CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01329211Updated May 20, 2013

Needs Assessment Evaluating Quality of Life Issues for Gastroparesis Patients and Caregivers

An observational study in Gastroparesis, sponsored by University of Florida. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-05-20.

Sponsored by University of Florida · Observational

Why this study was terminated
PI left institution,replacement PI not able to do study.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
68
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The project will involve conducting a Needs Assessment for Gastroparesis patients and their caregivers with the goal of identifying quality of life issues associated with this disease. Identifying these issues will ameliorate management and support systems for gastroparesis currently existent in the community and, hopefully, provide information for the establishment of more resources to assist the patients and their families.

Read the detailed description

This project will involve: a) distributing questionnaires to up to 200 participants (100 patients and 100 caregivers) at the Shands Gastrointestinal clinic and b) focus groups including patients, medical provider, and the clinic case manager. The questionnaires will provide information on the relative effect of gastroparesis on the quality of life of the patients and their caregivers. Assessment of this needs assessment will then help identify areas of potential resource improvement and mobilization to provide support for the patients and their family members.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastroparesis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Gastroparesis
  • Quality of Life
03

In context

Gastroparesis

307 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroparesis; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 68 is below the median of 100 across 77 observational studies indexed under Gastroparesis.

Browse Gastroparesis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Florida is the lead sponsor of 1,254 studies on the registry; 201 are open to participants now.

Of its 170 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The research plan involves reviewing patient records to identify potential subjects. Questionnaires will be distributed to gastroparesis patients and their caregivers during their visit to the GI clinic at the day of enrollment and at six-month intervals for a two-year follow-up period, after informed consent has been obtained. Patients and caregivers will also be recruited by telephone. Gastroparesis patients, who have an established patient-physician relationship with Dr. Sultan, will be contacted by telephone in order to inquire about their interest in participating in the study. The details of the study, including the questionnaires, risks, and potential benefits will be discussed over the phone. Then, if patients and/or their caregivers are willing to participate in the study, the informed consent forms and the questionnaires will be mailed to them with a posted envelope to be returned to Dr. Sultan by mail.

Inclusion criteria

  • Gastroparesis patients at the GI clinic of Shands Hospital at the University of Florida
  • Caregivers to Gastroparesis patients at the GI clinic of Shands Hospital at the University of Florida

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to fill out the questionnaires by any cause
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
68 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Gastroparesis Patients
  • Gastroparesis Patients' Caregivers
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Score in a Quality of life assessment Questionnaire

    Time frame: During the clinicial visit at the day of enrollment(Day 1)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Score in a Quality of life assessment Questionnaire

    Time frame: 1st follow-up, at 6 months from Date of enrollment

  2. Score in a Quality of life assessment Questionnaire

    Time frame: 2nd follow-up, at 12 months from date of enrollment

  3. Score in a Quality of life assessment Questionnaire

    Time frame: 3rd follow-up, at 18 months form date of enrollment

  4. Score in a Quality of life assessment Questionnaire

    Time frame: 4th(last) follow-up, At 24 months form date of enrollment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Florida
    Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 20, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01329211
Lead sponsor
University of Florida
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 5, 2011
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Feb 2013
Completion
Feb 2013
Last update
May 20, 2013

Study contacts

Shahnaz Sultan, MD
principal investigator · University of Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion