CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01345162PTSM04APHPUpdated Jun 9, 2014Results posted

Assessment and Prevention of Acute Post-herniotomy Pain

A Phase 4 interventional study of Ketorolac postoperative and postoperative Patrol in Hernia, sponsored by Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia. Completed at 2 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-06-09.

Sponsored by Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is the assessment and management of Acute Post-herniotomy Pain using two different therapeutical protocols per os: ketorolac versus association of acetaminophene+tramadol.

Read the detailed description

Persistent post-herniotomy pain (PPP) affects everyday activities in 5-10% of patients. Even brief intervals of acute pain can induce long-term neuronal remodeling and sensitization, chronic pain and lasting psychological distress. Chronic pain may be caused by intense acute PPP, intraoperative nerve injury and/or ongoing inflammation or mesh response with subsequence damage to nerve structures. The aim of our study is to analyze analgesic efficacy, safety and prevention of persistent postsurgical pain of two different pharmacological strategies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hernia

Keywords

  • Herniotomy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia is the lead sponsor of 255 studies on the registry; 113 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females over 18 years, under 80 years, scheduled for elective herniotomy
  • Classification American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I: without systemic disease
  • Classification ASA II or III (mild systemic disease or severe systemic disease that limits the activity without invalidity).
  • Patients with hernia typ 2, 3a, 3b (classification NYHUS (1993))
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA III, IV
  • Emergency surgery
  • Recovery in intensive care unit after surgery
  • habitual opioid consumption
  • NSADs allergy
  • cognitive or mental alterations
  • coagulopathy
  • piastrinemia \< 100.000/mm3
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    ketorolac

    Patients will be given intraoperative analgesia with Ketorolac and tramadol before the the end of surgery, then Ketorolac postoperative 10mg 1cp x 3/die, from the day of surgery for 4 days after surgery.

    Drug: Ketorolac postoperative · Drug: intraoperative analgesia

  • Other
    acetaminophene+tramadol

    Patients will be given intraoperative analgesia with Ketorolac and tramadol before the the end of surgery, then postoperative Patrol (acetaminophene 325mg+tramadol 37,5mg) 1cp x 3/die for 4 days after surgery.

    Drug: postoperative Patrol · Drug: intraoperative analgesia

Interventions

  • DrugKetorolac postoperative

    Ketorolac 10mg 1cp x 3/die

    Also known as: Toradol

  • Drugpostoperative Patrol

    acetaminophene 325mg+tramadol 37.5mg, 1cp x 3/die

    Also known as: Patrol

  • Drugintraoperative analgesia

    ketorolac 30 mg iv

    Also known as: Ketorolac

  • Drugintraoperative analgesia

    Tramadol 100 mg if Weight over 50 kg, 50 mg if weight below 50 kg

    Also known as: Tramadol

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Analgesic Efficacy

    percentage of patients with NRS≥4. (NRS=numeric rating scale; o quantify pain from0=no pain to 10=worst pain possible). NRS≥4 is cosidered as suboptimal pain control worth to be treated with adjunctive analgesics. We therefore condidered the difference in percentage of patients experiencing not optimal pain control in the two groups to understand, if any, the difference in analgesic efficacy between the two drugs.

    Time frame: 4 days postherniotomy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    All adverse events (eg: PONV (postoperative nausea and vomiting), itching, dizziness, epigastralgia) are recorded. Assessment of any difference between the two groups.

    Time frame: 4 days postherniotoy

  2. Difference in Recovering Daily Activity

    Assessment of the difference in recovering daily activity in terms of NRSm (Numeric Rate Scale at movement)

    Time frame: 4 days after surgical procedure

  3. Assessment of Any Connections Between the Two Therapeutical Strategies and the Recurrence of Surgical Complications

    Assessment of the recurrence of surgical complications. Evaluation of all the patients after 5 days by clinical evaluation. After 1 and 3 month in the patients who refer pain. Assessment of any difference between the two groups.

    Time frame: 4 days postherniotomy

  4. Development of Persistent Postoperative Pain

    Assessment of pain prevalence and presentation of persistant postoperative pain. Evaluation of all the patients after 1 and 3 months by phone call and with clinical re-evaluation in all patients who referred pain.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

07

Results

Posted Jun 9, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneKetorolacAcetaminophene + Tramadol
Started100100
Completed9896
Not completed24
Withdrew: Protocol violation24

Outcome measures

PrimaryAnalgesic Efficacy

percentage of patients with NRS≥4. (NRS=numeric rating scale; o quantify pain from0=no pain to 10=worst pain possible). NRS≥4 is cosidered as suboptimal pain control worth to be treated with adjunctive analgesics. We therefore condidered the difference in percentage of patients experiencing not optimal pain control in the two groups to understand, if any, the difference in analgesic efficacy between the two drugs.

Time frame:
4 days postherniotomy
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients with NRS≥4
Analgesic Efficacy
percentage of patients with NRS≥4KetorolacAcetaminophene + Tramadol
Analgesic Efficacy26.532.3
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

All adverse events (eg: PONV (postoperative nausea and vomiting), itching, dizziness, epigastralgia) are recorded. Assessment of any difference between the two groups.

Time frame:
4 days postherniotoy

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryDifference in Recovering Daily Activity

Assessment of the difference in recovering daily activity in terms of NRSm (Numeric Rate Scale at movement)

Time frame:
4 days after surgical procedure

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryAssessment of Any Connections Between the Two Therapeutical Strategies and the Recurrence of Surgical Complications

Assessment of the recurrence of surgical complications. Evaluation of all the patients after 5 days by clinical evaluation. After 1 and 3 month in the patients who refer pain. Assessment of any difference between the two groups.

Time frame:
4 days postherniotomy

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryDevelopment of Persistent Postoperative Pain

Assessment of pain prevalence and presentation of persistant postoperative pain. Evaluation of all the patients after 1 and 3 months by phone call and with clinical re-evaluation in all patients who referred pain.

Time frame:
Up to 3 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over 3 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Ketorolac—0/98 (0%)6/98 (6.1%)
Acetaminophene + Tramadol—0/96 (0%)12/96 (12.5%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventKetorolacAcetaminophene + Tramadol
stipsisGastrointestinal disorders5/989/96
vertigo headache parestesiaNervous system disorders2/985/96
reactive hydroceleRenal and urinary disorders1/981/96
bleedingBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/980/96
hypotensionCardiac disorders1/980/96
dyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/980/96

Baseline characteristics

patients enrolled who completed the evaluations

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)KetorolacAcetaminophene + TramadolTotal
Mean56.6 ± 14.656.6 ± 1556.6 ± 14.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)KetorolacAcetaminophene + TramadolTotal
Female5914
Male9387180
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
    Pavia, Lomabardy 27100, Italy
  • Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi
    Varese, Lombardy 21100, Italy
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Bugada D, Lavand'homme P, Ambrosoli AL, Klersy C, Braschi A, Fanelli G, Saccani Jotti GM, Allegri M; SIMPAR group. Effect of postoperative analgesia on acute and persistent postherniotomy pain: a randomized study. J Clin Anesth. 2015 Dec;27(8):658-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Aug 30. PubMed 26329661 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01345162
Lead sponsor
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia
Collaborators
University of Pavia
Responsible party
Massimo Allegri (MD, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 29, 2011
Start date
Mar 2010
Primary completion
May 2012
Completion
May 2012
Results posted
Jun 9, 2014
Last update
Jun 9, 2014

Study contacts

Fabrizio Cavalloro, MD
principal investigator · IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion