An interventional study of Elaspine™ in Lower Back Pain, sponsored by Spinelab AG. Completed at 5 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-11-17.
Sponsored by Spinelab AG · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The safety and performance of the Elaspine™ Implant System in the treatment of lower back pain will be evaluated with a prospective and nonrandomized, multicenter post-marketing clinical study (PMCS). The study will be enrolled within Germany and Switzerland in 3-5 clinical centres, including in average 10 patients per centre. The study is conducted in accordance with the Standard ISO 14155, where applicable on clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects and other legal requirements.
2,373 studies on the registry are indexed under Back Pain; 284 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 1,941 interventional studies indexed under Back Pain.
Browse Back Pain studies →This is the only study on the registry with Spinelab AG as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patient has one or more of the following structural abnormalities with imaging studies verifying them at one or two contiguous levels within L1-L5:
Retrolisthesis according to one of the following definitions (acc. to Ruch, William J.; Literature Reference 21):
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient has previously been diagnosed osteopenia or metabolic bone diseases or severe osteoporosis - if suspected to be confirmed by bone density being 2.5 SD below normal as assessed using DEXA analysis in:
Impantation of Elaspine™ device
Device: Elaspine™
Implantation of device
Safety
Incidence (including severity) of operative and post-operative complications throughout the first 3 months postoperatively by category (general, operative, post-operative, possibly device related etc.)
Time frame: 24 months
Performance
Defined as the incidence of device complications and device malfunctions (including severity), as assessed by radiographic evaluation throughout the first 12 months post-operatively. Device malfunctions include, but are not limited to loosening or breakage of the pedicle screws, disassembly of the locking clip, breakage of the rod, pathological motion or stiffness of the segments and disc collapse. Reading of the imaging studies will be centralized at an independent facility.
Time frame: 24 months
Changes in function status (ODI), back pain (VAS) and health status (SF-12) at two-years post-operatively will be measured and compared to the preoperative baseline
Time frame: 24 months
Changes in neurologic function at two-years post-operatively as compared to the preoperative baseline by motor, sensory, reflexes and straight leg raise
Time frame: 24 months
Changes in angular range of motion from maximum flexion to extension between preoperative baseline and the two-year postoperative outcome assessed by radiographic imaging (dynamic xrays)
Time frame: 24 months
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.