A Phase 3 interventional study of HepavaxGene (thiomersal free) and Engerix B in Hepatitis B, sponsored by Crucell Holland BV. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged Up to 1 Day, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-03-04.
Sponsored by Crucell Holland BV (part of Johnson & Johnson) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention
The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether HepavaxGene TF is non-inferior to the comparator vaccine both at impeding hepatitis B transmission from mothers positive for chronic hepatitis B (Stratum 1) to their children and also in terms of seroconversion rate in children of mothers negative for chronic hepatitis B (Stratum 2) one month after completion of the immunization schedule.
1,662 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis B; 192 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 1,738 is above the median of 120 across 1,191 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis B.
Browse Hepatitis B studies →Crucell Holland BV is the lead sponsor of 37 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
First submitted after Crucell Holland BV became part of Johnson & Johnson.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Three types of subject:
Neonates whose mothers are positive for both HBsAg and HBeAg
Neonates whose mothers are positive for only HBsAg
Neonates whose mothers are negative for both HBsAg and HBeAg
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
Subjects of mothers with chronic hepatitis B (positive for both HBsAg and hepatitis B envelope antigen - HBeAg)
Biological: HepavaxGene (thiomersal free)
Subjects of mothers with chronic hepatitis B (positive for both HBsAg and HBeAg)
Biological: Engerix B
Subjects of mothers with chronic hepatitis B (positive for HBsAg only)
Biological: HepavaxGene (thiomersal free)
Subjects of mothers with chronic hepatitis B (positive for HBsAg only)
Biological: Engerix B
Subjects of mothers without chronic hepatitis B (negative for both HBsAg and HBeAg)
Biological: HepavaxGene (thiomersal free)
Subjects of mothers without chronic hepatitis B (negative for both HBsAg and HBeAg)
Biological: Engerix B
10 µg/0.5 mL, intramuscular injection on Day 1, Month 1, Month 6
10 µg/0.5 mL, intramuscular injection on Day 1, Month 1, Month 6
Seroconversion rate for subjects in Stratum 2
Hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) concentrations are measured from blood samples by standard enzyme linked immuno sorbent assay (ELISA) for subjects whose mothers are negative for chronic hepatitis B. Seroconversion rate is defined as HBsAb ≥10 mIU/mL.
Time frame: Month 7
Positivity for HBsAg for subjects in Stratum 1
The presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), as determined by ELISA, for subjects whose mothers are positive for chronic hepatitis B
Time frame: Month 2, Month 7 and Month 12
Seroconversion rate for subjects in Stratum 1
Seroconversion rate is defined as HBsAb concentrations from ELISA ≥10 mIU/mL
Time frame: Month 7
Solicited adverse events
Local adverse events: pain, erythema, swelling at the injection site Systemic adverse events: irritability, sleepiness, change in eating/breast feeding habits, crying, fever \[body temperature ≥38°C\]
Time frame: Days 1 to 4
Seroconversion rate for subjects in Stratum 1
Seroconversion rate is defined as HBsAb concentrations from ELISA ≥10 mIU/mL
Time frame: Month 12
Positivity for HBsAg for subjects in Stratum 2
Time frame: Months 2, 7 and 12
The record gives a start of May 2011, a primary completion of Nov 2012 and a completion of Nov 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.