CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01363895ISAR-AFUpdated Apr 11, 2017

Interventional Strategies in Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Catheter Ablation

An interventional study of Percutaneous closure of LAA and Catheter ablation of AF in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-11.

Sponsored by Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality1. The management of AF patients is aimed at reducing symptoms and at preventing severe complications associated with AF. In the last years, two new strategies have emerged with different objectives. In the PROTECT AF study2, percutaneous closure of the Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) with a closure device provided an alternative strategy to oral anticoagulation for stroke prophylaxis. The AFFIRM trial3 has shown that drug-based management of AF with a rhythm-control strategy conferred no advantage over a rate-control strategy in cardiovascular mortality and might be associated with an increased noncardiovascular death rate4. Catheter ablation has gained a greater place in the rhythm control strategy, showing superiority in maintaining sinus rhythm in comparison with AAD5. However, in persistent AF, repeat ablation procedures are necessary in up to 70% of patients to achieve sinus rhythm at a long-term follow-up6-7.

This prospective, randomized trial will compare the percutaneous closure of the LAA combined with a rate-control strategy to catheter ablation in the management of patients with persistent AF. Patients who are eligible for catheter ablation as well as LAA closure device implantation and are willing to participate in the study will be randomly assigned to catheter ablation or percutaneous closure of the LAA by a closure device implantation in the relation 1:1. The primary endpoint of the study is a composite endpoint at 12 months of all cause death, thrombo-embolic events, major bleeding (BARC type 3), re-hospitalisation and severe symptoms due to arrhythmias. Secondary endpoints include a composite endpoint of bleeding, a composite endpoint of thrombo-embolic events, cardio-vascular mortality, total duration of hospitalisation, sustained discontinued anticoagulation, quality of life improvement, use of Antiarrhythmic Drugs (AAD), total costs, freedom from arrhythmia and average ventricular frequency in 7-day holter ECG at 12 months.

The objective of the study is to assess the superiority of percutaneous closure of the LAA combined with rate-control to catheter ablation in patients with oligosymptomatic AF.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation
  • catheter ablation
  • percutaneous closure of LAA
  • intervention
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is below the median of 144 across 2,380 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen is the lead sponsor of 112 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with oligosymptomatic AF eligible for both interventions (CA and LAA closure device implantation).
  2. Written, informed consent by the patient or her/his legally-authorized representative for participation in the study.
  3. In women with childbearing potential a negative pregnancy test is mandatory.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Left atrial thrombus
  2. Other indication than AF for oral anticoagulation (valve prosthesis, pulmonary embolism, recurrent vein thrombosis)
  3. Contraindication for oral anticoagulation
  4. Severe valvular heart disease
  5. Severe left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction\<30%)
  6. Malignancies or other comorbid conditions (for example severe liver, renal and pancreatic disease) with life expectancy less than 12 months or that may result in protocol non-compliance.
  7. Pregnancy (present, suspected or planned) or positive pregnancy test.
  8. Patient's inability to fully cooperate with the study protocol.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Percutaneous closure of LAA

    Percutaneous closure of LAA

    Procedure: Percutaneous closure of LAA

  • Active comparator
    Catheter ablation of AF

    Catheter ablation of AF

    Procedure: Catheter ablation of AF

Interventions

  • ProcedurePercutaneous closure of LAA

    Percutaneous closure of LAA

  • ProcedureCatheter ablation of AF

    Catheter ablation of AF

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. A 12-month composite endpoint of all cause death, thrombo-embolic events, major bleeding BARC type III, re-hospitalisation and severe symptoms due to arrhythmias

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The individual components of the primary endpoint

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Discontinuation of anticoagulation

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Quality of Life

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Use of Antiarrhythmic Drugs

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. freedom from symptomatic arrhythmia

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Deutsches Herzzentrum München
    Munich, 80636, Germany
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 11, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01363895
Lead sponsor
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
First posted
Jun 2, 2011
Start date
Nov 2010
Primary completion
Nov 2012
Completion
Nov 2013
Last update
Apr 11, 2017

Study contacts

Albert Schömig, MD
study chair · Deutsches Herzzentrum München
Steffen Massberg, MD
principal investigator · Deutsches Herzzentrum München
Isabel Deisenhofer, MD
principal investigator · Deutsches Herzzentrum München
Sonia Ammar, MD
study director · Deutsches Herzentrum München
Julia Goedel, MD
study director · Deutsches Herzzentrum München

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion