: Region-1.0 ± 2.64-1.8 ± 3.97
SecondaryActual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Waist Circumference

Change in waist circumference measurements from Baseline

Time frame:
Month 7
Reported as:
Mean · cm
Actual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Waist Circumference
cm10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
Actual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Waist Circumference-1.6 ± 8.47-7.1 ± 11.78
SecondaryActual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Cholesterol & Triglycerides

Change in parameter measurements: cholesterol \& triglycerides from Baseline

Time frame:
Month 7
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Actual Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time: Cholesterol & Triglycerides
mmol/L10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
Total cholesterol-0.5 ± 1.07-0.4 ± 1.00
HDL cholesterol-0.1 ± 0.280 ± 0.32
Triglycerides0 ± 0.53-0.2 ± 0.64
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time

Percentage change in parameter measurements: blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, fasting serum lipid profile, weight, bone density and body composition (examined by DXA scan) from Baseline

Time frame:
Month 7
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage change
Percentage Change From Baseline in Clinical Signs Over Time
Percentage change10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
SBP-4.3 ± 11.46-3.0 ± 10.18
DBP-4.7 ± 14.19-2.6 ± 13.78
BMI-2.6 ± 5.26-6.1 ± 6.94
Weight-2.6 ± 5.26-6.1 ± 6.91
Waist circumference-1.4 ± 8.60-6.6 ± 10.06
HDL-6.7 ± 15.180.3 ± 20.91
Total cholesterol-7.2 ± 16.86-6.6 ± 16.40
Triglycerides4.2 ± 39.54-0.9 ± 39.61
Body composition-2.4 ± 6.68-3.6 ± 10.47
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Having a Favorable Shift From Baseline in Clinical Signs

This includes patients with improvements in symptoms from baseline. Clinical signs over time include: facial rubor, fat pads, hirsutism, striae, (via photographs by a second local physician who was blinded to the treatment dose and time point of the photograph) and muscle strength.

Time frame:
Month 7
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Having a Favorable Shift From Baseline in Clinical Signs
Percentage of participants10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
Facial rubor32.753.6
Hirsutism (females only)22.232.6
Striae23.123.6
Bruising25.014.3
Supraclavicular fat pad40.428.6
Dorsal fat pad28.840.0
Muscle strength8.94.5
SecondaryPercentage of Participants That Attained a Mean Urinary Free Cortisol (mUFC) <= 1.0 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) at Month 7 Regardless of Dose Up-titration at Month 4.

All of the participants who discontinued prior to month 4 evaluations were classed as non-responders. For participants missing month 7 mUFC assessments, the last available mUFC assessment at or after month 4 was carried forward as the month 7 mUFC assessment value. Analysis split by screening strata of mUFC Stratum 1: mUFC 1.5x to \< 2.0 x ULN Stratum 2: mUFC 2.0x to \<= 5.0 x ULN

Time frame:
Month 7
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants That Attained a Mean Urinary Free Cortisol (mUFC) <= 1.0 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) at Month 7 Regardless of Dose Up-titration at Month 4.
percentage of participants10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
stratum:1.5 x ULN to < 2.0 x ULN52.0 (31.31 to 72.20)52.0 (31.31 to 72.20)
stratum:2.0 x ULN to <= 5.0 x ULN36.7 (23.42 to 51.71)35.3 (22.43 to 49.93)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients That Attain a Reduction of at Least 50% in mUFC From Baseline

All of the participants who discontinued prior to month 4 evaluations were classed as non-responders. For participants missing month 7 mUFC assessments, the last available mUFC assessment at or after month 4 was carried forward as the month 7 mUFC assessment value. Analysis split by screening strata of mUFC Stratum 1:

Time frame:
Months 7, 12, 24 & 36
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients That Attain a Reduction of at Least 50% in mUFC From Baseline
percentage of participants10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
M735.1 (24.39 to 47.11)43.4 (32.08 to 55.29)
M1235.1 (24.39 to 47.11)38.2 (27.25 to 50.02)
M2483.3 (62.62 to 95.26)57.1 (28.86 to 82.34)
M36100 (63.06 to 100.00)33.33 (0.84 to 90.57)
SecondaryPercent of Participants Attaining a Time to First Achievement of at Least a 50% Reduction in mUFC From Baseline at Indicated Time Points

Time to first achievement of a 5by randomized groups.0% reduction in mUFC from baseline

Time frame:
every month in the core phase and every 3 months in the extension phase) up to and including the cut-off date for the Month 12 CSR (10-Nov-2015)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percent of Participants Attaining a Time to First Achievement of at Least a 50% Reduction in mUFC From Baseline at Indicated Time Points
Percentage of participants10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
M780.5 (69.7 to 89.3)73.4 (62.4 to 83.4)
M1284.4 (74.0 to 92.3)80.7 (69.4 to 89.8)
SecondaryPercent of Participants With a Duration of at Least 50% Reduction in mUFC From Baseline at Indicated Time Points

Duration of 50% reduction from baseline is defined as the period starting from the date of patient's first 50% reduction from baseline

Time frame:
Months 6, 12 & 18
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percent of Participants With a Duration of at Least 50% Reduction in mUFC From Baseline at Indicated Time Points
Percentage of participants10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
M678.4 (66.6 to 88.3)77.8 (66.0 to 87.7)
M1284.9 (73.7 to 93.1)83.7 (72.6 to 92.1)
M1884.9 (73.7 to 93.1)83.7 (72.6 to 92.1)
SecondaryPharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Ctrough

Pasireotide trough levels (Ctrough) was 1 of the parameters used for PK assessments. Ctrough is the pre-dose PK concentration with an elapsed time from previous injection of 28+/-2 days. All patients randomized to the study had at least 1 PK observation \& were therefore included in the pharmacokinetic analysis set. PK observations with missing concentrations, missing dose, missing elapsed time or an elapsed time from previous injection outside of 28 ±2 days window were excluded. Given that SOM230 LAR was administered once a month, Ctrough was collected every 28 days and thus this provides a summary of Ctrough values provided by incident dose (last dose administered prior to PK sample collection), not by randomized dose, hence each column is equivalent to an incident dose \& not an arm/group. Patients randomized to either 10mg or 30mg could be titrated down to 5mg due to safety, or titrated up to 40mg, hence the 4 incident doses/columns that were allowed per protocol during this study.

Time frame:
Days 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309, 337
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Ctrough
ng/mL10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose5 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose40 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
Day 292.03 ± 1.257.63 ± 4.58——
Day 572.35 ± 1.157.82 ± 4.220.83 ± NA—
Day 852.39 ± 1.328.56 ± 4.261.03 ± 0.63—
Day 1132.40 ± 1.118.31 ± 3.871.29 ± 0.24—
Day 1412.47 ± 0.947.88 ± 4.001.04 ± 0.6810.7 ± 4.91
Day 1692.47 ± 0.958.46 ± 3.512.01 ± 0.2212.0 ± 5.08
Day 1972.88 ± 1.299.13 ± 4.250.72 ± 0.3911.9 ± 5.87
Day 2252.68 ± 0.988.57 ± 4.701.19 ± 0.4311.3 ± 5.18
Day 2532.87 ± 1.579.00 ± 4.931.77 ± 0.8812.1 ± 5.21
Day 2813.36 ± 1.488.18 ± 4.231.24 ± 0.5211.4 ± 5.85
Day 3092.50 ± 0.999.34 ± 5.610.66 ± NA12.0 ± 4.58
Day 3373.07 ± 1.628.90 ± 4.371.91 ± 1.7912.6 ± 6.21
SecondaryPharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax

Pasireotide peak levels (Cmax) was one of the parameters used for PK assessments. Cmax is the post-dose PK concentration with an elapsed time from the previous injection of 21+/-2 days. All patients randomized to the study had at least one PK observation and were therefore included in the pharmacokinetic analysis set (PAS). Cmax PK observations ("Day 20" and "Day 104") with an elapsed time from the previous injection outside of 21+/-2 days window were excluded. Given that SOM230 LAR was administered once a month, the Cmax were collected every 28 days in this study, thus this provides a summary of Cmax values provided by incident dose (last dose administered prior to PK sample collection), not by randomized dose, hence each column is equivalent to an incident dose and not an arm/group. Patients randomized to either the 10mg or 30mg could be titrated down to 5mg due to safety, or titrated up to 40mg, hence the 4 incident doses/columns that were allowed per protocol during this study.

