CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01343251Updated Sep 8, 2017Results posted

HeRO Graft Compared to Permanent Catheters for End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Patients Receiving Hemodialysis

An observational study in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), sponsored by Merit Medical Systems, Inc.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-08.

Sponsored by Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
33
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of this research study was to compare the following outcomes between patients with a Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) Graft and patients with a cuffed catheter for dialysis access over one year: quality of life and incidence of bacteremia, vascular interventions, hospitalizations, and death.

Read the detailed description

All eligible participants who provided informed consent were included in the study. Participants who refused HeRO Graft implantation, or did not have the HeRO Graft implanted for any other reason, were followed in the control group. Several patients did not receive the HeRO graft due to anatomical challenges and failure to complete both steps of the two-stage implant procedure. All consented participants who had an implanted HeRO Graft were followed in the study group. All participants were followed until the study end, withdrawal, loss to follow-up, or death. The analysis included only HeRO Graft patients and control patients who were not lost to follow-up; patients who were lost to follow-up, before data collection, were excluded from analysis.

After obtaining Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, baseline demographic and clinical data was collected. Following surgery, implant procedure data was collected on study participants who received HeRO Grafts. HeRO Grafts were placed using a 2-step process with initial placement of the ePTFE portion, followed by completion of the graft by placement of the venous outflow component. Following enrollment, outcomes of interest were collected at follow-up visits scheduled weekly for 4 weeks, bi-weekly for 3 months, and monthly to 1 year, for a total of 18 follow-up visits. Study coordinators documented post-operative complications, incidence of thrombosis, hospitalizations, infection incidents, and deaths at each follow-up.

Quality of life data were also collected from all participants using the RAND Corporation's Short Form (36) (SF-36) Health Survey. This survey was completed at enrollment and again at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)

Keywords

  • dialysis
  • HeRO graft
  • catheter
  • chronic renal failure
  • end stage renal disease
  • renal insufficiency
03

In context

Kidney Diseases

3,840 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Diseases; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 33 is below the median of 192 across 1,033 observational studies indexed under Kidney Diseases.

Browse Kidney Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Merit Medical Systems, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants with ESRD requiring permanent cuffed catheters were targeted. Participants who had not exhausted peripheral venous access sites suitable for fistulas and grafts were excluded.

Inclusion criteria

  • ESRD patients requiring hemodialysis
  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Able to participate in quality of life survey
  • All patients who are not candidate for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG)
  • Life expectancy 2 years or greater
  • Willing and able to participate with follow-up examinations

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding females
  • Disorder that compromises the ability to give informed consent and/or comply with the study procedures
  • Any medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator may pose a safety risk to a subject in the study or which may interfere with the study participation
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
33 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • HeRO Graft

    patients who are evaluated and receive a HeRO Graft implant for hemodialysis

  • Control

    control group of non-HeRO patients who are evaluated but do not receive a HeRO Graft for any reason

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Compare mortality rate between study arms

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Infection Rate (Percentage of Participants With at Least One Infection)

    Compare incidence of infection between study arms

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Quality of Life

    Compare the RAND Short Form (SF)-36 Health Survey, Total Test Scores at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months between study arms. Total test scores range on a scale from 0-100, with the lower the score equating to more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health. The total score is calculated using a methodology described by the RAND Corporation, which assigns a recoded value to each survey item. Recoded items are averaged amongst scales and the total score is an average of the eight sections. (http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/www/external/health/surveys_tools/mos/mos_core_36item_scoring.pdf).

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Intervention Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Required at Least One Intervention While on Study)

    Compare vascular intervention rates between study arms. The vascular interventions which were included were: Angioplasty, Thrombectomy, Arteriovenous (AV) Fistulogram/Diagnostic Angiogram, Banding, Access Removal, Access Exchange, Access Revision, Creation of New Access, and any combination of these interventions which were performed simultaneously.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Hospitalization Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Were Hospitalized at Least Once While on Study)

    Compare incidence of hospitalization (for any reason) between study arms. Reasons for hospitalizations included: infection, cardiac problems, bleeding, vascular access thrombosis, fall (injury), hematuria, fluid overload, peripheral neuropathy, pulmonary embolism, edema, and shortness of breath.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Results

Posted Mar 14, 2016
Limitations and caveats
Target sample size (statistical power) was not achieved. Catheter reduction and fistula first policies limited recruitment. Additionally, study patients were not blind to exposure and this knowledge may have had an impact on QoL measurement.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHeRO GraftControl
Started1617
Completed1617
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryMortality

Compare mortality rate between study arms

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants who died
Mortality
percentage of participants who diedHeRO GraftControl
Mortality18.829.4
Statistical analysis
  • HeRO Graft vs Control · Chi-squared · p = 0.48
SecondaryInfection Rate (Percentage of Participants With at Least One Infection)

Compare incidence of infection between study arms

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Patients
Infection Rate (Percentage of Participants With at Least One Infection)
Percentage of PatientsHeRO GraftControl
Infection Rate (Percentage of Participants With at Least One Infection)25.064.7
Statistical analysis
  • HeRO Graft vs Control · Chi-squared · p = 0.02
SecondaryQuality of Life

Compare the RAND Short Form (SF)-36 Health Survey, Total Test Scores at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months between study arms. Total test scores range on a scale from 0-100, with the lower the score equating to more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health. The total score is calculated using a methodology described by the RAND Corporation, which assigns a recoded value to each survey item. Recoded items are averaged amongst scales and the total score is an average of the eight sections. (http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/www/external/health/surveys_tools/mos/mos_core_36item_scoring.pdf).

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Quality of Life
units on a scaleHeRO GraftControl
Test 1 (Baseline)58.06 ± 25.4951.30 ± 28.78
Test 2 (3 Months)56.30 ± 23.7855.22 ± 22.40
Test 3 (6 Months)58.44 ± 22.0853.53 ± 23.49
Test 4 (12 Months)60.41 ± 18.0620.14 ± 4.67
Statistical analysis
  • HeRO Graft vs Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.49 (SF-36 Test 1 Total Score)
  • HeRO Graft vs Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.91 (SF-36 Test 2 Total Score)
  • HeRO Graft vs Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.67 (SF-36 Test 3 Total Score)
  • HeRO Graft vs Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.001 (SF-36 Test 4 Total Score)
SecondaryIntervention Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Required at Least One Intervention While on Study)

Compare vascular intervention rates between study arms. The vascular interventions which were included were: Angioplasty, Thrombectomy, Arteriovenous (AV) Fistulogram/Diagnostic Angiogram, Banding, Access Removal, Access Exchange, Access Revision, Creation of New Access, and any combination of these interventions which were performed simultaneously.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Intervention Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Required at Least One Intervention While on Study)
percentage of participantsHeRO GraftControl
Intervention Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Required at Least One Intervention While on Study)93.864.7
Statistical analysis
  • HeRO Graft vs Control · Chi-squared · p = 0.04
SecondaryHospitalization Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Were Hospitalized at Least Once While on Study)

Compare incidence of hospitalization (for any reason) between study arms. Reasons for hospitalizations included: infection, cardiac problems, bleeding, vascular access thrombosis, fall (injury), hematuria, fluid overload, peripheral neuropathy, pulmonary embolism, edema, and shortness of breath.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients
Hospitalization Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Were Hospitalized at Least Once While on Study)
Percentage of patientsHeRO GraftControl
Hospitalization Rate (Percentage of Participants Who Were Hospitalized at Least Once While on Study)62.564.7
Statistical analysis
  • HeRO Graft vs Control · Chi-squared · p = 0.90

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
HeRO Graft—16/16 (100%)0/16 (0%)
Control—15/17 (88.2%)0/17 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 25
Most frequent serious events
EventHeRO GraftControl
Intervention to Restore PatencyVascular disorders12/164/17
InfectionInfections and infestations6/1612/17
Access ExchangeVascular disorders1/164/17
Death-Unknown CauseGeneral disorders3/163/17
Access CreationVascular disorders0/163/17
BleedingBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/160/17
Access ExplantVascular disorders2/160/17
PseudoaneurysmVascular disorders2/160/17
Congestive Heart FailureCardiac disorders0/162/17
Pulmonary EmbolismBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/160/17

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)HeRO GraftControlTotal
Mean56.69 ± 11.0863.12 ± 11.4960.00 ± 11.38
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)HeRO GraftControlTotal
Female91221
Male7512
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)HeRO GraftControlTotal
United States161733
08

Study locations

1 site
  • St. Clair Specialty Physicians
    Detroit, Michigan 48236, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ethier J, Mendelssohn DC, Elder SJ, Hasegawa T, Akizawa T, Akiba T, Canaud BJ, Pisoni RL. Vascular access use and outcomes: an international perspective from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Oct;23(10):3219-26. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn261. Epub 2008 May 29. Erratum In: Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Dec;23(12):4088. PubMed 18511606 ↗
  • Foley RN, Chen SC, Collins AJ. Hemodialysis access at initiation in the United States, 2005 to 2007: still "catheter first". Hemodial Int. 2009 Oct;13(4):533-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2009.00396.x. Epub 2009 Sep 16. PubMed 19758304 ↗
  • Mokrzycki MH, Zhang M, Cohen H, Golestaneh L, Laut JM, Rosenberg SO. Tunnelled haemodialysis catheter bacteraemia: risk factors for bacteraemia recurrence, infectious complications and mortality. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Apr;21(4):1024-31. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfi104. Epub 2006 Jan 31. PubMed 16449293 ↗
  • Katzman HE, McLafferty RB, Ross JR, Glickman MH, Peden EK, Lawson JH. Initial experience and outcome of a new hemodialysis access device for catheter-dependent patients. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Sep;50(3):600-7, 607.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.04.014. Epub 2009 Jul 22. PubMed 19628360 ↗
  • Hakim RM, Himmelfarb J. Hemodialysis access failure: a call to action--revisited. Kidney Int. 2009 Nov;76(10):1040-8. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.318. Epub 2009 Aug 26. PubMed 19710629 ↗
  • Pisoni RL, Young EW, Dykstra DM, Greenwood RN, Hecking E, Gillespie B, Wolfe RA, Goodkin DA, Held PJ. Vascular access use in Europe and the United States: results from the DOPPS. Kidney Int. 2002 Jan;61(1):305-16. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00117.x. PubMed 11786113 ↗
  • Surratt RS, Picus D, Hicks ME, Darcy MD, Kleinhoffer M, Jendrisak M. The importance of preoperative evaluation of the subclavian vein in dialysis access planning. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Mar;156(3):623-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.156.3.1781814. PubMed 1781814 ↗
  • Bohlke M, Uliano G, Barcellos FC. Hemodialysis catheter-related infection: prophylaxis, diagnosis and treatment. J Vasc Access. 2015 Sep-Oct;16(5):347-55. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000368. Epub 2015 Apr 20. PubMed 25907773 ↗
  • Yoon WJ, Lorelli DR. Avoiding the use of a femoral bridging catheter using a two-stage Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) graft implantation technique. J Vasc Access. 2015 May-Jun;16(3):189-94. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000325. Epub 2015 Jan 20. PubMed 25613143 ↗
  • Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83. PubMed 1593914 ↗
  • Gage SM, Katzman HE, Ross JR, Hohmann SE, Sharpe CA, Butterly DW, Lawson JH. Multi-center experience of 164 consecutive Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow [HeRO] graft implants for hemodialysis treatment. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Jul;44(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 May 12. PubMed 22580402 ↗
  • Tonnessen BH, Money SR. Embracing the fistula first national vascular access improvement initiative. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Sep;42(3):585-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.030. No abstract available. PubMed 16171614 ↗
  • Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):759-69. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759. PubMed 18474969 ↗
  • Dageforde LA, Bream PR, Moore DE. Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) device in end-stage dialysis access: a decision analysis model. J Surg Res. 2012 Sep;177(1):165-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.04.041. Epub 2012 May 9. PubMed 22608835 ↗
  • Ware JE, Kosinski M, Gandek. SF-36 Health Survey Manual & Interpretation Guide. Lincoln RI, Quality Metric Incorporated, 2000, pp. 10-14

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01343251
Lead sponsor
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
Collaborators
CryoLife, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 28, 2011
Start date
Jan 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2013
Completion
Dec 2013
Results posted
Mar 14, 2016
Last update
Sep 8, 2017

Study contacts

Robert Provenzano, MD
principal investigator · St. Clair Specialty Physicians

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion