A Phase 2 interventional study of Prednisolone and dipyridamole in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by Zalicus. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-05-15.
Sponsored by Zalicus · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
Thus study will test an experimental drug called Z-102 (combination of prednisolone and dipyridamole) to treat patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis.
The primary objective of the study was to demonstrate the efficacy of Z102 (2.7 mg prednisolone/360 mg dipyridamole) versus placebo on the Disease Activity Score 28 using C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis at the study endpoint of 12 weeks
3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 294 is above the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.
Browse Arthritis studies →Zalicus is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Prednisolone 2.7 mg daily for 12 weeks
Drug: Prednisolone
Dipyridamole 360 mg daily for 12 weeks
Drug: dipyridamole
Prednisone 5 mg daily for 12 weeks
Drug: Prednisone
Prednisolone 2.7 mg plus dipyridamole 360 mg daily for 12 weeks
Drug: Z102
Placebo daily for 12 weeks
Other: placebo
Prednisolone 2.7 mg daily
dipyridamole 360 mg daily
Prednisone 5 mg daily
Prednisolone 2.7 mg plus dipyridamole 360 mg daily
Also known as: prednisolone, dipyridamole
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at 12 Weeks
The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in Disease Activity Score 28 using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) from baseline to Week 12. The DAS28-CRP is a composite measure of inflammation in Rheumatoid Arthritis and incorporates a tender and swollen joint count, CRP and Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity expressed in a Gaussian distribution of variables ranging from 0 to 10. A DAS28-CRP score of \<3.2 suggests a low level of disease activity, while a score of \>5.1 suggests a high level of disease activity. Using the DAS-CRP as a continuous scale allows investigators (and clinicians) to measure a clinically meaningful endpoint following institution of a therapeutic intervention. In RA, clinical remission would therefore be graded as a DAS28 score of ≤3.2 with disease flare accompanying scores of ≥5.1; well-controlled disease is best characterized as fitting in between these two scores.
Time frame: baseline to week 12
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP Individual Components at 12 Weeks
The mean change in the individual components of the Disease Activity Score 28 using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) from baseline to Week 12 which included individual assessment of Tender Joint Count (28-joint assessment), Swollen Joint Count (28-joint assessment), Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity and absolute CRP level. In each case, higher scores indicate more disease activity. The DAS28-CRP is a composite measure of inflammation in Rheumatoid Arthritis and incorporates a tender and swollen joint count, CRP and Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity expressed in a Gaussian distribution of variables ranging from 0 to 10. A DAS28-CRP score of \<3.2 suggests a low level of disease activity, while a score of \>5.1 suggests a high level of disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline to week 12
Percentage of Subjects Achieving ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 at 12 Weeks
The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 is a widely accepted composite index of improvement in RA proposed by the ACR (Fransen and van Riel 2009). ACR20 refers to a composite improvement of 20% in swollen joint count, tender joint count, and 3 or more of the following 5 measures:Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Patient Pain VAS, Patient's self-addressed disability (HAQ) (Arnet 1988 and Felson 1995), Acute-phase reactant (ESR or CRP) The ACR 50 and ACR 70 are similar tools, used to indicate 50% and 70% improvement, respectively.
Time frame: Week 12
Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) at Week 12
The Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) scale contains 16 items and measures four dimensions of fatigue: severity (#1-2), distress (#3), degree of interference in activities of daily living (#4-14), and timing (#15-16). Fourteen items contain numerical rating scales (#1-14) and two items have multiple-choice responses (#15-16). Respondents are asked to reflect on fatigue patterns for the past week. To calculate the Global Fatigue Index (GFI): Convert item #15 to a 0-10 scale by multiplying each score by 2.5 and then sum items #1, 2, 3, average #4-14, and newly scored item #15. Scores range from 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (severe fatigue). Do not assign a score to items #4-14 if respondent indicated they "do not do any activity for reasons other than fatigue." If respondents select no fatigue on item #1, assign a zero to items #2-16. Item #16 is not included in the Global Fatigue Index.
Time frame: week 12
Time to Failure (Days)
Patients will be monitored for addition of any DMARD or withdrawal due to flare. The time to failure is defined as the duration of study participation (in days) until a qualifying event or completion of study treatment, whichever comes first.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
| Milestone | Prednisolone | Dipyridamole | Prednisone | Z102 | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 32 | 41 | 18 | 84 | 83 |
| Completed | 25 | 28 | 16 | 64 | 65 |
| Not completed | 7 | 13 | 2 | 20 | 18 |
The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in Disease Activity Score 28 using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) from baseline to Week 12. The DAS28-CRP is a composite measure of inflammation in Rheumatoid Arthritis and incorporates a tender and swollen joint count, CRP and Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity expressed in a Gaussian distribution of variables ranging from 0 to 10. A DAS28-CRP score of \<3.2 suggests a low level of disease activity, while a score of \>5.1 suggests a high level of disease activity. Using the DAS-CRP as a continuous scale allows investigators (and clinicians) to measure a clinically meaningful endpoint following institution of a therapeutic intervention. In RA, clinical remission would therefore be graded as a DAS28 score of ≤3.2 with disease flare accompanying scores of ≥5.1; well-controlled disease is best characterized as fitting in between these two scores.
| units on a scale | Prednisolone | Dipyridamole | Prednisone | Z102 | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at 12 Weeks | -1.147 ± 0.235 | -0.813 ± 0.216 | -1.237 ± 0.296 | -0.907 ± 0.149 | -0.538 ± 0.153 |
The mean change in the individual components of the Disease Activity Score 28 using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) from baseline to Week 12 which included individual assessment of Tender Joint Count (28-joint assessment), Swollen Joint Count (28-joint assessment), Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity and absolute CRP level. In each case, higher scores indicate more disease activity. The DAS28-CRP is a composite measure of inflammation in Rheumatoid Arthritis and incorporates a tender and swollen joint count, CRP and Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity expressed in a Gaussian distribution of variables ranging from 0 to 10. A DAS28-CRP score of \<3.2 suggests a low level of disease activity, while a score of \>5.1 suggests a high level of disease activity.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 is a widely accepted composite index of improvement in RA proposed by the ACR (Fransen and van Riel 2009). ACR20 refers to a composite improvement of 20% in swollen joint count, tender joint count, and 3 or more of the following 5 measures:Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Patient Pain VAS, Patient's self-addressed disability (HAQ) (Arnet 1988 and Felson 1995), Acute-phase reactant (ESR or CRP) The ACR 50 and ACR 70 are similar tools, used to indicate 50% and 70% improvement, respectively.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
The Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) scale contains 16 items and measures four dimensions of fatigue: severity (#1-2), distress (#3), degree of interference in activities of daily living (#4-14), and timing (#15-16). Fourteen items contain numerical rating scales (#1-14) and two items have multiple-choice responses (#15-16). Respondents are asked to reflect on fatigue patterns for the past week. To calculate the Global Fatigue Index (GFI): Convert item #15 to a 0-10 scale by multiplying each score by 2.5 and then sum items #1, 2, 3, average #4-14, and newly scored item #15. Scores range from 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (severe fatigue). Do not assign a score to items #4-14 if respondent indicated they "do not do any activity for reasons other than fatigue." If respondents select no fatigue on item #1, assign a zero to items #2-16. Item #16 is not included in the Global Fatigue Index.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Patients will be monitored for addition of any DMARD or withdrawal due to flare. The time to failure is defined as the duration of study participation (in days) until a qualifying event or completion of study treatment, whichever comes first.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Collected over Adverse event data were collected from the time of consent through the end of study visit at 12 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prednisolone | — | 1/32 (3.1%) | 6/32 (18.8%) |
| Dipyridamole | — | 2/41 (4.9%) | 30/41 (73.2%) |
| Prednisone | — | 0/18 (0%) | 5/18 (27.8%) |
| Z102 | — | 5/84 (6%) | 38/84 (45.2%) |
| Placebo | — | 4/83 (4.8%) | 33/83 (39.8%) |
| Event | Prednisolone | Dipyridamole | Prednisone | Z102 | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oedema PeripheralGeneral disorders | 1/32 | 0/41 | 0/18 | 0/84 | 0/83 |
| Angina PectorisCardiac disorders | 0/32 | 1/41 | 0/18 | 0/84 | 0/83 |
| Calculus UretericRenal and urinary disorders | 0/32 | 1/41 | 0/18 | 0/84 | 0/83 |
| SciaticaNervous system disorders | 0/32 | 0/41 | 0/18 | 2/84 | 1/83 |
| Haemolytic AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 0/32 | 0/41 | 0/18 | 0/84 | 1/83 |
| Ureteric ObstructionRenal and urinary disorders | 0/32 | 0/41 | 0/18 | 0/84 | 1/83 |
| Deep Vein ThrombosisVascular disorders | 0/32 | 0/41 | 0/18 | 0/84 | 1/83 |
| Hip FractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 0/32 | 0/41 | 0/18 | 1/84 | 0/83 |
| Humerus FractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 0/32 | 0/41 | 0/18 | 1/84 | 0/83 |
| Rheumatoid ArthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 0/32 | 0/41 | 0/18 | 1/84 | 0/83 |
| Event | Prednisolone | Dipyridamole | Prednisone | Z102 | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HeadacheNervous system disorders | 1/32 | 11/41 | 0/18 | 13/84 | 4/83 |
| ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 1/32 | 3/41 | 1/18 | 5/84 | 8/83 |
| Rheumatoid ArthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 0/32 | 3/41 | 1/18 | 5/84 | 4/83 |
| Back PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 1/32 | 3/41 | 0/18 | 1/84 | 1/83 |
| Abdominal Upper PainGastrointestinal disorders | 1/32 | 3/41 | 0/18 | 1/84 | 1/83 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 0/32 | 2/41 | 1/18 | 3/84 | 1/83 |
| DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders | 0/32 | 1/41 | 1/18 | 2/84 | 1/83 |
| NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations | 1/32 | 1/41 | 1/18 | 1/84 | 4/83 |
| VertigoEar and labyrinth disorders | 0/32 | 2/41 | 0/18 | 1/84 | 0/83 |
| Oedema PeripheralGeneral disorders | 1/32 | 0/41 | 0/18 | 0/84 | 2/83 |
population randomized to double blind phase of study and recieved at least one dose of study drug
| Age, Continuous(years) | Prednisolone | Dipyridamole | Prednisone | Z102 | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 55.2 ± 12.69 | 55.9 ± 9.35 | 55.5 ± 9.82 | 54.5 ± 11.53 | 53.7 ± 12.44 | 54.6 ± 11.5 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Prednisolone | Dipyridamole | Prednisone | Z102 | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 26 | 36 | 17 | 72 | 75 | 226 |
| Male | 6 | 5 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 32 |
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Zalicus