Time frame:
Days 22, 106, 190
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax
ng/mL10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose5 mg Pasireptide LAR Dose40 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
Day 22 (M 0.75)3.0 ± 1.508.2 ± 3.99——
Day 106 (M 3.75)3.3 ± 1.929.4 ± 3.721.7 ± 0.42—
Day 190 (M6.75)4.0 ± 1.7310.0 ± 3.911.4 ± 0.7812.1 ± 5.21
SecondaryActual Change in Standardized Score of Cushing's Disease HRQoL (CushingQOL) Score From Baseline

CushingQol is a disease-specific patient-reported outcome instrument. It is a single-domain 12 item Cushing's disease quality of life instrument. The Cushing's syndrome quality of life (CushingQoL) questionnaire is a single domain questionnaire which includes 12 self-report items scored using a five point Likert scale anchored at (1=always/very much and 5=never/not at all). The patient is asked to report what they think or feel about their Cushing's syndrome and how much the illness has interfered in usual activities over the past 4 weeks. The total score is standardized on a 0-100 scale with lower scores indicating a greater impact on quality of life.

Time frame:
Months 7, 12, 24 & 36
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Actual Change in Standardized Score of Cushing's Disease HRQoL (CushingQOL) Score From Baseline
scores on a scale10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
M75.7 ± 15.977.8 ± 11.63
M126.4 ± 17.566.8 ± 14.42
M245.9 ± 15.568.7 ± 12.80
M361.4 ± 9.1014.6 ± 5.10
SecondaryActual Change in SF-12v2 Score From Baseline - Mental Component Summary

SF-12v2 General Health Survey is a general patient reported outcome instrument over time. It is scored to provide eight health domain scores (Bodily Pain (BP), General Health (GH), Physical Functioning (PF), Role-Physical (RP), Social Functioning (SF), Role-Emotional (RE), Vitality (VT) and Mental Health (MH)). These eight domain scores can be combined to form two summary scores reflecting overall physical and mental health: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). The analyses reported here focus on PCS and MCS scores. The domain scores use a norm-based score, which standardizes the scores with respect to the mean and standard deviation of a nationally representative sample of United States (US) adults. These are the scores on the original scale which have not been transformed in any way. The possible range of scores is 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better outcomes.

Time frame:
Months 7, 12 & 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Actual Change in SF-12v2 Score From Baseline - Mental Component Summary
scores on a scale10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
M74.1 ± 8.814.3 ± 8.05
M122.3 ± 9.973.3 ± 8.26
M243.3 ± 10.436.4 ± 2.53
SecondaryActual Change in SF-12v2 Score From Baseline - Physical Component Summary

SF-12v2 General Health Survey is a general patient reported outcome instrument over time. It is scored to provide eight health domain scores (Bodily Pain (BP), General Health (GH), Physical Functioning (PF), Role-Physical (RP), Social Functioning (SF), Role-Emotional (RE), Vitality (VT) and Mental Health (MH)). These eight domain scores can be combined to form two summary scores reflecting overall physical and mental health: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). The analyses reported here focus on PCS and MCS scores. The domain scores use a norm-based score, which standardizes the scores with respect to the mean and standard deviation of a nationally representative sample of United States (US) adults. These are the scores on the original scale which have not been transformed in any way. The possible range of scores is 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better outcomes.

Time frame:
Months 7, 12 & 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Actual Change in SF-12v2 Score From Baseline - Physical Component Summary
scores on a scale10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose
M71.9 ± 8.50-0.8 ± 7.46
M124.9 ± 5.56-0.5 ± 6.73
M245.3 ± 4.32-1.1 ± 5.54

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Events are collected from First Patient First Visit (FPFV) until Last Patient Last Visit (LPLV). All Adverse Events reported in this record are from date of First Patient First Treatment until Last Patient Last Visit up to approximately 5 years.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose—22/74 (29.7%)73/74 (98.6%)
30 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose—19/76 (25%)76/76 (100%)
All Patients—41/150 (27.3%)149/150 (99.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 50
Most frequent serious events
Event10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR DoseAll Patients
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders2/743/765/150
Pituitary-dependent Cushing's syndromeEndocrine disorders2/741/763/150
Cholecystitis acuteHepatobiliary disorders2/740/762/150
Stress fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/740/762/150
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/742/762/150
Angina unstableCardiac disorders1/740/761/150
Adrenal insufficiencyEndocrine disorders1/740/761/150
HyperadrenocorticismEndocrine disorders1/740/761/150
Anogenital dysplasiaGastrointestinal disorders1/740/761/150
HaemorrhoidsGastrointestinal disorders1/740/761/150
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 68
Most frequent other events
Event10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR DoseAll Patients
HyperglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders36/7435/7671/150
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders26/7435/7661/150
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders15/7433/7648/150
Diabetes mellitusMetabolism and nutrition disorders15/7420/7635/150
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations18/7413/7631/150
HeadacheNervous system disorders18/7410/7628/150
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders17/7416/7633/150
FatigueGeneral disorders13/7415/7628/150
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders11/7413/7624/150
HypertensionVascular disorders11/7413/7624/150

Baseline characteristics

Full analysis set (FAS): The FAS comprises all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR DoseTotal
Mean38.3 ± 12.5238.6 ± 12.9938.5 ± 12.72
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR DoseTotal
Female5860118
Male161632
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)10 mg Pasireotide LAR Dose30 mg Pasireotide LAR DoseTotal
Caucasian394483
Asian272451
Black202
Other6814
08

Study locations

82 sites
  • ClinTriCo
    Phoenix, Arizona 85381, United States
  • University of California at Los Angeles UCLA Tiverton
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Harbor-UCLA Medical Center LA Biomed
    Torrance, California 90509, United States
  • Emory University School of Medicine/Winship Cancer Institute G2304 - C2301
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Pituitary Center, Division of Endocrinology SC
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center SC-2
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0944, United States
  • Mount Sinai School of Medicine Mt. Sinai Medical Center
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • Oregon Health & Sciences University DeptofOregonHealth&Sciences(2)
    Portland, Oregon 97201, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania - Clinical Studies Unit Unniv SC
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center CSOM230G2304
    Nashville, Tennessee 37212-3139, United States
  • Swedish Medical Center Swedish
    Seattle, Washington 98122-4379, United States
  • Medical College of Wisconsin MCW 2
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Buenos Aires, C1232AAC, Argentina
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Cordoba, X5009BSN, Argentina
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Edegem, Antwerpen 2650, Belgium
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Jette, Brussel 1090, Belgium
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bruxelles, 1070, Belgium
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Gent, 9000, Belgium
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fortaleza, CE 60020-181, Brazil
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-913, Brazil
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Ribeirao Preto, SP 14048-900, Brazil
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    São Paulo, SP 05403 000, Brazil
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 1V7, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Montreal, Quebec H2L 4M1, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sherbrooke, Quebec J1N 5N4, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Beijing, Beijing 100730, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Shanghai, 200025, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Shanghai, 200040, China
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Besancon cedex, 25030, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Caen Cedex9, 14033, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Le Kremlin Bicetre, 94275, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Lille Cedex, 59037, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Marseille Cédex 5, 13385, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Pessac Cedex, 33604, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Erlangen, 91054, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Germering, 82110, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Wurzburg, 97080, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012, India
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632004, India
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    New Delhi, 110 029, India
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Petach Tikva, 49100, Israel
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Ancona, AN 60126, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Milano, MI 20149, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Milano, MI 20162, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Padova, PD 35128, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Napoli, 80131, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Nagoya, Aichi 460-0001, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fukuoka city, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Maebashi city, Gunma 371 8511, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sapporo-city, Hokkaido 060-8648, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kobe-city, Hyogo 650-0017, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Nankoku-city, Kochi 783-8505, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kyoto-city, Kyoto 612-8555, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Suita-city, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8470, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Osaka, 534-0021, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Rotterdam, 3015 CE, Netherlands
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Jesus Maria, Lima 11, Peru
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Miraflores, Lima 18, Peru
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Gdansk, 80-952, Poland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Poznan, 60-355, Poland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Warszawa, 00-909, Poland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Wroclaw, 50-367, Poland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Moscow, 119296, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    St.- Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sevilla, Andalucia 41013, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Alzira, Comunidad Valenciana 46600, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Barcelona, 08041, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Diskapi / Ankara, Ankara 06110, Turkey
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Istanbul, TUR 34098, Turkey
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Izmir, 35340, Turkey
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Salford, Manchester M6 8HD, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Norwich, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sheffield, S5 7AU, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lacroix A, Bronstein MD, Schopohl J, Delibasi T, Salvatori R, Li Y, Barkan A, Suzaki N, Tauchmanova L, Ortmann CE, Ravichandran S, Petersenn S, Pivonello R. Long-acting pasireotide improves clinical signs and quality of life in Cushing's disease: results from a phase III study. J Endocrinol Invest. 2020 Nov;43(11):1613-1622. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01246-0. Epub 2020 May 8. PubMed 32385851 ↗
  • Newell-Price J, Pivonello R, Tabarin A, Fleseriu M, Witek P, Gadelha MR, Petersenn S, Tauchmanova L, Ravichandran S, Gupta P, Lacroix A, Biller BMK. Use of late-night salivary cortisol to monitor response to medical treatment in Cushing's disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2020 Feb;182(2):207-217. doi: 10.1530/EJE-19-0695. PubMed 31804965 ↗
  • Fleseriu M, Petersenn S, Biller BMK, Kadioglu P, De Block C, T'Sjoen G, Vantyghem MC, Tauchmanova L, Wojna J, Roughton M, Lacroix A, Newell-Price J. Long-term efficacy and safety of once-monthly pasireotide in Cushing's disease: A Phase III extension study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2019 Dec;91(6):776-785. doi: 10.1111/cen.14081. Epub 2019 Oct 1. PubMed 31465533 ↗
  • Lacroix A, Gu F, Gallardo W, Pivonello R, Yu Y, Witek P, Boscaro M, Salvatori R, Yamada M, Tauchmanova L, Roughton M, Ravichandran S, Petersenn S, Biller BMK, Newell-Price J; Pasireotide G2304 Study Group. Efficacy and safety of once-monthly pasireotide in Cushing's disease: a 12 month clinical trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Jan;6(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30326-1. Epub 2017 Oct 12. Erratum In: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Jan;6(1):e1. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30410-2. PubMed 29032078 ↗
  • Silverstein JM. Hyperglycemia induced by pasireotide in patients with Cushing's disease or acromegaly. Pituitary. 2016 Oct;19(5):536-43. doi: 10.1007/s11102-016-0734-1. PubMed 27405306 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2011 to primary completion in Dec 2016, 61 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2018, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 14, 2011
First posted
Jun 16, 2011
StartActual
Nov 4, 2011
Primary completionActual
Dec 21, 2016
CompletionActual
Dec 21, 2016
Results first posted
Apr 11, 2018
Last update
May 22, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 22, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01374906
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 16, 2011
Start date
Nov 4, 2011
Primary completion
Dec 21, 2016
Completion
Dec 21, 2016
Results posted
Apr 11, 2018
Last update
May 22, 2018

Study contacts

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
study director · Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion