ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01372098Updated Jun 9, 2015

Nurse-family Partnership (NFP) Curriculum Study

An interventional study of NFP + IPV intervention in Domestic Violence, sponsored by McMaster University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-06-09.

Sponsored by McMaster University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
492
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) intervention in the context of Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) program improves women's quality of life and reduces violence relative to the NFP alone using a cluster randomized controlled trial. Our hypothesis is that an IPV intervention can be designed that is acceptable to participants in the NFP, feasible to implement, and that this intervention will improve quality of life for women and reduce exposure to violence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Domestic Violence

Keywords

  • Domestic Violence
  • Spouse Abuse
03

In context

Lead sponsor

McMaster University is the lead sponsor of 738 studies on the registry; 125 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (43%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 16 years and older
  • NFP program participants (woman with first live birth and living in poverty)
  • English speaker

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- Woman who cannot communicate in English

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
492 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NFP + IPV intervention

    The protocol for number and timing of visits will be the same for both NFP+IPVI and Standard Care, as follows: weekly for the first four visits, every other week for the remainder of the pregnancy, every week for six weeks in the postpartum and every other week until the infant is 21 months old after which it is once a month for the last three months. We recognize that the intervention might prompt the nurse and mother to alter the regular visit schedule if IPV is present.

    Behavioral: NFP + IPV intervention

  • No intervention
    NFP (standard care)

    The NFP nurses currently receive some training regarding IPV, but it is minimal. Between intake and when the child is 3 months and 12 months old, there is a brief instruction that the nurse assess for IPV. If the client acknowledges current abuse when completing the Abuse Assessment Screen, the nurse should "assist her to evaluate threats to personal safety and make referrals as needed". There is a prompt to be mindful of client safety, and to make referrals as needed.

Interventions

  • BehavioralNFP + IPV intervention

    The intervention focuses on helping women stay safe in a relationship. Strategies for overcoming barriers to using and accessing community resources and services, and community agency interventions for women exposed to IPV is built into the intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in WHO Quality of Life-BREF at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-,12-, 18-, and 24-month postpartum

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Composite Abuse Scale (CAS)

    Validated 30-item research instrument that assesses exposure to physical, sexual and emotional abuse, harassment and combined severe abuse.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-,12-, 18-, and 24-month postpartum

  2. The Domestic Violence Survivor Assessment (DVSA)

    Based on Prochaska's Transtheoretical Model of Behaviour Change (also known as "stages of change") and was developed by Dienemann and colleagues to gain a better understanding of battered women's cognitive states during counseling.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-,12-, 18-, and 24-month postpartum

  3. PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    Depression measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-,12-, 18-, and 24-month postpartum

  4. SPAN (Startle, Physiological arousal, Anger and Numbness)

    Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-,12-, 18-, and 24-month postpartum

  5. The SF-12 (v. 2)

    Mental and Physical Health

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-,12-, 18-, and 24-month postpartum

  6. The TWEAK

    Screening tool for alcohol abuse/dependency.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-,12-, 18-, and 24-month postpartum

  7. Drug Abuse Screening Tool (DAST)

    Prescription and Street Drug Use.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-,12-, 18-, and 24-month postpartum

  8. The Intimate Partner Violence Strategies Index (IPV Strategies)

    Specific actions women take to cope with violence.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-, 6-,12-, 18-, and 24-month postpartum

  9. The Childhood Experiences of Violence Questionnaire Short Form (CEVQ-SF)

    Childhood maltreatment

    Time frame: 6-month postpartum

  10. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ)

    Childhood maltreatment.

    Time frame: 6-month postpartum

  11. A modified version of the Health and Social Service Utilization questionnaire

    Assessment of service utilization.

    Time frame: 6-,12-, 18-, and 24-month postpartum

  12. Child health outcomes

    Data regarding the following child health outcomes are gathered by maternal interview: 1) birth weight; 2) length of gestation; 3) injuries; 4) emergency department visits (including those that are injury-related); 5) hospitalizations; 6) immunizations; and 7) developmental delay.

    Time frame: Outcomes 1 and 2 are assessed at infant birth, 3 to 7 will be assessed at 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-month postpartum

  13. Child Protection Service records

    Number of reports made, cases of confirmed child maltreatment, the type of maltreatment, the duration that cases were open, and whether children were placed in foster care or in custody of another family member.

    Time frame: 24-month postpartum

  14. The Public Health Nurses' Responses to Women Who Are Abused

    Nurses' readiness to treat IPV. In the 20-item PHNR, nurses respond to one of two scenarios that resemble real-life experiences they would encounter in a postpartum home visit. The instrument measures nurses' thoughts, feeling and actions in response to identifying and responding to IPV. The PHNR has good internal consistency with an overall Cronbach alpha of 0.79.

    Time frame: Collected from nurses at baseline, 12 and 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • 600 S. Commonwealth Ave., #800
    Los Angeles, California 90005, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kalra N, Hooker L, Reisenhofer S, Di Tanna GL, Garcia-Moreno C. Training healthcare providers to respond to intimate partner violence against women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 31;5(5):CD012423. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012423.pub2. PubMed 34057734 ↗
  • Jack SM, Boyle M, McKee C, Ford-Gilboe M, Wathen CN, Scribano P, Davidov D, McNaughton D, O'Brien R, Johnston C, Gasbarro M, Tanaka M, Kimber M, Coben J, Olds DL, MacMillan HL. Effect of Addition of an Intimate Partner Violence Intervention to a Nurse Home Visitation Program on Maternal Quality of Life: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Apr 23;321(16):1576-1585. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3211. PubMed 31012933 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2011, a primary completion of May 2015 and a completion of May 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 9, 2011
First posted
Jun 13, 2011
Start
May 2011
Primary completionActual
May 2015
CompletionActual
May 2015
Last update
Jun 9, 2015
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01372098
Collaborators
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), Annie E. Casey Foundation
Responsible party
Harriet L. MacMillan (Professor of Pediatrics, McMaster University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 13, 2011
Start date
May 2011
Primary completion
May 2015
Completion
May 2015
Last update
Jun 9, 2015

Study contacts

Harriet MacMillan, MD
principal investigator · McMaster University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion