CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01360853ONTRACUpdated Aug 4, 2016

Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na in Previously Untreated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

A Phase 3 interventional study of ON 01910.Na and Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, sponsored by Traws Pharma, Inc.. Completed at 46 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-08-04.

Sponsored by Traws Pharma, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The question being asked in this study is: Will patients with advanced pancreatic cancer live significantly longer if they are treated with a combination of Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na than if they are treated with Gemcitabine alone? There are two parts to this study. In the first part of the study, patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have received no prior chemotherapy for this disease will be assigned by chance either to the group that will be treated with both Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na (about 100 patients will be in this group) or, to the group that will be treated with Gemcitabine only (about 50 patients will be in this group). How long patients survive in the 2 groups will be compared. If it looks like there is no difference between the groups, the study will stop. If it looks like patients in the group that were treated with both Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na survive longer, the study will continue into a second part where more patients will be treated in order to confirm and better understand the findings of the first part of the study.

Read the detailed description

This will be a Phase III study with sample size recalculation after 100 events have occurred. The study will be open-label, randomized, controlled, multi-center and will be conducted at approximately 200 to 300 study sites (60 to 80 study sites in the first portion of the trial).

In the first portion of the study, a total of 150 patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have received no prior chemotherapy for this disease will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion to 1 of the 2 following treatment regimens:

  • Arm A: Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle + ON 01910.Na 1800 mg/m2 via 2 hr continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) infusions administered twice weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle (approximately 100 patients)
  • Arm B: Gemcitabine only, 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle (approximately 50 patients).

Patients will be stratified at entry using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (ECOG scores of 0 1 vs. ECOG scores of 2; patients with higher scores will not be enrolled).

Patients will remain on study until disease progression or death from any cause, whichever comes first. Moreover, after treatment discontinuation for any cause, all patients will be followed until death.

After 150 patients have been enrolled, accrual will pause and patients will be followed until 100 deaths have occurred. At that time, the Data Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) will oversee a formal interim analysis to compare overall survival (OS) between the 2 groups and may recommend early stopping for futility. If the study continues after interim analysis, then the randomization scheme will continue up to 364 patients or the newly-calculated sample size. The maximum number of enrolled patients will be 650. The number of clinical sites may be expanded up to approximately 200 to 300 centers.

Patients in the gemcitabine-only arm (Arm B) will not be allowed to cross over to the combined treatment arm (Arm A). In addition, no palliative radiotherapy will be allowed during the trial.

The primary analysis will compare OS in the ON 01910.Na + gemcitabine arm (Arm A) vs. gemcitabine-only arm (Arm B) once an appropriate number of events has been reached. There are 2 secondary efficacy outcomes: progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response.

Toxicity will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03. Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities and > Grade 2 non-hematologic toxicities will be monitored.

02

Conditions studied

  • Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Keywords

  • pancreatic cancer
  • gemcitabine
  • ON 01910.Na
  • rigosertib sodium
03

In context

Pancreatic Neoplasms

3,235 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms; 899 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 160 is above the median of 46 across 2,424 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms.

Browse Pancreatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Traws Pharma, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients at least 18 years old presenting with histopathologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas; metastatic disease is defined as disease which has spread beyond the peri-pancreatic lymph nodes.
  • Patients must have received no prior chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer, including adjuvant chemotherapy.
  • Measurable disease, defined as lesions that can be accurately measured in at least 1 dimension with longest diameter (LD) ≥20 mm using conventional techniques or ≥10 mm with spiral computed tomography (CT) scan; measurable lymph nodes must be ≥15 mm in the short axis.
  • ECOG Performance Status of 0, 1, or 2.
  • Patients must have adequate renal function and serum creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dL.
  • Patients must have adequate liver function as defined by total bilirubin ≤2.0 mg/dL and transaminase levels no higher than 3.0 times the institution's upper limit of normal (ULN). Patients with hepatic metastases may have transaminase levels of up to 5.0 times the ULN.
  • All patients must have a serum albumin ≥3.0 g/dL.
  • Patients must have adequate bone marrow (BM) function as defined by a granulocyte count ≥1,500/mm3, a platelet count ≥100,000/mm3, and hemoglobin >9 g/dL.
  • Disease-free period of more than 5 years from prior malignancies other than pancreas (except curatively treated basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma in situ of the cervix and ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS] breast disease).
  • Adequate contraceptive regimen (including prescription oral contraceptives [birth control pills], contraceptive injections, intrauterine device [IUD], double-barrier method [spermicidal jelly or foam with condoms or diaphragm], contraceptive patch, or surgical sterilization) before entry and throughout the study for female patients of reproductive potential or female partners of male patients.
  • Female patient with reproductive potential must have a negative urine beta human chorionic gonadotropin (bHCG) pregnancy test at Screening.
  • Willing to adhere to the prohibitions and restrictions specified in this protocol.
  • Patient must have signed an informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with unresectable locally advanced disease without evidence of disease elsewhere.
  • Life expectancy of less than 12 weeks.
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, uncontrolled hypertension or seizure disorder.
  • Active infection not adequately responding to appropriate therapy.
  • Symptomatic or clinically evident ascites.
  • Serum sodium less than 130 mEq/L or conditions that may predispose patients to hyponatremia.
  • Female patients who are pregnant or lactating.
  • Male patients with female sexual partners who are unwilling to follow the strict contraception requirements described in this protocol.
  • Major surgery without full recovery or major surgery within 3 weeks of ON 01910.Na treatment start.
  • Evidence of brain metastases.
  • Any concurrent administration and/or prior administration within 4 weeks of the first dose of study drug, of radiotherapy, or immunotherapy.
  • Psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit the patient's ability to tolerate and/or comply with study requirements, or inability to comply with study and/or follow-up procedures (e.g., drug addition, chronic non-compliance, etc.).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
160 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm A: Combination

    Arm A: Gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle, + ON 01910.Na, 1800 mg/m2 via 2 hr CIV infusions administered twice weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle.

    Drug: ON 01910.Na · Drug: Gemcitabine

  • Active comparator
    Arm B: Gemcitabine only

    Arm B: Gemcitabine only, 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle.

    Drug: Gemcitabine

Interventions

  • DrugON 01910.Na

    ON 01910.Na, 1800 mg/m2 via 2 hr CIV infusions administered twice weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle.

    Also known as: rigosertib sodium

  • DrugGemcitabine

    Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle.

    Also known as: Gemzar, Gemcitabine HCl

  • DrugGemcitabine

    Gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle.

    Also known as: Gemzar, Gemcitabine HCl

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Survival

    This study's primary outcome is overall survival, defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. All patients will be followed until death. Patients lost to follow-up will be censored at the time last known alive.

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-free survival

    Progression-free survival is defined as the time from the randomization to documented disease progression or death. Patients who are alive and do not have disease progression by the clinical cutoff will be censored at the dates of their last tumor evaluation. Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS will be compared using a stratified log-rank test (stratified by ECOG status: 0-1 vs. 2). Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals will be estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazards models.

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. Tumor size

    Objective tumor response rates using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST).

    Time frame: 18 months

  3. Safety/tolerability

    Toxicity will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.03

    Time frame: 18 months

  4. QOL questionnaire

    Quality of life (QOL) questionnaire, using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer(EORTC) QLQ-C30 version 3.

    Time frame: 18 months

  5. Biomarkers

    In this study, archival tissue will be collected and analyzed in order to identify molecular characteristics of pancreas tumors, which may confer susceptibility or resistance to gemcitabine alone or in combination with ON 01910.Na.

    Time frame: 18 months

  6. Population Pharmacokinetics

    Measurement of ON 01910.Na in plasma of all patients in Arm A 1 hour after starting ON 01910.Na infusion at Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 1 only.

    Time frame: 18 months

  7. Full Pharmacokinetics

    At a limited number of sites, blood samples for measurement of ON 01910.Na and gemcitabine will be obtained at Cycle 1 Day 1 only, in a subset of 10 patients in Arm A, at the following 12 time-points: predose; 15 min after starting gemcitabine infusion; 30 min, immediately before ending gemcitabine infusion; 15 min after starting ON 01910.Na infusion; 30 min after ON 01910.Na infusion start; immediately before ending ON 01910.Na infusion; and, 15 min, 30 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr and 8 hr after ending ON 01910.Na infusion.

    Time frame: 18 Months

07

Study locations

46 sites
  • UCSD Moores Cancer Center
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • Desert Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Palm Springs, California 92262, United States
  • Pacific Cancer Care
    Salinas, California 93901, United States
  • Premiere Oncology
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • University of Colorado Cancer Center
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Kaiser Permanente Colorado
    Denver, Colorado 80205, United States
  • Poudre Valley Cancer Center of the Rockies
    Fort Collins, Colorado 80528, United States
  • Yale Cancer Center
    New Haven, Connecticut 06519, United States
  • Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Miami Beach, Florida 33140, United States
  • University of Hawaii Cancer Center
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96813, United States
  • University of Kansas Cancer Center
    Westwood, Kansas 66205, United States
  • UMASS Medical School
    Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, United States
  • Karmanos Cancer Institute
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • Billings Clinic Cancer Center
    Billings, Montana 59101, United States
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
    Buffalo, New York 14263, United States
  • New York University Langone Medical Center
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • University of Rochester Medical Center
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Levine Cancer Institute
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28204, United States
  • Cone Health Cancer Center
    Greensboro, North Carolina 27403, United States
  • Hendersonville Hematology and Oncology at Pardee
    Hendersonville, North Carolina 28971, United States
  • Rex Cancer Center UNC Healthcare
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, United States
  • St. Alexis Medical Center-Mid Dakota Clinic PC
    Bismarck, North Dakota 58501, United States
  • University of Cincinnati Cancer Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, United States
  • Kaiser Permanente NW
    Portland, Oregon 97227, United States
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, United States
  • Medical University of South Carolina - Hollings Cancer Center
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • McLeod Regional Medical Center
    Florence, South Carolina 29506, United States
  • Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
    Seattle, Washington 98109, United States
  • Semmelweis University Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Oncotherapy
    Budapest, 1078, Hungary
  • Semmelweis University, 3rd Department of Internal Medicine
    Budapest, 1125, Hungary
  • Hetenyi Geza Hospital 5004, Szolnok, Hungary
    Szolnok, 5004, Hungary
  • Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital
    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500034, India
  • Regional Cancer Center
    Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695001, India
  • Jaslok Hospital & Research Centre
    Mumbai, Maharashtra 400026, India
  • Shatabdi Superspeciality Hospital
    Nashik, Maharashtra 422005, India
  • Ruby Hall Clinic
    Pune, Maharashtra 411001, India
  • Lifeline Multispeciality Hospitals
    Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600096, India
  • State Budget Medical Institution of the Arkhangelsk Region
    Arkhangelsk, 163045, Russian Federation
  • Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Oncology Center
    Chelyabinsk, 454087, Russian Federation
  • State Budget Medical Institution Clinical Oncology Center 1
    Krasnodar, 350040, Russian Federation
  • Budget Medical Institution of the Omsk Region: Clinical Oncology Center
    Omsk, 644013, Russian Federation
  • State Budget Medical Institution: Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital
    Saint Petersburg, 194291, Russian Federation
  • State Medical Institution: Tula Regional Oncology Center
    Tula, 300053, Russian Federation
  • Zakarpattia Regional Clinical Oncology Center Department of Chemotherapy
    Uzhhorod, 88014, Ukraine
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jimeno A, Chan A, Cusatis G, Zhang X, Wheelhouse J, Solomon A, Chan F, Zhao M, Cosenza SC, Ramana Reddy MV, Rudek MA, Kulesza P, Donehower RC, Reddy EP, Hidalgo M. Evaluation of the novel mitotic modulator ON 01910.Na in pancreatic cancer and preclinical development of an ex vivo predictive assay. Oncogene. 2009 Jan 29;28(4):610-8. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.424. Epub 2008 Nov 24. PubMed 19029951 ↗
  • Jimeno A, Li J, Messersmith WA, Laheru D, Rudek MA, Maniar M, Hidalgo M, Baker SD, Donehower RC. Phase I study of ON 01910.Na, a novel modulator of the Polo-like kinase 1 pathway, in adult patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 1;26(34):5504-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9788. Epub 2008 Oct 27. PubMed 18955447 ↗
  • O'Neil BH, Scott AJ, Ma WW, Cohen SJ, Aisner DL, Menter AR, Tejani MA, Cho JK, Granfortuna J, Coveler AL, Olowokure OO, Baranda JC, Cusnir M, Phillip P, Boles J, Nazemzadeh R, Rarick M, Cohen DJ, Radford J, Fehrenbacher L, Bajaj R, Bathini V, Fanta P, Berlin J, McRee AJ, Maguire R, Wilhelm F, Maniar M, Jimeno A, Gomes CL, Messersmith WA. A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1180. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw095. Epub 2016 Mar 3. No abstract available. PubMed 26945010 ↗
  • O'Neil BH, Scott AJ, Ma WW, Cohen SJ, Leichman L, Aisner DL, Menter AR, Tejani MA, Cho JK, Granfortuna J, Coveler L, Olowokure OO, Baranda JC, Cusnir M, Phillip P, Boles J, Nazemzadeh R, Rarick M, Cohen DJ, Radford J, Fehrenbacher L, Bajaj R, Bathini V, Fanta P, Berlin J, McRee AJ, Maguire R, Wilhelm F, Maniar M, Jimeno A, Gomes CL, Messersmith WA. A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015 Dec;26(12):2505. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv477. Epub 2015 Oct 21. No abstract available. PubMed 26489442 ↗
  • O'Neil BH, Scott AJ, Ma WW, Cohen SJ, Aisner DL, Menter AR, Tejani MA, Cho JK, Granfortuna J, Coveler L, Olowokure OO, Baranda JC, Cusnir M, Phillip P, Boles J, Nazemzadeh R, Rarick M, Cohen DJ, Radford J, Fehrenbacher L, Bajaj R, Bathini V, Fanta P, Berlin J, McRee AJ, Maguire R, Wilhelm F, Maniar M, Jimeno A, Gomes CL, Messersmith WA. A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1923-1929. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv264. Epub 2015 Jun 19. Erratum In: Ann Oncol. 2015 Dec;26(12):2505. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv477.. Leichman, L [added]. Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1180. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw095. PubMed 26091808 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 4, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01360853
Lead sponsor
Traws Pharma, Inc.
Collaborators
Academic GI Cancer Consortium (AGICC)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 26, 2011
Start date
May 2011
Primary completion
Jun 2015
Completion
Dec 2015
Last update
Aug 4, 2016

Study contacts

Wells Messersmith, MD
study chair · Anschutz Cancer Pavilion
Lawrence P. Leichman, MD
study chair · Academic Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancer Consortium
Antonio Jimeno, MD, PhD
study chair · Anschutz Cancer Pavilion

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion