CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01332266Updated Jan 3, 2022Results posted

E7050 in Combination With Cetuximab Versus Cetuximab Alone in the Treatment of Platinum-Resistant Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of E7050 and Cetuximab in Platinum-Resistant Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck, sponsored by Eisai Inc.. Completed at 23 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-03.

Sponsored by Eisai Inc. · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
95
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether participants with platinum-resistant squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who receive either E7050 administered with cetuximab or cetuximab alone experience greater benefit.

Read the detailed description

This open-label, multicenter, randomized study will consist of a Phase 1b: a safety run-in period with 3 ascending doses of E7050 in combination with cetuximab; and a Phase 2 portion: a randomized 2-arm period. Approximately 95 participants with platinum-resistant squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck will be enrolled in the study (10-15 participants in the Phase 1b portion and 80 participants in the Phase 2 portion). Participants will only participate in either the Phase 1b or the Phase 2 portion of the study.

In the Phase 2 portion, participants will receive study treatment (E7050 plus cetuximab or cetuximab alone) for approximately six 28-day cycles (24 weeks). Beyond 24 weeks, participants who are experiencing clinical benefit may continue E7050 plus cetuximab, cetuximab alone or E7050 alone (Arm 1), or may continue cetuximab alone (Arm 2), depending on the original randomization treatment arm, for as long as clinical benefit is sustained and the treatment is well tolerated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Platinum-Resistant Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • head and neck
  • squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
  • phase 1b
  • phase 2
03

In context

Carcinoma

6,738 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,159 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 95 is above the median of 45 across 5,167 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.

Browse Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Eisai Inc. is the lead sponsor of 361 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Of its 81 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 54 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Platinum-resistant (defined as failure to respond to treatment with a platinum agent or recurrence of disease after initial response to platinum within 12 months of completing therapy), locally advanced, recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN, which is untreatable by surgical resection or radiation therapy
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 0-2
  • Blood pressure must be well-controlled. Participants must have no history of hypertensive crisis or hypertensive encephalopathy; Adequate end organ function

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Nasopharyngeal tumors
  • Previously received E7050, anti-angiogenic therapy, or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy (prior anti-angiogenic/EGFR therapy is permitted in Phase 1b only. Prior cetuximab is permitted if administered in combination with radiation
  • Presence of brain metastases, unless the participant has received adequate treatment at least 4 weeks prior to randomization, and is stable, asymptomatic, and off steroids for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization
  • Palliative radiotherapy is not permitted throughout the study period
  • Clinically significant hemoptysis
  • Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or active bone fracture
  • Major surgical procedure, open biopsy or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to Day 1, or anticipation of need for a major surgical procedure during the course of the study
  • Clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 6 months prior to first dose.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
95 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active Comparator; Phase 1b: Cohort 1,2,and 3

    Phase 1b: Cohort 1; 200 mg E7050 + 250 mg/m2 cetuximab Cohort 2; 300 mg E7050 + 250 mg/m2 cetuximab Cohort 3; 400mg E7050 + 250mg/m2 cetuximab Phase 2: Arm 1; MTD E7050 + 250 mg cetuximab Arm 2; 250 mg cetuximab Interventions: Drug cetuximab

    Drug: E7050 · Drug: Cetuximab

  • Active comparator
    Phase 2

    Phase 2: Arm 1; MTD E7050 + 250 mg/m2 cetuximab Arm 2; 250 mg/m2 cetuximab

    Drug: E7050 · Drug: Cetuximab

Interventions

  • DrugE7050

    E7050 given orally at 200, 300, or 400 mg once daily.

    Also known as: Golvatinib

  • DrugCetuximab

    Cetuximab is given at an initial dose of 400 mg/m2 given as a 2-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by a dose of 250 mg/m2 given as a 1-hour IV infusion on Day 8, Day 15, and Day 22 of Cycle 1, and Day 1, Day 8, Day 15, and Day 22 of each subsequent cycle.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs) as Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0)

    DLT:adverse events graded as NCI CTCAEv4.0 occurring less than or equal to(\<=)28 days after treatment.Events as: Non-hematological: 1)Grade greater than or equal to(\>=)3 peripheral neuropathy; 2)Grade 3 fatigue or 2 point decline in eastern cooperative oncology group performance status that persisted for greater than(\>)7 days; 3)Grade \>=3 nausea,vomiting despite optimal antiemetic treatment; 4)Any nonhematologic toxicity of Grade \>=3, with exceptions as alopecia,single laboratory values out of normal range,hypersensitivity reaction. Hematological 1)Grade 4 neutropenia lasting \>7 days; 2)Febrile neutropenia as fever \>=38.5 degree celsius with absolute neutrophil count less than(\<)1.0\*10\^9 per liter(/L); 3)Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with nontraumatic bleeding requiring platelet transfusion; 4)Grade 4 thrombocytopenia with/without nontraumatic bleeding. Other 1)Study drug related death; 2)Toxicity that dose escalation committee believed to be DLT that was not covered by above DLT criteria.

    Time frame: Cycle 1 (Cycle length is equal to [=] 28 days)

  2. Phase 1b: Plasma Concentration of Golvatinib When Given in Combination With Cetuximab

    Time frame: Cycle 1: 0-48 hours post-dose (Each cycle=28 days)

  3. Phase 2: Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    TEAEs are defined as an adverse event that has an onset date, or a worsening in severity from baseline (pre-golvatinib), on or after the first dose of golvatinib. The severity was graded according to CTCAE v4.0. Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL). Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to adverse event.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years 11 months

  4. Phase 2: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Vital Sign Values

    Time frame: Up to 4 years 4 months

  5. Phase 2: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings

    Physical examination was performed and included evaluation of 1) General appearance, 2) Head; Eyes; Ears; Nose; Throat (HEENT), 3) Neck, 4) Heart, 5) Chest (Including Lungs), 6) Abdomen, 7) Extremities, 8) Skin, 9) Lymph Nodes, and 10) neurological status. Here, number of participants with markedly abnormal physical examinations were reported.

    Time frame: Up to 4 years 4 months

  6. Phase 2: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values

    Time frame: Up to 4 years 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Phase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the earlier of the following two events: the date of PD or the date of death based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumor (RECIST) v1.1. PD is defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase or 5 millimeter (mm) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS was estimated and analyzed using Kaplan Meier method. As planned, data for this endpoint was analyzed and collected till primary completion date.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization until the earlier of the following two events: the date of PD or the date of death (Up to approximately 4 years 4 months)

  2. Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With PFS at Week 12

    PFS rate at week 12 is defined as the percentage of participants who were still alive without disease progression at 12 weeks from the date of randomization. PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the earlier of the following two events: the date of PD or the date of death based on RECIST v1.1. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase or 5 mm increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS rate was estimated and analyzed using Kaplan Meier method.

    Time frame: At Week 12

  3. Phase 2: Time to Progression (TTP)

    TTP is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of PD based on RECIST v1.1. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase or 5 mm increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. TTP was estimated and analyzed using Kaplan Meier method. As planned, data for this endpoint was analyzed and collected till primary completion date.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of PD (Up to approximately 4 years 4 months)

  4. Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)

    OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death. OS was analyzed using Kaplan Meier method. As planned, data for this endpoint was analyzed and collected till primary completion date.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of death (Up to approximately 4 years 4 months)

  5. Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response

    Overall response rate is defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on RECIST v1.1. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to \<10 mm. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. As planned, data for this endpoint was analyzed and collected till primary completion date.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization until CR or PR (Up to approximately 4 years 4 months)

07

Results

Posted Jan 3, 2022
Limitations and caveats
No pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted in this study due to incomplete pharmacokinetic sample bioanalysis due to unresolved queries leading to inadequate calculations and limited data interpretability.

Participant flow

Participants took part in the study at 28 investigative sites in the Republic of Korea, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and the United States from 19 September 2011 to 04 September 2017.

Phase 1b
Participant flow — Phase 1b
MilestonePhase 1b: Cohort 1: Golvatinib 200 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 2: Golvatinib 300 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 3: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2
Started45300
Completed00000
Not completed45300
Withdrew: Death33200
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11100
Phase 2
Participant flow — Phase 2
MilestonePhase 1b: Cohort 1: Golvatinib 200 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 2: Golvatinib 300 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 3: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2
Started0004241
Completed00000
Not completed0004241
Withdrew: Death0003336
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up00020
Withdrew: Physician decision00031
Withdrew: Symptomatic deterioration00001
Withdrew: Progression disease00021
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject00022

Outcome measures

PrimaryPhase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs) as Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0)

DLT:adverse events graded as NCI CTCAEv4.0 occurring less than or equal to(\<=)28 days after treatment.Events as: Non-hematological: 1)Grade greater than or equal to(\>=)3 peripheral neuropathy; 2)Grade 3 fatigue or 2 point decline in eastern cooperative oncology group performance status that persisted for greater than(\>)7 days; 3)Grade \>=3 nausea,vomiting despite optimal antiemetic treatment; 4)Any nonhematologic toxicity of Grade \>=3, with exceptions as alopecia,single laboratory values out of normal range,hypersensitivity reaction. Hematological 1)Grade 4 neutropenia lasting \>7 days; 2)Febrile neutropenia as fever \>=38.5 degree celsius with absolute neutrophil count less than(\<)1.0\*10\^9 per liter(/L); 3)Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with nontraumatic bleeding requiring platelet transfusion; 4)Grade 4 thrombocytopenia with/without nontraumatic bleeding. Other 1)Study drug related death; 2)Toxicity that dose escalation committee believed to be DLT that was not covered by above DLT criteria.

Time frame:
Cycle 1 (Cycle length is equal to [=] 28 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs) as Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0)
ParticipantsPhase 1b: Cohort 1: Golvatinib 200 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 2: Golvatinib 300 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 3: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2
Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs) as Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0)000
PrimaryPhase 1b: Plasma Concentration of Golvatinib When Given in Combination With Cetuximab
Time frame:
Cycle 1: 0-48 hours post-dose (Each cycle=28 days)

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryPhase 2: Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

TEAEs are defined as an adverse event that has an onset date, or a worsening in severity from baseline (pre-golvatinib), on or after the first dose of golvatinib. The severity was graded according to CTCAE v4.0. Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL). Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to adverse event.

Time frame:
Up to 5 years 11 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Phase 2: Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsPhase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2
Phase 2: Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)2121
PrimaryPhase 2: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Vital Sign Values
Time frame:
Up to 4 years 4 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Phase 2: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Vital Sign Values
ParticipantsPhase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2
Phase 2: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Vital Sign Values00
PrimaryPhase 2: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings

Physical examination was performed and included evaluation of 1) General appearance, 2) Head; Eyes; Ears; Nose; Throat (HEENT), 3) Neck, 4) Heart, 5) Chest (Including Lungs), 6) Abdomen, 7) Extremities, 8) Skin, 9) Lymph Nodes, and 10) neurological status. Here, number of participants with markedly abnormal physical examinations were reported.

Time frame:
Up to 4 years 4 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Phase 2: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
ParticipantsPhase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2
General Appearance56
HEENT2017
Neck2422
Heart10
Chest (Including Lungs)45
Abdomen63
Extremities20
Skin45
Lymph Nodes1315
Neurologic35
PrimaryPhase 2: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values
Time frame:
Up to 4 years 4 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Phase 2: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values
ParticipantsPhase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2
Phase 2: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values00
SecondaryPhase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the earlier of the following two events: the date of PD or the date of death based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumor (RECIST) v1.1. PD is defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase or 5 millimeter (mm) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS was estimated and analyzed using Kaplan Meier method. As planned, data for this endpoint was analyzed and collected till primary completion date.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization until the earlier of the following two events: the date of PD or the date of death (Up to approximately 4 years 4 months)
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Phase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)
weeksPhase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2
Phase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)15.71 (12.14 to 23.86)15.71 (9.29 to 18.71)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2 vs Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.89 · 95% CI 0.54 to 1.46
SecondaryPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With PFS at Week 12

PFS rate at week 12 is defined as the percentage of participants who were still alive without disease progression at 12 weeks from the date of randomization. PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the earlier of the following two events: the date of PD or the date of death based on RECIST v1.1. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase or 5 mm increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS rate was estimated and analyzed using Kaplan Meier method.

Time frame:
At Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With PFS at Week 12
percentage of participantsPhase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With PFS at Week 1268.9 (50.79 to 81.44)59.4 (41.90 to 73.23)
SecondaryPhase 2: Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of PD based on RECIST v1.1. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase or 5 mm increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. TTP was estimated and analyzed using Kaplan Meier method. As planned, data for this endpoint was analyzed and collected till primary completion date.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization until the date of PD (Up to approximately 4 years 4 months)
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Phase 2: Time to Progression (TTP)
weeksPhase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2
Phase 2: Time to Progression (TTP)15.43 (12.14 to 23.14)16.00 (9.29 to 19.14)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2 vs Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.03 · 95% CI 0.61 to 1.73
SecondaryPhase 2: Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death. OS was analyzed using Kaplan Meier method. As planned, data for this endpoint was analyzed and collected till primary completion date.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization until the date of death (Up to approximately 4 years 4 months)
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)
weeksPhase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2
Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)39.71 (28.43 to 49.71)36.71 (28.00 to 44.43)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2 vs Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.85 · 95% CI 0.53 to 1.37
SecondaryPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response

Overall response rate is defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on RECIST v1.1. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to \<10 mm. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. As planned, data for this endpoint was analyzed and collected till primary completion date.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization until CR or PR (Up to approximately 4 years 4 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response
percentage of participantsPhase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response9.5 (0.7 to 18.4)4.9 (0 to 11.5)

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 5 years 11 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Phase 1b: Cohort 1: Golvatinib 200 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^23/4 (75%)1/4 (25%)4/4 (100%)
Phase 1b: Cohort 2: Golvatinib 300 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^23/5 (60%)4/5 (80%)5/5 (100%)
Phase 1b: Cohort 3: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^22/3 (66.7%)2/3 (66.7%)3/3 (100%)
Phase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^233/42 (78.6%)15/42 (35.7%)42/42 (100%)
Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^236/41 (87.8%)15/41 (36.6%)38/41 (92.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 39
Most frequent serious events
EventPhase 1b: Cohort 1: Golvatinib 200 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 2: Golvatinib 300 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 3: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/40/51/33/421/41
Pneumonia AspirationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/40/51/32/420/41
Upper Airway ObstructionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/40/50/30/421/41
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders0/41/50/30/420/41
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/41/50/31/420/41
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/41/50/30/420/41
CellulitisInfections and infestations0/41/50/30/420/41
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/41/50/31/421/41
Haemorrhage SubcutaneousSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/41/50/30/420/41
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/40/50/30/423/41
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 88
Most frequent other events
EventPhase 1b: Cohort 1: Golvatinib 200 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 2: Golvatinib 300 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 3: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2
Dermatitis AcneiformSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/40/52/310/427/41
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/40/50/31/423/41
Alanine Aminotransferase IncreasedInvestigations0/40/52/310/423/41
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders1/41/52/310/423/41
Aspartate Aminotransferase IncreasedInvestigations0/41/52/310/422/41
HypophosphataemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/40/52/33/421/41
Oropharyngeal PainRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/40/52/30/420/41
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/41/52/319/428/41
Blood Alkaline Phosphatase IncreasedInvestigations0/43/50/33/420/41
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/41/50/34/425/41

Baseline characteristics

Safety population was defined as all participants enrolled and randomized into Phase 1b and Phase 2, except for those who drop out of study prior to receiving any study treatment, or were without any safety assessments following the first dose of study treatment.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Phase 1b: Cohort 1: Golvatinib 200 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 2: Golvatinib 300 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 3: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Total
Mean70.0 ± 8.2958.8 ± 12.5859.3 ± 5.5158.4 ± 11.0453.9 ± 9.8457.0 ± 10.79
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Phase 1b: Cohort 1: Golvatinib 200 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 2: Golvatinib 300 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 3: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Total
Female2004713
Male253383482
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Phase 1b: Cohort 1: Golvatinib 200 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 2: Golvatinib 300 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 3: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Total
Hispanic or Latino100102
Not Hispanic or Latino353414193
Unknown or Not Reported000000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Phase 1b: Cohort 1: Golvatinib 200 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 2: Golvatinib 300 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 3: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000000
Asian233161236
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000000
Black or African American010102
White210242956
More than one race000000
Unknown or Not Reported000101
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)(Participants)Phase 1b: Cohort 1: Golvatinib 200 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 2: Golvatinib 300 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 1b: Cohort 3: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 1: Golvatinib 400 mg + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Phase 2: Arm 2: Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Total
ECOG: 0 (Fully Active)100101021
ECOG: 1 (Restricted in Physical Activity; Ambulatory)343282462
ECOG: 2 (Ambulatory and Capable of All Self-care)010135
ECOG: 3 (Capable of Only Limited Self-care)000000
ECOG: 4 (Completely Disabled)000000
ECOG: 5 (Dead)000000
Not Specified000347
08

Study locations

23 sites
  • Tucson, Arizona 85715, United States
  • Fort Myers, Florida 33905, United States
  • Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States
  • Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Toledo, Ohio 43623, United States
  • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
  • Nashville, Tennessee 37203, United States
  • Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 410-769, Korea, Republic of
  • Hwasun, Jeollanam-do 519-763, Korea, Republic of
  • Busan, 602-739, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul, 110-744, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul, 120-752, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul, 135-710, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul, 138-736, Korea, Republic of
  • Dnipropetrovsk, 49102, Ukraine
  • Donetsk, 83003, Ukraine
  • Donetsk, 83092, Ukraine
  • Kharkiv, 61024, Ukraine
  • Kyiv, 3057, Ukraine
  • Sumy, 40005, Ukraine
  • London, Greater London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
  • Manchester, Greater Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
  • Glasgow, Strathclyde G12 0YN, United Kingdom
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 3, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01332266
Lead sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Collaborators
PharmaBio Development Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 11, 2011
Start date
Sep 19, 2011
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2016
Completion
Sep 4, 2017
Results posted
Jan 3, 2022
Last update
Jan 3, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion