CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01323543Updated Nov 17, 2015

Safety and Performance of the Elaspine System in the Treatment of the Lumbar Spine

An interventional study of Elaspine™ in Lower Back Pain, sponsored by Spinelab AG. Completed at 5 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-11-17.

Sponsored by Spinelab AG · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
21 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The safety and performance of the Elaspine™ Implant System in the treatment of lower back pain will be evaluated with a prospective and nonrandomized, multicenter post-marketing clinical study (PMCS). The study will be enrolled within Germany and Switzerland in 3-5 clinical centres, including in average 10 patients per centre. The study is conducted in accordance with the Standard ISO 14155, where applicable on clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects and other legal requirements.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lower Back Pain

Keywords

  • Back Pain,
  • Back Pains, Low
  • Low Back Pains
  • Pain, Low Back
  • Pains, Low Back
  • Lumbago
  • Lower Back Pain
  • Back Pain, Lower
  • Back Pains, Lower
  • Lower Back Pains
  • Pain, Lower Back
  • Pains, Lower Back
  • Low Back Ache
  • Ache, Low Back
  • Aches, Low Back
  • Back Ache, Low
  • Back Aches, Low
  • Low Back Aches
  • Low Backache
  • Backache, Low
  • Backaches, Low
  • Low Backaches
  • Low Back Pain, Recurrent
  • Recurrent Low Back Pain
  • Low Back Pain, Postural
  • Postural Low Back Pain
  • Low Back Pain, Mechanical
  • Mechanical Low Back Pain
  • Low Back Pain, Posterior Compartment
03

In context

Back Pain

2,373 studies on the registry are indexed under Back Pain; 284 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 1,941 interventional studies indexed under Back Pain.

Browse Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Spinelab AG as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient has signed and understood the approved Informed Consent form and is able to meet the proposed follow-up and postoperative management program.
  2. Patient is skeletally mature and between 21 - 80 years of age.
  3. Patient's pre-operative Body Mass Index (BMI) is ≤ 34.
  4. Patient's pre-operative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is ≥ 30% (≥15 out of 50 points).
  5. Patient's pre-operative back pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is >60 (0-100 scale), with or without associated leg pain (leg pain VAS score).
  6. Patient has received non-operative treatment for low back pain for > 6 months and is unresponsive.
  7. Patient has one or more of the following structural abnormalities with imaging studies verifying them at one or two contiguous levels within L1-L5:

    • Discopathy
    • Degenerative disc disease
    • Massive or recurrent disc herniation
    • Non-isthmic spondylolisthesis ≤ Grade 1 (acc. To Meyerding)
    • Spinal stenosis
    • Partially defective facet joints
    • Retrolisthesis according to one of the following definitions (acc. to Ruch, William J.; Literature Reference 21):

      • Complete Retrolisthesis: The body of one vertebra is posterior to both the vertebral body of the segment of the spine above as well as below
      • Stairstepped Retrolisthesis: The body of one vertebra is posterior to the body of the spinal segment above, but is anterior to the one below.
      • Partial Retrolisthesis: The body of one vertebra is posterior to the body of the spinal segment either above or below.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Degenerative spondylolisthesis greater than Grade 1 as defined by greater than 25 percent vertebral slip forward over the inferior vertebral body (acc. to Meyerding Classification) or significant segmental instability at or adjacent to intended treatment level.
  2. Need for more than two-level or two non-contiguous-level surgery in the lumbar spine.
  3. Patient has more than 50% defective facet joint (half of the articular joint surface) or laminectomy
  4. Patient is scheduled for another lumbar surgery such as but not limited to a fusion
  5. Patient has recent vertebral fractures or past fractures which did not heal.
  6. Patient has known allergies to titanium alloy and polycarbonate urethane (PCU).
  7. Patient has clinically compromised vertebral body structure and morphology at the lumbar spine due to current or past trauma (or pathological vertebral fracture) or significant endplate incompetence such as Schmorl´s node.
  8. Patient has spondylolysis at the levels to be treated or an adjacent level.
  9. Patient has a frontal curve in the lumbar spine >10°.
  10. Patient has previously been diagnosed osteopenia or metabolic bone diseases or severe osteoporosis - if suspected to be confirmed by bone density being 2.5 SD below normal as assessed using DEXA analysis in:

    • Postmenopausal females if suggested by x-ray or other risk factors
    • Males over the age of 60 that have sustained a non-traumatic hip or spine fracture
  11. Patient is taking medications known to potentially interfere with bone/soft tissue healing, including but not limited to the long term use of corticosteroids. (This is not intended to exclude patients using inhalation medications for asthma.)
  12. Patient has an active infection either systemic or at the local site of intended surgery.
  13. Patient has been diagnosed with hepatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, an autoimmune disease, or AIDS, ARC, or is HIV positive or any other diseases that according to surgeons may have an impact on the outcome of the surgery.
  14. Patients with known malignant diseases or bone tumors.
  15. Patients with vascular malformations such as abdominal aneurysm.
  16. Patient has a progressive neuromuscular disease. Patient has active malignancy within the last 15 years, unless the malignancy was treated with curative intent and there have been no clinical signs or symptoms for at least 5 years.
  17. Patient has cervical myelopathy.
  18. Patient is pregnant or planning in becoming pregnant in the next 2 years.
  19. Patient is currently participating in another investigational study where the endpoints have not yet been achieved. 8/35 Elaspine™ PMCS 01, Clinical Investigation Plan CIP EN Version C, October 1st, 2010 CONFIDENTIAL
  20. Patient has mental illness, and/or diagnosed as clinically depressed or belongs to a vulnerable population (e.g., prisoner, severe drug abuser, developmentally disabled) that would compromise ability to provide informed consent or compliance with follow-up requirements. If suspected to be confirmed by classification according to DSM IV.
  21. Patient has had another surgical procedure(s) within the last 60 days involving general anesthesia or any surgical procedure that might increase the risk of deep vein thrombosis.
  22. Loss of Disk height according to Pfirrmann (> C) or Frymoyer (>3) and or severe spondylosis.
  23. Patient shows three or more signs of anorganic behaviour (Waddell´s signs).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Elaspine™

    Impantation of Elaspine™ device

    Device: Elaspine™

Interventions

  • DeviceElaspine™

    Implantation of device

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety

    Incidence (including severity) of operative and post-operative complications throughout the first 3 months postoperatively by category (general, operative, post-operative, possibly device related etc.)

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Performance

    Defined as the incidence of device complications and device malfunctions (including severity), as assessed by radiographic evaluation throughout the first 12 months post-operatively. Device malfunctions include, but are not limited to loosening or breakage of the pedicle screws, disassembly of the locking clip, breakage of the rod, pathological motion or stiffness of the segments and disc collapse. Reading of the imaging studies will be centralized at an independent facility.

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in function status (ODI), back pain (VAS) and health status (SF-12) at two-years post-operatively will be measured and compared to the preoperative baseline

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Changes in neurologic function at two-years post-operatively as compared to the preoperative baseline by motor, sensory, reflexes and straight leg raise

    Time frame: 24 months

  3. Changes in angular range of motion from maximum flexion to extension between preoperative baseline and the two-year postoperative outcome assessed by radiographic imaging (dynamic xrays)

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • Helios Rosmann Klinik
    Breisach, Baden-Wuerttemberg 79206, Germany
  • Stauferklinikum Schwäbisch Gmünd
    Mutlangen, Baden-Wuerttemberg 73557, Germany
  • HSK Dr. Horst-Schmidt-Klinik
    Wiesbaden, Hessia 65199, Germany
  • Katholisches Klinikum Marienhof
    Koblenz, Rhineland-Palatinate 56073, Germany
  • HUG Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève
    Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 17, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01323543
Lead sponsor
Spinelab AG
Collaborators
UL International GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 25, 2011
Start date
Aug 2010
Primary completion
Jun 2015
Completion
Jun 2015
Last update
Nov 17, 2015

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion