ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT01314508Updated Apr 14, 2026

Increlex Treatment of Children With Chronic Liver Disease and Short Stature

An interventional study of Increlex in Growth Failure and Chronic Liver Disease, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-14.

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
The sponsor has notified us that they are not funding the study
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
4 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A major consequence of chronic liver disease in childhood is growth failure. This is because a chemical essential for growth called growth factor is created in the liver. Lack of response to growth hormone in people with chronic liver disease is characterized by high levels of growth hormone and low levels of growth factors. This growth hormone resistance is reflected in a variety of factors including insulin resistance and low nutritional intake. Unfortunately, growth hormone therapy has no effect for children with liver disease. In addition, failure of normal growth or malnutrition makes liver disease even worse in children, and growth hormone therapy is not likely to reverse this. A lack of proper nutrition is associated with hospitalizations and frequent complications. Poor growth is a predictor of poor outcomes after liver transplantation. Thus the management of children with liver disease remains a challenge. Children who have successful orthotopic liver transplants (OLT) show much improvement in some aspects of growth, including skin fold thickness, mid-arm circumference, and normalization of growth factor levels. However, some studies have recently reported that the growth of 15-20% of children remains poor even after a liver transplant. This can be explained by persistent abnormalities in growth factors after transplant.

Growth factor was found to be a good tool for prognosis in patients with chronic liver disease. Studies showed that patients with liver cirrhosis and growth factor levels below normal values showed lower long-term survival rates compared with patients who had above normal values. This suggests that growth factor can be a good predictor of survival and early marker of poor liver function. In this case, aggressive feeding may modestly improve growth factor levels leading to improved growth but it is unlikely that effects will be optimal. The investigators propose that growth factor administration may have a positive effect that leads to better growth which is a major predictor of good outcome. To date, no reports study the use of growth factor in children with chronic liver disease. This study proposes to examine the effect of growth factor therapy in childhood chronic liver disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Growth Failure
  • Chronic Liver Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pre-pubertal children
  • pre-transplant
  • not treated with growth hormone for at least 3 months
03

In context

Failure to Thrive

84 studies on the registry are indexed under Failure to Thrive; 12 are open to participants now.

Browse Failure to Thrive studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,170 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 95 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 70 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Pre liver transplant patients with:

  • Chronic liver disease
  • Short stature (\< 5%)
  • Low IGF-1 (\<-1SDS for age)
  • Chronologic age 4-18 and bone age \< 14 for boys and \< 12 for girls (pre-pubertal)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Status post transplant
  • Evidence of
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Participation in other clinical trials involving products
  • Treatment with growth hormone within 3 months
  • Pregnancy
  • Significant abnormality in clinical results
  • Hypoglycemic at baseline
  • Allergic to benzyl alcohol
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    All patients will be treated with IGF-1 factors

    Patients will serve as their own control.

    Drug: Increlex

Interventions

  • Increlex therapy will begin at 40 micrograms/kg/day twice a day. The dose will be escalated by 20 mcg twice a day every other week up to 100mcg/kg/week.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Growth velocity is the primary outcome. Improved height SDS

    Improved growth velocity with improved height standard deviation scores (SDS) is the primary expected result.

    Time frame: One year of therapy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Improved BMI

    An improved body mass index is a secondary expected result of this study.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Improved quality of life

    An improved quality of life as assessed by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory forms is another expected result.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jun 2011 and a primary completion of Oct 2011. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 8, 2011
First posted
Mar 14, 2011
Start
Jun 2011
Primary completionActual
Oct 2011
Last update
Apr 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01314508
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 14, 2011
Start date
Jun 2011
Primary completion
Oct 2011
Last update
Apr 14, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Mecasermin

Start the discussion